Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties propose changes to taxes on property or capital gains, and what could those changes mean for people trying to buy?

NZ 2026 election: property taxes and your first-home deposit

When you're renting, working steadily and saving for a first home, it can feel as though house prices keep moving the goalposts. One important question for the 2026 New Zealand general election is whether the tax system should do more to tax property and accumulated wealth, or continue to favour other ways of saving and investing.

The election is on 7 November 2026. As of October, the main divide is between parties proposing new taxes on property gains, land or wealth, and parties that favour keeping the existing approach or making more targeted changes. Summary of 2026 election tax policiesThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

For first-home buyers, the key distinction is that a tax on property ownership is not the same as a tax on the profit from selling an investment property. Each can affect house prices, rents, investment decisions and your ability to save in different ways.

Which parties are proposing property or capital gains tax changes?

Here are the main proposals announced for the 2026 election, based on party policy summaries and reporting available in October 2026.

South Island Election Conference 2026

1. Labour Party

Capital gains tax

Proposal: A flat 28% tax on gains from residential and commercial property, applying to gains arising from 1 July 2027. The family home, farms, KiwiSaver, shares, businesses, inheritances and personal items would be exempt. The tax would apply when the property is sold, rather than retrospectively taxing gains accrued before the start date. Election Tax Policies, part two'Nine New Taxes': What to make of National's claims about Labour

What it could mean for you: If you buy a home to live in, the proposed family-home exemption means you would not pay this tax on its eventual sale. If you later buy a rental property as an investment, its taxable capital gain could be subject to the 28% rate. Labour says the revenue would fund healthcare, including three free GP visits each year.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

2. Green Party

Wealth and inheritance taxes

Proposal: A 2.5% annual tax on net wealth above $10 million, alongside a capital acquisitions tax on covered gifts and inheritances above $1 million. The family home and certain other assets are excluded from the wealth-tax calculation. The party also proposes changes to landlords' ability to deduct mortgage interest from rental income. Election 2026: Will parties’ tax policies support public health and equity?'Nine New Taxes': What to make of National's claims about Labour

What it could mean for you: The wealth-tax threshold is far above the assets of most first-home buyers, and the family-home exemption would protect an eligible owner-occupied home. Changes to rental-property taxation could affect landlords' after-tax returns, potentially influencing rents, rental supply and investors' decisions to sell. Those effects are uncertain.

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

3. Te Pāti Māori

Wealth and property transaction taxes

Proposal: A wealth tax on net assets above $2 million and a 5% stamp duty on certain residential property sales. Its wider tax platform also includes higher income-tax rates for high earners. The precise scope and implementation details matter, particularly for which property transactions would attract stamp duty. 'Nine New Taxes': What to make of National's claims about LabourThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

What it could mean for you: A tax on property transactions could change the cost of buying or selling, depending on how the rules are designed. If first-home purchases were exempt, your direct cost might be unaffected; if not, the tax could increase the upfront cash needed to buy. The proposed wealth-tax threshold is also relevant to people with substantial assets, rather than typical deposit savers.

4. The Opportunity Party

Annual land-value tax

Proposal: An annual tax of 1.75% on urban land value and 0.5% on rural land value. Unlike a capital gains tax, this would generally be payable each year, even if the owner had not sold the property. The party links the proposal to a broader tax and income-support reform package. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government'Nine New Taxes': What to make of National's claims about LabourElection 2026: Will parties’ tax policies support public health and equity?

What it could mean for you: A land-value tax could increase the ongoing cost of owning a home, including one that is not generating rental income. Opportunity argues that taxing land would discourage speculative holding and help bring house prices down. Whether prices fall enough to offset the ongoing tax, and whether the tax is passed through to rents, would depend on market responses and the policy's detailed design.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

5. National Party and ACT New Zealand

Continuity in tax settings

Proposal: Both have campaigned on a “no new taxes” approach, rather than adopting the new broad property, land or wealth taxes proposed by the parties above. Their emphasis is on maintaining lower-tax settings and targeted measures to support investment and savings. Which election tax policies could survive coalition negotiations?Summary of 2026 election tax policies

What it could mean for you: There would be no new tax of the types described above under their stated approach. However, that does not guarantee lower house prices or an easier deposit target. Housing supply, mortgage rates, incomes, investor demand and existing property-tax rules would still matter.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

6. New Zealand First

Opposes new broad taxes

Proposal: The party has explicitly opposed new wealth, inheritance and comprehensive capital gains taxes. It has also proposed a tax-free threshold on the first $14,000 of income, intended to help lower- and fixed-income households. Election 2026: Will parties’ tax policies support public health and equity?Which election tax policies could survive coalition negotiations?

What it could mean for you: If the income-tax proposal were implemented, you might have more take-home income available for savings, depending on your earnings and the final design. It would not directly reduce the purchase price of a home, and its impact on your deposit timeline would depend on how much your tax bill changed.

How could these policies affect your deposit and buying prospects?

There are several different mechanisms at work. A policy can make property less attractive to investors without necessarily making buying easier for every renter.

  1. House prices and competition from investors

If taxes reduce the after-tax returns from property investment, some investors may buy fewer properties or sell existing ones. That could reduce competition for homes and put downward pressure on prices. But owner-occupiers, population growth, construction levels, credit availability and interest rates also influence prices, so a tax change alone cannot guarantee affordability improves.

  1. Rent and your ability to save

If landlords face higher costs, some may try to raise rents. Whether they can do so depends on tenants' alternatives, rental supply and market conditions. If rental supply shrinks, finding a suitable rental could become harder. On the other hand, lower investor demand could help more renters become owner-occupiers over time.

  1. Upfront deposit versus ongoing ownership costs

A capital gains tax generally applies when a taxable asset is sold at a gain. A land tax can be payable annually, whether or not the property is sold. A stamp duty is generally triggered by a covered transaction. For your first purchase, these distinctions matter: the deposit is only one hurdle, while rates, insurance, mortgage repayments and other ownership costs affect whether a home remains affordable.

  1. What happens to the money raised?

Labour proposes directing its capital gains tax revenue towards healthcare, while Opportunity links its land tax to a broader income-support package. The value to your household would depend on the actual policy, the benefits you receive, and any changes to your rent, income or other costs. A tax that raises revenue does not automatically translate into cheaper homes.

These are potential economic effects, not guaranteed outcomes. Tax-policy analysts also note that a party's announced policy may change in coalition negotiations, and that a Labour-led government could face pressure to broaden its capital gains tax beyond Labour's original proposal. Which election tax policies could survive coalition negotiations?Summary of 2026 election tax policies

What matters most for a first-home buyer?

For you and your partner, it may help to separate the question into three parts when comparing party policies:

  • Your deposit timeline: Would the policy change your take-home pay or your rent enough to affect how much you can save each month?
  • The price of the home you want: Is the proposal likely to change investor demand, housing supply or competition for the kind of property you would buy?
  • Your costs after buying: Would it change your ongoing tax obligations, mortgage affordability or the cost of maintaining a home?

A particularly important distinction is whether a party proposes taxing the gain made by an investor, the land value each year, or the property transaction itself. Those approaches have different consequences, and a family-home exemption can make a substantial difference to a couple buying their own place.

Questions worth checking before you vote

  • Does the policy explicitly exempt a first-home purchase and an owner-occupied family home?
  • When would the change take effect, and would it apply to existing property owners?
  • How does the party expect the policy to affect rents and the number of homes built?
  • If the proposal raises revenue, what would that revenue fund, and how would the benefit reach your household?
  • Which policies would the party need support from coalition partners to implement?

For a cross-party overview, KPMG's 2026 election tax-policy summary and 1News' breakdown of the parties' proposed taxes are useful starting points. Summary of 2026 election tax policies'Nine New Taxes': What to make of National's claims about Labour

The bottom line: A policy that reduces investor demand could potentially help first-home buyers compete, but a policy that increases ongoing ownership costs could also create new pressures. The important question is not simply which party proposes more or less tax, but how each proposal might affect the price you pay, the rent you pay while saving, and the long-term cost of owning your first home.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties propose changes to taxes on property or capital gains, and what could those changes mean for people trying to buy?

Navigating the property market while trying to save a deposit can feel like chasing a moving target, especially with property taxation being a central debate in the 2026 New Zealand general election.

Different political parties have put forward distinct proposals regarding property taxes and capital gains, which could alter market dynamics, investor behavior, and how you compete against other buyers.


Key Party Proposals on Property and Capital Gains

  • The Labour Party: Proposes a 28% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on residential investment properties and commercial properties (excluding the family home and farms). This tax would apply only to capital growth accumulated after mid-2027 and would replace the current bright-line test.
  • The Green Party: Proposes a broader shift toward taxing capital, which includes extending the bright-line test back out to 10 years, permanently removing interest deductibility for residential landlords, and introducing a 2.5% annual wealth tax on net assets above $10 million.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes replacing various existing taxes with a broad annual Land Value Tax (1.75% on urban land), which would apply to all land—including owner-occupied homes—though it is designed to be offset by a universal citizen's income.
  • National, ACT, and New Zealand First: Generally oppose a broad capital gains tax or wealth tax. The current settings maintained under National feature a 2-year bright-line test and full interest deductibility for landlords. Their focus for first-home buyers leans more toward supply-side changes and mortgage/loan settings (such as expanding access schemes) rather than new property taxes.

What These Changes Could Mean for First-Home Buyers

If you are trying to step onto the property ladder, these tax policies introduce both potential advantages and ongoing challenges:

  1. Level of Competition from Property Investors:
    • If CGT, wealth taxes, or stricter bright-line/interest rules are implemented (e.g., Labour, Greens, or TOP approaches): Policies that claw back investor tax breaks or tax future property profits tend to cool speculative demand. For first-home buyers, this can mean facing fewer cashed-up residential property investors at open homes and auctions, potentially easing upward pressure on entry-level house prices.
    • If current settings or looser tax rules remain (e.g., National/ACT approach): Landlords retain interest deductibility and a short 2-year bright-line test, which maintains incentives for property investment. While this encourages rental supply, it can mean you continue to compete directly with established investors for starter homes.
  2. The "Moving Target" and Market Uncertainty:
    • Major shifts in tax policy can cause temporary periods of market hesitation as buyers and sellers adjust to new rules. However, because owner-occupied family homes are explicitly excluded from proposed capital gains taxes (like Labour's 28% model), buying your first home shields you from direct capital gains liabilities on that property once you own it.
  3. Wider Economic Trade-offs:
    • Many of the parties proposing property or capital taxes pair them with income tax reductions or personal tax-free thresholds (such as adjustments to tax brackets or citizen incomes). Depending on your household income, these changes could alter how quickly you are able to save your deposit from your regular take-home pay.

Next Step

Are you primarily hoping that a change in government policy will help lower house prices, or are you more focused on policies that directly expand first-home buyer lending and deposit support schemes?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties propose changes to taxes on property or capital gains, and what could those changes mean for people trying to buy?

For renters and first-home buyer hopefuls trying to crack the New Zealand property market, the shifting target of a housing deposit is one of the biggest financial stresses. In the lead-up to the 2026 general election, political parties diverge sharply on property and capital taxation.

The proposals on the table and what they could mean for first-home buyers break down across the political spectrum:


Parties Proposing Direct Capital Gains or Property-Specific Taxes

  • New Zealand Labour Party
  • The Proposal: Proposes a limited Capital Gains Tax (CGT) of 28% on gains made from 1 July 2027 onward. It applies to residential investment properties, commercial properties, holiday homes, and secondary properties, but explicitly excludes the primary family home.
  • What it means for buyers: By making property speculation and secondary property ownership less lucrative, Labour’s policy aims to level the playing field. It is designed to reduce the competitive advantage that property investors have over first-home buyers (who often get outbid by equity-rich landlords), potentially cooling runaway house price inflation and helping stabilize the "moving target" of your deposit.
  • Green Party
  • The Proposal: Proposes reversing the current government's landlord tax cuts by reinstating strict interest-limitation rules (removing interest deductibility) and extending the bright-line test back out to 10 years. They also propose a broader net-wealth tax ( 2.5% on assets over $10 million, with the family home exempt) and a 33%

Capital Acquisitions Tax on large inheritances/gifts over $1 million.

  • What it means for buyers: Like Labour, tightening interest deductibility and extending the bright-line test strips away tax perks for residential property investors. This makes holding residential investment property less attractive, which can reduce investor demand and ease upward pressure on house prices, potentially giving first-home buyers more breathing room in the market.
  • Te Pāti Māori
  • The Proposal: Proposes a 5% stamp duty on residential sales (with a specific exemption for first-home buyers), alongside a 33% land banking tax and a 2% vacant house tax. They also propose a net wealth tax starting at thresholds above $2 million.
  • What it means for buyers: The stamp duty explicitly shields first-home buyers while penalizing other purchasers, aiming to deter speculators and free up land or vacant homes. This could increase housing stock availability and reduce speculative bidding against owner-occupiers.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP)
  • The Proposal: Proposes a comprehensive tax reset featuring an annual Land Value Tax ( 1.75% on urban land and 0.5% on rural land) levied on the underlying land value rather than building improvements or capital gains on sale.
  • What it means for buyers: A land value tax encourages productive development and discourages land banking or empty lots sitting idle. It shifts the tax burden away from income and toward land holding, which tends to structurally lower land prices over time, making land and housing more affordable for people trying to buy their first home.

Parties Campaigning to Maintain Current Settings (No New Property/Capital Taxes)

  • New Zealand National Party & ACT New Zealand
  • The Proposal: Campaigning on maintaining current tax settings—retaining 100%, interest deductibility for landlords and keeping the 2-year bright-line test, with no new capital gains or broad property taxes introduced.
  • What it means for buyers: Proponents argue that these settings encourage private rental supply and economic investment without adding market distortions. For first-home buyers, it means the market operates under the status quo where investors retain their current tax incentives to participate in the housing market, meaning the competition and deposit targets will be driven primarily by broader market interest rates, credit availability, and general housing supply rather than tax changes.
  • New Zealand First
  • The Proposal: Has remained largely silent on specific property or capital gains taxes this cycle, focusing its platform primarily on areas like immigration and business tax adjustments rather than structural changes to housing taxation.

Summary for First-Home Buyers

  • If you favor interventions that penalize property speculation and aim to lower or stabilize house prices by discouraging multi-property investors, the policies from Labour, the Greens, TOP, and Te Pāti Māori directly target those mechanisms.
  • If you favor the status quo where investment settings remain unchanged to support rental supply stability through private landlords, National and ACT align with that approach. [Wolfbrook Residential]
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties propose changes to taxes on property or capital gains, and what could those changes mean for people trying to buy?

AI Overview

The property tax landscape is a major battleground for the 2026 New Zealand general election. The major political parties have distinct, competing frameworks for capital gains and property investment taxes.

For first-home buyers trying to save a deposit, these policies could shift how property is valued as an investment, impacting overall market competition and your saving timeline.


🏛️ Summary of Proposed Property & Capital Gains Taxes

The current status quo consists of a 2-year bright-line test and 100% mortgage interest deductibility for landlords. The table below outlines how each party intends to alter or preserve these rules:

Political Party Capital Gains or Wealth Tax Proposal Landlord Tax Settings
National Party / ACT No new taxes ; explicitly rejects a Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Status Quo : Retains 100% interest deductibility and the 2-year bright-line test.
Labour Party 28% flat CGT on residential investment and commercial property sales (applies only to gains made after 1 July 2027). Status Quo : Retains 100% interest deductibility; completely replaces the bright-line test with the CGT.
Green Party 2.5% Annual Wealth Tax on individual net assets over $10M + 33% Capital Acquisitions Tax on inheritances/gifts over $1M. Reverse Tax Cuts : Restores a 10-year bright-line test and removes interest deductibility for landlords.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) Land Value Tax (LVT) : An annual tax of 1.75% on urban land value and 0.5% on rural land value. Shifts tax burden entirely onto the unimproved value of the land itself.

(Note: Under Labour and Green proposals, thefamily home is explicitly exempt from these new asset or capital gains taxes).


🔑 What This Means for First-Home Buyers

The party that forms the government will influence market dynamics, directly affecting your path to homeownership:

1. Maintaining the Status Quo (National / ACT)

  • Market Impact : Keeping the 2-year bright-line test and full interest deductibility makes residential property more financially attractive to mom-and-pop investors.
  • What it means for you : You will continue to compete directly with property investors for lower-tier, entry-level homes. On the supportive side, National has pledged to expand access to 5% deposit requirements via the First Home Loan scheme to help buyers get over the deposit hurdle faster.

2. Introducing a Targeted Capital Gains Tax (Labour)

  • Market Impact : A 28% tax on investment profits aims to direct speculative capital away from housing and toward the productive economy. Because it only taxes gains accumulated after July 2027, it avoids a sudden investor panic sale but dampens long-term property speculation.
  • What it means for you : By reducing investor demand over time, it may stabilize house price growth, meaning your "moving deposit target" won't accelerate as fast. However, critics argue investors could pass extra costs onto renters or slow down the build rate of new rental supplies.

3. Aggressive Wealth Taxes & Landlord Rollbacks (Greens / TOP)

  • Market Impact : Reverting to a 10-year bright-line test and eliminating interest deductibility heavily penalizes highly leveraged property portfolios. TOP's land tax penalizes holding valuable land without developing it.
  • What it means for you : These aggressive policies generally exert downward pressure on house prices, which could make buying cheaper. Conversely, the Green Party's income tax policy includes a tax-free threshold on your first $10,000 of income , which would marginally increase your take-home pay to help save that deposit faster. I Ranked Every Party's Property Policy [NZ Election 2026]A tax system for all of us - Green Party of Aotearoa New ZealandWhat are the Greens' tax plans - and who would have to pay?

To help tailor this information, could you share a bit more context?

  • Do you plan to buy a new-build property or an existing home?
  • Are you actively utilizing KiwiSaver withdrawals or a First Home Grant to build your deposit?
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account