Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, the clearest differences are around who should control education decisions, how strongly Te Tiriti should shape schools, and whether Māori-medium education and te reo Māori should be actively expanded or left more to parental/school choice.

One important current fact: the Waitangi Tribunal’s September 2026 report found that aspects of the Government’s curriculum reforms breached Treaty principles, including partnership and active protection of te reo, tikanga and mātauranga Māori. It specifically recommended renewed partnership with Māori in designing Māori-medium and kaupapa Māori curriculum. Tribunal releases report on the reform of the national curriculum | Waitangi Tribunal

At a glance

Party Māori-medium / kaupapa Māori education Te reo Māori Support for children at school Te Tiriti & Māori participation
National Supports Māori-medium provision and says Budget 2026 includes support for it; current government has continued funding for Māori-medium/kaupapa Māori schools. Budget invests in the future of te reo Māori | National Party Teacher training and resources, including Te Ataarangi for 50,000 teachers and new Māori-language curriculum resources. Māori education package and draft curriculum release as school starts | National Party Strong emphasis on literacy, numeracy, attendance and achievement; Budget 2026 includes $268m over four years for student-support programmes and $213m for school lunches. Student support - Ministry of Education Has removed the former statutory requirement for school boards to give effect to Te Tiriti and is reviewing/reducing some Treaty references in legislation. Ensuring Treaty references are consistent | National Party
Labour Says it would work in partnership with Māori and restore stronger Māori leadership in education. Release: Labour will partner with Māori in education Explicitly supports restoring Te Tiriti commitments in schools and says it will work with kura and communities to strengthen reo and Māori education. Release: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schools Emphasises evidence-based curriculum, stability, expert assessment, and parental confidence; its wider 2026 programme includes Māori-led employment/training support. Release: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s education Would restore the school-board obligation to give effect to Te Tiriti and describes Māori partnership in education as a commitment. Release: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schools
Green Strong support for Māori-led education and Te Tiriti-centred approaches; its manifesto puts rangatiratanga and community power at the centre. Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Proposes $50m extra per year: $30m for continuous te reo professional development for teachers and $20m for Te Taura Whiri and Te Mātāwai. Ake, Ake, Ake: Green Party commits $200m to the future of te reo Māori - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Broader approach centred on social support, community services and reducing material hardship alongside education. Commits to putting Te Tiriti at the heart of government and strengthening rangatiratanga of iwi and hapū. Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
Te Pāti Māori The strongest emphasis on Māori-led education authority, Māori governance and Māori solutions; wants barriers to education removed and mātauranga Māori properly embedded. Policy - Te Pāti Māori Wants to strengthen and normalise te reo Māori everywhere, with community-led revitalisation and greater state accountability. Policy - Te Pāti Māori Frames education around identity, belonging, hauora, Māori potential and whānau authority, alongside academic success. Maipi-Clarke Backs Tribunal Scrutiny of Education Reform - Te Pāti Māori Proposes substantially stronger Māori constitutional participation: an independent Te Tiriti Commission, binding Waitangi Tribunal recommendations and a $220m Matike Mai Fund. TE PĀTI MĀORI LAUNCHES TE TIRITI ENTRENCHMENT POLICY - Te Pāti Māori
ACT Supports parental/school choice rather than statutory Māori/Treaty requirements; charter schools are a major part of its approach. ACT New Zealand Schools can teach te reo and tikanga, but ACT opposes compulsory Treaty-related requirements and stresses choice. ACT New Zealand Very strong focus on literacy, numeracy, attendance, testing, accountability and alternative schooling. It also has policies on cheaper uniforms and school-bus access. ACT New Zealand Favours a more uniform conception of citizenship and has opposed statutory Treaty obligations in schools; its 2026 policy proposes constitutional principles including equality before the law. ACT New Zealand
NZ First Emphasises a common education system and compulsory attendance rather than Māori-specific governance. Its published material strongly criticises what it describes as “indoctrination” in schools. For the Nation, the Whole Nation, and Nothing but the Nation - NZ First Its current policy direction puts considerably more emphasis on English as a common national language; its English Language Bill passed first reading in 2026. English Language Bill passes first reading - New Zealand First Strong emphasis on attendance, basic literacy/numeracy and parental responsibility. For the Nation, the Whole Nation, and Nothing but the Nation - NZ First Proposes a binding referendum on whether the Māori seats should continue and has historically opposed co-governance and Māori-specific constitutional arrangements. NZ First Bill to Enable Binding Referendum on Māori Seats at 2026 Election - New Zealand First

The Māori-medium question

If having a strong Māori-medium pathway available to your children is central, there is an important distinction between supporting existing provision and changing who has power over it.

Māori-medium/kaupapa Māori education is already separately funded: schools and kura with Level 1–2 Māori immersion students receive dedicated operational funding, while Māori-language programmes at immersion Levels 1–4 receive language-programme funding. Kaupapa Māori education and Māori-medium education support funding - Ministry of Education

National's current government has added teacher-development and curriculum resources, including a new te reo training programme for 50,000 teachers. Māori education package and draft curriculum release as school starts | National Party But the Waitangi Tribunal has found that the curriculum reform process did not adequately involve Māori and recommended returning to genuine partnership in developing Te Marautanga o Aotearoa, the Māori-medium curriculum. Tribunal releases report on the reform of the national curriculum | Waitangi Tribunal

Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori are more explicit about Māori participation in determining Māori education, rather than simply providing Māori content within a centrally determined system. Labour specifically says it will enable greater Māori leadership over Māori education. Release: Labour will partner with Māori in education Te Pāti Māori goes further, proposing a Māori-led education authority and Māori governance of education. Policy - Te Pāti Māori

ACT and NZ First take a different approach: their emphasis is on common academic standards, parental choice, attendance and avoiding compulsory Treaty-related requirements. ACT explicitly says schools can choose how much te reo Māori and tikanga they teach, but should not be legally required to do so. ACT New Zealand

If your priority is support for your child at school

There are actually two different questions worth separating:

  1. “Will my child get effective academic and learning support?”
  2. “Will my child be supported to succeed as Māori?”

The parties weight those differently.

The current government's education programme has put substantial money into learning support. Budget 2025, for example, funded around 650 additional Learning Support Coordinator teacher-equivalents, while Budget 2026 includes additional funding for teacher aides, attendance support and healthy lunches. Learning support - Ministry of Education

ACT puts particularly strong emphasis on measurable academic outcomes, attendance, testing, parental information and school choice. ACT New Zealand

Labour combines academic standards with a more explicitly Treaty-based and Māori-partnership approach. Its proposed independent curriculum/assessment body is intended to give schools more stability and reduce politically driven curriculum changes. Release: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s education

Te Pāti Māori and the Greens put more emphasis on the cultural, social and material conditions surrounding learning—identity, whānau, community control, hauora and Māori-led provision—rather than treating academic achievement as the sole measure of educational success. Policy - Te Pāti Māori

And for a working whānau, cost matters too

Your question isn't only about education ideology. The practical household question is what happens to the family's weekly budget and the services children rely on.

For example, Labour's 2026 platform includes a $20 weekly public-transport cap, free prescriptions and three free GP visits a year. Labour's 2026 Election Policies National is emphasising lower taxes, grocery competition, keeping rates affordable and household energy costs. 2026 Election Policy | National Party

Those are separate from the Māori-education question, so I'd avoid assuming that a party's position on Te Tiriti tells you what its policies will mean for your household finances.

A useful way to compare them

Given the things you've identified, I'd put the issues into four separate columns when reading party policies:

  • Tamariki: literacy/numeracy, attendance, learning support, lunches, uniforms, transport and wellbeing.
  • Reo: availability and resourcing of Māori-medium/kura kaupapa pathways and support for te reo in mainstream schools.
  • Rangatiratanga: whether Māori, iwi, hapū, whānau and kura have meaningful decision-making power over Māori education.
  • Whānau budget: taxes, wages, housing, food, transport, healthcare and other services that affect what is left in the household each week.

That avoids reducing the choice to a single “pro-Māori/anti-Māori” spectrum. The parties are making different trade-offs between central standards, parental choice, Māori authority, Treaty obligations and state-funded support.

If you want, I can next make this much more practical by comparing National vs Labour vs Greens vs Te Pāti Māori vs ACT vs NZ First on a working Māori household in Hamilton/Waikato, including taxes, wages, housing, groceries, transport, health, school costs, Māori services and local decision-making—with the 2026 policies and their likely stated household effects side by side.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

As a Māori parent in a working household navigating the 2026 general election, balancing the household budget, supporting your children’s schooling, and upholding Te Tiriti o Waitangi are likely at the front of your mind.

Political parties present distinct philosophies and approaches to Māori-medium education, te reo Māori, and school support. Below is an overview of how the political spectrum compares on these issues.


1. Māori-Medium Education and Self-Determination (Tino Rangatiratanga)

Parties differ sharply on whether Māori education should be directed by mainstream government agencies or governed via independent, Māori-led authorities.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates strongly for tino rangatiratanga in education. A cornerstone of their policy platform is the creation of an independent Māori Education Authority, designed to shift control, funding, and decision-making back to Māori to better support kura kaupapa and wharekura.
  • The Green Party: Focuses heavily on expanding and securing long-term, baseline funding for kaupapa Māori providers across early childhood and schooling. They emphasize removing structural barriers for whānau and strengthening Māori governance in education.
  • Labour Party: Historically supports resourcing growth in Māori-medium and immersion pathways, emphasizing partnership models through the Ministry of Education rather than separate statutory authorities.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First: Generally favor centralizing educational standards through mainstream agencies (such as the Ministry of Education and the Education Review Office). They tend to emphasize standardized curriculum delivery (like structured literacy and numeracy) across all schools, while National has rolled out targeted resource packages for kura (such as specific pāngarau and Te Reo Rangatira resources) without devolving structural governance into a separate authority.

2. Te Reo Māori in Schools

The integration and normalization of te reo Māori across the education sector see a divide between embedding language revitalization and focusing strictly on core English-medium academic basics.

  • Te Pāti Māori and the Greens: Support significant funding boosts for te reo Māori initiatives, viewing language revitalization as a core Tiriti obligation. They push for compulsory or deeply integrated te reo pathways and sustained backing for community-led language learning.
  • Labour: Supports initiatives that integrate te reo into the broader curriculum and resources teacher capability, aligning with a bilingual or bicultural public service framework.
  • National-led Government/Coalition Parties: Current implementation includes targeted support for teacher capability (such as digital language training modules for teachers) and curriculum resources. However, parties like ACT and NZ First are generally critical of broad public sector or educational "biculturalism" requirements, favoring a primary focus on core academic subjects (English, mathematics, and science) and opposing race-based policy prioritization.

3. Support for Children at School and Household Costs

For working households juggling the cost of living, school support policies intersect directly with household budgets and student wellbeing.

  • Support Services & Wellbeing: Parties on the left (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) strongly back universal or targeted programs like school lunches (Ka Ora, Ka Ako) and in-school health/social services, viewing them as essential for working families and student achievement. Center-right parties (National, ACT) lean toward maintaining targeted support where need is highest or focusing heavily on academic metrics, structured learning hours, and attendance enforcement.
  • Cost of Living Relief: While broader economic policies vary, cost-of-living pressures are addressed through different mechanisms—such as Te Pāti Māori’s policy to remove GST from basic food items like kai, versus National and ACT’s focus on tax relief and adjustments to thresholds.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

  • If you prioritize independent Māori governance (tino rangatiratanga) and expanded funding for kura: Look toward Te Pāti Māori or the Green Party.
  • If you prioritize bicultural integration within the public system alongside mainstream resourcing: Look toward Labour.
  • If you prioritize standardized core curriculum, structured resource toolkits, and mainstream accountability: Look toward National (with coalition partners ACT and NZ First emphasizing core basics and opposing separate ethnic governance models).

Are there specific household cost policies or local service supports you would like to compare next?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

Navigating the 2026 general election as a Māori parent juggling household costs and a commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi means looking closely at how different political blocs view self-determination (tino rangatiratanga), public spending, and support for tamariki.

The political landscape splits largely into two distinct approaches regarding te reo Māori, Māori-medium education, and broader support systems for working households. You can review detailed, platform-by-platform breakdowns on tools like Policy.nz or RNZ's Policy Guide.


1. Te Pāti Māori & The Greens (Mana Māori & Left-Aligned Bloc)

  • Māori Education Authority: Te Pāti Māori advocates for the establishment of an independent Māori Education Authority (Mana Motuhake in education) to shift full decision-making power and resourcing over Māori education into Māori hands.
  • Te Reo Māori: Strongly support making te reo Māori a core curriculum subject through Year 10 and reversing public sector renamings. [RNZ]
  • Support for Tamariki & Household Costs: Propose expanding free or low-cost provisions for families, including free school lunches, free public transport for students, and free school counselling, alongside broader economic interventions like community food funds to combat cost-of-living pressures for working whānau.
  • Te Tiriti stance: Position Te Tiriti o Waitangi as the foundational constitutional base and oppose any legislative attempts to redefine or restrict Treaty principles.

2. Labour (Centre-Left)

  • Māori-Led & Regional Support: Focuses on targeted funding and grants for Māori-led training and educational pathways, including funding routed through marae and iwi trusts. They generally push back against wholesale structural overhaul of NCEA/curriculums in favour of stability. [RNZ]
  • Te Reo Māori: Generally supportive of integrating te reo and Aotearoa New Zealand histories deeply into the public school curriculum, though more moderate in structural devolution than Te Pāti Māori.
  • Support for Tamariki & Household Costs: Champions universal or targeted state-backed safety nets for families, defending baseline welfare and nutritional support programs in schools against recent scaling-back.

3. National, ACT & NZ First (Centre-Right / Current Government Bloc)

  • Focus on Mainstream Achievement & English Standards: Emphasise standardized testing (such as regular reading, writing, and math reporting), structured literacy, and teacher authority in classrooms. They argue that core academic basics should take priority over structural identity-based reorganisations.
  • Te Reo Māori & Public Institutions: Have pursued policies to scale back the usage of te reo Māori names in core government departments and public service branding (for instance, removing the reo subtitle from the school lunch programme), arguing for common English-language accessibility.
  • Support for Tamariki & Household Costs: Restructured the school lunch programme (Ka Ora, Ka Ako) via cost-efficiency measures, which drew criticism from opposition parties over meal quality, while favouring broad economic relief via tax adjustments over targeted demographic spending.
  • Te Tiriti stance: NZ First and ACT explicitly advocate for reviewing or replacing references to "Treaty principles" in legislation with strict, defined parameters or alternative frameworks, contrasting sharply with the principle of co-design and partnership.

Key Questions to Weigh for Your Whānau

  • Decision-Making: Do you prefer a system moving toward an independent Māori Education Authority (tino rangatiratanga), or do you favour centralized, mainstream educational governance?
  • Resourcing vs. Cost of Living: How do you weigh parties offering direct universal services for tamariki (free lunches, transport, counselling) against those focusing on broad economic management and tax settings? [RNZ]
  • Cultural Place: Does a party's stance on protecting or rolling back te reo Māori in public life align with your household’s values regarding identity and Te Tiriti?
Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

AI Overview

For the upcoming 2026 New Zealand General Election on November 7, the major political parties offer distinct approaches to Māori-medium education, te reo Māori, and student support. The political landscape is broadly split between left-leaning parties advocating for Māori-led governance and expanded language mandates, and right-leaning coalition parties focusing on baseline academic standards, mainstream curriculum reforms, and alternative schooling models.

The primary policy differences relevant to working whānau are outlined below.


Core Policy Comparison

Party Māori-Medium & Governance Te Reo Māori in Schools Student Support & Welfare
Te Pāti Māori Establish a Māori Education Authority to return decision-making to Māori communities. Make te reo Māori a core, compulsory subject through Year 10. Expand school lunches, provide free public transport for students , and offer free school counselling.
Labour Fund Māori-led trades training ($21m/year) via marae and iwi trusts. Support the integration of te reo and Aotearoa history, but freeze current curriculum overhauls. Protect the targeted Ka Ora, Ka Ako (School Lunches) program and reduce student loan repayment rates.
Greens Support localized, iwi-led education and structural funding equity. Push for systemic embedding of te reo Māori and Te Tiriti throughout the standard curriculum. Increase school operations grants by 10% , reduce class sizes to 20, and support free student transit.
National Support iwi-led charter options under the new model but focus heavily on state-wide standards. Focus on baseline literacy and numeracy; limit language mandates in general public settings. Maintain targeted school lunch efficiencies; ban or strictly limit device screen time for Years 1–3.
ACT Championed the restoration of Charter Schools , allowing iwi/private groups to bypass Ministry rules. Strongly oppose any compulsory te reo mandates in standard schools. Give teachers legal power to remove disruptive students; cap compulsory branded uniform items to 3 to cut costs.
NZ First Support mainstream adjustments; historically neutral/skeptical on charter school expansion. Oppose language requirements; promote a single national curriculum focused on core subjects. Focus on standard classroom discipline and basic funding allocations.

Key Themes for Māori Working Households

1. Educational Governance & Self-Determination

  • Māori-Led Systems: Te Pāti Māori is campaigning on an autonomous Māori Education Authority. This body would give iwi and Māori communities total oversight over funding and curriculum for kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa, and wharekura.

  • The Charter School Alternative: The ACT -driven charter school model (strongly backed by the right-wing coalition) allows iwi and corporate entities to establish schools outside standard Ministry of Education constraints. While Te Pāti Māori and Labour oppose the market-driven nature of charter schools, some iwi have utilized the framework to launch kaupapa Māori classrooms.

2. Te Reo Māori Mandates

  • Compulsory vs. Optional: Te Pāti Māori and the Greens want te reo Māori embedded firmly as a core, mandatory subject into secondary schooling.

  • Focus on the Basics: Conversely, National , ACT , and NZ First oppose mandatory language inclusion. They prefer a "back to basics" approach centered strictly on English literacy, science, and math, having already moved to reduce reo-centric naming conventions across government entities.

3. Household Costs and Student Support

  • Everyday Whānau Expenses: For working households, practical costs are a major battlefield. ACT has introduced policies specifically targeting the "ridiculous cost" of school uniforms by capping branded requirements. Te Pāti Māori and the Greens approach the cost-of-living crisis by offering systemic waivers, such as making public transport entirely free for school-aged tamariki.

  • School Lunches: The Ka Ora, Ka Ako school lunch program remains a point of contention. Left-leaning parties wish to expand its universal reach, while right-leaning parties advocate for strictly targeted, lower-cost alternative delivery models to save taxpayer funds.


If you want to look closer at specific parts of these platforms, let me know:

  • Do you want to see the details of how household tax changes or FamilyBoost childcare rebates vary between these parties?

  • Would you like more information on how the parties differ regarding Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations in local governance?

  • Are your tamariki in mainstream schooling or a kaupapa Māori/medium environment?

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account