# Question 72: I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Who should I vote for if my main aim is to keep a secure, affordable home on NZ Super? Explain the reasons and uncertainties.

Collected 31 October 2026

[NZ Election 2026 · Edition 7 study](https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/7)

## ChatGPT

Answer ID: bfce1e92-c893-44d4-9794-ecd35543c129

## Your housing security should be a central part of your voting decision

If you are retired, rent your home, and rely mainly on NZ Super, there are several important questions to consider before voting in the 2026 New Zealand general election.

Your concern is about more than whether you can afford this month's rent. It is about whether you can remain securely housed for the rest of your retirement, without being forced to move because of rent increases, a landlord selling, or a change in your financial circumstances.

There are three distinct things to examine:

1. Rent affordability: Will government policy help keep rent manageable on a fixed income?
2. Security of tenure: Will you have greater protection against being required to leave your home?
3. Retirement income: Will NZ Super and other assistance keep pace with your housing costs?

I would assess parties on all three rather than simply looking at which party promises the most housing construction.

## 1. What the parties are proposing for renters

The following comparison uses policies announced or reported by October 2026. It focuses on the measures most relevant to someone renting on NZ Super.

| Party | Rent affordability | Security of tenure | Public housing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Green Party | Rent increases capped at the lower of inflation or wage growth | Long-term or permanent tenancies; stronger renter protections | Major expansion |
| Labour | More affordable housing and community housing | Reverse no-cause evictions; longer notice | 6,000 additional social homes over four years |
| National | Emphasis on housing supply and private-sector investment | Retains 90-day no-cause termination rules | No equivalent additional 6,000-home commitment identified |
| NZ First | Focus on housing supply and social housing access | Has not announced an equivalent comprehensive rent-control package | Social housing prioritised for citizens |
| ACT | Emphasis on private rental supply and reducing regulation | Supports current no-cause termination rules | No equivalent comprehensive expansion commitment identified |
| Te Pāti Māori | Universal rent control | Repeal no-cause evictions | More social housing, with a stated Māori allocation |
| TOP | Planning reform and affordable housing finance | No equivalent comprehensive rent-control package identified | Supports greater affordable and social housing provision |

Sources: [The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026](https://policy.nz/2026/party-vote/policies/housing)[Labour's 2026 Election Policies](https://www.labour.org.nz/policy)[How parties stand on issues affecting older New Zealanders](https://greypowermag.co.nz/politics/how-parties-stand-on-issues-affecting-older-new-zealanders/)

There are some important distinctions behind this table.

### The Green Party

Its announced housing programme includes:

- Capping annual rent increases at whichever is lower: inflation or average wage increases.
- Requiring rental tenancies to be offered as long-term or permanent arrangements.
- A rental Warrant of Fitness.
- A substantial expansion of public housing.
- Stronger legal protections for renters.

These proposals address both of your concerns: rent increases and the risk of losing your home.

The uncertainty is whether these proposals would pass into law, how the rent cap would be implemented, and whether landlords might respond by withdrawing properties from the rental market.

### The Labour Party

Labour's 2026 programme includes:

- Reversing no-cause evictions.
- Giving tenants more notice.
- Improving rental warmth and safety.
- Establishing 6,000 additional social housing places over four years.
- A $950 million Crown guarantee for community housing funding.

These measures could improve your security and potentially expand alternatives if your current tenancy ends.

However, Labour's announced programme does not include the same specific general rent-increase cap as the Greens.

Source: [Labour's 2026 Election Policies](https://www.labour.org.nz/policy)[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)

### National and ACT

Their approaches place more emphasis on private-sector housing supply, investment and reducing regulatory barriers.

The argument behind this approach is that increasing the availability of rental properties can improve competition and moderate rents.

The uncertainty for an existing older renter is that more houses being built does not necessarily mean that your particular rent becomes affordable, or that you will be able to remain in your present home.

Their approach also offers less change to the existing no-cause termination rules than the proposals from Labour and the Greens.

### New Zealand First, Te Pāti Māori and TOP

These parties also deserve consideration.

- NZ First: Its policies include prioritising New Zealand citizens for social housing. It has expressed support for retaining NZ Super at 65.
- Te Pāti Māori: Its housing programme includes universal rent control, ending no-cause evictions and expanding support for tenants at risk of losing their homes.
- TOP: Its approach includes planning reform, affordable housing finance and improvements to rental quality. Its retirement-income proposals also deserve careful examination.

The detail and practical effects of these policies need to be considered individually. [The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[How parties stand on issues affecting older New Zealanders](https://greypowermag.co.nz/politics/how-parties-stand-on-issues-affecting-older-new-zealanders/)[Where the parties stand on New Zealand Super](https://www.localmatters.co.nz/general_elections_2026/where-the-parties-stand-on-new-zealand-super/)

## 2. NZ Super is an equally important part of the decision

Because NZ Super is your main income, I would pay particular attention to whether parties will preserve its purchasing power.

There are meaningful differences in their retirement policies.

According to the September 2026 party responses reported by Grey Power:

- Labour, the Greens, NZ First and TOP explicitly support keeping the NZ Super eligibility age at 65.
- National supports universal superannuation but proposes gradually increasing the eligibility age to 67 from 2044.
- ACT also proposes increasing the age to 67, with transitional arrangements.
- Existing superannuitants are not the same as future retirees, so proposed eligibility-age changes should not be confused with reductions to your current payment.

[How parties stand on issues affecting older New Zealanders](https://greypowermag.co.nz/politics/how-parties-stand-on-issues-affecting-older-new-zealanders/)[Where the parties stand on New Zealand Super](https://www.localmatters.co.nz/general_elections_2026/where-the-parties-stand-on-new-zealand-super/)

For someone already receiving NZ Super, I would look particularly at:

- Whether the annual increases will continue to reflect wage growth.
- Whether the party will preserve universal NZ Super.
- Whether rent assistance will be sufficient.
- Whether other living costs, particularly electricity, rates-related costs and healthcare, will be manageable.

## 3. An important issue: what protection do you have today?

It is worth understanding the current rules, because they show exactly where changes in government policy could matter.

Under the current tenancy rules:

- A landlord generally cannot increase rent more than once every 12 months.
- At least 60 days' written notice is required.
- There is currently no general legal cap on how large a rent increase can be.
- Periodic tenancies can currently be ended by landlords with 90 days' notice without giving a reason.

[Rent increases and reductions » Tenancy Services](https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/rent-bond-and-bills/rent/increasing-rent/)[Periodic or fixed-term tenancy » Tenancy Services](https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/starting-a-tenancy/types-of-tenancies/periodic-or-fixed-term-tenancy/)[PF007: Housing · AI election answers](https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/1/questions/7d43b22a-ce3a-4570-a748-4b81cf42e2c7/)

This means that even if you have been a good tenant for many years, your ability to stay in your home is not necessarily guaranteed.

A policy banning no-cause evictions could be particularly significant for you.

## 4. Don't overlook accommodation assistance

There is another issue worth investigating regardless of which party forms the next government.

Work and Income provides an Accommodation Supplement for eligible people who pay rent.

The amount depends on:

- Your income.
- Your assets.
- Your rent.
- Your household circumstances.
- Your area of residence.

For a single person, the current maximum ranges from $70 to $165 a week, depending on the area. There are also eligibility thresholds and asset restrictions.

Importantly, receiving NZ Super does not automatically exclude you.

You can check the rules here:

- [Work and Income – Accommodation Supplement](https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/products/a-z-benefits/accommodation-supplement?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- [Current NZ Super payment rates](https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/eligibility/seniors/superannuation/how-much-you-can-get?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

I would investigate whether you qualify, because additional assistance could make a meaningful difference to your weekly budget.

## 5. The questions I would use to assess each party

Rather than judging parties on broad promises, consider asking each one these six questions:

| Question | Why it matters |
| --- | --- |
| Will you limit excessive rent increases? | Protects your fixed income |
| Will you prevent no-cause evictions? | Reduces the risk of forced moves |
| Will you expand affordable public housing? | Provides alternatives to private renting |
| Will you protect NZ Super's value? | Protects your basic income |
| Will you improve rent assistance? | Helps meet increasing housing costs |
| Will you provide more long-term rental options for older people? | Supports stability in retirement |

One further consideration: a policy can sound attractive but still be difficult to implement. Look for funding commitments, legislation, implementation dates and measurable targets.

## 6. Where to check the parties' actual commitments

I recommend these independent or primary sources:

- [Policy.nz – 2026 election policy comparison](https://policy.nz/2026/party-vote/policies/housing?utm_source=chatgpt.com) — compare parties across housing, renting, social housing and income.
- [Grey Power – How parties stand on issues affecting older New Zealanders](https://greypowermag.co.nz/politics/how-parties-stand-on-issues-affecting-older-new-zealanders/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) — particularly relevant to retirement and older people's housing.
- [Interest.co.nz – 2026 housing policy comparison](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting?utm_source=chatgpt.com) — useful detail on rent controls and housing proposals.
- [Labour's official policy programme](https://www.labour.org.nz/policy?utm_source=chatgpt.com).
- [Green Party official website](https://www.greens.org.nz/?utm_source=chatgpt.com).
- [National Party official website](https://www.national.org.nz/?utm_source=chatgpt.com).

## My overall assessment of the issues

The important distinction is between three different approaches to housing security:

- Rent regulation: directly addresses how quickly your rent can increase.
- Tenancy protection: addresses the risk of being required to leave your home.
- Public and community housing: provides an alternative if private renting becomes unaffordable or insecure.

These are different policy approaches, and parties have made different commitments to them. No party's promises guarantee that you will be able to stay in your present home.

I would not base your decision solely on promises about building more houses or increasing economic growth. Those things may help over time, but they do not necessarily protect an existing tenant on a fixed retirement income.

One final thought: At retirement age, housing security is about dignity and independence, not simply finding somewhere else to live whenever a landlord decides to sell or increase the rent.

Your two votes also have different purposes: the party vote determines each party's share of Parliament, while the electorate vote chooses your local MP.

The decision is yours, but these are the policy differences I would examine most closely before voting.

## Gemini

Answer ID: 2c6a07c1-e6d5-42d5-b956-ba57fbd5fdae

Deciding how to vote when you are retired, renting, and relying primarily on NZ Super involves weighing different political philosophies regarding the rental market, state housing, and income support. Because no single party completely eliminates all risks for renters, your vote depends on which set of trade-offs and uncertainties you are most comfortable accepting.

Here is an overview of how the major political parties approach housing security and retirement income for renters, along with the reasons and uncertainties associated with each.

---

### 1. Centre-Left to Left Parties (e.g., Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori)
*These parties generally focus on direct market intervention, renter protections, and expanding state-provided housing.*

* **Key Policies for Renters:** 
  * **Labour** has proposed banning no-cause evictions (requiring landlords to give specific legal reasons to end a tenancy), limiting rent increases to once every 12 months, and heavily restarting Kāinga Ora state housing builds to increase the social housing pool. 
  * **The Greens and Te Pāti Māori** have advocated for stronger measures, such as more rigid forms of rent control (tying increases strictly to inflation) and significantly expanding public housing.
  * **Retirement Income:** Labour, the Greens, and NZ First all explicitly support keeping the NZ Super eligibility age at 65 and protecting its value relative to wages.
* **Why it fits your aim:** If your primary anxiety is sudden rent spikes, the insecurity of being told to move without a reason, or finding an affordable alternative if you do have to move, these parties offer direct regulatory protections for tenants and aim to grow the pool of state/social housing that low-income seniors can eventually access.
* **Uncertainties and Trade-offs:** 
  * Economists and landlord groups often argue that strict rental controls and heavy regulations can cause landlords to exit the market, inadvertently shrinking the overall supply of private rentals and driving rents *up* overall. 
  * These parties often support broad tax reforms (such as capital gains or land taxes), which critics argue can create wider economic shifts, though owner-occupied primary homes are typically carved out.

---

### 2. Centre-Right to Right Parties (e.g., National, ACT)
*These parties generally focus on economic growth, property investor incentives to encourage private housing supply, and structural fiscal management.*

* **Key Policies for Housing & Retirement:**
  * **National** has focused on supply-side mechanisms through encouraging private development and has restored interest deductibility for landlords to stimulate private rental availability. Their primary housing focus has been assisting first-home buyers rather than regulating renters.
  * **ACT** similarly focuses heavily on freeing up land supply and cutting red tape for building consents, while opposing capital gains or wealth taxes. On retirement, ACT has proposed gradually raising the NZ Super age to 67 (by 2035) with exemptions for physically demanding work, arguing that Super must be fiscally sustainable long-term. National has previously indicated openness to raising the super age further out (post-2044), subject to cross-party consensus.
* **Why it fits your aim:** If you believe that the best way to keep rents stable is to *encourage private investment so that rental supply naturally outstrips demand*, these parties align with that philosophy. They generally avoid heavy-handed tenancy restrictions, preferring market-led solutions.
* **Uncertainties and Trade-offs:** 
  * For a renter on NZ Super, relying purely on the private market can be risky. If private rents rise faster than the Accommodation Supplement or NZ Super adjustments, you may find yourself priced out without the safety net of expanded social housing. 
  * Furthermore, parties leaning toward raising the Super age or altering entitlements introduce long-term structural questions about retirement income adequacy, even if current retirees are typically grandfathered in.

---

### 3. Parties Focused on Seniors and Structural Reform (e.g., New Zealand First, TOP)
* **New Zealand First** strongly champions older New Zealanders. They firmly oppose raising the NZ Super age, commit to maintaining Super at 66% of the net average wage, and propose specific seniors' housing plans and options to support "ageing in place".
* **The Opportunities Party (TOP)** proposes replacing parts of the current system with a universal citizen's income/housing payment model, alongside offering interest-free rates deferral for older homeowners and heavy land-value taxation to reshape the property market.
* **Why it fits your aim:** NZ First directly centers the financial security, dignity, and housing needs of aging New Zealanders, protecting your baseline income from policy shifts.
* **Uncertainties and Trade-offs:** While NZ First protects your income baseline, its specific levers for controlling private rental inflation are more limited compared to parties proposing outright tenancy overhauls. 

---

### Summary Checklist to Help Your Decision
When casting your vote, consider which risk you are most eager to guard against:
1. **The Regulatory Route (Labour / Greens):** Best if you want immediate legal protection against no-cause evictions and caps on how often rent can be raised, balanced against the risk that landlord-focused regulations might tighten the private rental market.
2. **The Income Protection Route (NZ First):** Best if your absolute priority is locking in the value and age eligibility of NZ Super and prioritizing senior-specific housing strategies.
3. **The Market Supply Route (National / ACT):** Best if you believe building more houses overall—through private enterprise and fewer planning restrictions—is the only sustainable way to eventually curb housing costs, accepting that it relies more heavily on the private rental market.

*Note: Party manifestos and policy details can shift rapidly as campaigns progress. It is worthwhile checking updated policy trackers (such as Policy.nz) closer to election day to see the exact commitments of your local candidates.*

## Google AI Mode

Answer ID: eb635959-5619-48dc-a508-413f2cbcbec3

Deciding how to vote when you are retired, renting, and relying on New Zealand Superannuation involves weighing different political philosophies regarding the housing market, tenant protections, and government support.

As an independent observer, I cannot tell you who to vote for, but we can break down how the major parties approach renter security, housing affordability, and income support, alongside the key uncertainties. You can compare individual candidate and party stances directly on Policy.nz.

* * *

Key Party Approaches to Renting and Housing Security

Different political blocks view the problem of rental security through contrasting lenses—either through increased regulation and state-backed supply, or through market incentives for private landlords.

1\. The Greens and the Labour Party (Left / Centre-Left)

 * **The Focus:** Stronger regulation of the rental market, boosting public/social housing, and direct cost-of-living relief.

 * **Relevant Policies:** Parties on the left generally champion policies designed to give tenants more stability—such as limiting rent increases (with some proposals capping annual increases or restricting frequency), pushing for rental warrants of fitness to guarantee warm and safe homes, and expanding social housing stock to reduce reliance on the private market.

 * **Why it aligns with your aim:** If your primary fear is sudden displacement or steep rent hikes outstripping NZ Super, these parties advocate for direct legal constraints on landlords and increased state safety nets.

 * **The Trade-off/Uncertainty:** Critics and landlord representative groups often argue that heavy regulation or rent controls can disincentivise private property investment, potentially shrinking the overall pool of available rental properties and indirectly driving private rents higher or making landlords more selective.

2\. The National Party and ACT (Centre-Right / Right)

 * **The Focus:** Encouraging private property supply through market-led incentives, easing regulation on landlords, and property development.

 * **Relevant Policies:** Centre-right parties typically focus on making it easier to build houses (through zoning and resource management reform) and restoring confidence for private residential landlords (such as maintaining interest deductibility or lighter-touch tenancy laws), arguing that an overall increase in housing supply is the only sustainable way to moderate rent prices.

 * **Why it aligns with your aim:** If you believe that a thriving private rental market with plenty of supply is the best way to keep rent competitive without government overreach, these parties lean toward market solutions.

 * **The Trade-off/Uncertainty:** For a renter on a fixed income, relying on broad market supply takes time. If the private market tightens or landlords pass on costs, a lighter regulatory framework offers fewer direct guardrails against sudden rent spikes or decisions by landlords to sell properties.

3\. New Zealand First (Populist / Nationalist)

 * **The Focus:** Economic nationalism, prioritizing New Zealand citizens in housing/social support, and addressing cost-of-living pressures.

 * **Relevant Policies:** NZ First often emphasizes targeted relief for seniors, protecting the universal entitlement and value of NZ Super, and ensuring public resources and social housing support are prioritized for citizens.

 * **Why it aligns with your aim:** They frequently position themselves as a champion for older New Zealanders concerned about cost-of-living pressures on fixed incomes.

 * **The Trade-off/Uncertainty:** Their specific mechanisms for deep systemic changes in the rental market can vary depending on coalition dynamics, making the direct outcome for private renters less predictable.

* * *

Major Uncertainties to Keep in Mind

 1. **The Coalition Reality (MMP):** Under New Zealand's MMP voting system, single parties rarely govern alone. A vote for a smaller party (like the Greens, ACT, or NZ First) or even a major party often results in a coalition government. Compromises made during coalition negotiations can significantly water down or reshape specific housing and renter policies.
 2. **Supply vs. Regulation Lag:** Even if a party promises more social housing or zoning reforms, building homes takes years. Immediate security against a rent increase next month is hard for any government to guarantee without aggressive market intervention, which carries its own economic fallout.
 3. **The Indexation of NZ Super:** NZ Super is pegged to average wage movements rather than inflation or average rents specifically. When rental inflation outpaces wage growth, Superannuitants who rent face a structural squeeze that broader macroeconomic policies may or may not successfully address in the short term.

To check your local candidates' specific pledges and see which party aligns best with your personal risk tolerance, you can review the complete voter toolkit on [Vote.nz](https://vote.nz) and compare detailed breakdowns on [Policy.nz](https://policy.nz).

## AI Overviews

Answer ID: a1ad5ce1-37ff-4b9b-850a-7529e5883a42

For a retiree renting in New Zealand whose main income is **NZ Super** , the 2026 general election presents a stark choice between political parties offering entirely different paths to housing security and affordability. Choosing who to vote for depends on whether you believe security is best achieved through direct government restrictions on landlords or by increasing the total supply of houses to bring costs down. bbc.comNew Zealand election 2026: What you need to know - BBC

No single party can guarantee an absolute solution, as all options carry economic trade-offs and political uncertainties. Here is a breakdown of your main choices based on the parties' official 2026 election manifestos. rnz.co.nzLabour releases manifesto collating policies ahead of electionA definitive guide to the rule

* * *

The Left-Leaning Bloc: Direct Protections and Rent Limits

If your primary concern is an immediate fear of **rent hikes** or **being forced to move via "no-cause" evictions** , the policies of the Labour and Green parties align most closely with your goals. rnz.co.nz'Renters deserve a fair deal' - Labour promises to ban no-cause evictionsNZ Election 2026: What Each Party Means for Landlords

1\. The Green Party

 * **The Plan:** The Green Party offers the most stringent tenant protections. They pledge to introduce strict **rent controls capping increases at a maximum of 2% per year** (even between tenancies). They would also ban no-cause evictions, enforce an independent Rental Warrant of Fitness to guarantee warm homes, and build 35,000 new homes to clear the social housing waitlist. realestate.co.nzNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked | realestate.co.nzNz housing policies for the 2026 election - Facebook

 * **The Uncertainty:** Critics and landlord groups argue that a 2% rent cap could backfire. Landlords facing fixed cost increases (like rates and insurance) might pull their properties off the long-term rental market entirely or become highly selective, making it much harder for retirees on fixed incomes to secure a new lease if they do have to move. m.scoop.co.nzLabour's Rental Rules Would Leave More Kiwis Locked Out

2\. The Labour Party

 * **The Plan:** The [Labour Party](https://www.labour.org.nz) released a dedicated renter’s package in late October 2026. Labour promises to **ban no-cause evictions** , requiring landlords to give a legally valid reason to end a tenancy. They would limit rent increases to once a year, require longer notice periods (up to 90 days if a landlord sells the house), and restart public state-house building programs. fullstackproperty.co.nzLabour vows no-cause evictions ban, to make rentals warmer, safer

 * **The Uncertainty:** While less aggressive than the Greens' rent caps, property management experts warn that banning no-cause evictions and adding compliance costs (like mandatory curtains under Healthy Homes rules) could prompt landlords to raise initial rents to cover potential future risks. Furthermore, Labour leader Chris Hipkins has ruled out adopting the Greens' broader wealth tax policies, leaving questions about how aggressively a Labour-led coalition could fund massive social housing expansions.

* * *

The Right-Leaning Bloc: Market Supply and Landlord Incentives

If you believe that the best way to keep rent affordable is to **increase the number of available homes** and lower the costs landlords face so they don't pass them on to you, the National and ACT parties offer a different approach. facebook.com

3\. The National Party & ACT

 * **The Plan:** The [National Party](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFKtcGIhqXo) and its coalition partner ACT focus heavily on deregulating the housing sector. They maintain the policy of allowing **"no-cause" 90-day termination notices** , arguing this gives landlords the confidence to take a chance on tenants without perfect histories. ACT also proposes removing rental loss "ring-fencing" to allow landlords to offset rental losses against other income, aiming to boost property investment and lower overall market pressure. thedlist.co.nzParty policies, simplified: Housing | The D*List

 * **The Uncertainty:** For a retiree strictly on NZ Super, this approach offers the least amount of immediate baseline protection. Rents are left entirely to market forces. If a landlord decides to sell or raise the rent beyond what your Super covers, you could still face a sudden 90-day notice to move without the landlord needing to justify the decision. fullstackproperty.co.nz

* * *

Comparison of Key Housing Policies for Renters

Policy Feature| The Green Party| The Labour Party| National / ACT
---|---|---|---
**Rent Increases**| Capped at **2% per year**| Limited to **once per year**| Determined by the **open market**
**No-Cause Evictions**| **Banned** completely| **Banned** (requires valid reason)| **Allowed** (90-day notice period)
**Housing Focus**| Mass public housing & rent controls| Tenant security & public house building| Increasing private supply & lowering landlord costs

* * *

Key Voting Uncertainties to Consider

Because New Zealand utilizes the **MMP (Mixed Member Proportional) system** , no single party is likely to govern alone. Your vote should consider the likely coalitions: thespinoff.co.nz

 1. **A Labour-Green Coalition:** If you vote Labour or Green, the final policy will be a compromise. You are highly likely to get a ban on no-cause evictions, but a hard 2% rent cap might be negotiated away by Labour. rnz.co.nz

 2. **A National-ACT Coalition:** If you vote for the current government bloc, the focus will remain on building incentives and landlord tax relief, with minimal direct intervention in your day-to-day tenancy agreement. fullstackproperty.co.nz

To help me give you more relevant details, let me know:

 * Are you currently receiving the **Accommodation Supplement** alongside your NZ Super?

 * Would you be open to moving into **Council or Kainga Ora (Public) housing** if more became available?