--- title: "PF019 · Captured AI answers" publisher: "Onsomble Limited" publication: "NZBrands.ai" edition: 2 collected_on: "2026-10-12" html_url: "https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/2/questions/7248ecb4-bbad-42fc-842b-f31e2a9b9f06/" --- # PF019 · Captured AI answers Edition 2 · answers collected 12 October 2026. [Read on NZBrands.ai](https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/2/questions/7248ecb4-bbad-42fc-842b-f31e2a9b9f06/) ## Question My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about investors, land use and building more homes, and how might those choices affect first-home prices? Question ID: 7248ecb4-bbad-42fc-842b-f31e2a9b9f06. Report reference: PF019. Issue: Housing. Voter: Couple saving for a first home. [Source record (JSON)](https://nzbrands.ai/data/nz-election-2026/editions/2/answers/7248ecb4-bbad-42fc-842b-f31e2a9b9f06.json) ## How to read this evidence The answers below are shown as the assistants gave them, not a verified account or NZBrands.ai voting advice. They may contain errors or outdated claims. A recorded source association is not necessarily a link shown to the reader. Captured 12 October 2026. 4 answers were saved for this question. Missing answers have not been filled in. [Study methodology and limitations](https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/2/method.md) ## ChatGPT · asked nationally Answer ID: dfcc4a66-a321-400b-beb0-e7fb0dcf69d4. Captured 12 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** # New Zealand’s 2026 election: housing, investors and your first-home deposit If you and your partner are renting, working steadily and trying to save for a deposit, the key question is not just whether a party promises cheaper homes. It is what its policies would do to the price of a home you could actually buy, how quickly more homes could be built, and whether you could save a deposit faster than prices rise. For the 2026 New Zealand general election, there are three major policy levers worth comparing: - Investors and tax: Should investment properties receive tax advantages, and how should rental property ownership be treated compared with owning your own home? - Land use and infrastructure: Can councils allow more homes in desirable areas, and who pays for the roads, water and other infrastructure those homes need? - Building more homes: How can New Zealand make it easier and cheaper to build houses, apartments and townhouses, and ensure new supply keeps up with demand? These policies interact. Restricting investor demand might help some first-home buyers compete, while making rental investment less attractive could also affect rents or the supply of rental properties. Allowing more homes to be built can ease competition over time, but planning changes alone do not guarantee affordable homes in the places people want to live. I'll compare the parties' documented positions and distinguish their proposals from the likely economic effects, rather than treating any party's promises as guaranteed results. ## 1. What the main parties are proposing The policies below are based on published 2026 election material available as of 12 October 2026. Campaign platforms are still developing, so a proposal should not be treated as enacted policy unless it has already become law. ## National More supply, fewer barriers, help with deposits - Investors and tax: Has committed to no new taxes and retained the current policy direction that restored interest deductibility for residential landlords. - Land and building: Supports freeing up more land for development, reforming planning rules and improving how infrastructure for new housing is funded. The Government's new Planning Act and Natural Environment Act received Royal assent on 30 September 2026. [New planning laws receive Royal assent](https://www.national.org.nz/news/260930-chrisbishop-1)[Going for Housing Growth programme - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport (Formerly Te Tūāpapa Kura Kāinga](https://www.hud.govt.nz/our-work/going-for-housing-growth-programme) - First-home buyers: Proposes extending access to the First Home Loan scheme's 5% deposit requirement by raising its household income cap to $300,000. [National is backing first home buyers](https://www.national.org.nz/news/260906-backs-first-home-buyers) Potential effect on you: additional homes could moderate price growth over time, while a smaller deposit could help you buy sooner. But easier access to credit can also increase competition for existing homes, and a lower deposit does not mean a smaller mortgage. ## Labour Taxing investment-property gains, building homes and supporting buyers - Investors and tax: Proposes a 28% capital gains tax on profits from selling residential investment and commercial property, excluding the family home and farms. It would apply to gains made after 1 July 2027, with revenue earmarked for health. [Capital Gains Tax to Level the Playing Field for Businesses, Create Jobs and Fix New Zealand's Health System](https://www.labour.org.nz/election-policy-pages/capital-gains-tax/)[Labour's 2026 Election Policies](https://www.labour.org.nz/our-policies/) - Land and building: Its housing platform commits to building more homes, alongside a Start Work Now plan intended to create jobs and build homes and infrastructure. [Affordable homes for all](https://www.labour.org.nz/homes)[Labour's 2026 Election Policies](https://www.labour.org.nz/our-policies/) - First-home buyers: Says it will make buying a first home easier, although the details of individual buyer-support measures should be checked against its current full policy announcements. Potential effect on you: taxing investment gains could make some investors less willing to pay high prices for existing properties, depending on how the tax changes their decisions. However, it would not automatically make homes cheaper, and the effect on rental supply and rents is uncertain. ## Green Party Housing as a necessity, stronger renter protections and public housing - Investors and tax: Proposes reversing landlord tax changes introduced by National, including the restored interest deductibility settings, to reduce tax advantages for property speculation. [Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis](https://www.greens.org.nz/greens_announce_plan_to_end_homelessness_fix_housing_crisis) - Land and building: Proposes major public and community housing construction, with financing support for councils and community providers. Its approach combines housing provision with stronger renter protections. [Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis](https://www.greens.org.nz/greens_announce_plan_to_end_homelessness_fix_housing_crisis) - Renters: Proposes capping annual rent increases at 2%, reversing no-cause evictions and introducing a Rental Warrant of Fitness. [Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis](https://www.greens.org.nz/greens_announce_plan_to_end_homelessness_fix_housing_crisis) Potential effect on you: more public and community homes could expand alternatives to private renting, while reversing landlord tax advantages could reduce some investor demand. Rent controls may offer more predictable housing costs, but their longer-term effect on rental investment and supply would depend on implementation. ## ACT Property rights, less regulation and infrastructure reform - Investors and tax: Its general approach favours lower regulatory barriers and property rights rather than policies that deliberately discourage property investment. - Land and building: Supports allowing people to build on their property unless they cause material harm to others or the natural environment, and reforming infrastructure funding so councils can accommodate growth. [ACT New Zealand](https://www.act.org.nz/policies/infrastructure) - First-home buyers: Its supply-focused approach aims to make housing more abundant rather than relying principally on direct price controls. Potential effect on you: more buildable land and less expensive consenting could reduce the cost of adding homes and ease price pressure over time. The result depends on whether infrastructure, construction capacity and actual demand allow that extra capacity to become completed homes. ## New Zealand First Check the detailed housing commitments as they are released - Investors, land and building: Its full 2026 position needs to be assessed against the party's latest published housing and tax commitments. I could not verify a sufficiently detailed, current housing package from the sources available for this comparison. Potential effect on you: the important questions are whether its final programme changes investor tax settings, restricts or enables land development, and funds infrastructure or direct home-building. It would be misleading to infer the answers from its general political positioning. For an up-to-date cross-party policy tracker, [Policy.nz's 2026 housing comparison](https://policy.nz/2026/party-vote/policies/housing) covers housing affordability, rental conditions and related proposals. [Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026](https://policy.nz/2026/party-vote/policies/housing) ## 2. New Zealand First: population growth and infrastructure New Zealand First's September 2026 immigration announcement adds another dimension to housing policy. - Demand: It proposes substantially reducing non-essential immigration, arguing that population growth has put pressure on housing and infrastructure. - Land and infrastructure: It proposes a 30-year Population Plan to coordinate immigration, housing and infrastructure, and says major population growth should occur where infrastructure exists or is funded. - Investors: Its previous published housing policy supported restoring landlord interest deductibility to encourage rental investment. Check its latest election commitments before assuming that every earlier proposal remains current. [NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies](https://www.nzfirst.nz/nz_first_announces_immigration_reform_policies)[2023 Election Policies](https://www.nzfirst.nz/2023_policies) Potential effect on first-home prices: If population growth slows while homebuilding continues, demand pressure could ease. But migration also affects the construction workforce, and lower migration does not necessarily translate into cheaper homes if building slows too. ## 3. How these policies could change the price you pay It helps to separate the price of an existing home from the cost of building a new one. ### Investor tax settings Affects who competes to buy existing homes When buying an investment property becomes less tax-attractive, some investors may bid less aggressively or redirect their money elsewhere. That can reduce competition for first-home buyers. However, investors might instead sell properties, build fewer rentals or seek higher rents where market conditions allow. ### Land-use rules Affects where homes can be built Allowing more homes on existing urban land, or opening suitable land at city edges, can increase the supply of housing. More competition between sellers and developers can ease price pressure. But zoned capacity is not the same as completed homes: financing, infrastructure, construction costs and demand still matter. ### More construction and infrastructure Affects the number and cost of new homes Roads, water networks, consenting and access to building materials all influence whether new homes can be delivered economically. More construction can improve affordability, especially when homes are built where people want to live. If demand grows faster than supply, extra building may simply prevent prices rising as quickly rather than lower them outright. ### Deposit assistance Affects when you can enter the market A smaller required deposit can bring your purchase date forward, but it does not directly lower the house's price. If many buyers gain access to more credit without a matching increase in supply, some of that benefit can be absorbed into higher prices. The Government's own housing-affordability indicators illustrate why no single number tells the whole story. Its April 2026 report found nationwide deposit affordability improved by 4% over 2025, as house prices fell 1% and incomes rose 3%. Mortgage affordability also benefited from lower interest rates. But results varied across regions, and a rise in interest rates could reverse some of the improvement. [Housing affordability improved in 2025, but unevenly and with regional variance - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport (Formerly Te Tūāpapa Kura Kāinga](https://www.hud.govt.nz/news/housing-affordability-improved-in-2025-but-unevenly-and-with-regional-variance) ## 4. What matters most for your deposit Here is a simple example using hypothetical numbers, not a prediction of New Zealand house prices. ## First-home deposit calculator Change the figures to explore how house prices and savings affect your target. Assumes a constant monthly saving rate and constant annual house-price growth, compounded monthly. Excludes investment returns, interest, buying costs and changes in lending rules. Target home price ### $700,000 $400k $800k $1.2m $400k $800k $1.2m $400k $800k $1.2m Deposit target ### 20% 5%10%20% Deposit saved so far ### $40,000 $0 $100k $200k $0 $100k $200k $0 $100k $200k Combined monthly savings ### $2,000 $500 $2,500 $5,000 $500 $2,500 $5,000 $500 $2,500 $5,000 Assumed annual house-price growth ### 3% −2%0%3%6% Deposit target at today's price # $140,000 Gap at today's price: $100,000 If price stays flat # 4y 2m Time to deposit target If prices change # 5y 2m Time to the changing target This is a deposit-only illustration, not a mortgage eligibility estimate. Actual lenders may require a larger deposit, and a lower-deposit loan may have different conditions or costs. The point of the calculator is that even moderate house-price growth can keep moving your deposit goal. Conversely, if prices are stable while your savings and income grow, your position can improve without a dramatic fall in prices. ## 5. Questions to ask before deciding how to vote Rather than relying on a headline promise, you and your partner could use these questions to assess each party's detailed plan. - Will it increase completed homes? Look for delivery targets, infrastructure funding, construction capacity and timelines, not just the number of homes permitted by zoning. - What happens to investor demand? Check whether tax changes apply to existing investments, future purchases or gains made after a particular date. - What happens to rents while you save? A policy that lowers purchase prices but raises your rent could slow your deposit savings. A policy that stabilises rent may help you save even if purchase prices change little. - Will deposit assistance change the price or only the deposit hurdle? Check the income limits, eligibility conditions, mortgage costs and how many additional buyers may enter the market. - How would the policy be implemented under MMP? A party's manifesto is not a guarantee that its proposal will become law. Coalition agreements, funding and implementation details matter. ## 6. Where to check the commitments yourself - [Policy.nz — 2026 housing policy comparison](https://policy.nz/2026/party-vote/policies/housing): compare party positions across housing affordability, renting and social housing. - [National — 2026 election policies](https://www.national.org.nz/policies): includes the proposed extension of 5% deposit eligibility. - [Labour — housing policies](https://www.labour.org.nz/homes): its housing platform and home-ownership commitments. - [Green Party — housing plan](https://www.greens.org.nz/greens_announce_plan_to_end_homelessness_fix_housing_crisis): renter protections, public housing and landlord tax settings. - [ACT — housing and infrastructure](https://www.act.org.nz/policies/infrastructure): its approach to property rights, planning and growth infrastructure. - [New Zealand First — current announcements](https://www.nzfirst.nz/): check the latest housing, immigration and infrastructure proposals. The general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting starting on 26 October. [Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026](https://policy.nz/2026/party-vote/policies/housing) The central trade-off: policies that restrain investor demand aim to change who can compete for homes; policies that enable construction aim to change how many homes are available. Those approaches can work together, but their effects on prices, rents and your deposit will depend on how they are designed and delivered. For your situation, it is worth comparing the likely effect on both sides of your household budget: the rent you pay while saving and the price and mortgage costs of the home you eventually buy. **End captured answer** ## Gemini · asked nationally Answer ID: fc1afc72-c766-42b2-87f3-bf99534a06c1. Captured 12 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** Navigating the housing market as a first-home buyer while trying to save a deposit can feel like chasing a moving target. Ahead of the **2026 New Zealand general election**, political parties have staked out distinct approaches to property investors, land use, and building more homes. The proposals on the table and how they could influence first-home prices and your path to ownership include the following key breakdowns: --- ### 1. Treatment of Investors & Property Taxation The debate over investors centres on balancing rental market supply with the level of competition first-home buyers face against landlords for entry-level housing. * **Labour:** Proposing a **28% Capital Gains Tax (CGT)** on residential investment and commercial property (excluding the family home) starting July 2027. * *Effect on prices:* Aimed at dampening investor demand, which could reduce the bidding pressure and competition first-home buyers face on everyday houses, though critics argue it may impact rental availability. * **National & ACT:** Generally favour landlord-friendly settings, supporting interest deductibility and opposing new broad taxes (like a CGT or wealth tax). National has also proposed expanding access to **5% deposit First Home Loans** by raising the income cap to $300,000. * *Effect on prices:* While low-deposit schemes help buyers enter the market faster with less saved, making property more attractive to private investors can increase buyer competition for the exact stock first-home buyers look for (such as standalone starter homes and townhouses). * **The Greens & Te Pāti Māori:** Focus heavily on wealth and property speculation taxes, restricting land banking, and significantly expanding public and affordable housing. * *Effect on prices:* Designed to curb speculative price inflation and shift stock toward state or affordable community housing, creating a tougher landscape for private property investors. * **The Opportunities Party (TOP):** Proposes a structural shift to a **1.75% annual Land Value Tax** on urban land (paired with a Citizen’s Income). * *Effect on prices:* TOP explicitly models that this could lower general house prices by roughly 10–15% by heavily penalising land banking and incentivising development. --- ### 2. Land Use, Consenting, and Building More Homes Most parties agree that increasing overall housing supply is essential for long-term affordability, but they disagree on the regulatory tools required. * **ACT and National** lean heavily into deregulation—reducing planning, RMA, and consenting barriers to make it cheaper and faster for developers to build. The logic is that freeing up land supply and construction will cool long-term price growth through sheer volume. * **Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori** place a stronger emphasis on state-led development, urban intensification paired with infrastructure funding, and protecting tenant rights alongside building state and transitional housing. --- ### How These Choices Might Affect First-Home Prices 1. **Short-term vs. Long-term Tension:** Policies that make it easier to buy (like National's expanded low-deposit loan thresholds) can immediately boost your purchasing power, but if supply doesn't keep pace, they risk pumping more demand into the market and pushing prices up. Conversely, tax-heavy policies targeting investors (like Labour's CGT or TOP's land tax) aim to flatten or drop capital growth, making housing more affordable overall, but they introduce market transition risks. 2. **The Supply Factor:** Ultimately, no matter who is in power, sustained improvements in first-home affordability heavily rely on whether infrastructure can support continuous, dense building in regions where people actually want to live. As you weigh your vote, are you more focused on policies that aim to directly lower house prices through taxation and market cooling, or those that aim to help you bridge the deposit gap while encouraging private building supply? **End captured answer** ## Google AI Mode · asked nationally Answer ID: fc3bbd9d-c4ce-4da1-9608-dc11725d69f8. Captured 12 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** Navigating the property market as first-home buyers while trying to hit a moving target can feel exhausting, especially when balancing steady jobs with the realities of renting. As the 2026 New Zealand General Election approaches, housing, property taxation, and land use have once again become major political battlegrounds. Different political blocs approach property investors, land use, and supply from contrasting economic angles. Here is an overview of what the major political parties propose and how these philosophies generally translate to first-home buyer impacts. * * * 1\. Property Investors & Taxation * **National and ACT (Status Quo / Investor-Friendly Settings):** * **The Approach:** The current National-led government has fully restored interest deductibility for residential landlords, extended Healthy Homes compliance timeframes, and rolled back certain tenancy restrictions (such as restoring 90-day no-cause terminations). National and ACT generally oppose new property-specific taxes, favoring settings that keep private landlords active in the market to supply rental accommodation. * **Effect on First-Home Prices:** Proponents argue this maintains rental availability. However, many economists and first-home buyer advocates note that maintaining tax advantages for investors can increase competition at the lower-to-middle end of the housing market, potentially keeping purchase prices higher or making bidding more aggressive against cashed-up or leveraged investors. * **Labour and the Greens (Tighter Regulation / Tax Reform):** * **The Approach:** Labour has proposed a 28% capital gains tax (CGT) on commercial and residential property sales (excluding the family home). The Greens have advanced broader tax reform packages that include reinstating stricter bright-line tests, removing interest deductibility for investors, and introducing mechanisms like land banking taxes or wealth/asset taxes. * **Effect on First-Home Prices:** These policies aim to level the playing field. By reducing the after-tax profitability of speculative residential property investment, the goal is to cool investor demand. Lower investor demand typically translates to reduced competition for entry-level houses, potentially slowing price growth or creating more breathing room for first-home deposits to catch up. The trade-off sometimes debated by critics is whether rental supply could tighten in the short term. * * * 2\. Land Use and Zoning * **Intensification and Urban Expansion:** * **The Approach:** Across the political spectrum, there is general consensus that high regulatory hurdles and restrictive land supply drive up costs, though methods vary. National and ACT have emphasized infrastructure funding and working alongside local councils to free up land for development, while also promoting competitive urban growth. Labour and the Greens tend to emphasize a mix of infrastructure-backed urban intensification, transit-oriented development, and protections against speculative "land banking" (where owners sit on vacant or underutilized urban land waiting for it to appreciate). * **Effect on First-Home Prices:** * Releasing more greenfield land or streamlining rules for medium-to-high-density infill housing theoretically increases overall housing supply, which dampens price inflation over the long run. * Land banking taxes specifically target owners holding vacant plots, compelling them either to build or sell, which can free up land for new residential construction and moderate plot costs. * * * 3\. Building More Homes and Direct Support * **Government-Supported Construction vs. Market-Led Capacity:** * **Labour and the Greens** lean toward targeted construction support, investment in public and social housing, and partnering with community housing providers. * **National and ACT** lean heavily into incentivizing local councils to permit more building through financial rewards tied to housing stock growth, streamlining resource management laws, and supporting private developer infrastructure rather than large state-led builds. ACT has also floated ideas around easing lending restrictions or facilitating alternative deposit/borrowing avenues (such as targeted savings/superannuation flexibilities). * * * Summary: What This Means for Your Target Deposit * **If you favor market-driven supply & investor incentives (National/ACT):** The focus is on cutting red tape, encouraging private developers to build, and keeping rental stock owned by private landlords. Prices are expected to be dictated primarily by broader economic conditions (like interest rates and construction pipelines) rather than tax penalties on property ownership. * **If you favor demand-dampening tax changes & state/targeted backing (Labour/Greens):** The focus is on shifting the scales away from property speculation via capital gains or land taxes. This is intended to directly reduce the purchasing power and appetite of multi-property investors, theoretically slowing house price growth so that your savings target stops running away from you. Because New Zealand governments are frequently formed through coalitions, the ultimate policy mix will likely depend on post-election negotiations. Weighing these options comes down to whether you believe lowering prices requires penalising investor speculation or purely unleashing a massive wave of new private and infrastructure-backed construction. [www.goodwins.co.nz] **End captured answer** ## Google AI Overviews · asked nationally Answer ID: b633cfda-e8f0-4d1f-b770-802678de5d1b. Captured 12 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** Saving for a first home deposit while renting can feel like chasing a moving target. For the upcoming **7 November 2026 New Zealand general election** , housing remains a primary battleground. The major political blocks offer distinct philosophies on investors, land use, and house building, which could directly impact your journey to homeownership. * * * 1\. Property Investors & Landlords The parties are sharply divided on tax and regulatory incentives for residential property investors, which directly affects how much competition you face when buying an entry-level home. Party| Proposed Strategy for Investors| Potential Impact on First-Home Prices ---|---|--- **National & ACT**| **Maintain investor incentives.** They support the full restoration of mortgage interest deductibility and the current short bright-line test implemented during their term. ACT favors fewer restrictions and lower taxation on residential investment.| **Upward pressure / Status quo.** Keeps property investment attractive. This may increase competition from investors looking at the same entry-level properties you are eyeing. **Labour**| **Introduce a 28% Capital Gains Tax (CGT).** Effective 1 July 2027, a flat 28% tax would apply to profits from selling residential investment properties, commercial spaces, and baches. The family home is exempt.| **Downward pressure on investor demand.** By lowering the net profit margin for property flippers and landlords, it may reduce investor competition, giving first-home buyers an advantage. **Green Party**| **Aggressive wealth/investment taxes and renter controls.** Proposes a wealth tax alongside capping annual rent increases at 2%. They also want a national register of landlords to enforce strict compliance.| **Downward price pressure / Potential rental shortages.** These measures disincentivize holding large property portfolios, potentially forcing some landlords to sell, increasing listings for buyers but constricting the rental supply. **The Opportunity Party (TOP)**| **Introduce a 1.75% annual Land Value Tax (LVT).** Applies to the value of the land (not the house itself) to shift the tax burden away from income and discourage land-banking.| **Substantial downward pressure.** Economists estimate TOP's proposed LVT could reduce residential property values by roughly 10%, making the deposit target easier to reach. * * * 2\. Land Use & Infrastructure How councils are allowed to open up land dictates where and what types of houses can be built, directly impacting your choices between buying an inner-city townhouse or a suburban standalone house. * **National & ACT:** Focus heavily on **cutting planning, zoning, and consenting red tape**. They favor funding local council infrastructure directly to incentivize greenfield development (building outward) and private developer supply. * **Labour:** Sits in the middle, supporting new housing supply initiatives while backing a proposed **"NZ Future Fund"** to build public infrastructure and support regional development. * **Green Party:** Prioritizes dense, urban land use, ensuring new builds are located close to public transit networks. They fiercely oppose using valuable public land for private sales. * * * 3\. Building More Homes The core disagreement is whether the government should fund house building directly or let the private market take the lead. * **Market-Led Supply (National / ACT):** They argue that by reducing regulation and making it cheaper for private developers to build, a massive influx of private sector housing supply will naturally moderate prices through competition. * **State-Led Supply (Greens / Labour):** The Greens have promised to build **tens of thousands of new public and social homes**. Labour heavily focuses on target construction support, financing community housing providers, and boosting affordable housing projects via Kāinga Ora. Summary of How This Affects Your Deposit Target If a **National/ACT/NZ First** coalition retains government, the market will likely rely on private sector supply chains. If building rates lag behind population growth, prices could hold steady or rise, keeping your deposit target high. If a **Labour/Green/Te Pāti Māori** bloc wins, the introduction of a Capital Gains Tax or wealth taxes could prompt a wave of investors to exit the market or pause buying. This drop in buyer competition could stabilize or lower entry-level house prices, giving you a window to secure a home. * * * To help narrow down how these policies might impact your specific financial timeline, let me know: * What **price range** or **region** are you aiming to buy in? * Do you plan to use **KiwiSaver** or first-home grant schemes to form your deposit? **End captured answer** ## Publication and corrections Published and funded by Onsomble Limited. NZBrands.ai takes no view on any party or policy. [Independence](https://nzbrands.ai/about/independence/) · [Corrections](https://nzbrands.ai/about/corrections/) · [Contact](https://nzbrands.ai/about/contact/)