Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

New Zealand 2026 election: healthcare costs and access

If you live with a long-term health condition and rely on income support, three things can make a particularly big difference to your day-to-day life: what you pay to see your GP, how long you wait for a specialist, and whether you can afford the medicines and repeat prescriptions you need.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, it helps to compare parties on those three issues separately. A policy that reduces prescription charges, for example, does not necessarily make GP visits cheaper or help you see a hospital specialist sooner.

I'll distinguish between existing healthcare arrangements, announced party policies and proposals that still need to be confirmed. Election promises are not the same as funded or implemented changes, and party policies can change during the campaign.

1. The main party differences at a glance

The comparison below reflects published policies and reporting available as of 18 October 2026. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Party Affordable GP care Specialist access Medicines
Labour Three free GP visits per year Proposes supporting more GP capacity; broader specialist pathway needs more detail Remove the $5 prescription charge
Green Party Move towards fully publicly funded primary care More investment in services, workforce and community care Increase Pharmac funding
National Focus on increasing appointments and service capacity, rather than universal free visits More planned treatments, health targets and use of public and private capacity Has funded additional medicines during its term
ACT New Zealand Invest $400 million in general practice over four years; expand pharmacists' role Greater use of private providers to reduce waiting lists Increase medicines spending towards Australia's level
New Zealand First More doctors and alternative primary-care delivery Proposes a $925 million annual waiting-list reduction fund Proposes replacing Pharmac and adding $1.3 billion for medicines
Te Pāti Māori Emphasises community-led, accessible and culturally safe care Emphasises Māori health equity and Māori-led services; detailed national waiting-list measures need checking A specific, comparable medicines funding commitment needs checking

Sources: party announcements and the New Zealand Medical Journal's October 2026 election review. These are policy descriptions, not ratings of party performance. Labour's Cost of Living PlanManifesto 2026Budget 2025: Record investment in health deliveryACT New ZealandElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

2. What each policy could mean for you

Affordable GP appointments

Botany Medical and Urgent Care | Botany Town Centre

Labour — three free visits a year

Labour proposes a Medicard giving everyone eligible for publicly funded healthcare three free GP consultations annually, from July 2028. It says the policy would save up to $250 per person each year. If you attend your GP frequently for monitoring, reviews and new symptoms, the key limitation is that visits beyond those three are not covered by this particular promise. Labour also proposes a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to support GP practice ownership. Labour's Cost of Living PlanElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Health Checks

Greens — broader publicly funded primary care

The Greens propose moving towards fully publicly funded primary care, alongside publicly funded dental care. For someone needing more than occasional GP appointments, the important distinction is the ambition to reduce charges across primary care rather than covering just a set number of consultations. The details of delivery and the timing of full implementation matter. Manifesto 2026Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Doctor's appointment: 9 essential questions to ask - BHF

National — expand appointment capacity

National's approach emphasises increasing the number of appointments, expanding urgent and after-hours services, offering online primary care and training more doctors. Budget 2025 included $447 million to support primary-care access. Its approach focuses on service capacity rather than Labour's proposed three free visits for everyone. More capacity may help with appointment availability, but it does not automatically mean your regular GP fees will fall. Budget 2025: Record investment in health deliveryElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Be Nicer! — Roslyn Pharmacy — Expert Advice From Trusted Neighbours, a pharmacy in Dunedin

ACT — more general practice funding and pharmacy services

ACT announced an additional $400 million for general practice over four years on 18 October 2026, aiming to retain and recruit doctors and increase appointments. Its Pharmacy First policy would also let pharmacists manage more conditions, including stable long-term conditions. This could offer another route to some routine care, although a pharmacist cannot replace every GP review or specialist consultation. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

The practical question for your circumstances: if you need a GP every few weeks or every month, compare policies on the cost of all your appointments, not just the first few. Also check whether the proposal covers your existing practice and what happens if you need longer consultations.

Specialist access and waiting lists

For long-term conditions, getting a referral is only part of the process. The crucial issues are how long you wait, whether you qualify for publicly funded treatment, and what happens if your condition worsens while you wait.

The important distinction is between promising more treatment and specifying how people with chronic conditions will receive timely follow-up care. When comparing the parties, look for clear commitments covering specialist appointments, diagnostic tests, treatment thresholds and follow-up after a diagnosis.

Prescription medicines and Pharmac

If you need regular medication, there are two different questions: the cost of collecting prescriptions and whether the medicine you need is funded at all.

For your situation, it is worth checking whether a party has specified funding for the particular medicines you use, medicines for rare conditions, and access to treatments that are currently unfunded or subject to restrictive criteria.

3. Help with healthcare costs you may be able to access now

You do not have to wait until after the election to check your eligibility for assistance.

Community Services Card

If you receive income support, you may already qualify. It can reduce the cost of GP visits, after-hours care and eligible prescriptions. Work and Income automatically issues cards to some benefit recipients, so check whether yours is current. Community Services CardCommunity Services Card

Check Community Services Card eligibility

Disability Allowance

Work and Income may help with regular, ongoing health-related costs associated with a condition lasting longer than six months. Depending on your circumstances, this can include GP fees and prescription expenses. Eligibility and payment amounts depend on the relevant rules and your situation. Prescriptions and health practitioner costsBenefit rates at 1 April 2026

Check help with GP and prescription costs

Care Plus and longer prescriptions

Ask your GP whether you qualify for Care Plus, which supports people with ongoing health conditions through additional funded consultations and care planning. Also ask whether your stable long-term condition qualifies for a prescription lasting up to 12 months. Since February 2026, eligible prescriptions can have just one co-payment for the prescription, although pharmacies still generally dispense up to three months of medicine at a time. General practicesPrescriptions

Read Health NZ's GP support information

One important detail: the standard $5 prescription charge does not apply to everyone. Community Services Card holders are exempt from the standard charge for eligible prescriptions from approved providers, although other medicine or pharmacy costs may still apply. That means Labour's proposed removal of the charge could have a different direct financial effect on you depending on your existing entitlements. PrescriptionsPharmaceutical co-payments

4. A practical way to compare the policies before voting

Rather than relying on party slogans, you could assess each party against these questions:

  • Regular GP care: Will my total annual costs fall if I need 10, 15 or 20 consultations a year?
  • Specialists: Is there a funded plan to shorten waits for the referrals and tests relevant to my condition?
  • Medicines: Will the policy reduce my actual pharmacy bill, fund more medicines, or both?
  • Income support: Does the party propose changes to health-related financial assistance, including Disability Allowance?
  • Delivery: Is the policy costed, funded, and accompanied by a plan to recruit enough clinicians?

The New Zealand Medical Journal's October 2026 review makes a useful distinction: removing fees can make care more affordable, but it does not necessarily create more appointments. Likewise, additional medicine funding and waiting-list initiatives need workable implementation plans. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

For a further neutral comparison, you can use Policy.nz's 2026 health policy comparison to inspect the parties' published positions across health services, medicines, workforce and funding.

Ultimately, the most relevant policies are those that address your actual pattern of healthcare use: frequent GP visits, ongoing specialist monitoring, and the medicines you depend on. Looking at those three costs separately will help you distinguish between promises that sound similar but would affect your circumstances differently.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

Navigating the healthcare system with a long-term health condition involves balancing regular GP visits, timely specialist referrals, and consistent access to affordable medicines. In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties offer distinct philosophies on how to fund, structure, and deliver these services.


1. Affordable GP and Primary Care

General practice is the frontline for managing long-term conditions, but cost barriers remain a major concern for many New Zealanders. Parties differ sharply on universal vs. targeted approaches:

  • Labour: Proposes a flagship policy introducing a "Medicard," which provides three free GP visits per year for every New Zealander, alongside free prescriptions.
  • The Greens: Propose going further with unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded via a wealth tax, prioritizing high-need community care clinics first.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports free primary care and dental for all whānau earning under $60,000, alongside a Māori Health Card model linking funding directly to patients.
  • National / ACT / NZ First (The Coalition Government): Generally oppose universal free GP schemes, terming them untargeted or unaffordable. Instead, National's approach has focused on targeted capacity funding, workforce pipelines, and expanding the scope of practice for other health professionals (such as pharmacists and nurses) to ease pressure on GPs. ACT prefers a market-oriented model, proposing incentives/health savings accounts to encourage private cover.

2. Specialist Access and Waitlists

Long-term condition management often relies on specialist oversight and timely diagnostic tests or elective procedures. Parties diverge on whether to fix public backlogs through direct public resourcing or by leveraging the private sector:

  • National & ACT: Emphasize leveraging the private sector to reduce public wait times. The current government has utilized multi-year contracts with private hospitals (such as through elective boost programmes) to outsource surgeries and clear backlogs. ACT advocates viewing the government as a "purchaser rather than provider" of health services.
  • Labour, The Greens, & Te Pāti Māori: Strongly oppose outsourcing public health funding to private providers, arguing it drains vital resources from the public system. They focus on rebuilding public hospital capacity, increasing workforce retention, and addressing waitlists through direct public funding and regional equity initiatives.
  • New Zealand First: Places a heavy emphasis on dedicated funding funds aimed at waitlist reduction and regional diagnostic resourcing, prioritizing the public system's structural capacity.

3. Medicines and Pharmac Funding

For people with chronic conditions, regular access to subsidized medicines is vital.

  • Parties on the Left (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Place strong emphasis on lowering point-of-access costs. Labour features free prescriptions as a core cost-of-living policy, and minor parties advocate for expanding Pharmac’s budget significantly to ensure life-modulating and modern medicines are funded faster and without strict arbitrary caps.
  • Parties on the Right / Government: Focus on working within Pharmac’s existing merit-based evaluation framework while continuously adding new medicines to the funded list as fiscal conditions allow. The current government has emphasized adding more therapeutics to the Pharmac schedule by increasing the agency's funding allocations iteratively through recent budgets.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

When reviewing where parties stand relative to your personal circumstances, consider:

  1. Upfront Cost vs. Tax Structure: Do you prefer universal subsidies (like free GP visits/prescriptions via broad taxes) or targeted support for lower-income households?
  2. Public vs. Private Delivery: Do you favor policies that channel funding strictly into public infrastructure, or those that utilize private-sector partnerships to clear specialist waitlists faster?

Would you like to explore any specific party's wider manifesto or examine how a particular policy area affects disability support support services?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

For New Zealanders managing long-term health conditions, navigating primary care costs, prescription charges, and specialist/medicines access is a central issue in the 2026 general election. The major political parties offer distinct approaches and policies that directly impact affordability and accessibility.

Affordable GP Care & Primary Access

  • Labour Party: Proposes a headline policy of three free general practitioner (GP) or nurse consultations per year for every person entitled to publicly funded healthcare, delivered via a new "Medicard" system. To address capacity constraints and prevent bottlenecks from increased demand, they propose a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to assist practitioners with practice ownership and incentivize primary care recruitment.

  • National Party (Current Incumbent/Coalition): Relies on structural and workforce expansions rather than universal free GP visits. Their approach includes building workforce capacity through more local and overseas-trained doctors, backing a new Waikato medical school, and utilizing digital health services (such as 24/7 digital consultations) to ease primary load. They also implemented the recent shift allowing 12-month long prescriptions for stable, long-term conditions , which cuts down the frequency of routine GP visits required just to renew scripts.

  • ACT Party: Focuses heavily on workforce supply, proposing a $400 million funding boost aimed at retaining local GPs and attracting international practitioners to alleviate severe primary care shortages. [RNZ]

  • Green Party: Emphasizes workforce support by introducing universal training payments for students completing qualifications in essential health and social support fields (including nursing and allied health professions) to bolster the community health pipeline. [RNZ]

Medicines & Pharmac Funding

  • Labour Party: Promises to reinstate universally free prescriptions for all Pharmac-funded medicines starting July 2027 (removing the $5 prescription co-payment fee introduced or adjusted under the previous settings).

  • ACT Party: Proposes a structural shift to increase Pharmac’s proportion of the total health budget by 1% each year , gradually moving New Zealand's relative spend on medicines from around 4.9% up toward 12% by 2033, aiming closer to the OECD average.

  • National Party: Emphasizes direct funding injections for specific drug portfolios (pointing to previous Pharmac funding boosts covering dozens of new medicines and cancer treatments) and suggests creative resourcing, such as redirecting foreign aid streams into expanded medicine funding.

Specialist Access & Hospital Care

  • National Party: Focuses on delivery targets via expanded elective surgery volumes, reducing the hospital infrastructure repair backlog, expanding diagnostic scanner capacity, and extending specialized screening criteria (such as lowering bowel screening ages and extending free breast screening ranges). [National Party]

  • Labour & Other Parties: Generally advocate for greater direct public-sector funding to shorten elective and specialist waitlists, paired with workforce guarantees (such as guaranteeing public health system jobs for graduate nurses) to shore up hospital staffing levels. [RNZ]

If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:

  • Which specific aspect (e.g., out-of-pocket costs vs. wait times) matters most to your day-to-day management?
  • Whether you want a deeper look at how a specific party's wider income support or benefit policies interact with these health plans.
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have offered contrasting plans to address healthcare affordability and access. While left-leaning parties focus on lowering direct patient costs through free services and subsidized medication, right-leaning parties prioritize boosting health system capacity, reducing waitlists, and funding new treatments.

Party Comparison on Key Health Areas

Political Party Affordable GP Care Specialist & Hospital Access Medicines & Prescriptions
National Party Focuses on increasing GP clinic funding to grow enrolments rather than removing patient fees. Uses both public and private capacity to reduce elective waitlists; establishes a National Cancer Centre. Offers a $604M Pharmac budget uplift to fund 66 new medicines, funded by redirecting foreign aid.
Labour Party Introduces a "Medicard" providing 3 free GP visits per year for everyone. Funds structural repairs to clear hospital backlogs; guarantees jobs for graduate nurses. Restores universally free prescriptions from July 2027 by removing the $5 co-payment.
ACT Party Commits $400M over 4 years to retain doctors and incentivize clinics to offer more appointments. Aims to expand public-private partnerships to speed up cancer and elective care. Implements a "pharmacy first" plan allowing pharmacists to provide more direct clinic services and locker pickups.
Green Party Advocates for fully free and accessible public GP and mental health services. Reverses public service cuts and funds paid placements ($380/week) for training healthcare workers. Supports expanded medicine funding, paid for through a proposed wealth tax on the super-rich.
Te Pāti Māori Proposes free primary care and dental for whānau earning under $60,000 via a Māori Health Card. Prioritizes Māori-led health solutions and funding linked directly to patients to combat regional health gaps. Advocates for removing cost barriers to essential treatments and eliminating systemic health inequities.
NZ First Focuses broad primary care investments into workforce stabilization rather than universal fee removal. Focuses heavily on a dedicated $925M waitlist reduction fund to improve specialist access timelines. Historically supports medicine accessibility but prioritizes targeting waitlist backlogs over changing co-payments.

Impact on Long-Term Conditions and Income Support

If you rely on income support, the choice between these platforms generally balances immediate cost relief against system capability :

  • Cost Relief: Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori target your day-to-day expenses directly by eliminating prescription co-payments and removing or subsidizing doctor visit fees.
  • System Appointments: National and ACT focus their funding on growing the medical workforce and purchasing private hospital space. This aims to make it easier to actually book a specialist appointment or find an open GP clinic, though out-of-pocket consultation structures would remain largely unchanged.

For a deeper dive into the specific wording and minor party approaches, you can browse the comprehensive healthcare summaries hosted on Policy.nz Health Guide or check the breakdown of workforce implications on the Apex Policy Summaries page.

Learn more

If you want to look closely at how these changes might impact your weekly budget, let me know:

  • Which specific long-term condition or medication type you require?
  • Whether you currently hold a Community Services Card?
  • How often you currently need to see a specialist vs. a GP?

I can give you a more tailored look at how these election promises interact with your current care setup.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account