ChatGPT · No location
I migrated to New Zealand, have recently become a citizen and am eligible to vote. I work here, use English as a second language and want to understand both my options and the system. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on settlement support and rules affecting migrants who want family members to join them?
Yes. Since you are now a New Zealand citizen, you are eligible to vote if you meet the normal enrolment requirements. The 2026 general election is on Saturday 7 November, and New Zealand uses MMP (Mixed Member Proportional). You get two votes: a party vote and an electorate vote. Your party vote is the main vote determining each party’s share of Parliament; electorate MPs are chosen separately. What happens in a general election? | Elections NZ
Because your questions are particularly about settlement and bringing family to New Zealand, here is a neutral comparison of the major parties' published positions as of 5 October 2026.
First: what the current system does
It helps to distinguish family reunification from general immigration.
New Zealand currently has several family-related visa routes, including partner, dependent-child and parent categories. For parents in particular, the rules can involve income requirements, sponsorship and selection limits. In April 2026, Immigration New Zealand increased income thresholds for the Parent Category and Parent Boost Visitor Visa. Income thresholds to increase for Pacific and parent visa categories :: Immigration New Zealand
Settlement support is broader than visas. It can include protection from migrant exploitation, English/language and civic orientation, employment support, refugee resettlement, access to public services and policies affecting how quickly someone can obtain residence.
How the parties compare
| Party | Settlement / integration approach | Bringing family |
|---|---|---|
| Labour | Wants stronger community support and a formal NZ orientation/civic-education programme. It proposes extending the period before permanent residence from 2 to 4 years, while giving migrants more protection from exploitation. Release: Labour to ensure an immigration system that works for New Zealand | Wants to review parent-visa rules, alongside health and English requirements. It has not published a detailed promise to remove particular parent-visa income thresholds. Release: Labour to ensure an immigration system that works for New Zealand |
| National | Emphasises skilled migration, enforcement against exploitation and immigration compliance. Its government has put $18m over four years into additional frontline teams dealing with exploitation and non-compliance. More resources to combat migrant exploitation | National Party | The current government has moved 90% of Parent Resident Visa applications to a chronological queue rather than the previous ballot, with expressions of interest no longer expiring after two years. National also created its Parent Boost concept for longer visits by parents/grandparents without residence rights. Sam's Monthly Update | Looking back at August; Forward to September | National Party |
| Green Party | The most extensive published settlement programme: residence pathways for long-settled migrants, stronger migrant rights, employer switching, more refugee-resettlement funding and education about Te Tiriti for new migrants/refugees. Immigration and Refugees - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand | Explicitly wants to remove income barriers to sponsoring a parent visa, clear family-reunification backlogs, expand partners' work rights and create a humanitarian visa for family members of New Zealanders in conflict zones. Immigration and Refugees - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand |
| ACT | Emphasises contribution, English, employment, infrastructure and enforcement. Its May policy proposed a 5-year stand-down from income-tested benefits for residence-class migrants and stronger English requirements for work visas. ACT New Zealand | ACT has specifically campaigned for a more predictable Parent Resident Visa process, arguing for a fully queue-based system rather than a ballot. It also supports a Parent Boost Visa without unnecessarily costly private insurance. ACT New Zealand |
| NZ First | Takes a substantially more restrictive approach: reduce non-essential immigration, make integration and citizenship more central, extend the residence qualifying period from 2 to 5 years and citizenship from 5 to at least 10 years, and impose a 10-year welfare stand-down for non-citizens. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies - New Zealand First | Its 2026 immigration package proposes a 20,000-per-year resident-visa cap, linked to infrastructure capacity. Its published package is much more restrictive overall, although it also proposes a Pacific-specific pathway for some overstayers. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies - New Zealand First |
A particularly important distinction for you
If bringing parents is what you mean by "family members", the differences are quite concrete:
- Greens: explicitly propose removing income barriers to parent sponsorship and clearing family-reunification backlogs. Immigration and Refugees - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
- National: has moved most Parent Resident Visa selection from a ballot to a queue, making the process more predictable, while retaining an annual limit. Sam's Monthly Update | Looking back at August; Forward to September | National Party
- ACT: wants the parent system to be fully queue-based rather than partly ballot-based, while retaining the existing annual cap. ACT New Zealand
- Labour: says it would review parent-visa rules, but its current 2026 announcement doesn't specify the same concrete changes to parent sponsorship as the Greens or ACT. Release: Labour to ensure an immigration system that works for New Zealand
- NZ First: is proposing a much smaller overall resident-visa system, with a proposed 20,000 annual cap, so its broader approach would substantially affect the environment in which family residence applications are made. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies - New Zealand First
One thing that may matter especially to you as a new citizen
You have just crossed an important legal line: citizenship.
NZ First is explicitly campaigning for a much stronger distinction between citizens and non-citizens. For example, it proposes citizens-only voting and says it would extend the citizenship qualifying period for future migrants to at least 10 years. New Zealand First to Campaign on ‘Citizens Only Voting’ - New Zealand First
That doesn't change your right to vote in 2026—you are already a citizen—but it is relevant if you are thinking about family members who are still migrants, because their future residence, citizenship and access to some benefits could be affected by these proposals.
How to use your two votes
Think of the two votes as answering different questions:
- Party vote: Which party's overall direction and policies do I want represented in Parliament?
- Electorate vote: Which local candidate do I want representing my electorate?
Under MMP, a party generally needs 5% of the party vote or an electorate seat to enter Parliament, and parties often need to negotiate with other parties to form a government. What is MMP? | Elections NZ
So you do not have to treat the two votes as necessarily belonging to the same party.
For someone in your situation, I'd suggest separating the immigration question into four things when comparing manifestos:
- Can my spouse/partner and children join me?
- Can my parents join me, and what income/capacity requirements apply?
- How much help will migrants receive to settle, work and participate in society?
- How quickly and predictably can migrants obtain residence/citizenship?
Those produce noticeably different answers across the parties; there isn't a single simple "pro-migrant/anti-migrant" spectrum that captures the policies accurately.
If you tell me which family members you are thinking of bringing (partner, children, parents, siblings, etc.), I can make the next comparison much more practical—for example, a plain-English 2026 table showing each party's proposed visa rules, income requirements, waiting periods and settlement support, with links to the parties' actual policy documents.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account