Evidence · NZ Election 2026

Every question, every answer, every source

Everything the study collected, as it was collected on 5 October 2026. Read any answer in full, or download the tables behind every figure in the study.

questions
174
voters the questions were written as
32
answers collected, of 820 planned
815
answers compared like for like
800
pairs of national and town answers
124
answers with sources recorded
774
answers that showed a link
304

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per question.

    Question id, report reference, question, voter, issue, towns it was also asked from, answers per assistant

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per answer, with its full text.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, words, parties named, showed a link, websites recorded as sources, compared like for like, full text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row for each website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, town, website, publisher type

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per statement checked.

    Check, answer id, assistant, what the answer said, verdict, what the source says, source, date

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per answer to the eight questions that asked who to vote for.

    Answer id, question id, assistant, what the answer did, the words that show it

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per question asked both nationally and from a location, for each assistant.

    Question, town, assistant, both answer ids, parties named nationally and from the town, same parties

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

If your main income is NZ Super and you rent privately, the policies most directly relevant to you are those affecting rent increases, rental security, Accommodation Supplement, healthcare, power, groceries and transport. I’d separate those from policies aimed mainly at homeowners or working-age people.

The 2026 election is on 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 - Policy.nz

The main differences for someone in your situation

Issue Labour Greens National NZ First ACT
Direct protection against rent rises Stronger renter protections, but no hard rent cap Cap annual increases at 2% Emphasis on increasing housing supply rather than rent controls Emphasis on supply/economic measures; no 2% cap Opposes rent controls
Help with private rent Not a major new election promise Broader income/social-support approach Accommodation Supplement already increased by $10–$30/week for eligible private renters Has previously proposed increasing Accommodation Supplement for SuperGold holders Supports the current Accommodation Supplement increase
Security of tenancy Supports stronger renter protections Scrap no-cause evictions More emphasis on landlord/property-market settings No comparable 2026 rent-security proposal found More landlord/property-rights oriented
Healthcare costs 3 free GP visits + free prescriptions Broad expansion of public services Different approach; no equivalent Labour proposal Seniors-focused health proposals Different approach
Public transport $20/week cap on bus/train travel Strong emphasis on affordable public transport Auckland public-transport safety measures rather than a broad fare cap SuperGold concessions Market/property-focused approach
Groceries/essentials Ban price-gouging + supermarket competition Tax/corporate reforms and cheaper essentials More supermarket competition Strong emphasis on reducing supermarket/bank costs Competition and lower-regulation approach

Sources: party policies and election material. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

1. If your biggest worry is being priced out of your rental

This is probably the most important distinction.

The Green Party has the clearest specific proposal: a 2% annual cap on rent increases, together with scrapping no-cause evictions, a rental Warrant of Fitness and substantially more public housing. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

That is a much more direct response to your particular concern than simply hoping increased housing supply eventually restrains rents.

Labour supports stronger renter protections and more housing, but its 2026 policy package does not include the Greens' 2% hard cap. Labour instead emphasises building homes, its wider cost-of-living programme and a targeted capital-gains tax on investment-property profits. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

National and ACT take a substantially different approach. The Government has increased the maximum Accommodation Supplement for private renters by $10–$30 a week, funded partly by raising rents for some social-housing tenants. National argues that increasing supply and competition is the better long-term route rather than controlling rents. Delivering fairer social housing | National Party ACT explicitly supports that change and opposes rent controls. ACT New Zealand

So there is a genuine policy choice here: directly limiting rent increases versus increasing financial assistance and relying more heavily on housing supply and market competition.

2. The Accommodation Supplement could matter a lot

This is particularly worth checking because you are a private renter on NZ Super.

Budget 2026 increased the maximum Accommodation Supplement for eligible private renters by $10–$30 per week, while increasing the minimum rent contribution for social-housing tenants from 25% to 30% of income. Social Housing and Welfare - Budget 2026 - 28 May 2026

National says the additional Accommodation Supplement was intended to help low-income private renters, while ACT specifically supports the change. Delivering fairer social housing | National Party

Importantly, don't assume that receiving NZ Super automatically means you qualify or that you are receiving the maximum. Eligibility depends on circumstances including income, assets and accommodation costs.

NZ First has historically specifically advocated increasing the Accommodation Supplement for SuperGold holders and developing a seniors' housing plan because more retirees are expected to be renting. 2023 Election Policies - NZ First Its current 2026 policy material also says it does not support raising the NZ Super eligibility age or introducing means-testing. Winston Peters - “Seniors Sole Defender” - New Zealand First

3. Everyday bills beyond rent

For a retiree on a fixed income, healthcare can effectively be another major household expense.

Labour's 2026 package is unusually direct here: three free GP visits per year for everyone and removal of the $5 prescription charge from July 2027. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

Labour also proposes a $20-a-week public-transport fare cap, which could matter considerably if you regularly use buses or trains. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

For groceries, Labour proposes banning price-gouging on essential goods and increasing competition in the supermarket sector. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

The Greens take a broader approach, proposing tax changes aimed at high-wealth individuals and large corporations while cutting income tax for 96% of people; their stated objective is to fund public services and reduce living costs. Greens commit to tax the super-rich and large corporates fairly, cut income tax for 96%

4. One thing I would not overlook: NZ Super itself

There is an important difference between the parties on the future of Super.

NZ First explicitly says it will not raise the eligibility age to 67 or introduce means-testing, and its current campaign has emphasised protecting NZ Super. Winston Peters - “Seniors Sole Defender” - New Zealand First

It has, however, announced that from 2029 only New Zealand citizens would be eligible for NZ Super, subject to a three-year transition period. That is particularly relevant only to people whose citizenship/residency status might be affected. Winston Peters: "Citizenship and Superannuation"

The broader 2026 debate has included proposals from economists such as the OECD around changing the long-term design of NZ Super, but those should not be confused with policies actually being proposed by every party. The superannuation debate is back – but reform looks like a non-starter

What I would compare in your position

Rather than asking "Which party is best?", which is ultimately your decision, I'd look at these five questions:

  1. If my rent goes up sharply, do I want a legal limit on increases, or greater government assistance towards the rent?
  2. How important is protection against having to leave my home because the landlord ends the tenancy?
  3. How much would free GP visits and prescriptions save me each year?
  4. Would cheaper public transport materially reduce my weekly spending?
  5. How strongly do I want a party to commit to preserving NZ Super's current age and basic entitlement?

On the evidence currently published, the clearest direct rent-protection proposal is the Greens' 2% cap; the clearest direct private-renter financial intervention currently in force is the Government's higher Accommodation Supplement; and Labour has the clearest package of healthcare and public-transport savings. Those are descriptions of where the policies differ, rather than a recommendation about how you should vote. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

One practical step before deciding: check whether you're entitled to the Accommodation Supplement and how much you would receive under the new rates. For someone living mainly on NZ Super, that could be more immediately consequential than a broad election promise.

Compare the 2026 parties and policies on Policy.nz

If you tell me roughly what you pay in weekly rent and whether you live alone, I can also lay out a neutral “weekly budget impact” comparison of the major parties' relevant 2026 policies for a person in your circumstances.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

As a superannuitant who rents, navigating everyday costs and housing security is a central issue. The major political parties contesting the 2026 New Zealand General Election offer sharply contrasting approaches to how they plan to address housing costs, tenant stability, and the broader cost of living.

Different parties focus on distinct mechanisms—ranging from direct market regulation and tenant protections to supply-side incentives and health/transport cost relief:


1. Rent Regulation and Tenant Security

For renters worried about steep rent hikes or being forced to move, parties take fundamentally different views on market intervention:

  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Strongly campaign on direct renter protections. Their policies include introducing a Renters’ Rights Bill to cap annual rent increases (such as a 2% limit) and scrapping "no-cause" evictions to give tenants long-term security. They also push for a mandatory Rental Warrant of Fitness to ensure minimum living and heating standards.
  • Labour Party: Supports stronger tenant protections and previously removed no-cause evictions while in government, though they have stopped short of a hard legislative rent cap.
  • National & ACT Parties: Strongly oppose rent controls and caps, arguing that artificial price limits restrict the supply of rental properties and ultimately worsen the housing shortage. They favor deregulatory approaches (such as restoring mortgage interest deductibility for landlords), which they argue encourages private landlords to stay in the market and keeps competition active.

2. Public and Social Housing Supply

If private renting becomes unsustainable, reliance shifts to public options:

  • The Greens, Te Pāti Māori, and Labour heavily emphasize scaling up central government and community-led public housing construction to ensure low-income and fixed-income renters have access to secure, income-related rent-scale housing.
  • New Zealand First emphasizes a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan alongside broader options to support older New Zealanders to age in place, alongside traditional supply-side and first-home ownership measures.

3. Cost-of-Living and Everyday Expense Policies

Beyond rent itself, fixed-income households face pressure from healthcare, transport, and grocery bills. Parties have targeted these areas differently:

  • Labour: Proposes widespread cost-of-living relief measures including a $20 weekly public transport fare cap, three free GP visits a year via a new "Medicard", free prescriptions, and measures targeting the supermarket duopoly to lower grocery prices. They also propose a "SolarSaver" program to help lower energy bills for households, including renters.
  • National and ACT: Focus their cost-of-living strategies primarily on broader economic management, inflation reduction, and income-tax adjustments rather than universal service price caps, arguing that fiscal discipline is the best way to protect purchasing power.
  • New Zealand First: Has traditionally focused heavily on protecting the indexation of NZ Superannuation at 66% of the net average wage, ensuring the core benefit adjusts alongside wage growth, alongside targeted aged-care and senior support reforms.

Summary for Your Ballot Decision

When deciding your vote:

  • If your priority is direct protection against rent increases and forced moves, parties like the Greens and Te Pāti Māori offer hard market interventions (rent caps and ending no-cause evictions).
  • If your priority is lowering non-housing everyday expenses (such as doctor visits, prescriptions, and public transport), parties like Labour feature specific caps and free service policies.
  • If your priority is protecting the baseline value of NZ Super and encouraging broader economic stability or private rental supply balance, parties like NZ First, National, and ACT emphasize those specific mechanisms.

Are there specific everyday expenses—such as healthcare or power bills—that weigh most heavily on your monthly budget alongside your rent?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

Navigating renting on New Zealand Superannuation (NZ Super) brings valid concerns around housing stability and cost-of-living pressures. Ahead of the general election, New Zealand's political parties offer distinct approaches that intersect with renter security, income adequacy, and everyday expenses.

You can compare specific party stances and toolsets directly via platforms like Policy.nz. Below is an overview of how different party policy areas approach these everyday costs and housing security for retirees who rent:

  • Rent Regulation and Stability:

  • Parties on the left/progressive side (such as the Green Party) advocate for direct market interventions, including limiting annual rent increases (e.g., capping increases at 2%) and introducing a mandatory, independently enforced Rental Warrant of Fitness to ensure healthy living conditions.

  • Other parties focus more on expanding the overall supply of both public and private housing to ease rental market competition, arguing that building more homes is the most sustainable way to stabilize rent prices over the long term.

  • Support for Renters and Public Housing Access:

  • Policies addressing social housing prioritization (such as reserving or prioritizing public/social housing for New Zealand citizens or residents) aim to manage waitlists, though the direct impact depends heavily on the scale of new public housing builds.

  • Stronger tenant protection laws and stabilizing security of tenure are heavily championed by parties like the Greens, aiming to reduce the frequency of forced moves.

  • Tax Policy and Income / Cost of Living:

  • Some minor and opposition parties propose structural tax reforms—such as a tax-free income threshold (e.g., the first $10,000 earned) or a Universal Citizen’s Income approach—which can alter the net income landscape for individuals, though interactions with NZ Super settings vary by party design.

  • Parties focusing on broad economic management generally emphasize controlling inflation to protect the purchasing power of fixed incomes like NZ Super, rather than implementing direct price or rent controls.

To help narrow down which party aligns best with your situation, would you like to explore:

  • Specific superannuation eligibility or adjustment proposals?

  • Detailed comparisons on tenant rights and rent stabilization between specific parties?

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

AI Overview

For a retiree renting in New Zealand, the 2026 general election brings distinct party policies directly addressing rental security, living costs, and superannuation. Navigating life on NZ Super alone while managing rising rents is a growing challenge nationally.

Political approaches broadly divide into two camps: parties offering direct market interventions and rental caps, and parties focusing on increasing rental supply and targeted financial supplements.


🏠 Rent and Housing Stability

Housing is the largest fixed expense for renting retirees, and policies vary significantly regarding rent caps and eviction rules.

  • Green Party: Campaigning heavily on a Renters’ Rights Bill. They propose capping annual rent increases at 2% , removing "no-cause" terminations to prevent unexpected moves, and introducing a Rental Warrant of Fitness. They also plan to build thousands of accessible public homes and establish a state-owned, not-for-profit retirement village scheme.

  • Labour Party: Supports stronger renter protections and has previously restricted "no-cause" evictions. For the 2026 election, they are introducing a targeted capital gains tax on residential investment properties to shift investment away from property speculation, while exempting the family home.

  • National Party: Focuses on increasing housing supply to naturally stabilise prices. They point to recent implementations like restoring mortgage interest deductibility for landlords and returning the 90-day no-cause termination notice. They argue these rules incentivize landlords to stay in the market, keeping rental supply up. National also highlights its expansions to the Accommodation Supplement.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Proposes completely replacing the Accommodation Supplement with a universal housing payment and introducing interest-free rates deferrals to ease broader housing market pressures.

  • New Zealand First: Proposes a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan alongside policies designed to help seniors "age in place" safely.

  • ACT Party: Strongly opposes rent caps or market interventions, arguing they reduce overall rental availability. They focus on easing building restrictions to drive down construction costs.


🛒 Everyday Living Costs & Transport

Beyond rent, food, utilities, and transport heavily impact fixed-income households.

Party Core Cost-of-Living Policy Expected Impact for Seniors
Green Party Affordable Kai Policy: Forcing supermarket duopolies to sell select stores into public ownership ("KiwiMart"). Aims to structurally lower everyday grocery bills.
Labour Party Public Transport Cap: Implementing a nationwide $20 cap on public transport fares. Lowers travel costs, supplementing the SuperGold card.
National Party Tax & Rates Relief: Commitment to a "no new taxes" pledge and expanding the Rates Rebate Scheme. Limits additional tax burdens while attempting to ease local council cost pressures.

💰 Protecting NZ Superannuation

Fortunately for retirees, there is broad cross-party consensus on keeping NZ Super universal at age 65.

  • National, Labour, Greens, and TOP have all committed to protecting the existing structure of NZ Super.

  • New Zealand First seeks to preserve it for residents but has introduced a policy to restrict NZ Super access strictly to citizens from 2029 onward to manage long-term government expenditure.


To help look closer at the choices, let me know:

  • Are you currently receiving the Accommodation Supplement alongside your Super?

  • Is rental security (not being forced to move) more critical to you than the weekly cost of groceries?

I can break down how specific minor party coalitions or policy details might directly affect your weekly budget.

Ask anything

Captured 5 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account