Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

For a sole parent with a preschool child, the most important election-policy question is not simply “who gives families more?” It is how much of an extra dollar earned from work you actually get to keep after benefit abatement, tax credits and childcare costs.

The 2026 election is on 7 November 2026. New Zealand Parliament dissolved ahead of tight November vote

First, the current system you would be voting to change or retain

As at 2026:

That means there are actually three moving pieces when you consider taking another shift: your wages, the reduction in your main benefit, and changes in childcare/WFF entitlement.

What the major parties' positions mean for your situation

Party What is particularly relevant to a sole parent working part-time
National More emphasis on getting beneficiaries into work while retaining the existing targeted welfare structure. Its 2026 Budget allocated $93.3m to help 25,000 sole parents find work. National also retains/expands FamilyBoost, currently up to $120/week, and has increased the in-work tax credit temporarily to $147/week for eligible working families. Incentivising work and independence | National Party
Labour Labour has historically put more emphasis on making part-time work pay through a higher earnings threshold and expanding family assistance. Its previous policy raised the benefit abatement threshold to $160/week and provided Training Incentive Allowance support, including childcare costs for eligible sole parents. Carmel Sepuloni: Backing families to get ahead - NZ Labour Party Labour's current 2026 platform emphasises cost-of-living measures, but I have not found a newly announced 2026 policy replacing the current $160 Sole Parent Support threshold, so I would not treat that older proposal as a new election promise. Labour's 2026 Election Policies
Green Party The Greens propose a much larger restructuring of income support rather than small adjustments to the current benefit system. Their Income Guarantee model has proposed a family payment of up to $215/week for the first child and $135 for subsequent children, alongside a universal Best Start payment. Green Party will end child poverty - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand They also propose making ECE substantially cheaper: their 2025 plan proposed $10/day initially and free ECE, with 35 hours/week, by 2029. Green Budget: Early Childhood Education for Everyone - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
ACT ACT's approach is substantially more conditional. Its 2026 welfare policy proposes mandatory electronic money management for people on Jobseeker Support who remain on a work-ready benefit for more than four months, restricting spending to specified essentials including rent, groceries, power, transport, health and childcare. ACT New Zealand ACT is also campaigning to extend its broader welfare reforms, including stronger work expectations for people receiving benefits. ACT New Zealand
NZ First Its particularly relevant 2026 proposal is a $5,000-a-year Kiwi Kids Grant for each of a family's first three children, for their first three years, tax-free and in addition to existing support. At least one parent must be a New Zealand citizen. NZFirst Announces Policy to Encourage Kiwis To Have More Kids - New Zealand First For a preschooler older than three, that particular payment would no longer apply.

The practical differences

If your main problem is “I could take another shift, but the extra wages largely disappear”:

Labour's historical approach is particularly relevant because it has explicitly targeted the benefit abatement point. Under today's rules, the first $160/week of wages is protected, then the marginal deduction becomes significant. Sole parent support - deduction tables | Work and Income

The Greens' approach goes further by proposing a substantially different income-support structure, rather than relying so heavily on the distinction between “beneficiary” and “working family.” Green Party will end child poverty - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

National's approach is more focused on helping sole parents into employment while keeping targeted welfare, rather than promising a major relaxation of the benefit-abatement system. Incentivising work and independence | National Party

ACT's direction is the clearest shift toward stronger work expectations and conditions attached to welfare, rather than increasing the generosity of the safety net. ACT New Zealand

If childcare is the thing stopping you increasing your hours:

The Green proposal is the most structural: it would move towards very low-cost/free ECE rather than principally reimbursing parents after they have paid fees. Green Budget: Early Childhood Education for Everyone - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

National's current approach is FamilyBoost. It is potentially significant — up to $120/week — but you pay the ECE provider first and claim the rebate through Inland Revenue. How much FamilyBoost can you claim

The existing Childcare Subsidy is particularly important for a low-income sole parent because it can operate alongside the benefit and is specifically designed around childcare costs associated with work. Benefit rates at 1 April 2026 | Work and Income

If your concern is being required to work more hours than are realistically compatible with preschool care:

This is where the parties differ in philosophy as much as dollars. National and ACT place greater emphasis on moving people from benefits into employment; ACT's stated position is particularly explicit about work expectations. Incentivising work and independence | National Party Labour and the Greens place more emphasis on removing the financial barriers that make taking work worthwhile, including childcare and benefit-abatement settings. Carmel Sepuloni: Backing families to get ahead - NZ Labour Party

One particularly important trap when comparing policies

Don't compare a party's headline childcare payment with another party's headline benefit payment.

For your circumstances, I'd compare each party against this calculation:

Extra take-home pay from another shift − extra childcare − benefit lost − lost/changed tax credits + any new childcare/family payment

For example, under today's Sole Parent Support rules, going from $150 to $250 of weekly earnings doesn't mean you simply gain $100: the portion above $160 starts reducing your benefit. Sole parent support - deduction tables | Work and Income And once you cross into different Working for Families/benefit territory, the interaction becomes more complicated. Government payments that affect your Working for Families

So the marginal dollar is probably more important to you than the headline weekly benefit rate.

What I'd put on your election checklist

Rather than telling you which party to vote for, these are the five questions I'd use to compare their policies against your actual life:

  1. At what weekly earnings does my benefit start reducing?
  2. How quickly does the benefit reduce as my hours increase?
  3. Does childcare assistance rise with the hours I work, or do I have to absorb more of the childcare cost myself?
  4. At what point do I lose Family Tax Credit/other support or become eligible for in-work assistance?
  5. Are the work requirements compatible with having a preschool child and limited affordable childcare?

Those questions will often produce a much more useful comparison for a sole parent than the parties' general claims about “supporting families”.

One other thing worth watching: National's current FamilyBoost rules are already quite different from the original scheme — the rebate was increased from 25% to 40%, the maximum from $75 to $120/week, and the income threshold substantially increased. Wedd's Weekly - 30 July 2026 | National Party So comparisons using 2023 campaign material can be misleading.

If you give me roughly how much you earn per hour, how many hours you currently work, your weekly rent, and roughly what your preschool childcare costs per week, I can turn this into a worked $-per-week comparison of the current system versus each party's relevant 2026 proposals without making a recommendation about how you should vote.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

For a sole parent renting, working part-time, and raising a preschooler, the political landscape and party policies center heavily on childcare costs, benefit abatement thresholds (how much you can earn before your support decreases), housing/accommodation support, and active employment assistance.

Evaluating how different political approaches shape your options involves looking at distinct philosophies across the political spectrum:


1. Centre-Right / Coalition Parties (e.g., National, ACT, NZ First)

  • Focus: Transitioning from welfare to work independence, targeted employment services, and managing public spending.
  • Work & Income Support Rules: Recent frameworks (such as Budget 2026 initiatives) lean toward intensive work-focused case management for sole parents and active encouragement into sustainable part-time or full-time employment as children grow. The emphasis is on "invest-to-save" programs—providing flexible funds and placement training to help clear barriers to working.
  • Abatement and Financial Incentives: Policies typically focus on making sure work pays, though abatement thresholds mean that as your part-time hours and wages increase, your Sole Parent Support abates.
  • Housing and Cost of Living: Policies adjust elements like Accommodation Support and social housing configurations, which directly impact renters, alongside broader economic management aimed at curbing inflation.

2. Centre-Left / Opposition Parties (e.g., Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori)

  • Focus: Strengthening income adequacy, bolstering public services, and reducing child poverty.
  • Income Support & Abatements: Parties on the left generally favor higher baseline benefit rates and more generous abatement thresholds. This means you could work slightly more part-time hours before your benefit is reduced as sharply, letting you keep more of your hard-earned wages.
  • Childcare and Early Childhood Education (ECE): A major constraint for a sole parent with a preschooler is the cost and availability of ECE. Left-leaning parties typically emphasize expanding public and community-based ECE provision, protecting or increasing subsidies, and reducing out-of-pocket childcare costs so that taking on extra work hours isn't entirely eaten up by childcare fees.
  • Housing: Stronger emphasis on renter protections, increasing the supply of public and social housing, and expanding targeted housing supplements to ease rental stress.

Key Questions to Ask When Reviewing Party Manifestos:

As you weigh your vote, look specifically at each party's commitments on:

  1. Abatement Rates: Do they propose letting you earn more from your part-time job before cutting your main benefit?
  2. Childcare Subsidies: What direct relief or expanded free/low-cost hours do they offer for preschool-aged children, which dictates whether extra work hours are financially viable?
  3. Accommodation Support: How do their housing policies address the realities of renting on a mixed part-time/benefit income?

Are there particular party approaches or specific types of support (like childcare subsidies vs. wage thresholds) that you are most weighing up for your family right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

For a sole parent renting, working part-time, and raising a preschooler while navigating income support (such as Sole Parent Support) and childcare, the major political parties offer distinct ideological approaches. Your balance between work and support depends heavily on how different parties approach benefit abatement rates (how much support is reduced as you earn), direct childcare subsidies, housing assistance, and general cost-of-living adjustments.

The major policy directions group into distinct approaches across the political spectrum:

  • Left / Centre-Left (e.g., Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori):

  • Income Support & Abatements: Typically focus on lifting benefit levels and increasing or broadening Working for Families credits. Historically, these parties lean toward raising or expanding the thresholds of how much you can earn part-time before your benefit abates sharply, allowing you to keep more of your hard-earned part-time income.

  • Childcare & Early Childhood Education (ECE): Generally favour increased direct investment in public/community ECE infrastructure and expanded, accessible childcare subsidies for low-to-middle-income families to reduce the upfront cost barriers of returning to work.

  • Housing & Renting: Favour stronger renters' rights, increased state/social housing builds, and higher accommodation supplements or targeted housing support to ease rental stress.

  • Centre / Centre-Right (e.g., National, ACT):

  • Work Incentives & Welfare Reform: Tend to emphasize moving beneficiaries into independent work through active employment obligations, tighter work-test requirements, and structured support or sanctions if work search/part-time expectations aren't met. Abatement structures are often designed to ensure work "pays" compared to remaining solely on a benefit, but with a firm focus on transitioning off welfare into full-time independence over time.

  • Childcare Support: Often favour market-based or targeted tax-credit mechanisms (such as childcare tax rebates or family tax credits) aimed at offsetting costs for working parents rather than expanding direct government-provisioned services.

  • Tax and Cost of Living: Focus on broad-based income tax bracket adjustments (adjusting for inflation) and macroeconomic management to reduce inflation and living costs rather than increasing benefit quantum.

  • Consequential Trade-offs for Your Situation:

  • If a party increases abatement thresholds , you can take on an extra shift or two at work without your main benefit dropping as aggressively.

  • If a party focuses on direct childcare relief or tax rebates , the net hourly gain of working part-time goes up because your out-of-pocket preschool costs decrease.

  • If a party tightens work obligations or introduces spending controls/mutual obligations for sole parents, managing the unpredictability of a preschooler's sick days alongside part-time job expectations can become more tightly monitored.

You can review specific, side-by-side party manifestos and localized commitments as they are updated on platforms like Policy.nz or The Conversation's Policy Tracker. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising

Would you like to explore how specific proposals around abatement rates (benefit clawbacks) or childcare rebates compare between the blocks, or do you want to focus on housing/accommodation assistance policies?

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

AI Overview

For a sole parent working part-time and navigating income support, the 2026 general election policies present distinct choices between the major blocks, fundamentally altering work obligations, benefit design, and financial returns.


National & ACT (Current Coalition Approach)

The current government focuses on targeted employment support paired with strict work expectations , aiming to transition sole parents off benefits.

  • Work & Income Case Management: Budget 2026 allocated $93 million over two years to expand case management and flexible barrier-removal funding specifically for sole parents. This means more intense interaction with Work and Income (MSD) to find or extend hours.

  • Income Charging Shift: An operational shift set for 2027/2028 moves income reporting from annual to weekly automated matching via Inland Revenue. This minimizes end-of-year tax debt but can cause your weekly benefit to fluctuate rapidly based on variable part-time hours.

  • Childcare and Leave: National's core 2026 family policy is expanding Paid Parental Leave (PPL) to 30 weeks by 2029. Because your child is already a preschooler, this will not impact you directly, as it targets new births.

Labour & The Green Party (Left-Lean Alternatives)

The opposition parties focus heavily on lifting baseline benefit rates, easing abatement rules, and expanding universal public services like childcare.

  • Abatement Thresholds: A key piece of the Green and Labour platforms is raising the amount you can earn from your part-time job before your Sole Parent Support begins to reduce ("abate"). Easing this rule allows you to keep more of your wages alongside your benefit.

  • Tax Relief: Under Green Party proposals, you would benefit from a tax-free first $10,000 of income. Te Pāti Māori proposes a similar low-income "Kai Credit" to reduce food tax burdens.

  • Childcare Subsidies: Left-aligned parties support increasing funding directly to Early Childhood Education (ECE) providers to ensure lower out-of-pocket costs and broader hourly subsidies for parents returning to the workforce.

New Zealand First (Coalition Partner Variant)

NZ First offers unique policies designed to incentivise parental choices and boost family income structure.

  • Working for Families Boost: Leader Winston Peters announced a policy to increase Working for Families payments by at least $120 per week, specifically mentioning a desire to help single parents keep more money and work longer hours with a better return.

  • ECE & The Kiwi Kids Grant: They have proposed a "Kiwi Kids Grant" offering a tax-free $5,000 annual payment for the first three years of a child's life. Depending on the exact age of your preschooler, this could provide an immediate lump-sum or monthly cash injection, easing the financial pressure of part-time income transitions.


Summary Comparison for a Part-Time Sole Parent

Policy Area National / ACT Labour / Greens NZ First
Approach to Work High Support / High Expectations: Increased case management to push for more hours. Income Security: Higher baseline benefits and relaxed abatement rates to let you keep more earnings. Return on Work: Specifically targeting a $120+ weekly boost to Working for Families.
Childcare / Family Cash Focus on Paid Parental Leave extension for newborns. Focus on ECE affordability and direct service funding. Kiwi Kids Grant ($5k/year tax-free up to age 3).
System Mechanics Transitioning to automated weekly income tracking via IRD data. Tax restructures including a tax-free bracket on the first $10,000–$14,000. Simplifying the overall payment structures for single parents.
Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account