Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

    815rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

    4,216rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

    17rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

    32rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties differ on farming, biosecurity and access to services in rural New Zealand?

The 2026 New Zealand general election campaign is putting rural issues—especially farming regulation, biosecurity, and access to health, education, transport and other services—among the areas where parties draw some of their clearest differences. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026, and the major contest is expected to involve the centre-right government bloc (National, ACT and New Zealand First) and a Labour-led opposition grouping. New Zealand Parliament dissolved ahead of tight November vote

Below is a comparison of the main parties’ broad positions. Policies can change during the campaign, so this reflects published positions and announced priorities available during 2026. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Issue National Labour ACT New Zealand First Greens / Te Pāti Māori
Farming & regulation Emphasises reducing compliance costs, making farming easier, expanding market opportunities, and supporting primary-sector productivity. National has previously campaigned on reducing regulation and reviewing rules affecting farmers. Shadow Cabinet of Christopher Luxon Focuses on supporting farmers while balancing environmental standards; Labour has indicated it would avoid simply restoring earlier controversial freshwater settings and has emphasised practical approaches. Major Parties to Debate Farming Policy Ahead of Election Generally favours fewer regulations, stronger property rights, and reducing what it sees as unnecessary government intervention. Strong focus on protecting rural communities, primary industries and domestic production; often emphasises national ownership and regional economic development. New Zealand First has announced ten campaign policies ... Place greater emphasis on environmental limits, climate action, biodiversity and Māori land interests; the Greens argue farming transitions need stronger environmental safeguards.
Biosecurity Generally frames biosecurity as protecting trade, farming productivity and border security; tends to favour efficient systems with industry involvement. Supports strong public investment in biosecurity systems and sees government coordination as important to protecting agriculture and ecosystems. Typically stresses efficiency, accountability and reducing bureaucratic barriers while maintaining essential protections. Places a strong emphasis on protecting New Zealand’s borders, food production and rural livelihoods. More likely to connect biosecurity with ecosystem protection, native species protection and climate resilience.
Climate, land use & emissions More cautious about policies that affect farm profitability; has opposed approaches it considers economically damaging to farmers. Land-use change, including forestry conversions, has been a major rural concern. A carbon-credit land rush is hollowing out New Zealand farm country Supports emissions reduction but has sought approaches that are workable for farmers and rural communities. Generally supports market-based approaches and reducing regulation, including in climate policy where it affects economic activity. Often highlights concerns about the impact of environmental rules on rural communities and production. Places greater emphasis on reducing agricultural emissions, restoring waterways and changing land-use incentives.
Rural health services Emphasises improving delivery, workforce supply and access; its wider public-service approach stresses efficiency and reducing waiting times. New Zealand PM Luxon calls November 7 poll, promises economic prosperity Places more emphasis on expanding publicly funded services, including easier access to healthcare and preventive care. NZ opposition leader Hipkins says Labour focused on tackling cost of living woes Tends to focus on system reform, competition and reducing government inefficiency. Highlights regional access and ensuring smaller communities are not overlooked. Emphasises public provision, equity of access and addressing disparities affecting rural and Māori communities.
Rural schools, transport & connectivity Supports infrastructure investment and improving economic growth in regions. Emphasises maintaining public services and government investment where markets do not provide enough access. Favours local decision-making, private-sector involvement and reducing costs. Strong focus on regional infrastructure, roads and keeping smaller communities viable. Focuses on community-led development, public investment and reducing inequalities in service access.

The main dividing lines

1. Regulation versus environmental standards

A central rural debate is whether government rules are helping long-term sustainability or imposing unnecessary costs. Farming groups have highlighted issues such as resource management reform, climate policy, market access and rural investment as key election concerns. Major Parties to Debate Farming Policy Ahead of Election

  • National and ACT generally argue that farmers need fewer constraints and more certainty.
  • Labour generally argues for practical regulation alongside environmental protection.
  • Greens and Te Pāti Māori place more weight on ecological limits and climate adaptation.
  • NZ First tends to emphasise protecting traditional rural industries and regional communities.

2. Biosecurity: who pays and how it is managed?

All major parties treat biosecurity as important because agriculture, exports and native ecosystems depend on it. The difference is usually about emphasis:

  • More market-oriented parties tend to focus on efficient systems and reducing compliance burdens.
  • More interventionist parties tend to emphasise public investment, stronger government coordination and environmental protection.

3. Keeping rural communities viable

A major rural concern is not only farming profitability but whether people can access:

  • doctors and emergency care,
  • schools,
  • broadband and mobile coverage,
  • transport links,
  • banking and government services.

The parties differ less on the goal of maintaining rural communities than on the method:

  • National/ACT: growth, investment and reducing barriers for businesses.
  • Labour: stronger public-service investment.
  • NZ First: regional advocacy and protecting smaller towns.
  • Greens/Te Pāti Māori: community resilience, equity and environmental sustainability.

For a side-by-side comparison of specific policies as they are released, election policy comparison tools such as Policy.nz compile party positions by topic. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties differ on farming, biosecurity and access to services in rural New Zealand?

In the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties differ significantly on how they approach the primary sector, environmental regulations, biosecurity funding, and the maintenance of essential services in regional and rural communities.

1. Farming and Environmental Regulations

The core debate centers around balancing primary sector productivity with environmental management, freshwater rules, and climate obligations.

  • National and ACT:
    • Approach: Focus heavily on easing regulatory burdens, cutting red tape, and rolling back what they view as unworkable rules.
    • Key Policies: National has championed replacing the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management, simplifying intensive winter grazing rules, and keeping agriculture permanently out of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). ACT similarly emphasizes property rights, opposes the Zero Carbon Act targets, and pushes to scrap Te Mana o te Wai freshwater hierarchy elements in favor of localized catchment group support.
  • Labour and the Green Party:
    • Approach: Emphasize a sustainable, climate-resilient agricultural economy that holds the primary sector accountable for emissions and water quality.
    • Key Policies: They argue that failing to price agricultural emissions or properly protect waterways exacerbates climate-driven natural disasters and damages New Zealand’s clean, green export brand. They support binding freshwater standards, Indigenous biodiversity protection, and structured pathways to lower on-farm emissions.
  • New Zealand First:
    • Approach: Position themselves as a pragmatic voice for provincial and primary industries, supporting export-led growth while seeking to protect regional infrastructure and domestic food security against excessive bureaucratic oversight.

2. Biosecurity

Biosecurity is vital for protecting New Zealand's export-driven economy from foreign pests and diseases (such as Mycoplasma bovis or foot-and-mouth disease).

  • Centre-Right Parties (National, ACT, NZ First): Generally emphasize bolstering border risk management alongside industry partnerships. They favor practical, cost-effective biosecurity co-governance models with farmers and growers, ensuring that border checks and offshore surveillance are tightly aligned with primary sector economic priorities.
  • Centre-Left/Green Parties: Emphasize robust, fully funded state-backed biosecurity and quarantine systems. They connect biosecurity closely to climate resilience, ecosystem health, and indigenous biosecurity—arguing that environmental degradation weakens natural defenses against invasive species, pathogens, and wilding pines.

3. Access to Services in Rural New Zealand

Access to healthcare, education, transport, and law enforcement in remote or low-density regions is a major flashpoint.

  • ACT: Proposes specific rural-focused solutions, such as boosting rural policing (e.g., targeted patrol hours), implementing an "Open Seat" rule to protect rural school bus routes, and expanding the scope of rural pharmacists to treat common ailments and ease pressure on distant general practices. They also back infrastructure funding driven by fiscal restraint in Wellington.
  • National: Focuses on infrastructure repair and regional workforce pipelines—such as backing regional medical training initiatives (e.g., the Waikato Medical School proposal) to supply rural doctors and nurses, alongside streamlining local infrastructure and roading repairs after adverse weather events.
  • Labour and the Green Party: Emphasize public-sector delivery of core services. They argue that market-driven or decentralised models fail regional areas, and advocate for stronger government investment in public health networks, regional public transport, community-led infrastructure, and climate adaptation funds to support isolated towns facing environmental risks.

How do you think these different approaches would impact your own local community or business priorities in the regions?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties differ on farming, biosecurity and access to services in rural New Zealand?

Ahead of the November 7, 2026 New Zealand general election, rural communities, farming, and environmental sustainability have taken center stage in political debate. Major industry groups (such as Federated Farmers, DairyNZ, and Beef + Lamb New Zealand) have actively engaged political parties on key issues.

The approaches of the major political parties regarding farming, carbon/land use, biosecurity, and rural access to services show distinct ideological differences:

1. Farming, Emissions, and Land Use

  • National (Incumbent/Centre-Right): Focuses on protecting productive farmland from wholesale conversion into carbon forestry. National maintains that agriculture should stay out of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and has pledged no new taxes for farmers, emphasizing property rights and regulatory relief.
  • Labour (Centre-Left): Supports an urgent review of the ETS to disincentivize the conversion of productive sheep and beef farms into pine forests for carbon offsets. Labour has stated it will limit full farm-to-forest conversions and ruled out putting agriculture into the ETS or applying a capital gains tax to working farms, while pressing for practical freshwater and environmental targets. [RNZ]
  • ACT (Libertarian/Right): Advocates for minimal bureaucratic intervention, strong property rights, and lowering compliance costs for farmers. ACT heavily opposes heavy-handed climate pricing or rules on agriculture, favoring free-market adjustments.
  • Green Party (Left): Stands apart from the consensus by arguing that agricultural emissions must be priced under the ETS. The Greens propose taking forestry out of the ETS entirely to fix structural market distortions, pushing instead for a rapid transition toward regenerative farming and strict ecological boundaries. [RNZ]
  • New Zealand First (Populist/Centre-Right): Focuses strongly on regional and primary sector advocacy, pushing back against regulatory overreach from Wellington, protecting farming viability, and ensuring regional economic resilience.

2. Biosecurity

  • Biosecurity remains a core pillar managed via the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI), with joint focus across parties on protecting New Zealand's borders against high-risk incursions like Mycoplasma bovis , foot-and-mouth disease, and unwanted fruit flies.
  • Centre-right and incumbent parties (National, ACT, NZ First) emphasize border risk-management in tandem with export market protection, industry co-funding frameworks (Government-Industry Agreement), and operational efficiency at ports and airports.
  • Greens and Labour tend to emphasize resourcing for frontline biosecurity officers, climate-change-driven biosecurity threats (such as new invasive pests and diseases migrating southward due to warming temperatures), and strengthening ecological surveillance systems.

3. Access to Services in Rural New Zealand

  • Health and Education: Rural access to reliable healthcare (including GP shortages, rural maternity services, and emergency response times) and maintaining local rural schools are key battlegrounds.
  • National and the coalition government lean toward pragmatic regional infrastructure investments and operational funding, though rural advocacy groups frequently criticize all major parties for slow improvements in regional medical staffing.
  • Labour, the Greens, and NZ First place a heavier emphasis on direct public funding for regional and remote public services, arguing that market-led models fail rural communities. NZ First specifically campaigns on retaining regional infrastructure, local bank/service presence, and backing provincial economies.
  • Digital and Transport Connectivity: Reliable rural broadband (RBI) and cellular coverage, alongside the maintenance of local roads and bridges damaged by extreme weather events, remain universally acknowledged priorities. While all parties agree on the necessity of transport and digital connectivity to keep primary industries functioning, they differ on funding mechanisms—with the right favoring public-private partnerships and targeted regional funds, and the left favoring direct state-led capital expenditure.

You can track detailed, evolving candidate and party policy comparisons on platforms like Policy.nz or official electoral updates via Elections NZ. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties differ on farming, biosecurity and access to services in rural New Zealand?

AI Overview

As the 7 November 2026 New Zealand general election approaches, the major political parties present starkly different pathways for rural Aotearoa.

At the national level, the debate centers on the balance between economic deregulation and environmental sustainability, safeguarding primary exports, and improving basic infrastructure across rural communities.

🚜 Farming & Agricultural Regulation

The split on farming centers on regulation, emissions pricing, and taxation.

  • National: Focuses on rolling back compliance costs and preserving farm profitability. National highlights its removal of agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), its ban on full farm-to-forestry conversions to preserve farmland, and a 20% asset tax deduction for farmers. They pledge "no new taxes" for the sector.

  • ACT: Campaigning on the slogan "make farming fun again," ACT pushes for aggressive deregulation. They pledge to scrap the Zero Carbon Act , remove Te Mana o te Wai water rules from resource consenting, and eliminate "pointless red tape" dictated by Wellington.

  • Labour: Adopting a "listen and learn" approach, Labour has made a major policy shift by dropping its 18-year promise to price agricultural emissions. They explicitly state that their proposed targeted capital gains tax will exempt family farms. However, they plan to tightly review the broader ETS to address cheap forestry offsets.

  • Green Party: Focuses heavily on a sustainable transition. The Greens advocate for tighter standards on agricultural pollution, a wealth tax targeting high-value farms (above $10 million), and a cap on synthetic nitrogen fertilisers. They intend to provide financial incentives to transition rural economies away from heavy industrial animal farming.

  • New Zealand First: Rejects environmental constraints in favor of an economic growth strategy. NZ First opposes new taxes and instead pushes a 20% company tax rate for smaller businesses (turnover under $30m) to alleviate economic pressure on rural commercial entities.

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Has proposed a controversial 0.5% annual rural land value tax to fund a citizen's income. This has drawn criticism from farming groups like Federated Farmers who argue it penalizes fixed assets regardless of actual farm profitability.

🛡️ Biosecurity

Biosecurity remains rated as the top priority by agribusiness leaders to protect New Zealand's export reputation.

  • National & ACT (Current Coalition): The coalition emphasizes modernizing the infrastructure. Current Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard (ACT) and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay (National) have moved to update the Biosecurity Act 1993 to speed up emergency threat responses and protect primary industry borders. National has also boasted increased funding ($109 million) specifically aimed at wilding pine eradication.

  • Labour: Strongly agrees that border protections are vital to support the primary sector. Spokesperson Jo Luxton has criticized the coalition's broader environmental policies but aligns with the baseline need for stringent biosecurity to satisfy international free trade agreements.

  • Green Party: Links biosecurity tightly to overall biodiversity protection and climate resilience, arguing that climate change actively worsens pest and disease risks to the native ecosystem and rural economies.

🏥 Access to Rural Services & Infrastructure

The delivery of healthcare, education, connectivity, and law enforcement varies between regional investment models and targeted operational deregulation.

Party Key Policy / Focus Area for Rural Services
National Funding Rural Support Trusts and progressing construction on the Waikato Medical School to specifically train and place doctors/nurses into rural communities.
ACT Introducing a rural workforce visa ; creating a dedicated rural crime unit with 100,000 extra patrol hours; easing rules on agricultural drones; and allowing 24-hour e-lockers for easier rural medicine collection.
NZ First Focused on physical connectivity and hard infrastructure. They advocate for heavy regional investment into rural roads, telecommunications, water storage, irrigation, and flood protection.
Labour Pledging to boost core public service funding, including ring-fencing revenue from their proposed targeted capital gains tax specifically to upgrade health services and local hospital infrastructure nationwide.

For comprehensive, up-to-date tracking of individual campaign releases as the election nears, you can compare detailed items across the RNZ Election Policy Guide 2026 and the interactive Policy.nz 2026 Tracker.

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account