Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

    815rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

    4,216rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

    17rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

    32rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

For your situation, the key distinction is between support for the older person at home, respite/back-up for an unpaid carer, and aged residential care if staying at home is no longer workable. Those are related but not the same policy area.

As of 5 October 2026, here is how the main parties’ published positions compare. I’ve focused on documented 2026 commitments rather than trying to tell you which party is preferable.

Party Home-based care Respite / unpaid carers Aged residential care
National The government has expanded Hospital in the Home and transitional/aged-care capacity, and has supported home-and-community care providers. Increased mileage rates for home and community support workers | National Party Mahi Aroha, launched in September, is an ongoing government action plan for unpaid carers, covering health/wellbeing, financial security and recognition. The government has also incorporated carers' needs and respite into disability-support assessments. New roadmap for supporting unpaid carers | National Party National's 2026 policy material is relatively light on a major new aged-care restructuring. It has expanded short-stay aged-residential capacity and recently announced retirement-village reforms. More staff, extra beds as hospitals prepare for winter | National Party
Labour Labour's 2026 election platform emphasises health-system investment and affordability, but I found no comparably specific new home-care entitlement or respite programme in its published election policies. Labour's 2026 Election Policies Its clearest care-sector commitment is restoring pay-equity legislation and giving care/support workers an immediate $4/hour increase from January 2027. That could affect the workforce available to provide care, but it isn't itself a respite entitlement for family carers. Pay Equity - NZ Labour Labour has proposed faster repayment of retirement-village money—10% within five working days and the balance within three months—but that's primarily a retirement-village consumer-protection measure rather than aged-care service provision. Release: National's retirement village policy leaves residents out of pocket
Greens The 2026 manifesto explicitly calls for better-supported home and community care workers, including fair pay and travel time, and culturally appropriate services. Seniors - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand The Greens emphasise disability support, whānau autonomy and properly funded care services. They also support restoring pay equity for about 65,000 care/support workers and funding the resulting settlement. Disability - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Greens have explicitly backed a long-term overhaul of aged care following the 2026 advisory report, including its focus on in-home and residential care. Their manifesto calls for a long-term ageing strategy and stronger community-based support. Long-term investment in aged care can't wait - delaying it will only increase the cost - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
NZ First Its current 2026 material is less specific about home-based elder care. Its 2023 aged-care policy, which remains published, focused much more heavily on residential capacity. I haven't found a new 2026 election commitment specifically establishing a larger respite entitlement for unpaid carers. NZ First has historically made aged care a prominent issue, promising 2,000 additional residential-care beds, inflation-linked provider funding and a broader inquiry into aged care. However, that is its 2023 policy, so I would not treat those numbers as a confirmed 2026 promise without a new announcement. 2023 Election Policies - NZ First
ACT I haven't found a specific 2026 ACT commitment creating a new home-care or respite entitlement for older people. Likewise, I haven't found a specific 2026 ACT promise aimed at increasing respite for unpaid family carers. ACT's publicly available 2026 material I found does not set out a major new aged-care funding programme.

One important development: the aged-care system itself is under review

This election is happening just after the release of the independent Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group's report, A Place to Grow Old. It says the existing system is fragmented, difficult to access and under financial pressure. Its recommendations include expanding and improving in-home care, better support for carers and whānau, more residential beds, and changes to assessment and funding. A Place to Grow Old: Securing the future of aged care | Ministry of Health NZ

That's significant for your circumstances because the report recognises that keeping people at home isn't simply a matter of building more rest homes: formal home support and support for the family member doing the caring are part of the solution. The Health and Disability Commissioner likewise highlighted increased access to home-based care and easier assessment of needs. Quality of care and the rights of older people must be at the centre of aged care system reform — Health & Disability Commissioner

What this means specifically for someone who works part-time and provides daily care

I'd look particularly closely at these five questions when reading party policies:

  1. How many hours of funded home help would actually be available?
    For example, personal care, meals, housework, medication assistance and regular visits.

  2. Can the unpaid carer get predictable respite?
    There's a big difference between a general promise to "support carers" and an entitlement to, say, regular replacement care that lets you work or take a break.

  3. Who qualifies?
    Age, level of dependency, income/assets and whether the person has a disability can put someone into different funding systems.

  4. What happens when a provider can't supply the hours?
    This is particularly relevant given your concern about reliable support. A nominal entitlement isn't much help if there aren't enough workers or providers.

  5. How will the care workforce be funded?
    Labour and the Greens have particularly explicit 2026 commitments around care-worker pay; National has taken measures to support home-care providers and workers, including a temporary 30% mileage-rate increase. Increased mileage rates for home and community support workers | National Party

One complication: if the older family member is receiving support through Health NZ's older-person home-support system, rather than disability support, the relevant rules are different. Health NZ currently says older people can receive funded personal care, household support and carer support following a needs assessment, and family members can in some circumstances become paid carers. Home support services for older people and others

So, rather than treating "carer policy" as one issue, I'd separate your voting comparison into (a) funded home care, (b) respite for you, (c) financial recognition of unpaid carers, and (d) residential aged care capacity. On the evidence currently published, the parties have much more clearly differentiated positions on care-worker funding and the overall direction of aged care than on a specific, guaranteed respite entitlement for someone in your exact situation.

If you tell me roughly how many hours a week you provide care and whether the older person has had a Health NZ needs assessment, I can make the comparison much more concrete—for example, "what would each party's policy potentially change for a part-time working family carer?" without recommending how you should vote.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

Balancing part-time work with daily, unpaid care for an older family member is demanding, and finding reliable support is a critical issue in the 2026 New Zealand general election.

Major political parties approach home-based care, aged care, and respite services through distinct lenses, focusing on workforce support, funding models, and systemic reform.

Key Party Approaches & Policies

  • Labour Party
    • Aged Care & Workforce: Focuses heavily on the aged care sector workforce, explicitly pledging to address pay and conditions. Labour has criticized restrictions on pay equity claims and committed to restoring fair pay processes for care and support workers to combat high turnover and understaffing.
    • Support & Dementia Care: Emphasizes supporting ageing in place, increasing local and rural capacity for dementia support services, and utilizing advisory groups (such as the Ministerial Advisory Group on aged care) to overhaul residential and community-based structures.
  • National Party
    • Health & Care Priorities: National’s broader health strategy prioritizes overall healthcare delivery, improving system efficiency, and cutting waitlists. For older New Zealanders, their approach leans toward improving healthcare access and keeping living costs manageable, though specific aged-care funding mechanisms are tied to broader economic and health sector spending targets.
  • New Zealand First
    • Aged Care Reform: Identifies aged-care reform as a major priority.
    • Ageing in Place: Focuses on better coordination between primary, community, and aged care, alongside proposals for a Seniors Housing Plan and expanded options to support older New Zealanders to age in place safely.
  • Green Party
    • System Transformation: Advocates for systemic shifts toward fully publicly funded services.
    • Workforce & Care: Proposes transitioning private aged care and palliative care services into fully funded public models, coupled with strong commitments to workforce pay equity, fair workloads, and robust leave allowances for working people and informal carers.
  • The Opportunities Party (TOP) & Te Pāti Māori
    • Prevention & Community: TOP emphasizes long-term health planning (increasing health GDP share) and primary care funding, while Te Pāti Māori centers whānau wellbeing, preventative care, and culturally safe community-led support models.

Summary Comparison for Carers

Focus Area Labour / Left-Bloc (Greens, etc.) National / Centre-Right NZ First & Others
Home & Aged Care Funding Focus on public sector expansion, increased state investment, and structural overhaul. Focus on economic management, health system efficiency, and target-driven delivery. Prioritizing targeted aged-care reform and coordination between primary and community health.
Carer & Workforce Support High emphasis on care worker pay equity, fair wages, and better working conditions to retain staff. Broader health workforce planning and economic growth to fund public services. Supporting seniors' housing options and community-based coordination to ease pressure on families.

Things to Consider When Evaluating Manifestos

As parties finalize or roll out their full campaign manifestos ahead of the election, it is worth checking their specific commitments on:

  1. Respite Funding: Dedicated funding increases or flexible voucher systems for respite care, which allow primary carers to take necessary breaks without disrupting the care recipient's routine.
  2. Carer Support Subsidies: Direct financial recognition or adjustments to the Carer Support subsidy, which has historically faced criticism for being difficult to access and inadequate to cover actual relief-care costs.

Are you looking for specific details on how these policies might impact financial support options (like the Carer Support subsidy or Supported Living payments) for working carers?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

Navigating daily unpaid care while working part-time is a heavy load, and finding reliable support systems is a central issue for many households in the 2026 New Zealand General Election. Major political parties have outlined varying approaches to senior support, home-based care, and the strained care workforce.

A breakdown of how the responding parties generally compare on these key pillars indicates distinct priorities:

  • National Party : Emphasises broader economic management, keeping housing affordable, and strengthening mainstream health services. National highlights direct financial relief options for seniors (such as expanded rates rebates and adjustments to the Accommodation Supplement) to ease overall household cost pressures, alongside general commitments to addressing aged-care sector funding and workforce constraints. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • Labour Party : Focuses heavily on lowering direct healthcare and daily living costs. Their platform features initiatives like targeted caps on public transport fares and energy cost-reduction measures to assist fixed-income seniors, alongside supporting baseline pay equity provisions for the care workforce. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • Green Party : Places a strong structural emphasis on "ageing in place" and community-based health services. They propose targeted expansion for family carer support, a state-owned and not-for-profit retirement village framework, thousands of accessible public housing units, and enhanced home-insulation/solar programmes to make living environments easier to manage. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • New Zealand First : Has positioned aged-care reform as a core policy priority. They propose a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan alongside expanded practical choices and infrastructure designed to help older New Zealanders safely remain in their communities and homes. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP) : Strongly prioritizes ageing in place, advocating for direct community-based health structures and concrete, expanded support systems for family/whānau carers. They also propose replacing current accommodation support with a universal housing payment and offering interest-free rates deferrals for older homeowners. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • ACT & Te Pāti Māori: ACT did not complete the formal Grey Power Election Policy 2026 questionnaire due to capacity constraints, while Te Pāti Māori did not respond. Generally, ACT leans towards market-led solutions and economic growth to drive individual choice, whereas Te Pāti Māori historically focuses on whānau-centred, community-led hauora (health) models. [greypowermag.co.nz]

Across the political spectrum, while most responding parties voice support for workforce pay equity and ageing-in-place principles, detailed, dedicated funding announcements specifically guaranteeing immediate respite relief and expanded daily home-support hours vary significantly by party. You can review the raw organisational questionnaires via Grey Power New Zealand or advocacy breakdowns on Inclusive World NZ.

Would you like me to look into specific party manifestos regarding carer support allocations, or explore what current respite funding/subsidies you might already be eligible for through your local Te Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) region?

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

AI Overview

Navigating the demands of part-time work alongside daily caregiving is incredibly challenging, and access to dependable respite and home support makes a massive difference.

As the November 2026 general election approaches, the major political parties have distinctly different approaches to addressing the sector. A central backdrop to this election is the August 2026 report by the Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group which called for major structural reforms, including better integrated in-home support, to alleviate pressure on family carers.

A comparison of how the political parties approach home-based care, aged care, and the workforce that delivers these services highlights their key differences:

Political Party Policies on Care and Support

Political Party Primary Stance on Aged & Home-Based Care Key Workforce & Funding Commitments
National Focuses on managing the existing system efficiently by reducing hospital waitlists and funding additional medicines. Points to a recent 4% funding uplift ($79 million) for aged residential care. Full health policy details are staggered later in the campaign. Emphasizes expanding the workforce by recruiting more doctors/nurses and expanding scopes of practice for pharmacists and physician associates. Has not supported a wealth tax to expand public care funding.
Labour Promotes an overarching "Medicard" scheme providing three free GP visits and free prescriptions to lower health costs. Commits to structural reforms for seniors, including tighter timelines for retirement village exit payouts to help families fund transitioning into aged care. Pledges to settle the care and support workers' pay equity claim by Budget 2027. Proposes funding health expansion via a targeted 28% capital gains tax on investment property profits.
Green Party Advocates for a transition of aged care and palliative care into fully funded, publicly owned services. Commits to fully funding and implementing the national Dementia Mate Wareware Action Plan over five years. Pledges to restore the previous pay equity framework and spend $1.1 billion a year to rapidly settle the discontinued pay equity claim for 65,000 care and support workers within 100 days. Funded by a proposed wealth tax.
ACT Focuses on fiscal constraint, aiming to streamline health delivery and public services. Has historically resisted structural wealth taxes or state-mandated pay equity schemes. Did not submit specific seniors' policy updates to recent sector focus questionnaires. Emphasizes driving efficiency and private-sector solutions rather than expanding direct public provision or state funding injections.
The Opportunity Party (TOP) Proposes a 10-year cross-party Health Plan to remove political volatility. Aims to heavily increase investment in primary and preventive care so more older New Zealanders can safely age at home. Seeks to lock in a legislative basis where health spending rises from 7.4% to 9% of GDP over a decade, shielding community care from budget cuts during economic downturns.

Main Points of Difference for Carers

  • Workforce Stability and Care Reliability: A major driver of unreliable home care is staff shortages and low pay. The Greens and Labour are actively campaigning on reviving or fast-tracking the care and support workers' pay equity claims that were altered by the Coalition government in 2025. They argue higher wages will stabilise the sector. National and ACT focus instead on broader immigration, workforce training, and enabling other health professionals to relieve pressure on the wider system.

  • Funding Models: The left-leaning parties (Labour , Greens) plan to fund deep healthcare extensions via new tax structures (capital gains or wealth taxes). The right-leaning parties (National , ACT) aim to find efficiencies within existing allocations and grow primary care capacity through targeted funding injections (such as Budget 2025 allocations).

If you would like to explore specific aspects further, let me know if you want to look into individual party manifestos , how they plan to address respite allocations directly , or the upcoming voter registration deadlines.

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account