Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports?

For a farm operator, the trade question is less about “free trade” in the abstract and more about whether a party’s approach is likely to support market access, export competitiveness, compliance costs, biosecurity, and the reputation of New Zealand food and fibre products. The 2026 campaign is still developing, so some positions may change. New Zealand Parliament dissolved ahead of tight November vote

Here is how the main parties’ approaches broadly compare on trade access and protecting agricultural exports:

Party Trade access / export approach Implications for agriculture
Christopher Luxon’s New Zealand National Party Emphasises export growth, business competitiveness and selling more to overseas markets. National has highlighted “New Zealand’s Next Billion Customers” as part of its economic policy direction. 2026 Election Policy | National Party Likely focus areas are maintaining and expanding trade relationships, reducing regulatory barriers, and supporting exporters’ ability to compete internationally. National argues that agricultural exports underpin jobs and public services. Greens and Labour reignite war on farming | National Party
New Zealand Labour Party Labour generally supports international trade while placing more emphasis on economic resilience, standards, and government investment in productivity and innovation. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising For farmers, the relevant questions are how Labour would balance export growth with climate, environmental and labour standards, and how it would support value-added exports rather than only commodity exports.
Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Supports trade but frames agriculture around environmental limits, biodiversity, animal welfare and a transition toward lower-impact production. Its policies include agriculture, climate, freshwater and land-use measures. Complete Party Policy - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Farmers would likely want to examine how proposed environmental requirements affect costs and market access. Greens argue environmental credibility can strengthen New Zealand’s long-term position in premium export markets. Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
ACT New Zealand Generally advocates fewer regulatory barriers and a more market-led economy. The agriculture-related question is whether reducing domestic regulation would lower farm costs while still meeting overseas buyers’ requirements for sustainability and traceability.
New Zealand First Places strong emphasis on primary industries and protecting national interests. Its agriculture policies have opposed emissions pricing approaches that are not matched by trading partners, particularly where they could affect competitiveness. 2023 Election Policies - NZ First Likely appeal for farmers concerned about uneven international climate rules, while raising questions about how to meet overseas market expectations.

Issues likely to matter for a rural exporter

1. Free trade agreements and market access

New Zealand’s export economy depends heavily on access to markets such as China, the EU, the UK and CPTPP partners. Parties differ less on the goal of exporting more than on how to achieve it:

  • expanding trade agreements and reducing barriers;
  • supporting exporters with government diplomacy;
  • adding value through processing and branding;
  • managing environmental requirements imposed by overseas buyers.

2. Climate and environmental rules

A key divide is how parties balance:

  • lower compliance costs for farmers;
  • New Zealand’s international reputation for sustainable production;
  • requirements from overseas consumers and regulators.

The debate is not only domestic regulation: export customers increasingly set standards on emissions, biodiversity, animal welfare and traceability. Complete Party Policy - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

3. Rural services and infrastructure

For farms away from major centres, export success also depends on:

  • roads and freight links;
  • ports;
  • rural broadband;
  • veterinary and biosecurity services;
  • access to skilled workers.

These issues often sit alongside trade policy because they affect the cost of getting products to international customers.

4. Biosecurity

For agriculture, protecting exports also means protecting New Zealand’s disease-free status. Parties may differ on funding priorities, but biosecurity is a major export-enabling function because an outbreak can close markets quickly.

A useful way to compare parties before voting is to ask:

  1. Will this policy lower or raise the cost of producing an exportable product?
  2. Will it help or hinder access to premium overseas markets?
  3. Will it preserve New Zealand’s environmental reputation with buyers?
  4. Does it support the services rural communities need to keep operating?

If you want, I can also make a farm-focused comparison of the 2026 parties on emissions policy, freshwater rules, rural infrastructure and local services rather than trade alone.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports?

As a farm operation located away from main centers, balancing cost, compliance, and export markets is a central consideration for the November 2026 New Zealand general election.

Political parties approach agricultural trade access, export protection, and the intersection with compliance costs through distinct lenses.


Centre-Right & Coalition Parties (National, ACT, New Zealand First)

These parties heavily emphasize an active free trade agenda, reducing regulatory friction, and protecting primary sector competitiveness internationally.

  • National Party: Focuses heavily on pursuing aggressive free trade agreements (FTAs) and expanding market access for New Zealand’s food and fibre exports. Domestically, their strategy to protect export margins involves easing compliance costs (such as reviewing freshwater and resource management rules) and strengthening biosecurity laws and penalties to safeguard New Zealand's "clean, green" export brand.
  • ACT New Zealand: Advocates for sweeping deregulation to lower input and compliance costs for exporters. Their trade stance centers on opening markets further through bilateral deals, reducing red tape around resource consents, and pushing back against domestic pricing mechanisms (like agricultural emissions taxes) that they argue would put Kiwi exporters at a disadvantage compared to global competitors.
  • New Zealand First: Emphasizes food sovereignty, strict country-of-origin labelling, and protecting the domestic value chain. NZ First strongly backs the primary sector against international market barriers while opposing policies that mandate scaling down production, favoring instead practical innovation and trade diversification.

Centre-Left & Left Parties (Labour, Green Party)

These parties tie trade access directly to environmental credentials, sustainability storytelling, and meeting international market expectations around climate and water quality.

  • Labour Party: Maintains a traditional support for maintaining and leveraging existing trade pacts while emphasizing that modern export success relies on environmental integrity. Labour's approach focuses on ensuring that New Zealand's premium export branding is backed by verified sustainable practices, though they face pressure from rural groups over regulatory burdens. Their tax policy includes carve-outs for family farms under proposed capital gains frameworks.
  • Green Party: Links trade access explicitly to ecological footprint and climate action. They argue that global high-value markets increasingly demand verifiable low-emissions and regenerative practices. Their policies involve bringing agricultural emissions directly into the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and phasing out synthetic fertilizers, positioning this as necessary future-proofing to protect New Zealand exports from greenwashing accusations or carbon-border adjustments overseas.

Summary Comparison for Export Operations

Party Bloc Approach to Export & Trade Access Core Focus on Compliance / Operating Costs
National / ACT / NZ First Aggressive pursuit of new free trade deals; protecting export volume and brand integrity via strict biosecurity. Reducing regulatory compliance, opposing direct agricultural methane/carbon taxes, cutting red tape.
Labour / Greens Securing premium market access through verified environmental and climate credentials; protecting brand value. Tying operations to stricter freshwater standards, emissions pricing, and sustainable input limits.

Are you looking closer at how these trade and compliance policies intersect with specific farm input costs, or a particular regional service infrastructure?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports?

As you weigh up your options ahead of the 2026 general election, the intersection of international trade, export protection, and environmental compliance has taken centre stage—highlighted heavily during the recent rural sector debates hosted by industry groups like Federated Farmers.

The major parties approaching the 2026 election outline distinct philosophies on how to safeguard and boost our food and fibre exports while managing domestic rules:

  • National: Focuses heavily on aggressively pursuing and leveraging international free trade agreements (FTAs) and reducing red tape that burdens export competitiveness. In recent sector debates, National has defended New Zealand's standing on trade and climate obligations (such as the EU-NZ FTA), emphasizing market-led growth, pushing back against overly restrictive domestic compliance that hurts productivity, and keeping agricultural emissions policy pragmatic so it doesn't disadvantage exporters globally.

  • ACT: Positions itself as a staunch advocate for reducing regulatory and environmental compliance costs on farmers (such as freshwater rules and resource consent bottlenecks). ACT argues that the best way to protect agricultural exports is to free farmers from prescriptive, costly central government rules, maintaining that lower domestic operational costs directly translate to better international competitiveness and export resilience.

  • New Zealand First: Emphasizes a "kiwi-first" approach to sovereign economic security, focusing on protecting local land and supply chains while strongly backing traditional primary industries. They advocate for practical, common-sense approaches to regional infrastructure and rural services, ensuring that environmental and climate regulations do not penalise export-driven family farms or compromise our trade leverage.

  • Labour: Emphasizes a balanced approach between maintaining high-value international market expectations—noting that overseas consumers and premium markets increasingly demand certified sustainable and low-emissions credentials—and supporting regional service access. They argue that protecting long-term trade access requires credible environmental standards so New Zealand products retain their clean-green marketing edge overseas.

  • Green Party: Places the climate and ecological crisis at the core of its agricultural framework, arguing that long-term export protection relies entirely on genuine environmental sustainability. The Greens contend that ignoring global shifts toward stringent carbon and ecological accountability puts future trade access at risk, advocating for robust measurement of agricultural emissions and a transition toward regenerative farming practices to future-proof the sector against green-taper and international market lockouts. [NZ Herald]

When casting your vote from a remote rural property, your decision will likely pivot on whether you believe international export protection is best secured by aggressively cutting domestic compliance and costs (National, ACT, NZ First), or by leaning into verified, stringent environmental standards to meet changing global market demands (Labour, Greens).

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports?

AI Overview

Political party platforms for the 2026 New Zealand general election address trade access, protection of agricultural exports, operating costs, and environmental obligations in distinct ways. The major parties differ significantly on climate targets and global trade relationships.

Summary of Party Trade & Export Positions

Political Party Primary Trade Goal Climate & Protection Strategy Key Rural Operating Policy
National 7 new trade deals in 5 years (including Brazil, Switzerland, Nigeria) Free agriculture from the ETS; maintain Paris Agreement Replace the RMA, 20% investment tax deduction
Labour Protect premium access via high-standard green credentials Scrapped agricultural emissions pricing ; reform ETS forestry offsets Simple Capital Gains Tax exempting family farms
ACT Protect property rights and reduce domestic compliance Repeal Net Zero targets ; reconsider the Paris Agreement Introduce dedicated Rural Workforce Visas
NZ First Drive growth through low corporate tax rates Withdraw New Zealand from the Paris Agreement Lower company tax to 20% for turnover under $30m
Green Party Transition to high-value organic and regenerative exports Fully include agriculture in the ETS; phase out synthetic nitrogen Strengthen environmental regulations and freshwater protections

Detailed Overview by Party

National Party

The National Party focuses heavily on traditional free trade expansion.

  • Active Trade Agenda: They have pledged to target seven new trade deals over the next five years. The "first tranche" includes Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Switzerland, Bangladesh, Nigeria, and the European Free Trade Association (Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein).

  • Protecting Competitiveness: To lower your operating costs, National relies on its record of removing agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), banning full farm-to-forestry conversions, and rewriting the Resource Management Act (RMA). They support New Zealand's ongoing participation in the Paris Agreement.

Labour Party

The Labour Party links long-term trade access with maintaining international environmental credibility.

  • Protecting Green Premiums: Labour argues that protecting agricultural export value relies on keeping pace with international climate and environmental expectations, preventing carbon tariffs or boycotts from premium buyers overseas.

  • Policy Shift: In a major shift for the 2026 election, Labour officially dropped its 18-year promise to price agricultural emissions. Instead, they focus on fixing the broader ETS by reducing forestry offsets to bolster the domestic carbon price. They have guaranteed that their proposed Capital Gains Tax will completely exempt family farms.

ACT New Zealand

The ACT Party positions its platform around cutting "Wellington red tape" to make farming economically viable.

  • Protecting Exports from Over-Regulation: ACT argues that aggressive climate policies damage local productivity and export competitiveness. They are campaigning to end New Zealand’s Net Zero targets and are prepared to reconsider participation in the Paris Agreement unless a fairer international deal is reached.

  • Services & Costs: To directly address local operational constraints, ACT is proposing a dedicated Rural Workforce Visa to secure farm labour and wants to push for local planning rules grounded strongly in property rights.

New Zealand First

New Zealand First focuses on protecting the domestic economy and driving agricultural growth through fiscal adjustments.

  • Withdrawing from Global Pacts: NZ First is the most explicit about decoupling New Zealand from international climate commitments, campaigning directly on pulling the country out of the Paris Agreement.

  • Operating Support: Rather than introducing new farm taxes, they plan to drop the company tax rate to 20% for small-and-medium businesses (under $30m turnover) to lower overhead costs for rural business owners.

Green Party

The Green Party advocates for a fundamental shift in how New Zealand sells its goods to the world.

  • Ecological Export Protection: The Greens believe future trade access depends entirely on strict environmental compliance. They advocate for a shift toward high-value, organic, and ecologically sustainable exports.

  • Environmental Obligations: They propose fully including agriculture in the ETS and phasing out synthetic nitrogen fertilisers to restore freshwater health, while providing funding for hapū and iwi-led agricultural initiatives.

If you want to look closely at specific operational impacts, would it be helpful to look deeper into:

  • Water infrastructure and freshwater farm plan policies?
  • Changes proposed for the Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) or rural visa schemes?
  • Local service funding, such as rural health and roading?
Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account