# Question 18: My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do the parties' housing plans differ for first-home buyers rather than existing property owners?

Collected 2 November 2026

[NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8 study](https://nzbrands.ai/research/nz-election-2026/editions/8)

## ChatGPT

Answer ID: 3c66a1c6-53a8-41d9-8237-c95daa41affb

For your situation, the important distinction is between helping people buy their first home and making property ownership more financially attractive for people who already own homes.

Those are not necessarily the same thing.

As a renting couple with steady employment and a deposit goal, I'd compare the parties on five practical questions:

1. Deposit affordability: Will their policies make it easier to accumulate a deposit?
2. House prices: Do they intend to increase housing supply, reduce prices, or support demand?
3. Mortgage access: Will they help first-home buyers qualify for a mortgage?
4. Renting: Will they improve the security and affordability of renting while you save?
5. Long-term ownership: Will their policies make it easier to keep a home affordable after buying?

One important qualification: the 2026 election is still ahead, so it's important to distinguish confirmed party policies from proposals, previous election commitments and policies that may have changed.

## 1. How the main parties differ

The following reflects policies and commitments published during the 2026 campaign, checked against information available on 1 November 2026.

The focus here is what could change for a working couple currently renting, not the parties' entire housing programmes.

### National

Direct deposit assistance

National proposes:

- Raise the income limit for the government-backed First Home Loan scheme to $300,000, applying to individual buyers and couples.
- Allow eligible first-home buyers to purchase with a 5% deposit rather than the usual 20%.
- Retain its broader approach of encouraging private housing development and investment.

For example, on a $700,000 home:

- 5% deposit: $35,000.
- 20% deposit: $140,000.

The important distinction is that a 5% deposit makes buying possible sooner, but doesn't make the house cheaper. You still need to qualify for the mortgage and afford repayments. [National is backing first home buyers](https://www.national.org.nz/policies/backing-first-home-buyers)[Housing policy guide](https://unmasked.goodfriends.workers.dev/megan-http-www.radionz.co.nz/news/politics_election-2026/feature/housing-policy-guide)

### Labour

Deposit assistance and rent-to-buy

Labour has announced:

- Expand First Home Loans to a $300,000 income cap, with a 5% deposit requirement.
- Bring more banks into the scheme.
- Introduce rent-to-buy for eligible working tenants in Kāinga Ora and participating community housing.
- Credit $100 a week towards the deposit for eligible rent-to-buy participants, held in a trust account.
- Build at least 6,000 additional social housing places over four years.

Labour has also proposed a 28% capital gains tax on profits from commercial and residential investment properties, excluding the family home, from July 2027.

The rent-to-buy policy is worth understanding carefully: it isn't a universal scheme for everyone renting privately. Eligibility is tied to particular social housing providers.

[Making it Easier to Buy Your First Home](https://www.labour.org.nz/election-policy-pages/buy-your-first-home/)[Release: Labour to help more Kiwis buy their first home](https://www.labour.org.nz/news/release-labour-to-help-more-kiwis-buy-their-first-home/)[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising](https://stories.theconversation.com/nz-policy-tracker-2026/)

### Green Party

Focus on housing costs and renter protections

The Greens' approach is less about helping you borrow a larger amount and more about changing the housing market.

Their announced proposals include:

- Build tens of thousands of public homes.
- Cap annual rent increases at 2%.
- Link the rent for a new tenancy to the previous tenancy's rent.
- Reverse no-cause evictions.
- Introduce an independently enforced Rental Warrant of Fitness.
- Reverse tax changes benefiting landlords and property speculators.

For your situation, the potential benefit is more predictable renting while you save, alongside an attempt to reduce competition from property investors.

However, the Greens have not announced a comparable new 5% deposit scheme for first-home buyers.

[Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis](https://www.greens.org.nz/greens_announce_plan_to_end_homelessness_fix_housing_crisis)[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[How should housing policy change?](https://undecided.nz/issues/housing/)

### ACT

Focus on housing supply

ACT's housing approach centres on:

- Making it easier to build homes through planning and consenting reform.
- Allowing greater freedom to develop property, subject to restrictions around material harm and environmental impacts.
- Improving infrastructure funding so councils can accommodate new housing.
- Increasing competition in the building-products market.

The argument behind this approach is that making it easier to build more homes will help address the underlying shortage.

For you, the potential benefit is improved housing availability and affordability over time, rather than direct deposit assistance.

ACT has not announced a comparable new first-home deposit scheme.

[ACT New Zealand](https://www.act.org.nz/policies/infrastructure)[How should housing policy change?](https://undecided.nz/issues/housing/)

### New Zealand First

Focus on infrastructure and development

Its announced housing policies include:

- Requiring adequate infrastructure, including roads, water and wastewater, before fast-tracked housing developments receive approval.
- Reviewing how fast-track residential developments are approved.
- Prioritising New Zealand citizens for social housing.

The infrastructure requirement could help ensure developments are properly serviced, but it may also affect how quickly some projects receive approval.

NZ First has not announced a comparable new 5% deposit scheme in its published 2026 housing commitments.

[NZFirst Policy Announcement: Changes to Fast-Track Residential Approvals](https://www.nzfirst.nz/nzfirst_policy_announcement_changes_to_fast_track_residential_approvals)[Our Policy](https://www.nzfirst.nz/policy)

### Te Pāti Māori

Focus on land, public housing and renters

Its announced proposals include:

- Build 2,000 homes on ancestral Māori land within four years.
- Exempt first-home buyers purchasing homes under $1 million from its proposed 5% stamp duty on residential sales.
- Introduce a land-banking tax.
- Introduce a vacant-home tax.
- Repeal landlord interest deductibility.
- Introduce universal rent control and repeal no-cause evictions.

The proposed stamp duty exemption is particularly relevant: it would mean first-home buyers below the $1 million threshold would not face that proposed transaction tax.

The wider proposals aim to discourage speculative property investment and increase housing availability.

[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)

### The Opportunity Party (TOP)

Focus on land-use and tax reform

TOP proposes:

- An annual 1.75% tax on land value, with some exemptions.
- More consistent planning rules across the country.
- Easier approval for prefabricated and modular homes.
- GST refunds to councils for qualifying environmentally high-performing new homes.
- Low-cost government finance for organisations building affordable and social housing.

TOP does not offer a comparable direct first-home deposit scheme.

Its land-value tax is a particularly important difference: it would change the ongoing cost of holding land, including land owned by existing homeowners. The details of exemptions would matter considerably to someone who has just bought a home.

[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[Election 2026](https://www.anzasw.nz/election-2026-policy-tracker/)[Election Policy Comparison](https://www.propertynz.co.nz/advocacy/election-policy-comparison)

## 2. Side-by-side comparison for first-home buyers

| Party | Help with deposit? | Help with rent? | Main affordability approach |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| National | Yes – 5% First Home Loan expansion | No major new rent cap | Easier mortgage access and development |
| Labour | Yes – 5% loans and targeted rent-to-buy | Some protections and social housing | Deposit assistance and more public homes |
| Greens | No new deposit scheme | Yes – proposed 2% rent cap | Public housing and investor tax reform |
| ACT | No new deposit scheme | No major rent-control proposal | Planning reform and more private construction |
| NZ First | No comparable new deposit scheme | No major new rent cap | Infrastructure-backed development |
| Te Pāti Māori | Proposed first-home stamp duty exemption | Yes – universal rent control | Public housing and discouraging speculation |
| TOP | No direct deposit scheme | Stronger rental standards | Land tax and planning reform |

[How should housing policy change?](https://undecided.nz/issues/housing/)[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[National is backing first home buyers](https://www.national.org.nz/policies/backing-first-home-buyers)[Making it Easier to Buy Your First Home](https://www.labour.org.nz/election-policy-pages/buy-your-first-home/)[NZFirst Policy Announcement: Changes to Fast-Track Residential Approvals](https://www.nzfirst.nz/nzfirst_policy_announcement_changes_to_fast_track_residential_approvals)

## 3. What matters about existing property owners?

This is an important part of the comparison because housing policy can affect first-home buyers indirectly through its treatment of existing owners and landlords.

There are three broad approaches:

A. Support property investment and development

National has restored interest deductibility for residential landlords and supports private-sector development. ACT also emphasises private property rights and development.

Potential effect: more incentives for investment and construction, although investment in existing properties doesn't necessarily create additional homes.

B. Shift incentives away from property speculation

Labour proposes a capital gains tax on investment property profits, excluding the family home. The Greens want to reverse landlord tax changes. Te Pāti Māori proposes land-banking and vacant-home taxes.

Potential effect: these policies seek to change the financial incentives around property investment, potentially changing competition between investors and first-home buyers. Actual effects on prices and rental supply are uncertain.

C. Change the underlying cost of holding land

TOP proposes an annual land-value tax.

Potential effect: this could influence decisions about holding, developing or selling land. It would also affect some people who already own homes, depending on the exemptions and implementation.

[The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up](https://www.interest.co.nz/property/140674/housing-policies-capital-gains-tax-solar-roll-outs-rent-controls-and-offsetting)[Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis](https://www.greens.org.nz/greens_announce_plan_to_end_homelessness_fix_housing_crisis)[ACT New Zealand](https://www.act.org.nz/policies/infrastructure)[Election Policy Comparison](https://www.propertynz.co.nz/advocacy/election-policy-comparison)

## 4. The question of whether your deposit target will keep moving

There is something worth separating here: getting a deposit together and being able to afford a house are two different challenges.

Consider a hypothetical $700,000 home:

How the deposit hurdle changes

5% deposit

# $35,000

10% deposit

# $70,000

20% deposit

# $140,000

Illustrative purchase price, not a forecast or an assurance of mortgage eligibility.

But imagine house prices increase while you're saving. Your deposit could grow in dollar terms and still represent a smaller percentage of the home you want.

This is why the distinction between the parties' policies matters:

- Deposit schemes address the amount you need upfront.
- More housing construction seeks to address the price and availability of homes.
- Rent controls seek to protect the amount of money you can save each month.
- Investor tax changes seek to alter the relative attractiveness of property investment.

None of these policies alone guarantees that house prices will become more affordable relative to household incomes.

## 5. Questions I'd investigate before deciding

Rather than looking only at which party promises the smallest deposit, I'd look at these questions:

1. Will the policy make homes cheaper, or simply let buyers borrow more? More borrowing capacity can help you buy sooner, but can also leave you with a larger mortgage.
2. What happens to rental costs while you're saving? Rent increases can undermine deposit savings even when your wages are steady.
3. Will more homes actually be built? Look for specific construction targets, infrastructure funding and delivery timeframes.
4. What happens to the market for first-home buyers competing with investors? Examine tax treatment of existing properties and incentives for new housing.
5. What happens after you buy? Mortgage affordability, property taxes, insurance, rates and maintenance all matter.

For independent comparisons, two useful resources are:

- [Policy.nz – 2026 housing policy comparison](https://policy.nz/2026/party-vote/policies/housing?utm_source=chatgpt.com) – compare party policies by housing affordability, renting and social housing.
- [RNZ – 2026 housing policy guide](https://unmasked.goodfriends.workers.dev/megan-http-www.radionz.co.nz/news/politics_election-2026/feature/housing-policy-guide?utm_source=chatgpt.com) – a campaign policy guide updated during October.

## My overall observation

There are two particularly different approaches to pay attention to:

- National and Labour: Both have now proposed widening access to 5% First Home Loans, although Labour adds a targeted rent-to-buy pathway.
- Greens, ACT, Te Pāti Māori and TOP: Put more emphasis on changing the housing market itself, through different combinations of public housing, rental protections, planning reform and property-tax changes.

NZ First puts more emphasis on infrastructure and development conditions.

That is a difference in philosophy, not a guarantee of which approach will produce the most affordable homes.

One final thought: You don't have to judge a housing policy solely by whether it gets you into a house faster. It's also reasonable to ask whether it creates a market where someone on an ordinary working income can buy a home without taking on an unsustainable mortgage.

For a couple in your position, that's a very legitimate question to take into the voting booth.

---

Worked for 11s

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searched 16 websites

## Gemini

Answer ID: 29e384af-83eb-4697-a943-e37b26c1b944

Navigating the property market as renters with steady jobs while trying to save a deposit can feel like chasing a moving target. In New Zealand’s political landscape, the philosophical divide on housing often comes down to a tension between **supporting first-home buyers into ownership**, **protecting or encouraging property investors/landlords**, and **managing housing supply and taxation**. 

The major political parties propose distinct approaches that differentiate between first-home buyers and existing property owners:

---

### 1. National
* **For First-Home Buyers:** National’s core first-home buyer policy is aimed at lowering the deposit barrier. They have proposed lifting the income cap for the Kāinga Ora First Home Loan scheme (which allows a 5% deposit with government backing) from the current combined/single caps ($95,000 for singles; $150,000 for couples or single buyers with dependents) up to a single flat cap of **$300,000**. This is designed to let higher-income working couples or individuals access low-deposit loans. *(Note: Lenders' strict credit and affordability stress-tests still apply).*
* **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** National has maintained pro-investment settings introduced since late 2023, such as full interest deductibility for landlords and a shorter (2-year) bright-line test. They rule out a capital gains tax.
* **The Dynamic:** Focuses heavily on expanding purchasing eligibility via credit access rather than structural market cooling, though they also champion planning reforms to boost supply.

### 2. Labour
* **For First-Home Buyers:** Labour places a strong emphasis on addressing the structural competition you face against property investors. Alongside funding thousands of additional social housing places, their approach seeks to cool speculative investor demand at the lower-to-middle end of the market, theoretically easing the heat on first-home buyers.
* **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** Labour has proposed a **28% capital gains tax (CGT)** on residential investment and commercial properties (applying to gains made after 1 July 2027). Crucially for everyday homeowners, **the family home is explicitly exempt** from this CGT. However, it directly impacts landlords, multi-property owners, and holiday-home owners. Labour also retains 100% interest deductibility settings.
* **The Dynamic:** Attempts to shift the tax burden away from working income and primary owner-occupiers, aiming to level the playing field so first-home buyers compete less aggressively against leveraged investors.

### 3. New Zealand First
* **For First-Home Buyers:** NZ First places emphasis on home-ownership pathways and has historically championed shared-ownership or equity models with the Government, aiming to reduce the size of the mortgage a first-home buyer needs to take on.
* **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** Generally supportive of private rental investment and opposed to a broad capital gains tax, prioritizing private property ownership structures while looking for targeted ways to ease deposit and mortgage hurdles.

### 4. ACT
* **For First-Home Buyers:** ACT’s primary focus for affordability is radical supply-side reform—such as streamlining building consents, removing local councils from parts of the consenting process, and incentivizing councils with portions of GST on new builds. The argument is that drastically lowering construction bottlenecks is the only permanent cure for high prices.
* **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** ACT takes a firmly landlord-friendly stance, supporting interest deductibility, opposing capital gains or wealth taxes, and proposing the removal of "ring-fencing" on rental losses (which would allow investors to offset rental losses against other personal income).

### 5. Green Party
* **For First-Home Buyers & Renters:** The Greens focus heavily on massive public and community housing expansions to reduce reliance on private landlords, alongside strong renter protections (such as limits on rent increases). 
* **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** They advocate for progressive wealth taxes and an extended bright-line test, creating a tougher fiscal environment for multi-property owners and speculators to discourage land-banking.

---

### Summary: What this means for your "moving target"

* If you want policies that **directly target your deposit constraints or purchasing power**, parties like National (expanding 5% deposit access via higher income caps) and NZ First (shared-equity options) offer direct assistance to bridge the gap.
* If you want policies aimed at **curbing investor competition**, Labour’s proposed capital gains tax (which shields the family home but taxes investment gains) or the Greens' wealth tax approaches seek to shift market dynamics away from property speculation.
* If you believe the target keeps moving because **not enough physical homes are built**, parties like ACT and The Opportunity Party focus heavily on sweeping away consenting and land-use restrictions to speed up construction.

Because New Zealand frequently governs via coalitions, any single party's manifesto is often subject to compromise after the election. When weighing your vote, it helps to ask whether you prefer policy tools that help you leapfrog the deposit barrier directly, or structural market reforms aimed at slowing down house-price growth by altering how investors treat property.

<ElicitationsGroup message="To explore how these policies intersect with your specific situation:">
  <Elicitation label="Calculate how a 5% deposit and a $300k income cap change your borrowing power" query="How does a 5% deposit scheme work under current lending rules, and what would a $300k income cap realistically mean for a couple's borrowing capacity?"/>
  <Elicitation label="Break down how a capital gains tax affects the wider housing market" query="How do capital gains taxes historically impact house prices and first-home buyer market share when implemented?"/>
</ElicitationsGroup>

## Google AI Mode

Answer ID: 2c69fc49-4f0e-4ae6-9457-2dc2e3f02ed2

When you are renting, working steadily, and trying to crack into the property market, watching the deposit goalposts shift can feel exhausting. As voters navigate the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have put forward distinct contrasting visions. Their strategies generally split into two philosophies: helping first-home buyers bridge the initial deposit/purchasing gap versus reshaping the broader market dynamics for existing property owners and investors.

Here is how the major parties’ housing approaches break down regarding first-home buyers compared to existing property owners and investors:

1\. National

 * **For First-Home Buyers:** Focuses heavily on lowering immediate entry barriers. National has proposed widening access to the Kāinga Ora First Home Loan scheme, expanding eligibility for low 5% deposits by raising the household income threshold up to $300,000. The emphasis is on helping steady-income earners who can service a mortgage get past the 20% deposit hurdle sooner.

 * **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** Committed to no new broad capital taxes, aiming to maintain market stability for current homeowners without introducing new disincentives for property ownership.

2\. Labour

 * **For First-Home Buyers & Renters:** Focuses on shifting market competitiveness away from speculative investment. Labour’s headline tax policy features a capital gains tax (CGT) on residential investment and commercial property starting mid-2027, while explicitly exempting the family home. The structural idea is to cool speculative demand from investors, potentially dampening rapid house price inflation so the target deposit stops running away from first-home buyers.

 * **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** While the family home remains untouched, residential investment properties face the incoming 28% CGT on realized gains from mid-2027 onwards.

3\. New Zealand First

 * **For First-Home Buyers:** Proposes direct intervention via a shared-equity (shared-ownership) model where the Government co-owns a portion of the first home alongside the buyer. This reduces the size of the commercial mortgage and initial deposit required, though mechanics around buying out the government's share remain a factor to weigh.

 * **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** Tends to focus on regional and national infrastructure/immigration settings rather than targeting existing investor tax structures directly, maintaining a traditional market environment for current owners.

4\. ACT

 * **For First-Home Buyers:** Focuses primarily on supply-side reforms (such as local government zoning and RMA replacement) to free up land and construction, arguing that increasing the raw supply of houses is the only permanent way to lower prices.

 * **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** Proposes removing the "ring-fencing" rules on rental losses—allowing property investors to once again offset rental losses against regular income like salary or wages. This actively favors existing property investors by making leveraged property holding more tax-effective.

5\. Green Party

 * **For First-Home Buyers & Renters:** Focuses on systemic tax shifts and renter protections rather than direct first-home buyer grants. They propose a wealth tax and an extended bright-line test framework, alongside wider structural moves like strong renter rights, aimed at reducing the wealth gap between those who own property and those who do not.

 * **For Existing Property Owners / Investors:** Wealth and high-value asset holders face more direct taxation under their broader wealth-tax frameworks, altering the relative attractiveness of holding large property portfolios versus other assets.

Summary Perspective for Your Vote

 * If you want **direct purchasing assistance** (lower deposit minimums or co-ownership support), parties like **National** and **New Zealand First** offer the most direct mechanical tools to get you into a house sooner.

 * If you believe the main issue is **market inflation driven by investors** , parties like **Labour** or the **Greens** propose using the tax system to level the playing field against speculators—though these policies also spark debate over whether they might impact overall construction pipelines or rental availability.

 * If you look toward **supply and investor-incentive models** , **ACT** focuses heavily on regulatory supply reform while restoring tax deductions for landlords.

You can check your local electorate and compare specific candidate stances via Policy.nz as you weigh your party vote.

## AI Overviews

Answer ID: d34e97a3-dfbd-4a41-82cc-017b7363635d

The _2026 New Zealand general election_ presents a stark contrast in housing strategies. The primary point of difference sits between **the National-ACT coalition, which prioritizes deregulation and tax relief for property owners to stimulate supply, and the Labour-Green opposition, which proposes aggressive intervention through wealth/capital taxes and targeted support to make homes accessible for first-home buyers**.

Both major parties have converged on a key point: expanding the low-deposit threshold to make home ownership accessible for first-time buyers juggling high everyday living costs.

Comparing Major Party Housing Plans for the 2026 Election

Feature/Policy Area| National Party & ACT| Labour Party & Green Party
---|---|---
**First-Home Buyers**| **Expanded 5% Deposit:** Lifts the First Home Loan combined income cap to $300,000 for couples and single buyers.| **Identical 5% Deposit Shift:** Also supports raising the First Home Loan income cap to $300,000. Also introduces state rent-to-buy paths.
**Existing Property Owners & Investors**| **Tax Cuts & Relief:** Retains a short 2-year bright-line test, scraps interest non-deductibility, and rejects wealth or capital gains taxes.| **New Taxes:** Labour proposes a 28% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on investment properties (family homes exempt). Greens propose a 1.75% Land Value Tax.
**Renters' Rights**| **Landlord Incentives:** Re-introduces 90-day no-cause eviction notices to encourage landlords to open up properties to the market.| **Rental Controls:** Greens advocate for a 2% rent cap and a Rental Warrant of Fitness. Labour keeps strict healthy homes standards and no-cause eviction bans.
**Housing Supply Strategy**| **Deregulation:** ACT wants to overhaul the RMA to permit construction on private land freely, and share GST revenue with local councils.| **State Construction:** Focuses heavily on direct state house construction, pledging to build thousands of new public and community homes.

First-Home Buyers: How They Help You Save a Deposit

For buyers saving a deposit, the major parties target the problem differently:

 * **National's Approach:** National focuses on expanding access to the **Kāinga Ora First Home Loan scheme**. They propose lifting the household income cap to **$300,000** for all applicants. This allows higher-earning couples who are locked out by current thresholds to purchase a home with just a **5% deposit** instead of the standard 20%. National argues that easing constraints on landlords will also prevent rental price spikes while you save.

 * **Labour's Approach:** Labour has matched National's pledge to lift the First Home Loan income limit to **$300,000** for a 5% deposit. However, they add a **rent-to-buy scheme** for eligible public/community housing tenants, giving them a $100-a-week credit toward a deposit.

 * **The Green Party's Approach:** The Greens argue that the best way to help you save is by drastically cooling the market. By introducing **rent caps (limited to 2% annually)** and reversing tax breaks for speculators, they aim to lower your daily living costs so you can save faster without being outbid by wealthy investors at auctions.

Existing Property Owners & Investors: Moving the Target

The "moving target" feeling often comes from investors driving up prices. The parties have opposite views on how to handle existing property owners:

 * **National and ACT** believe that helping landlords operate more cheaply (by restoring interest deductibility and keeping the bright-line capital gains capital clock at 2 years) keeps the rental market stable and encourages overall market movement. They believe that increasing general housing supply via fewer council rules is the only sustainable way to permanently stop the target from moving.

 * **Labour and the Greens** want to deliberately disincentivize property speculation. Labour's proposed **28% Capital Gains Tax** on investment properties (taking effect July 1, 2027) is designed to tilt the playing field toward first-home buyers by making residential property less attractive to multi-property investors. The Greens' proposed **1.75% Land Value Tax** aims to do the same by penalizing wealth tied up in land banking.

If you would like to look closer at your immediate options while deciding on your vote, let me know:

 * Your approximate **combined household income** (to see if you fit under current vs. proposed First Home Loan caps) National is backing first home buyers | National Party

 * Your **current deposit savings goal** or target timeline

 * Whether you are looking preferentially at **new builds or existing properties** Govt housing package backs first home buyers | Beehive.govt.nzNz housing policies for the 2026 election - Facebook
