Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

    815rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

    4,216rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

    17rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

    32rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

For a household like yours, I’d separate the education question into three different things: (1) how much money goes into schools, (2) how much targeted help is available when a child needs extra support, and (3) how much of the school experience still comes out of parents’ pockets.

The 2026 election is on 7 November 2026. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 - Policy.nz

The broad picture

Party School funding / priorities Learning support Costs paid by families
National More funding for classrooms, school operating grants, structured literacy/numeracy and achievement-focused teaching Major expansion already legislated/funded: teacher-aide hours, Learning Support Coordinators, ORS, speech-language and psychology support Retains the current approach to school costs; its cheaper school-lunch model continues. No major 2026 pledge to eliminate ordinary costs such as uniforms
Labour More public investment in schools, with emphasis on school infrastructure and restoring programmes it says have been cut Favors stronger publicly provided support and opposes some current reforms, including charter schools; its detailed 2026 learning-support package is less developed publicly than National's More emphasis on reducing direct costs: Labour wants to restore the previous school-lunch programme and has a record of funding school donations away
Greens Strongest emphasis on increasing public investment in education and reducing inequality Supports substantial public provision for children with additional needs, but its 2026 headline education proposals are more focused on funding and affordability than a detailed new ORS-style package Strong emphasis on removing costs from families; proposes permanently restoring and expanding free school lunches
ACT Achievement, standards, parental choice and charter schools; generally more focused on effectiveness/accountability than simply increasing spending Supports targeted intervention but favours structural/choice-based approaches; its current education platform is less centred on expanding universal learning-support spending Has a particularly concrete 2026 proposal on uniform costs: limiting compulsory branded items and allowing generic alternatives
NZ First Core skills, practical education and employment links; says education spending is an investment Its published policy calls for completing Learning Support Coordinator coverage and greater support for learning difficulties Less specific than Labour/Greens on reducing everyday school expenses; its broader cost-of-living agenda is more prominent

There is an important distinction here: National has already made a very large learning-support commitment, rather than this being merely an election promise. Budget 2025 allocated $646m, including funding intended to provide Learning Support Coordinators to all Year 1–8 schools, expand early intervention, increase ORS funding and add more than two million teacher-aide hours a year from 2028. Nicola Grigg | Budget 2025 | National Party

Budget 2026 then added further education spending, including $131m for reading, writing and maths, $470m for school property and classrooms, and $212m to continue school lunches in 2027. Education - Budget 2026 - 28 May 2026

1. If your biggest concern is learning support

This is probably the clearest policy difference.

National has put unusually specific numbers around additional-needs support: Learning Support Coordinators for Year 1–8 schools, more teacher-aide hours, expanded early intervention, more speech-language therapists and psychologists, and a change to ORS so that verified students receive funding. Nicola Grigg | Budget 2025 | National Party

NZ First also explicitly supports completing the rollout of Learning Support Coordinators to all schools and says children with learning difficulties should receive additional support. 2023 Election Policies - NZ First

ACT puts more emphasis on achievement, accountability, parental choice and alternatives such as charter schools. Its argument is that a child who isn't being adequately served by a school should have another publicly funded option. ACT New Zealand

Labour and the Greens generally argue for strengthening the public-school system rather than expanding charter-school alternatives. Labour has also criticised cuts to education resources and wants greater public provision. The Greens' broader position is that education funding should be increased rather than constrained by the Government's fiscal approach. Chlöe Swarbrick Budget speech 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

So, if you have a child who actually needs teacher-aide, specialist, behavioural, speech-language or neurodiversity support, the details of the existing National learning-support expansion are worth looking at very closely, regardless of what you think about the parties' wider education philosophies.

2. If your concern is what you actually have to pay

This is where the distinction between free education and free schooling matters.

State-school tuition itself is free. But schools can charge for things such as optional goods/services, uniforms and some activities; state-integrated schools can also charge compulsory attendance dues. School donations are voluntary. Fees and charges at school - Ministry of Education

That means a family can quite legitimately experience a supposedly "free" school as costing hundreds or thousands of dollars a year.

School lunches

This is a significant party difference.

The Government's current programme is deliberately cheaper: Budget 2026 provides $212m to continue it through 2027. Education - Budget 2026 - 28 May 2026

Labour wants to restore the previous locally provided lunch programme. National calculates that doing so would cost an additional $122m a year from 2028; that figure is National's costing/argument, so I'd treat it as an attributed claim rather than an independent assessment. LABOUR'S HIDDEN BILL

The Greens have made the most explicit 2026 commitment: restore the original Ka Ora, Ka Ako model, extend it to roughly 400 additional schools/150,000 additional children, and fund it permanently. Their announced cost is about $472m in the first year, rising to $602m by 2030–31. Green Party announces plan for free and nutritious school lunches - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

For a family currently buying lunches for two school-age children, this is potentially a very tangible household-budget issue, rather than an abstract education policy.

Uniforms

Here ACT has the most specific proposal.

ACT says some families spend more than $1,000 per child on uniforms and proposes limiting state schools to three compulsory branded items, while requiring generic alternatives for commonly used items such as socks, shorts, trousers and skirts. ACT New Zealand

That doesn't make uniforms free; it is aimed at allowing parents to shop around rather than being tied to a particular school supplier.

Donations

The current system already makes donations voluntary, and schools in the school-donation scheme receive extra government funding in exchange for not asking for ordinary donations. Fees and charges at school - Ministry of Education

Labour has a particularly relevant record here: while previously in government it increased school funding specifically to remove donations at around 70% of schools. Our Progress - NZ Labour Party

Its 2026 platform, however, doesn't appear to make eliminating every remaining school-related parental payment the centrepiece of its education policy.

3. What this means for a two-income, mortgage-paying family

I'd look at the policies in two buckets, because they affect your household differently.

Immediate household costs

The policies most directly capable of reducing what you pay yourself are:

  • Free/expanded school lunches: especially relevant if you have two children.
  • Uniform reform: ACT has the clearest specific proposal.
  • School donations: Labour has the strongest established record of replacing them with government funding.
  • School transport: ACT is proposing that children be allowed to take available seats on school buses serving other schools, potentially relevant to transport costs for some families. ACT New Zealand
  • Broader household policy: because your pressure is also mortgage, power, rates and groceries, education policy alone may not be the biggest determinant of your disposable income.

Longer-term cost/risk if a child needs extra help

Here the question is less "will my school bill fall by $500?" and more:

If one of my children develops significant learning, behavioural, communication or other additional needs, how much support will the state provide before my family has to start paying privately?

National's current learning-support package is unusually concrete on this point: more teacher-aide hours, LSCs, ORS, specialists and early intervention. Nicola Grigg | Budget 2025 | National Party

That's worth distinguishing from parties' general promises to "invest more in education".

One important caveat

Don't assume that more school funding automatically means lower costs for parents. Government funding can instead go toward teachers, buildings, curriculum, specialist support or administration while families continue paying for uniforms, stationery, sports, camps, devices, transport and activities.

Conversely, a policy such as free lunches can reduce a family's weekly expenses without increasing the school's general funding.

So for your circumstances, I'd compare parties on both the per-child household benefit and the quality of the public service being funded, rather than simply asking who promises the biggest education budget.

If you want, I can next turn this into a family-budget comparison of National vs Labour vs Greens vs ACT vs NZ First, including the policies most likely to affect a household with two school-age children and two working adults—school lunches, uniforms, childcare/after-school care, tax/Working for Families, power and transport—without telling you which party to vote for.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

Balancing a household budget on two wages while managing a mortgage and tight household buffers is a reality for many New Zealand families. When looking at the upcoming general election, understanding how political parties approach school funding, learning support, and out-of-pocket costs can help clarify which platforms align with your family's needs.

The major political blocs approach these areas through distinct ideological lenses:

1. School Funding & Operations

  • National and Center-Right Parties: Focus heavily on "fixing the basics" through standard operational grant adjustments, targeted funding for curriculum rollouts (such as structured literacy and maths), and expanding choice via charter or partnership schools. Their emphasis is on measurable academic achievement in core subjects rather than broad increases in central bureaucracy.
  • Labour and Center-Left Parties: Generally favor baseline increases to direct operational funding for state and state-integrated schools to reduce reliance on local fundraising and donations. They emphasize equity-based funding (such as the Equity Index) to direct more resources to lower-income school communities.

2. Learning Support (Special Education & Needs)

  • National and Center-Right Parties: Typically target learning support funding toward specific interventions, frontline staffing adjustments, and managing cost pressures within existing resource envelopes, alongside encouraging alternative schooling models that may specialize in different learning styles.
  • Labour and Center-Left Parties: Usually advocate for sweeping systemic expansions of Learning Support Coordinator roles across all schools, aiming to reduce wait times for educational psychologists, speech therapists, and Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) funding.

3. Out-of-Pocket Family Costs (Donations, Uniforms, and Devices)

  • National and Center-Right Parties: Generally support families through broader economic levers—such as personal income tax relief and cost-of-living adjustments—leaving schools leeway to manage local donations, though strict guidelines exist around government "donations schemes" that encourage schools to drop voluntary family payments in exchange for direct Crown funding.
  • Labour and Center-Left Parties: Tend to focus on directly reducing school-generated costs for parents. This includes expanding the Government's school donations scheme to cover more schools if elected, targeted support for digital device access, and initiatives around school lunches (Ka Ora, Ka Ako) to directly offset household grocery pressures.

Summary for a Tight Household Budget

  • If your priority is macro-economic relief (tax cuts and cost-of-living management) alongside a structured, back-to-basics curriculum, center-right policies may appeal more.
  • If your priority is minimizing direct school-related costs (like donations and device fees) and expanding state-funded wraparound support like learning coordinators and school nutrition programs, center-left policies may align closer with your goals.

How do you feel about balancing broader tax relief versus targeted spending on direct school services for your children?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

For a household relying on two wages with a tight budget and school-age children, managing the hidden and direct costs of schooling is a major pressure point. New Zealand’s political parties offer distinct approaches to operational funding, learning support resources, and policies affecting family-borne expenses.

1. School Funding & Operational Grants

  • National (and the incumbent coalition/Government approach): Focuses funding heavily on core foundational achievement (such as structured reading, writing, and math targets) and curriculum/secondary standard refreshes. Budget allocations have included incremental increases to school operational grants (e.g., around a 2% baseline adjustment) and capital investments in classrooms, though critics and sector unions argue these increases lag behind actual inflation.

  • Labour: Proposes a more measured rollout or pause on broader systemic curriculum and NCEA overhauls to give schools "breathing room," arguing that constant administrative shifts waste valuable institutional resources. They emphasize redirecting focus toward teacher workload and baseline resourcing rather than continuous structural changes.

  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Generally advocate for significantly larger injections of direct operational funding into the public schooling system, targeting socio-economic equity, culturally responsive learning (such as increased funding for te reo Māori pathways), and reducing reliance on community fundraising. [The Conversation]

  • ACT New Zealand: Focuses more heavily on school autonomy, operational freedom, and holding schools accountable to measurable academic results rather than top-down bureaucratized spending increases. They also emphasize cutting central Ministry of Education administrative overhead.

2. Learning Support (Teacher Aides, Needs & Neurodiversity)

  • Incumbent / National-led approach: Budget allocations feature targeted funding packages for specific high-health needs funds, English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL), and pilot attendance programmes. However, education sector advocates point out that demand for learning support (such as teacher aides for neurodivergent or disabled children) consistently outpaces the funding pools provided.

  • Labour & The Greens: Argue that current learning support funding is severely under-allocated. They push for a guaranteed, centralized entitlement model for learning support so that schools don't have to fight or fundraise for scarce teacher-aide hours for children with high behavioral, physical, or cognitive needs.

  • ACT / Right-of-centre: Tends to favor localized decision-making, suggesting schools should have greater flexibility to decide how operational funds are spent locally rather than being bound by rigid central Ministry staffing ratios for support roles.

3. Costs Paid by Families (Donations, Uniforms, and Food)

  • School Lunches (Ka Ora, Ka Ako): The Coalition government maintained funding for the healthy school lunches program, though with ongoing adjustments and alternative delivery models aimed at cost-efficiency. Left-of-centre parties (Labour, Greens) strongly champion expanding or fully protecting universal free school lunches as a vital direct cost-of-living relief for families.

  • Donations and Activity Fees: While state and state-integrated schools accepting the "donations scheme" receive government funding in lieu of asking parents for routine donations, families still face heavy out-of-pocket costs for extracurricular activities, stationery, devices/tablets, and uniforms.

  • ACT: Has run specific policy discussions around school uniform affordability, aiming to crack down on exclusive supplier arrangements that force families into high clothing costs.

  • General Cost-of-Living Policies: Because school costs are tied to household survival, broader party stances matter significantly for a tight budget: Labour and the Greens propose wider cost-of-living interventions (such as transport caps or free/cheaper healthcare access), whereas National and ACT focus on broad tax relief, economic management, and inflation control to lower the general cost environment for dual-earner mortgage holders.

Would you like to explore how these parties differ on broader cost-of-living or tax policies that might directly affect your household budget alongside school costs?

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

AI Overview

For families managing tight budgets under mortgage and grocery pressures, the education policies of New Zealand’s major political parties for the 2026 general election offer distinct approaches to household costs, school resources, and classroom environments.

Direct Policy Comparison

Feature / Issue National & ACT (Coalition) Labour Party Green Party
School Lunches Maintained lower-cost model. Keep the restructured "Healthy School Lunches" scheme, which uses a bulk-procured model ($3.58/meal) to save over $120M annually. Expand funding. Increase government spending to boost the quality and reach of school lunch provisions. Full restoration & expansion. Revert the Ka Ora, Ka Ako program to its original local-provider model ($6.50/meal), expanding it to 400 more schools.
Out-of-Pocket Family Costs Targeted relief. ACT has specifically campaigned on regulating the cost of compulsory school uniforms and ensuring rural school buses don't bypass students. Indirect household relief. Maintain a $20 weekly public transport fare cap and re-introduce free prescriptions to ease wider family cash flow. Free early childhood care. Cap ECE fees at $10/day above the 20-hour limit, moving to 35 hours of completely free care by 2029.
Learning Support & Behaviour Classroom discipline. ACT proposes allowing teachers to use "reasonable force" to remove disruptive students and fining uncooperative parents up to $3,000. Targeted intervention. Focus government investment on early learning support systems and frontline funding rather than administrative structural shifts. Systemic inclusion. Broaden funding for specialized learning support staff and ensure fully inclusive education for neurodivergent or disabled students.
Curriculum & Core Funding Back to basics. Enforce mandatory one-hour daily blocks for reading, writing, and maths, alongside strict limits on digital screens for junior years. Support the growth of public-funded Charter Schools. Stability freeze. Pause the current government’s curriculum overhaul and NCEA changes for a year, handing oversight to a newly created politically independent council. No national streaming. Oppose rigid national literacy/numeracy testing models. Focus funding purely on public/state-integrated schools while phase out public funds for for-profit ECEs.

How These Choices Benefit a Tight Household Budget

  • Vote National / ACT if: You want the government to run tighter, lower-cost public operations to avoid new taxes, place a heavy emphasis on core academic hours, and use strict disciplinary tools to manage disruptive classrooms. You may also benefit from their direct focus on hidden costs like school uniforms.

  • Vote Labour if: You want a stabilizing pause on curriculum changes and prefer education policies governed by an independent body of experts rather than politicians. Their platform focuses on shifting broader living expenses via healthcare and transit savings to leave more room for your mortgage.

  • Vote Green if: Your primary budget pressure could be relieved by maximum state-funded coverage—such as fully subsidized, nutrient-heavy school lunches or entirely free early childhood hours if you have younger children transitioning into school.

If you want to look closely at a specific area, let me know:

  • What school years (Primary, Intermediate, or High School) your children are currently in?

  • Whether your children currently utilize or need specialized learning support (e.g., ORS funding, speech therapy, ADHD/neurodivergent accommodations)?

  • Whether before/after school care costs are a significant factor for your two-wage household?

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account