The 2026 New Zealand general election is on 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. Key dates | Vote NZ

For someone in your position—retired, owning your home, mainly dependent on NZ Super, with significant rates, power, insurance and healthcare costs—the differences between the parties are quite meaningful. I’d look at five things rather than simply asking which party says “cost of living” most often.

At a glance

Your concern	National	Labour	Greens	NZ First	ACT
NZ Super	Keep current system; stresses increases already delivered	Keep current system	More generous social-support approach	Strongest explicit commitment to protecting Super	Wants a long-term rethink of Super's sustainability
Rates	Strongest specific proposal: cap increases at 2–4% from 2029	No comparable nationwide cap identified	More supportive of councils, rather than restricting them	Supports seniors' rates assistance	Generally favours tighter government/local-government spending
Power	More generation, competition and infrastructure	Solar without upfront cost	Kiwipower, community power, solar/batteries, stronger public intervention	Break up major power companies	More generation, competition and private investment
Healthcare costs	More emphasis on system performance/access	3 free GP visits + free prescriptions	Major expansion of accessible public healthcare	Prevention and health-system reform	More private-sector involvement + cheaper medicines
Home insurance	No major direct premium-reduction policy found	No broad home-insurance subsidy found	Climate resilience/public provision may help indirectly	No broad premium policy found	No broad premium policy found

That table needs some qualification, particularly around Super and rates.

1. NZ Super: probably the most important issue for you

Under the current system, NZ Super rises each 1 April in line with average wage growth. As of April 2026, a single person living alone receives $1,110.30 a fortnight after tax at the M tax rate; two qualifying partners receive $1,708.16 combined. Changes to benefit and payment rates from 1 April 2026 | Work and Income

National

National is essentially offering continuity rather than a new senior-income programme. It points to the increases already delivered, retention of the Winter Energy Payment, and expanded rates rebates. National Supports Seniors | National Party

For you, that means the big question is whether you value predictability and lower government spending/taxation more than additional targeted benefits.

Labour

Labour's published 2026 programme doesn't propose changing the basic NZ Super system. Its emphasis is instead on reducing the expenses that come out of your Super—particularly healthcare costs. Its headline offer is three free GP visits a year for everyone and free prescriptions from July 2027. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

For someone who needs regular healthcare, that's potentially considerably more relevant than a small change in the Super payment itself.

Green Party

The Greens put substantially more emphasis on improving support for seniors and strengthening public services. Their manifesto explicitly identifies seniors as a priority and says healthcare should be accessible and properly supported. Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Their approach is therefore more about increasing the services you receive for your existing income, rather than simply increasing NZ Super.

NZ First

NZ First has made the clearest promise on protecting the existing Super model: it says it does not support raising the eligibility age to 67 or means-testing NZ Super. It also says it has retained the Winter Energy Payment and increased Super payments during the current term. Winston Peters - “Seniors Sole Defender” - New Zealand First

There is one important qualification: NZ First proposes that from 2029 only New Zealand citizens would be eligible for NZ Super. If you're already a citizen and otherwise eligible, that particular proposal would not reduce your entitlement. NZ Super for Citizens Only - New Zealand First

ACT

ACT is the outlier. It has argued that the cost of NZ Super is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain as the population ages and has criticised Labour for refusing to address the issue. ACT New Zealand

So, if preserving today's NZ Super rules is a high priority, ACT deserves particularly close scrutiny. Its argument is about long-term sustainability, whereas NZ First is the most emphatic about protecting the existing entitlement.

---

2. Council rates: National has the clearest direct proposal

This is probably the single biggest policy difference for a retired homeowner.

National proposes that, from 2029, councils would generally have to keep annual rates increases within a 2–4% target range, with exemptions for exceptional circumstances and an independent regulator overseeing the system. Keeping rates affordable | National Party

That's potentially very valuable if your rates are becoming one of your largest fixed expenses.

However, there's an important catch: it doesn't mean your rates bill can only ever rise by 2–4%. The policy concerns the annual increase and permits exemptions. It also doesn't address the possibility that councils could respond by cutting services or shifting costs elsewhere.

National has also already increased the Rates Rebate Scheme. From 1 July 2026, the maximum rebate is $830, and the SuperGold-holder income threshold is $46,400. A SuperGold Cardholder receiving only NZ Super can qualify for the full rebate if their rates exceed $2,000. Rate Rebate Scheme to assist ratepayers | National Party

For a retired homeowner, I'd regard National's rates policy as a genuinely material benefit—if your council's rates are otherwise heading well above 4%.

---

3. Electricity: the parties have quite different theories

This is another area where the differences are unusually clear.

National: more supply + competition

National's 2026 energy plan aims to increase generation, improve transmission and connections, and increase competition between electricity retailers. It argues that more supply and competition should eventually reduce household power costs. Affordable power Kiwis can rely on | National Party

Likely effect for you: potentially lower bills over time, but much of the benefit depends on whether additional generation and competition actually translate into retail savings.

ACT: competition and private investment

ACT takes a similar market-oriented approach but pushes it further: make it easier to build generation and networks, allow greater competition in electricity connections, and let consumers generate and sell power more freely. ACT New Zealand

If you own your home and have a suitable roof, that could be more relevant to you than it would be to a renter.

NZ First: break up the big power companies

NZ First proposes splitting the major electricity companies into generation and retail businesses, arguing that the current structure allows the large companies too much control over prices. It also proposes allowing household solar to be sold back to the grid at the same price as electricity purchased. "Power to the People" - Winston Peters - State of the Nation 2026 - New Zealand First

That's a much more interventionist proposal than National or ACT.

Greens: public ownership

The Greens propose Kiwipower, a publicly owned electricity company, along with community-owned power, rooftop solar and zero-interest loans for solar and batteries. Green Party launches plan to cut power bills and take power back from the big energy companies - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

For a homeowner worried about power bills, this is probably the most ambitious proposal—but also involves the biggest change to how the electricity market works.

Labour: solar without upfront cost

Labour proposes SolarSaver, allowing homeowners to get solar without paying the full upfront cost. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

That could be particularly interesting for a homeowner on a fixed income, because the attraction is reducing the initial capital hurdle rather than simply giving you a power-bill subsidy.

---

4. Healthcare: this may be where Labour's policy matters most to you

You said you need regular healthcare, so I'd give this considerably more weight than the average voter might.

Labour

Labour proposes:

• three free GP visits each year for every New Zealander
• free prescriptions from 1 July 2027
• a Family Doctor Loan Scheme intended to increase GP capacity
• substantial additional health funding. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

For someone who regularly sees a GP or takes several prescriptions, this is the most immediately quantifiable household saving I've found among the major parties.

Greens

The Greens propose a broader expansion of accessible public healthcare, arguing that GP services, hospitals and the health workforce have been underfunded. Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

The Green approach is therefore broader system expansion, rather than Labour's particularly easy-to-calculate "three GP visits + prescriptions" offer.

ACT

ACT favours a more mixed public/private model, with private providers being used to reduce waiting lists. It is also campaigning to close what it calls the medicines gap with Australia and to let pharmacies provide more everyday healthcare. ACT New Zealand

The potential advantage is faster access and more choice; the important question for you is whether that translates into lower out-of-pocket costs, rather than simply more private provision.

NZ First

NZ First's health programme currently emphasises prevention and shifting resources toward preventing chronic illness rather than simply treating it once people become sick. NZFirst Campaign Announcement: The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy” - New Zealand First

That's a longer-term approach, so it's less straightforward to translate into a dollar saving on your 2027 household budget.

---

5. Home insurance: there is a surprisingly big gap in the policy offerings

This is worth highlighting because your insurance bill is important to you, but it isn't an area where the major parties currently offer a simple "we'll reduce your premiums by X%" policy.

I couldn't find a major 2026 policy from National, Labour, Greens, NZ First or ACT that directly subsidises ordinary homeowners' insurance premiums.

That's important: don't assume that a party's cost-of-living programme will automatically bring your insurance premium down.

Insurance costs are also affected by things governments can't simply legislate away—particularly reinsurance costs, property risk, extreme-weather losses and insurers' assessment of particular locations.

So I'd treat insurance as a weak differentiator between the parties, unless a party subsequently announces a specific insurance/resilience policy.

---

What this means specifically for you

If I reduce the election to your particular household rather than asking which party has the "best" overall programme:

If your biggest problem is rates

National stands out. Its proposed 2–4% rates framework is the clearest direct intervention, and the expanded rates rebate is already relevant to lower-income SuperGold holders. Keeping rates affordable | National Party

If your biggest problem is GP and prescription costs

Labour stands out. Three free GP visits and free prescriptions are unusually concrete benefits for somebody who regularly uses healthcare. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

If your biggest problem is electricity

There are four quite different choices:

• National: more supply and competition.
• ACT: substantially more market competition and private investment.
• NZ First: break up the major power companies.
• Greens: public ownership plus community/household generation.
• Labour: make solar easier to install without upfront cost. Affordable power Kiwis can rely on | National Party

If your biggest concern is protecting NZ Super itself

NZ First is the clearest defender of the current entitlement. National and Labour are essentially maintaining the existing framework, while ACT is much more concerned about the scheme's long-term affordability. Winston Peters - “Seniors Sole Defender” - New Zealand First

If you want the broadest expansion of public services

The Greens offer the most extensive public-service approach, funded in part through significantly higher taxation of very wealthy individuals and large corporations. Their proposed wealth tax explicitly excludes the family home, which is relevant to a homeowner like you. Greens commit to tax the super-rich and large corporates fairly, cut income tax for 96% - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

---

My practical way of comparing them

For your circumstances, I wouldn't rank parties by their general ideology. I'd make a little five-column household calculation:

Annual NZ Super income
− rates
− home/contents insurance
− electricity
− GP/medical costs
− prescriptions
= money left for everything else

Then ask of each party: which of those five numbers does its policy actually change, by how much, and when?

On that basis, the most directly relevant contrasts are probably National vs Labour, with NZ First particularly relevant if protecting Super is your overriding concern, and Greens/ACT particularly relevant if electricity-market policy is high on your list.

One caution: these are campaign policies, not guaranteed outcomes. The election determines the composition of Parliament under MMP, so coalition negotiations can substantially change what a party actually gets enacted.

If you want, I can take the next step and build you a “retired homeowner scorecard” for National, Labour, Greens, NZ First and ACT, scoring each from 1–5 specifically on NZ Super, rates, power, insurance, GP/prescriptions, tax and aged care, without telling you who to vote for.