--- title: "PF086 · Captured AI answers" publisher: "Onsomble Limited" publication: "NZBrands.ai" edition: 3 collected_on: "2026-10-16" html_url: "https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/3/questions/cb8440d7-3354-4d90-9693-5467c06541fe/" --- # PF086 · Captured AI answers Edition 3 · answers collected 16 October 2026. [Read on NZBrands.ai](https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/3/questions/cb8440d7-3354-4d90-9693-5467c06541fe/) ## Question We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports? Question ID: cb8440d7-3354-4d90-9693-5467c06541fe. Report reference: PF086. Issue: Foreign affairs and defence. Voter: Farming household weighing costs and environmental rules. [Source record (JSON)](https://nzbrands.ai/data/nz-election-2026/editions/3/answers/cb8440d7-3354-4d90-9693-5467c06541fe.json) ## How to read this evidence The answers below are shown as the assistants gave them, not a verified account or NZBrands.ai voting advice. They may contain errors or outdated claims. A recorded source association is not necessarily a link shown to the reader. Captured 16 October 2026. 4 answers were saved for this question. Missing answers have not been filled in. [Study methodology and limitations](https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/3/method.md) ## ChatGPT · asked nationally Answer ID: b673bf27-c6b6-4f9e-ae8a-0daa09bf6f7c. Captured 16 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** # New Zealand 2026 election: trade access and agricultural exports For a farming business outside a main centre, trade policy matters well beyond the price paid at the farm gate. It can affect access to overseas markets, the cost of imported fertiliser and machinery, compliance requirements, and the resilience of the supply chains that get your products to buyers. As you compare parties ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, it helps to separate three questions: - Market access: Who is proposing to open new markets, strengthen free-trade agreements, and reduce tariffs or other barriers? - Export protection: Who is addressing biosecurity, food-safety standards, trade disputes, and the risk of overseas restrictions on New Zealand products? - Farm operating conditions: How do trade ambitions fit with environmental rules, emissions costs, transport infrastructure, and access to rural services? A party can support agricultural exports while disagreeing with others about how to achieve them, particularly where environmental standards and international trade obligations intersect. ## What the main parties are offering The comparison below reflects publicly reported positions available as of 16 October 2026. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. National has published a dedicated trade policy; for some other parties, the available evidence is a combination of election announcements, statements from trade spokespeople, and broader rural policies. [National to pursue the next billion customers](https://www.national.org.nz/news/20260705-hontoddmcclay)[Labour’s Trade for All revival sparks criticism](https://www.farmersweekly.co.nz/politics/labours-trade-for-all-revival-sparks-criticism/)[The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/main-parties-vying-form-new-zealands-next-government-2026-10-12/) ![Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/LCDs4P76HEgfCayafHeSga8GCw12Vxs2fPc3toeyLUZ-wmb6UiGRZY6bhdT1xRejtICfUd6GX2BWmI76EkpoWuffTU4g32bP_qUJp29rsfn5_Zvj5THHSYTLHSoo_5_YQyZ3zKE1WIpB4bu7raRltFl5TZFCgCcE0quf_GohkFI?purpose=inline) ## 1. National Party Trade expansion, export growth and reduced barriers National's formal policy, New Zealand's Next Billion Customers, commits to starting trade negotiations with seven new economies within five years: Brazil, Switzerland, Argentina, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Uruguay and the European Free Trade Association countries (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway). It also proposes reducing non-tariff barriers, expanding digital customs and paperless trade, conducting at least 23 trade missions over the next parliamentary term, and reaffirming the goal of doubling export value by 2034. National says the India free-trade agreement has been signed and is progressing through Parliament. [National to pursue the next billion customers](https://www.national.org.nz/news/20260705-hontoddmcclay)[New Zealand's Next Billion Customers](https://www.national.org.nz/policies/new-trade) For a farm: The emphasis is on opening more markets and making it easier to sell into them. The practical question is how quickly negotiations would deliver better access for your particular products, especially where tariffs, quotas or sanitary requirements remain obstacles. ![South Island Election Conference 2026](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/_spFKDBqOMVPoo8r35YLoGFwljs_-WWe4ur9fdZCfekzAxaUPGA75u8rI9uxOUTssI2hUZN1r4Zu1AeDrcNaxz3uHoFIyWjDpanT5s-KJ87QzxSu1uNjNL4MOHSuazRZuTy_TzC6aN4wxHHoyU_DhzMFuMCMjNBTtg2xRxOZL6c?purpose=inline) ## 2. New Zealand Labour Party Use existing agreements and include wider social and environmental goals Labour says it would reinstate its Trade for All approach, which incorporates environmental protection, workers' rights, gender equality and Indigenous rights into trade policy. Trade spokesperson Damien O'Connor has indicated that Labour would likely pursue fewer new trade negotiations than National and focus more on helping businesses take advantage of agreements already secured. Labour has also indicated it would consider restoring $10 million to New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, the export-development agency, to help businesses develop markets opened by trade agreements. [Labour’s Trade for All revival sparks criticism](https://www.farmersweekly.co.nz/politics/labours-trade-for-all-revival-sparks-criticism/)[Speech: Labour's foreign policy](https://www.labour.org.nz/news/speech-labours-foreign-policy/) For a farm: The emphasis is on getting more commercial value from existing market access while retaining broader standards in trade negotiations. Consider whether export-development support would help your business, and whether the proposed negotiating approach would secure the specific access your sector needs. ![POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/K1DpIS-dF4mtKrl0KIyfSnF_8RO2gnoDtATKXcH-ytfTo6cgmA_wwVhD8J5hW6OuytxDrAergQSGimCSsVKfunUK61RDtNU5GxwiaPB_cRB685VjK9FjkZErmrrvx_4zTP2h6GpckCQVzANm4LVdUE3kTNzzpmgwLxBt7L_7t70?purpose=inline) ## 3. ACT New Zealand Lower farm compliance costs and fewer regulatory constraints ACT's agricultural platform focuses on reducing farm red tape, opposing agricultural emissions pricing, keeping agriculture out of the Emissions Trading Scheme, and replacing what it describes as excessive regulation with clearer national standards. It also advocates faster access to approved agricultural chemicals and veterinary medicines. On trade negotiations, ACT's Andrew Hoggard has criticised Labour's Trade for All approach, arguing that additional conditions could make it harder to secure agricultural market access. [ACT New Zealand](https://www.act.org.nz/make-farming-fun-again)[ACT New Zealand](https://www.act.org.nz/news/act-won-t-sacrifice-farmers-for-paris-targets)[Labour’s Trade for All revival sparks criticism](https://www.farmersweekly.co.nz/politics/labours-trade-for-all-revival-sparks-criticism/) For a farm: The main relevance is the potential effect on compliance costs and investment decisions at home, alongside a preference for trade negotiations focused on commercial access rather than a broad set of additional policy objectives. These are distinct from a quantified commitment to open particular new export markets. ![New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/UmXClDd76aKEk_XyXfEEacFBHXO18HFMG1Im-weRm7tb64uGzBsRK3vWPXuiFN2zaWaNznb7eSDIJucKOhlXtwb6Lq-BYR6oxisKzHsWTxF5AsiLmtcNGDNtwCsXzgIuSp2vW4pa6pAda-tTriG23zKX1ZuknQ81HGh411pqRkM?purpose=inline) ## 4. New Zealand First Primary industries and regional infrastructure New Zealand First says it will continue prioritising the primary sector and regional New Zealand. It highlights its record of securing regional infrastructure funding, including for flood protection, water storage, irrigation and port upgrades. It also emphasises support for industries such as fishing, forestry, aquaculture and wool. [Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary Sector](https://www.ruralnewsgroup.co.nz/rural-news/rural-general-news/election-2026-party-policies-primary-sector-farmers)[Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary Sector](https://www.ruralnewsgroup.co.nz/rural-news/rural-general-news/election-2026-party-policies-primary-sector-farmers) For a farm: Infrastructure can affect freight costs, access to export gateways, water resilience and the viability of remote operations. The key question is which projects would receive funding, where they would be located, and on what timetable. The sources reviewed provide less detail on a new, specific trade-negotiation programme than National's published plan. ![Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/xwoeA3rTn5Pu0UL1uRc6X_g8ADsfUTe55rxQEjXC_rnFR_6TPTr_9eG0LsowNOdFRtax24qB8h-LRfUtZEf42T0CC5OclOZ5katbFJAYxs0cZRyqDBlGNgF_8AV_5WTCbYonGIqLGuK095lLGrkBVw3L8vdsA06tLHVNuCJquuc?purpose=inline) ## 5. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Sustainability and wider conditions in trade agreements The Greens support Trade for All and argue that trade policy should incorporate sustainability and justice. Their published trade and foreign investment policy emphasises these principles, while their agriculture and climate policies set out broader environmental objectives. The party's trade spokesperson has argued that such provisions may strengthen relationships with partners such as the European Union, although they may not appeal to every trading partner. [Complete Party Policy](https://www.greens.org.nz/policy)[Labour’s Trade for All revival sparks criticism](https://www.farmersweekly.co.nz/politics/labours-trade-for-all-revival-sparks-criticism/) For a farm: This approach makes environmental credentials and the terms under which goods are produced more central to trade policy. It is worth checking the detailed proposals for your sector to establish the likely compliance implications and whether they would create commercial opportunities in particular markets. ## Other parties to consider - The Opportunities Party (TOP): Its 2026 platform includes a proposed land-value tax, including a 0.5% annual tax on rural land. For a farm owner, that is relevant to operating costs and land ownership, although it is not itself a trade-access policy. [The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/main-parties-vying-form-new-zealands-next-government-2026-10-12/)[Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary Sector](https://www.ruralnewsgroup.co.nz/rural-news/rural-general-news/election-2026-party-policies-primary-sector-farmers) - Te Pāti Māori: Its reported campaign priorities include housing, health, education and environmental protection. The sources reviewed do not establish a sufficiently detailed, current agricultural-export programme to make a like-for-like trade comparison. [The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/main-parties-vying-form-new-zealands-next-government-2026-10-12/) ## What does “protecting agricultural exports” actually mean? A trade agreement is only one part of the picture. New Zealand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade identifies market access and the rules governing agricultural trade as important to the country's export interests. It notes that free-trade agreements cover around 70% of current goods exports, but that barriers to agricultural trade remain an issue. [Agricultural trade negotiations | New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade](https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/our-work-with-the-wto/agricultural-trade-negotiations) For your farm, there are four practical areas worth examining across party policies. 1. Tariffs, quotas and market access Will the party pursue new agreements, improve access under existing ones, or help exporters reach buyers in markets where New Zealand already has a trade deal? 2. Biosecurity and product standards What will it do to prevent pests and diseases entering New Zealand, and to help exporters meet overseas food-safety, animal-health and plant-health requirements? Market access can be lost even when tariffs are low. 3. Environmental compliance and export credibility How will domestic emissions, freshwater and land-use rules affect production costs? Will the party prioritise reducing compliance costs, maintaining environmental commitments, or combining the two? What matters commercially is how the policies affect both production and access to buyers. 4. Freight, infrastructure and rural services What commitments exist for rural roads, ports, reliable electricity, telecommunications, water infrastructure and veterinary services? These affect your farm even if you do not export directly, because processors and exporters depend on your production reaching their markets efficiently. ## A practical way to compare the policies Rather than treating any party's export target as a guarantee of better returns, look for measurable commitments and ask how they connect to your farm's circumstances. | Question to ask | What to look for | | --- | --- | | Which new markets? | Named countries, negotiating timelines and specific products that could benefit | | Will access improve in practice? | Reduced tariffs, larger quotas, recognition of standards and fewer non-tariff barriers | | What happens if a market closes? | Biosecurity capability, trade-dispute support and market diversification | | What will it cost to comply? | Specific changes to emissions, freshwater, land-use and reporting rules | | What about rural isolation? | Funded infrastructure and service commitments, not just general promises | One further distinction is important: a government can negotiate access to a market, but it cannot guarantee export prices, overseas demand or the profitability of an individual farm. Those outcomes also depend on exchange rates, input costs, processors, shipping and conditions in overseas markets. ## Where to verify the latest commitments These sources are useful starting points for checking party claims against the published policies: - [National — New Zealand's Next Billion Customers](https://www.national.org.nz/policies/new-trade) - [Labour — 2026 election policies](https://www.labour.org.nz/policy) - [ACT — Make Farming Fun Again](https://www.act.org.nz/make-farming-fun-again) - [Green Party — complete policy directory](https://www.greens.org.nz/policy) - [Rural News — 2026 primary-sector election coverage](https://www.ruralnewsgroup.co.nz/rural-news/rural-general-news/election-2026-party-policies-primary-sector-farmers) My suggestion is to compare the parties against the products your farm produces, your biggest compliance expenses and the rural services you depend on. That will make the trade-policy differences more concrete without assuming that a party's national export strategy necessarily translates into a better outcome for every farm. **End captured answer** ## Gemini · asked nationally Answer ID: 8802a677-05da-4799-a8ef-63af85e912c8. Captured 16 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** For a farm business well outside a main center, balancing operating margins, environmental compliance, and regional infrastructure is a central calculus for the **2026 New Zealand general election**. Political parties have framed their pitches around lowering on-farm costs, expanding global market access, and easing regulatory hurdles. --- ### 1. Trade Access and Export Growth Export performance and international market access are focal points across the political spectrum, given that food and fibre exports anchor New Zealand's merchandise trade. * **National (Incumbent/Coalition Leader):** Highlights its export expansion record—pointing to recent trade arrangements (such as deals with the UAE and Gulf states, and the India Free Trade Agreement coming into force). National's stated goal is to double export value over a ten-year window, maintaining that current trade negotiations focus on translating high international demand into reduced tariff barriers. * **New Zealand First:** Places a heavy emphasis on the primary sector, stressing that primary industries drive roughly 82% of New Zealand's merchandise exports. Their approach centers on ensuring that foreign policy, trade negotiations, and infrastructure settings prioritize export-oriented primary production and protect biosecurity. * **Labour Party:** Focuses heavily on a "cost-of-farming crisis" affecting export competitiveness. Labour supports targeted export growth but emphasizes that trade agreements must run parallel to protecting domestic environmental standards and supply-chain resilience. They also advocate streamlining the approval system for agricultural compounds and veterinary medicines (ACVM) to reduce delays in getting newer, safer crop protection and animal health tools to market. * **ACT Party:** Advocates for removing bureaucratic red tape on land, water, and labor to allow export-focused sectors to scale efficiently. Their trade and primary sector policy centers on lowering compliance costs so that New Zealand exporters can remain internationally competitive against subsidized foreign producers. * **Green Party & The Opportunity Party (TOP):** Emphasize high-value, sustainable, and climate-resilient exports. While supporting international trade, they condition their support on strict environmental credentials, arguing that long-term global market access for New Zealand meat, dairy, and horticulture increasingly relies on low-carbon footprints and certified regenerative or sustainable practices. --- ### 2. Protecting Agricultural Exports via Environmental and Operating Rules Protecting the "clean, green" brand that underwrites New Zealand's agricultural exports is approached differently depending on the party: * **Compliance and Red Tape Reduction (National, ACT, NZ First):** * National points to its actions in scrapping previous pricing frameworks on livestock emissions (taking agriculture out of the ETS) and replacing parts of the Resource Management Act (RMA) with legislation that explicitly writes food and fibre production into the Natural Environment Act as a statutory goal. * Recent policy rollouts focus on standardizing farm rules (such as for local quarrying, fertilizer storage, and micro-hydro energy generation) to lower consent costs for remote properties. * **Environmental Bottom Lines and Climate Transition (Labour, Greens, TOP):** * Labour asserts that a productive sector and clean freshwater can coexist, maintaining environmental bottom lines that prevent development from overriding basic ecological health. * The Green Party supports strict regulation of agrichemicals to protect freshwater quality, alongside state-backed financial and research support for farms transitioning to low-emission, regenerative practices. * TOP focuses on structural tax reforms (such as exploring alternative land value frameworks offset by a citizen’s income) and tying economic incentives to technology rollouts and sustainable land management. --- ### Summary Comparison for Remote Farming Operations | Party Block | Core Focus on Operating Costs | Approach to Export & Trade Access | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **National / NZ First** | Cutting compliance costs, scrapping prescriptive rules, streamlining water storage and local resource consents. | Aggressive pursuit of free trade agreements (e.g., India, Gulf states) and maximizing primary sector output volumes. | | **Labour** | Easing cost-of-farming pressures, streamlining agrichemical/ACVM approval times. | Balancing trade expansion with strict environmental bottom lines and supply chain security. | | **Greens / TOP** | Transition support for low-carbon farming, technology tax credits, and sustainable land use incentives. | Positioning exports around premium, low-emissions, and eco-certified international branding. | **End captured answer** ## Google AI Mode · asked nationally Answer ID: 27d91787-0aad-424d-9ef8-3158519cb69e. Captured 16 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** As you weigh up your vote for the 2026 general election from a remote rural property, the intersection of international trade, compliance costs, and environmental expectations is front and centre. Different political groupings approach the primary sector through distinct lenses—balancing export market expansion against domestic compliance and climate obligations. An overview of what the major parties are emphasizing regarding trade access, export protection, and on-farm operational costs highlights these differences: 1\. National Party * * **Trade and Market Access:** Emphasizes expanding global market access as a primary engine to double export value over a 10-year framework. Highlights recent trade milestones, including agreements with the UAE, Gulf states, and the India Free Trade Agreement (cutting or removing tariffs on a vast majority of goods). * **Operating Costs & Regulations:** Focuses heavily on reducing "green and red tape". Promotes land-use flexibility and has rolled out a suite of 19 proposed national environmental/operational standards (covering areas like water storage, drain maintenance, and fertiliser application) intended to bypass regional council variations. * **Environmental/Climate Obligations:** Re-iterates keeping agriculture out of the formal Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), prioritizing local catchment groups and streamlined resource management rules over top-down pricing of biogenic methane. * 2\. Labour Party & Left-Leaning Alignment (Green / Opportunities potential configurations) * * **Trade and Market Access:** Supports maintaining and leveraging existing free trade architecture, though with a persistent focus on ensuring trade pacts align with high environmental and labor standards. * **Operating Costs & Regulations:** Tends to place higher compliance expectations on greenhouse gas reporting, freshwater caps, and biodiversity protection. While Labour has indicated it won't campaign on putting agricultural emissions straight into the ETS, a potential left-leaning coalition (featuring parties like the Greens) would likely introduce tighter climate and freshwater constraints, impacting long-term operational overhead. * **Environmental/Climate Obligations:** Views strict environmental stewardship as a vital tool to protect high-value, premium export positioning in eco-conscious international markets (like the EU and UK), arguing that environmental credentials safeguard market access against green-taper barriers. * 3\. ACT Party * * **Trade and Market Access:** Strongly pro-free-trade, advocating for aggressive bilateral deals and the removal of remaining global tariffs. * **Operating Costs & Regulations:** Positions itself as the strongest critic of regulatory overreach from Wellington. Advocates for sweeping cuts to regulatory compliance, rolling back distinct bureaucratic interventions in farming, and reducing local/central government overlap that drives up daily operational costs for remote properties. * **Environmental/Climate Obligations:** Favours market-led or practical environmental management over prescriptive mandates, strongly opposing carbon pricing mechanisms that disadvantage local producers relative to international competitors. * 4\. New Zealand First * * **Trade and Market Access:** Focuses on national sovereignty in trade, supporting pragmatic market diversification and aggressive defense of New Zealand biosecurity and export integrity overseas. * **Operating Costs & Regulations:** Emphasises practical support for regional and rural service access, pushing back against regulatory costs that threaten the viability of remote or family-owned farming enterprises. * **Environmental/Climate Obligations:** Advocates for a common-sense approach to climate change that doesn't penalize local food production or compromise national food security for the sake of international metrics. * You can read detailed ongoing sector analysis through publications like Rural News Group or tracking the policy proposals directly via [Farmers Weekly](https://www.farmersweekly.co.nz/) as polling day approaches. **End captured answer** ## Google AI Overviews · asked nationally Answer ID: dbbc7ec8-89cc-4eb3-abfe-baab0949a9c9. Captured 16 October 2026. **Begin captured answer — shown as given, not verified** For the **2026 New Zealand general election** , major political parties have positioned their trade and export policies to address how global market access interacts with on-farm costs and environmental requirements. The trade and export protections being offered by the major political parties generally fall into distinct approaches: National Party & ACT (Incumbent Coalition) * **Trade Strategy:** National is running on its record of signing the EU-FTA, concluding negotiations with the UAE and Gulf Cooperation Council, and promoting the free trade agreement with India (taking effect October 20, 2026) to slash tariffs for major exporters like kiwifruit. * **Export Protections via Lower Costs:** Both [National Party](https://www.national.org.nz) and ACT Party argue that the best way to protect exports is to make them competitive internationally. They aim to achieve this by cutting domestic "red and green tape". This includes permanently excluding agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), replacing the Resource Management Act (RMA), and introducing 19 nationwide standards to bypass council consents for everyday farm work, animal waste, and water storage. * **Biosecurity & Supply Chains:** ACT's Andrew Hoggard (holding the Biosecurity portfolio) focuses rules on actual risks rather than processes to protect export integrity. National also plans to secure fertiliser security agreements with key trading partners to insulate farms from global supply line spikes. New Zealand First * **Biosecurity Focus:** New Zealand First heavily emphasizes strengthening border biosecurity to protect New Zealand’s primary industry reputation, promising greater resourcing for border agencies. * **Input & Tech Access:** To keep exports productive, they support easier regulatory approvals for agricultural chemicals, crop-protection tools, and a cautious liberalisation of genetic technology laws. Labour Party * **Trade for All Revival:** Labour’s trade spokesperson, Damien O'Connor, has confirmed plans to reinstate the "Trade for All" framework. This progressive agenda seeks to ensure the economic benefits of international trade are distributed widely to smaller regional communities and workers, rather than just large multinational trading firms. * **Export Safeguards:** While Labour wants to review the ETS regarding forestry distortions and disincentivise selling productive farmland for carbon-sink pine plantations, they have walked away from previous plans to campaign on pricing agricultural emissions, attempting to balance climate goals without kneecapping current export returns. Green Party * **High-Value Green Exporting:** The Green Party views the future of export security through a strictly premium lens. They back the "Trade for All" agenda and propose state-backed transitions to regenerative and organic farming. They argue that international markets (like the EU) increasingly demand high environmental standards, meaning strict domestic climate policies—such as bringing agriculture into the ETS and phasing out synthetic nitrogen fertilisers—are necessary to future-proof NZ’s market access. * **Export Restrictions:** The Greens support stricter animal welfare rules, including a total ban on live animal exports. * * * If you are looking to weigh these options further against your own operational costs, let me know: * What **specific sector** you farm in (e.g., dairy, sheep and beef, or horticulture)? * Which **environmental obligations** (like freshwater plans or emissions) impact your region the most? * What specific **local services** (such as rural health or roads) are currently most critical to your family? **End captured answer** ## Publication and corrections Published and funded by Onsomble Limited. NZBrands.ai takes no view on any party or policy. [Independence](https://nzbrands.ai/about/independence/) · [Corrections](https://nzbrands.ai/about/corrections/) · [Contact](https://nzbrands.ai/about/contact/)