Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

    815rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

    4,216rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

    17rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

    32rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

Because your key issue is “if I take more paid hours, will the extra income actually leave me better off after childcare and changes in support?”, I’d compare parties on four things rather than their general family rhetoric:

  1. Direct childcare costs
  2. How Working for Families and other payments taper as earnings rise
  3. Sole-parent work obligations and benefit settings
  4. Whether childcare supply/hours are practical for a working parent

The 2026 election is on 7 November 2026. New Zealand Parliament dissolved ahead of tight November vote

Parties whose policies are especially relevant to you

Green Party — childcare affordability is a central policy

The Greens have the most explicit 2026 proposal aimed at changing the underlying cost of ECE. Their plan would:

  • cap parent fees at $10 per day per child, on top of the existing 20 free ECE hours;
  • move towards free ECE for up to 35 hours a week from 2029;
  • expand community/non-profit ECE provision;
  • end public funding for for-profit ECE providers by 2028, with providers needing to become non-profit to receive public funding. Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide

They also propose a substantial redesign of Working for Families. Their broader income-support proposals have included increasing payments for families and making support less dependent on the existing system. Green Party will end child poverty - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Why this matters for you: if the main thing preventing you from accepting more work is the marginal cost of childcare, the Greens' proposal is directly aimed at that problem rather than primarily giving parents a reimbursement after they have paid fees.

The important caveat is timing: the headline free-ECE change is proposed for 2029, so you would want to examine what happens during 2027–28 as well. Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide

National — particularly relevant if you benefit from FamilyBoost and want to increase work

National's approach is much more centred on subsidising families' childcare bills while retaining the existing ECE system.

FamilyBoost was expanded under the current National-led government to reimburse 40% of eligible ECE costs, up to $120 a week, with eligibility extended to households with average income up to $229,000. Over 97,500 families benefiting from FamilyBoost | Beehive.govt.nz

National has also increased some Working for Families support, including changes to the family tax credit and the abatement threshold. A temporary 2026 measure increased the in-work tax credit by up to $50 a week for qualifying working families. $50 a week for lower-income working families | National Party

On welfare, National's direction is explicitly towards increasing employment. Budget 2026 included $93.3 million to help 25,000 sole parents access employment assistance, with the Government describing the goal as increasing work and career opportunities. Incentivising work and independence | National Party

Why this matters for you: National is particularly worth examining if you are already working and could get substantial FamilyBoost/WFF assistance. But you should look carefully at what happens to your total support as your hours and income rise, rather than looking only at the childcare rebate.

Labour — worth watching closely, but there is an important information gap

Labour is clearly one of the major parties you should compare, particularly on Working for Families, benefits and public services. Its 2026 policy programme is now published. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

However, as of the latest information I found, Labour had not yet released a specific 2026 ECE policy package. An independent ECE policy tracker says Labour's 2026 childcare commitments were still outstanding, while noting Labour's historical emphasis on qualified ECE teachers, pay parity and regulation. Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide

So I wouldn't fill that gap by assuming Labour will simply restore or expand its previous policies. Ask specifically what Labour proposes for childcare fees and Working for Families when a parent increases their hours.

NZ First — look at it mainly for its direct family cash payment

NZ First has proposed a Kiwi Kids Grant of $5,000 a year for each of the first three years of each of the first three children, tax-free and on top of existing support. At least one parent must be a New Zealand citizen. NZFirst Announces Policy to Encourage Kiwis To Have More Kids - New Zealand First

This is different from a childcare subsidy: it gives the family cash regardless of whether the money is actually spent on ECE.

Why it matters to you: depending on your circumstances, an additional $5,000 could materially change the calculation of whether working additional hours is worthwhile. But because it isn't specifically tied to childcare, compare it against what the other parties would give you after childcare and after any changes in other support.

ACT — especially relevant if your concern is benefit/work rules

ACT's 2026 welfare policy puts considerably more emphasis on work obligations and reducing long-term benefit dependence. It proposes, among other things, tighter rules around health-related benefits and mandatory electronic money management for certain long-term Jobseeker recipients. ACT New Zealand

ACT has not, at least in the ECE policy information currently available, put forward a comparable major childcare-cost proposal to the Greens' $10/day/free-ECE plan. Its recent ECE approach has focused more on reducing regulation and supporting parental workforce participation. Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide

Why it matters to you: if you're currently receiving Sole Parent Support or another benefit, ACT is a party whose proposed changes to the rules surrounding work and benefits deserve close scrutiny, even if childcare isn't its headline policy.

One thing I'd pay particular attention to: the "work more" cliff

This is arguably more important for you than the headline childcare number.

Under the current system, a sole parent on Sole Parent Support with a youngest child aged 3–13 has an obligation to look for suitable part-time work and generally to take suitable work offered. Sole Parent Support obligations | Work and Income

At the same time, Working for Families changes with family income, and some payments have specific hours/income conditions. For example, the current Minimum Family Tax Credit requires a single parent to work at least 20 hours a week and provides a top-up to a specified after-tax income level if the other conditions are met. Minimum family tax credit

Childcare assistance can also be substantial: Childcare Subsidy can cover up to 50 hours a week depending on circumstances, while FamilyBoost operates separately through Inland Revenue. Childcare | Work and Income

So the question I'd put to every party is:

“If I am a sole parent currently working, say, 15–20 hours a week, what happens to my disposable income if I increase to 25, 30 or 35 hours, after childcare, tax, Working for Families and any benefit abatement?”

That's much more revealing than asking which party is “for working families.”

A useful way to compare them

Issue Green National Labour NZ First ACT
Major childcare-cost proposal Yes — $10/day then free 35 hrs Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide FamilyBoost up to $120/wk Over 97,500 families benefiting from FamilyBoost | Beehive.govt.nz 2026 ECE plan not yet clear Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide $5k/year child grant NZFirst Announces Policy to Encourage Kiwis To Have More Kids - New Zealand First No comparable major proposal identified Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide
Directly tackles ECE fees Yes Yes, via rebate Still to be specified Indirectly Less emphasis
Broader family-income support Significant expansion/reform proposed Green Party will end child poverty - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Existing WFF + tax-credit changes 1 April boost for superannuitants, families and other Kiwis | National Party See detailed 2026 policy package Labour's 2026 Election Policies Universal child grant More conditional/work-focused
Sole-parent/work-policy relevance High High High Moderate High
Key question for you Will the proposed ECE system actually be available when/where you need it? How much will you retain as your hours rise? What exactly replaces/changes current childcare and WFF settings? Are you eligible for the citizenship requirement, and how does the grant interact with other support? What happens to your benefit/support as work requirements increase?

My practical takeaway

I wouldn't tell you which party to vote for, but based specifically on the problem you've described, I'd make your comparison start with Green, National and Labour, then look closely at NZ First and ACT for the way they change the income-support/work equation.

And I would not decide based on the advertised childcare amount alone. The decisive calculation is likely to be:

extra wages − extra childcare − tax − lost benefit/WFF = actual gain from taking more hours.

If you give me a rough hourly wage, current weekly hours, child's age, weekly childcare cost, rent, and whether you're currently receiving Sole Parent Support/Working for Families, I can build a neutral 2026 party-by-party “what happens if I work 20 → 25 → 30 hours?” comparison using the published policies.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

For a sole parent working part-time with a preschool child, the core challenge of increasing work hours comes down to two intersecting factors: effective marginal tax rates (how much benefit assistance is lost as earnings rise) and the direct cost of early childhood education (ECE) and childcare subsidies.

When looking ahead to the New Zealand general election, different political parties approach these pressures through distinct economic and social lenses. Depending on whether you lean toward targeted state support, market-incentive models, or community-based structures, several parties warrant a closer look:

1. The Labour Party & The Green Party (Centre-Left to Left)

  • The Focus: Expanding public support, strengthening community-based care, and lowering structural barriers for low-to-middle-income families.
  • Why look here:
    • Childcare & ECE Provision: The Green Party’s early education policy framework focuses heavily on expanding public and community-backed provision and phasing out funding for for-profit private centers. Historically, left-leaning parties favor strengthening the public safety net, targeted childcare subsidies through Work and Income, and broader abatement thresholds so that working parents do not lose a massive chunk of assistance the moment they pick up extra shifts.
    • Welfare and Abatement: Parties on the left generally advocate for higher support thresholds for sole parents entering or expanding paid work, aiming to reduce the "trap" where earning an extra dollar results in losing a dollar or more of benefit and accommodation support.
  • Key Question to Ask Them: How do their policies protect sole parents from losing targeted accommodation or income support when increasing part-time hours?

2. The National Party & ACT Party (Centre-Right to Right)

  • The Focus: Rewarding work, incentivising employment pathways, and using tax relief or targeted rebates to make childcare more flexible.
  • Why look here:
    • Work Incentives: The National Party has placed a heavy emphasis on "welfare-to-work" frameworks and funding packages designed to help sole parents transition past employment barriers and into greater financial independence.
    • Targeted Assistance: Right-of-centre policies typically prioritize broad-based tax adjustments, family tax credits, or specific rebate mechanisms (such as previous iterations of childcare tax rebates or FamilyBoost initiatives) intended to put money directly back into the pockets of working families so they can choose private or flexible care arrangements.
  • Key Question to Ask Them: Do their tax and rebate structures effectively cover the high hourly cash-flow costs of preschool care before the reimbursement hits your bank account?

3. New Zealand First & Te Pāti Māori (Cross-Currents)

  • New Zealand First: Often emphasizes cost-of-living relief, support for families, and law-and-order/family stability, sometimes proposing broad family grants (such as past proposals for universal or targeted demographic grants).
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on whānau-centred approaches, removing financial and structural obstacles for whānau entering education and training, and heavily backing kaupapa Māori ECE providers (like Kōhanga Reo), which can offer culturally grounded and community-subsidized networks.

What to Look for in Party Manifestos

As the election campaign unfolds, look specifically for announcements regarding:

  1. Childcare Subsidy Abatement Thresholds: Check whether parties plan to lift the income thresholds before your Work and Income Childcare Subsidy or Working for Families tax credits start cutting out. For a part-time worker wanting to step up hours, a high abatement rate can make extra work financially unviable.
  2. "Top-Up" and Gap Fees: Many ECE providers charge above the funded hours. Look at whether parties are offering mechanisms to control or offset these out-of-pocket gap fees.
  3. Sole Parent Work Obligations & Flexi-Wages: Review how parties intend to support sole parents transitioning from part-time to full-time hours through training incentives or flexible wage subsidies.

Are there specific aspects of your current part-time setup—such as navigating Work and Income rules or facing high local ECE gap fees—that are making your decision particularly difficult?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

As a sole parent renting, working part-time, and raising a preschooler, your situation sits right at the intersection of early childhood education (ECE) affordability , income support/abatement rules (how much benefit or Working for Families assistance you lose as you earn more), and housing/accommodation support.

When looking at the 2026 New Zealand general election landscape, different political parties propose distinct levers to help bridge the gap between wanting to work more hours and managing fixed costs. Here is a breakdown of the parties you should look at most closely, categorized by the core approaches they represent:

1. The Labour Party & The Green Party (Focus: Direct State Subsidies & Income Support)

If your primary concern is lowering the direct out-of-pocket cost of childcare and strengthening public safety nets for lower-to-middle income earners, centre-left and left-wing parties focus heavily on expanding government-funded entitlements.

  • What to look at:

  • Labour Party: Historically champions broad-based extensions of free or heavily subsidized early childhood hours (such as previous policies targeting free 20 hours ECE for younger age brackets) alongside direct abatement adjustments to make part-time work more rewarding before assistance tapers off. Their platform generally emphasizes bolstering public services, training incentives, and direct cost-of-living assistance (like public transport caps or health-related support) to free up disposable household income.

  • Green Party: Focuses on sweeping structural income support, which often includes universal or highly accessible baseline incomes, lifting benefit and Working for Families abatements so that earning an extra dollar from working more hours doesn’t immediately result in a drastic cut to your main support or accommodation supplement.

  • Why look closely: If childcare costs are an absolute barrier to stepping up your work hours, parties in this bloc lean toward making childcare universally free/cheap via direct government funding to providers, and easing the penalty (abatement rates) on earning extra part-time wages.

2. The National Party & ACT New Zealand (Focus: Targeted Rebates, Tax Relief & Market Flexibility)

If your focus is on tax-system adjustments, targeted rebates for actual fees paid, or increasing the flexibility of childcare options, centre-right and right-wing parties take a different tack.

  • What to look at:

  • National Party: Tends to favor targeted assistance through mechanisms like FamilyBoost (childcare tax rebates or targeted childcare rebates aimed at lower-to-middle income families using licensed ECE) combined with broader income tax relief designed to let you keep more of what you earn from extra hours. Their philosophy emphasizes choice and incentivizing work through tax adjustments rather than sweeping universal free government service provision.

  • ACT New Zealand: Focuses heavily on reining in government spending, cutting red tape in the ECE sector to lower regulatory compliance costs for providers (which they argue reduces the operational pressure forcing centres to hike fees), and utilizing tax cuts to reward increased workforce participation.

  • Why look closely: If you prefer targeted tax-credit style rebates (recovering a percentage of the fees you personally pay out-of-pocket) and systems that reward gross earnings via tax reduction rather than expanded welfare structures, these parties align closer to that model.

3. New Zealand First (Focus: Cost-of-Living & Regional/Family Stability)

  • What to look at: NZ First generally positions itself around practical cost-of-living relief, support for working families, and easing inflationary pressures on basics like food, housing, and energy.

  • Why look closely: They frequently target policies that protect lower- and middle-income households from systemic cost spikes, meaning their approach is often pragmatic rather than ideological—focusing on whether families can practically afford day-to-day survival while transitioning into more work hours.

Key Questions to Ask the Parties in 2026

To pin down your vote, look specifically at each party's official policy manifestos for the 2026 election around three exact metrics affecting your household:

  1. ECE/Childcare Subsidies: Are they promising direct fee-free hours for your child's specific age group (e.g., expanding the 20 Hours ECE scheme), or are they offering a fee-reimbursement/tax-rebate model (like FamilyBoost) where you have to pay upfront and claim it back later? (Upfront costs can still choke a tight weekly budget even if a rebate comes later).
  2. Abatement Rates (Working for Families & Accommodation Supplement): What are their rules on how fast your financial assistance reduces as your part-time hours turn into more full-time/higher-wage hours? A high abatement rate can make working extra hours feel financially pointless ("the effective marginal tax rate trap").
  3. Renting & Accommodation Support: As a sole parent who rents, check how their accommodation supplement or housing policies interact with income bumps, because any gain in work income can sometimes be heavily offset if housing assistance drops simultaneously.

You can track and compare the granular details as they roll out on platforms like the ECE Election Policy Guide or individual party manifestos (such as the Labour Party Policies or National Party News) to see which mechanism—direct free service vs. tax-credit rebate—best fits your cash-flow reality.

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , you should look most closely at the Green Party , New Zealand Labour Party , National Party , and New Zealand First. Each offers drastically different approaches to childcare costs, tax credits, and renters' rights that will directly dictate your financial viability if you increase your working hours.

A direct comparison of their key 2026 election policies highlights how they affect a part-time working sole parent who rents:

Policy Comparison for the 2026 Election

Political Party Childcare & Early Childhood Education (ECE) Support Rules & Income (Working for Families) Renting & Housing
Green Party Caps ECE fees at $10/day above the 20-hour entitlement. Aims for completely free ECE up to 35 hours/week by 2029. Phases out funding for for-profit centres. Introduces a $10,000 tax-free income band , which boosts take-home pay for part-time work. Funded via a wealth tax on high net-worth individuals. Strong advocacy for renters' rights , including capping rent increases and reversing landlord tax breaks.
Labour Party Focuses on sector stability by funding a $600 million boost to ECE teacher pay to address staffing shortages. Retains the 20-hours free ECE extension to 2-year-olds. Focuses on living costs: introduces a "Medicard" for 3 free GP visits and free prescriptions. Imposes a $20/week public transport fare cap. Imposes a 28% Capital Gains Tax on investment properties (excluding the family home) to fund services and deter property speculation.
National Party Retains the FamilyBoost tax rebate , offering up to 25% back on childcare fees (up to $3,900/year depending on income). Focuses on removing digital screens from ECEs. Opposes new taxes. Promotes penalties and support to move people from benefits into work. Offers a $1,500 "Baby Boost" KiwiSaver contribution at birth. Maintains policies that support landlords (like interest deductibility), arguing it increases rental supply and keeps rents stable.
New Zealand First Supports structural funding adjustments but places a heavier emphasis on broader family tax credits rather than direct ECE delivery overhauls. Pledges a massive $120+ per week increase to Working for Families tax credits to offset high cost-of-living pressures for working parents. Focuses on prioritizing housing supply and regional infrastructure rather than changing rental regulations.

Why these differences matter to you

  • The "Abatement" Trap: As a sole parent working part-time, your support from Work and Income (WINZ) and Working for Families reduces (abates) the more hours you work. NZ First’s credit boost or the Greens' tax-free band directly minimize this penalty on your extra income.

  • Upfront Costs vs. Rebates: National's FamilyBoost requires you to pay fees first and claim a rebate later, which can stretch weekly cash flow. In contrast, the Greens' $10-a-day cap reduces your out-of-pocket costs at the point of care.

  • Rental Stability: If you are worried about rent hikes or sudden lease terminations while trying to establish work routine stability, the rent-control policies of the Greens and Labour provide more security, whereas National and ACT lean into a market-driven approach to lower costs by reducing landlord regulations.

If you would like to narrow this down, let me know:

  • The age of your child (e.g., under 2, or 3–4 eligible for the current 20-hour subsidy)

  • Roughly how many extra hours you want to take on

  • Whether you currently receive Sole Parent Support or Accommodation Supplement

I can help map out exactly how your income support might change under different scenarios.

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account