Every question, every answer, every source

As of 5 October 2026, the major parties are offering quite different approaches to crime and justice. The biggest divide is over where to put the emphasis: tougher consequences and more incarceration, or prevention, rehabilitation and reducing imprisonment. The comparison below focuses on National, Labour, ACT, Greens, NZ First, Te Pāti Māori and Opportunity. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 - Policy.nz

At a glance

Party	Crime prevention	Policing	Sentencing / prisons	Rehabilitation
National	Gang suppression, consequences, targeted prevention	More visible patrols; additional specialist police	Tougher: Three Strikes, fewer sentence discounts, more prison capacity	Supports rehabilitation, but within a punishment/consequences framework
ACT	Target repeat offending and escalating behaviour; private security role	More community/rural enforcement; expanded powers	Very tough: Three Strikes for burglary, minimum 3 years/no parole on third burglary	Skills/rehabilitation programmes, especially as a condition for parole
NZ First	Youth intervention, community policing, border/drug enforcement	More police; 500 additional frontline officers proposed; rural/community policing	Mandatory minimums for some serious offences; strongly supports tougher sentencing	Rehabilitation for prisoners, including employment/licensing pathways
Labour	More emphasis on evidence-based interventions and addressing causes	Opposes what it sees as overuse of police for social problems	Opposes Three Strikes-style mandatory sentencing; retains prisons	Strong emphasis on rehabilitation; would scrap military-style youth boot camps
Greens	Strongest prevention focus: housing, mental health, addiction, violence prevention	Police remain important, but social services should deal with social problems	Reduce imprisonment; oppose Three Strikes and punitive expansion	Major expansion of rehabilitation, restorative justice and community programmes
Te Pāti Māori	Transformative/prevention-led: poverty, trauma, whānau, addiction	Shift resources from police toward communities; police body cameras	Abolish prisons by 2040; repeal many punitive laws	Māori-led justice, restorative justice, healing and community-based alternatives
Opportunity	Evidence-led early intervention	Less emphasis on simply adding police	Reduce reliance on imprisonment; specialist courts	Very strong: treatment, vocational training, post-release case management

National

National's approach is centred on deterrence, consequences, visible policing and targeting gangs/repeat offenders. It points to increased Police patrols, gang-patch restrictions and powers, restored Three Strikes, limits on sentence discounts and cumulative sentencing as key parts of its record. Restoring law and order, making New Zealand safer | National Party

For 2026, National is also proposing an Auckland transport-policing team with 50 additional sworn officers, covering trains, buses, ferries and high-risk hubs. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising

On rehabilitation, National hasn't rejected it: its position is essentially that serious/repeat offenders should face meaningful consequences while prisons and corrections also provide rehabilitation. Its overall model nevertheless puts considerably more weight on punishment and incapacitation than the Greens, Te Pāti Māori or Opportunity.

ACT

ACT goes further toward mandatory consequences for repeat offending.

Its headline 2026 proposal is "Three Strikes for burglary": a person convicted of burglary three times would receive a minimum three-year prison sentence, with no parole. ACT New Zealand

ACT is also proposing:

• giving trained and licensed private security professionals limited powers to deal with threatening or destructive behaviour;
• 100,000 additional rural patrol hours annually;
• expanded tools for rural crime;
• deportation of resident-visa holders convicted of serious crimes carrying maximum sentences of 10 years or more;
• a new offence covering coercive use of animal abuse in family violence. ACT New Zealand

ACT's broader justice programme combines longer/tougher sentences with rehabilitation. Its stated position is that people should complete skills or rehabilitation programmes before being considered for parole. ACT New Zealand

NZ First

NZ First is also firmly in the law-and-order/consequences camp.

Its published justice programme has called for:

• at least 500 new frontline police within 18 months of taking office;
• doubling Youth Aid officers;
• mandatory prison sentences for serious assaults on police, Corrections officers and first responders;
• stronger community policing, including Māori and Pasifika wardens;
• a youth-justice demerit system;
• stronger action against fleeing drivers. Policy Announcements: Law & Order and Justice, Courts & Corrections - NZ First

In the 2026 Budget, NZ First highlighted $50 million for frontline policing and $70.7 million for border security aimed partly at organised crime and illicit drugs. It also emphasises getting young people into education and work, which is relevant to its preventative approach. Budget 2026: Common sense wins for NZ First - New Zealand First

So NZ First combines more police + tougher sentencing + youth intervention, rather than the more fundamental justice-system redesign proposed by Te Pāti Māori.

Labour

Labour occupies a position between the punitive coalition parties and the more transformative Greens/Te Pāti Māori.

It opposes the government's military-style youth boot camps and says it would scrap them in favour of evidence-based interventions, therapeutic support and rehabilitation. Release: Labour will scrap National’s boot camps

On prisons, however, Labour is quite different from Te Pāti Māori: it has explicitly said it does not support abolishing prisons, describing them as necessary for corrections, rehabilitation and reducing reoffending. Election 2026: Te Pāti Māori to campaign on abolishing prisons, Labour dead-set against it - NZ Herald

Labour also opposes Three Strikes-style mandatory sentencing. Its position is that mandatory minimums can produce unjust outcomes rather than reliably reducing crime. NZ Law and Order Policy 2026 Compared

In practical terms, Labour's model is:

retain police and prisons + reject some of the coalition's harsher measures + put greater weight on rehabilitation and evidence-based youth interventions.

Green Party

The Greens have perhaps the clearest prevention-first approach among the established parliamentary parties.

Their 2026 manifesto explicitly describes its justice policy as "prevention and rehabilitation", with crime prevention focused on its underlying drivers. It proposes reforming the justice system and improving access to support, particularly for young people. Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

The Greens argue that policies addressing housing, poverty, mental health, addiction and family/sexual violence can prevent offending before it reaches the criminal-justice system. They also favour a health-based approach to drug use rather than the traditional punitive "war on drugs". Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

On sentencing, they oppose Three Strikes and a major expansion of imprisonment, arguing that incarceration can perpetuate rather than break cycles of offending. Three strikes has failed before and will fail again - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Their rehabilitation model includes restorative justice, community programmes and better reintegration, while they have also criticised solitary confinement and called for better-resourced Corrections rehabilitation. Govt must end solitary confinement - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori proposes the most radical restructuring of the justice system.

Its central 2026 proposal is to abolish prisons by 2040, replacing them progressively with community-based and community-led alternatives. It says a small number of people who pose serious risks would still require secure, highly supervised rehabilitation. Election 2026: How would Te Pāti Māori’s policy to get rid of prisons actually work? - NZ Herald

Its programme includes:

• a Māori Justice Authority;
• community-led justice and restorative approaches;
• addressing poverty, trauma and other causes of offending;
• repealing many of the government's punitive justice measures;
• closing youth residences and military-style boot camps;
• restoring Section 27 cultural reports;
• requiring Police to wear body cameras;
• increasing the Steps to Freedom payment for people leaving prison from $300 to $1,000. Election 2026: Te Pāti Māori to campaign on abolishing prisons, Labour dead-set against it - NZ Herald

The key philosophical distinction is that Te Pāti Māori wants to move resources from police and prisons toward communities and prevention, rather than simply making the existing system more effective.

Opportunity Party

Opportunity's Smart on Crime policy is particularly explicit about evidence and rehabilitation.

It proposes early intervention when children first come to the attention of Oranga Tamariki, including parenting support, mentoring and trauma counselling. It would expand specialist courts such as the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court and Te Pae Oranga, and target addiction, undiagnosed conditions and family violence as drivers of offending. Smart on Crime - The Opportunity Party

For victims, it proposes expanding restorative justice and specialist sexual-violence courts.

For people leaving prison, Opportunity proposes:

• vocational/trade training linked directly to employers;
• specialist case management;
• accommodation and employment assistance;
• sustained post-release mentoring. Smart on Crime - The Opportunity Party

It also supports regulating recreational cannabis, arguing that this would reduce organised crime and youth incarceration. Smart on Crime - The Opportunity Party

So Opportunity is much closer to the Greens on prevention and rehabilitation, but frames its programme particularly around measurable outcomes and rigorous evaluation.

The biggest policy differences

1. What actually prevents crime?

National / ACT / NZ First: deterrence, visible policing, incapacitating repeat offenders and imposing consequences.

Labour: a mixture of enforcement and prevention, with greater emphasis on evidence-based rehabilitation than the current government's approach.

Greens / Te Pāti Māori / Opportunity: prevention should address the circumstances that generate offending—particularly addiction, trauma, poverty, housing problems, mental-health issues and dysfunctional family environments. Smart on Crime - The Opportunity Party

2. Should sentences get tougher?

There is a very clear split.

National, ACT and NZ First support the current direction of tougher sentencing. National has already restored Three Strikes; ACT wants to extend a Three Strikes mechanism specifically to burglary; NZ First supports mandatory minimum sentences for some serious offences. Restoring law and order, making New Zealand safer | National Party

Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori oppose that direction, although Labour differs substantially from the latter two because it still regards prisons as necessary.

Opportunity favours alternatives and specialist courts rather than longer mandatory prison terms. Smart on Crime - The Opportunity Party

3. What role should Police have?

The National/ACT/NZ First model puts substantially more emphasis on police visibility and enforcement.

National points to increased patrols; ACT wants additional rural patrols and expanded community-security tools; NZ First has advocated substantial increases in frontline police. Restoring law and order, making New Zealand safer | National Party

The Greens, Te Pāti Māori and Opportunity don't argue that Police are unnecessary. Their difference is that they don't see adding enforcement capacity as the main answer to the underlying causes of crime.

Te Pāti Māori goes furthest in shifting resources away from police and prisons toward community-led responses. Justice - Te Pāti Māori New (Not live)

4. What should rehabilitation look like?

There is actually more cross-party agreement here than the rhetoric sometimes suggests.

Most parties support some rehabilitation. The disagreement is about how much emphasis it should receive and when:

• National/ACT/NZ First: rehabilitation alongside punishment and incarceration.
• Labour: rehabilitation and therapeutic intervention, especially for young offenders, while retaining prisons.
• Greens: rehabilitation as a central component of justice and a route away from incarceration.
• Te Pāti Māori: rehabilitation/community healing as the basis for replacing prisons.
• Opportunity: evidence-tested rehabilitation, treatment, employment and post-release support as the central crime-reduction mechanism.

Bottom line — without ranking the parties

The 2026 election presents a fairly stark choice in criminal-justice philosophy, rather than simply different versions of the same policy:

National–ACT–NZ First: prevent crime through deterrence, policing, incapacitation and tougher consequences.

Labour: retain conventional policing and prisons but put substantially more emphasis on evidence-based rehabilitation and youth intervention.

Greens–Opportunity: reduce offending primarily through prevention, treatment, restorative justice and rehabilitation, with less reliance on imprisonment.

Te Pāti Māori: fundamentally redesign the justice system around Māori/community-led justice and ultimately replace prisons with community-based alternatives.

One important caveat: a party's stated policy isn't the same thing as its demonstrated effect. For example, claims that tougher sentencing or particular rehabilitation programmes reduce crime involve empirical questions that can't be answered simply by comparing manifestos. The parties themselves disagree about the evidence, and the effects can vary substantially by type of offending.

For a systematic comparison of the published 2026 policies, Policy.nz's 2026 election policy database is useful alongside the parties' own policy documents.