Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about accessible, affordable housing for disabled people?

New Zealand 2026 election: accessible, affordable housing for disabled renters

If you want to keep renting and living independently, there are several connected issues worth examining when comparing parties' policies: affordable rent, accessible homes, security of tenure, funding for home modifications, and reliable transport and support services.

For disabled people, a housing policy can sound promising while leaving practical questions unanswered. For example, a party might promise more homes without specifying how many will be wheelchair-accessible, or support independent living without explaining how tenants will afford rent and disability-related costs.

I'll focus on New Zealand's national political parties and distinguish between announced election proposals, existing government policies and commitments that still need to be verified. The 2026 general election is upcoming, so policies may change before polling day.

1. What the parties are proposing

The clearest housing-specific commitments I found are from the Green Party. Other parties have relevant proposals on social housing, disability support or income security, but they do not all set out the same level of detail on accessible rental housing.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Accessible homes, rental affordability and modifications

The Greens' 2026 housing policy specifically proposes:

  • Adequate, timely funding for home modifications so disabled people can afford homes that meet their needs.
  • Stronger regulations and incentives for universally designed housing.
  • More public housing and measures to reduce rents, including capping rent increases.
  • Housing developments connected to public transport, shops and community facilities.

These proposals directly address both the physical accessibility of a home and the cost of remaining in it. A home forGreens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis

Sources: Greens' 2026 housing policy · 2026 manifesto

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour Party

Cost of living, transport and public services

Labour's published 2026 election policies include a $20 weekly cap on bus and train fares, scheduled to begin by 1 July 2027, and a wider programme addressing living costs and public services.

Lower public-transport costs could help with everyday travel, but a general bus and train fare cap is not the same as a commitment to fund accessible vehicles, wheelchair taxis or door-to-door transport. I could not verify a comparable, specific 2026 Labour commitment on accessible private rentals or home-modification funding in the sources reviewed. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesBlind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

Sources: Labour's 2026 policies · Blind Low Vision NZ's election policy review

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

Social housing reform and disability-support administration

National's government has announced reforms intended to target social housing more tightly towards people with the greatest needs and to encourage transitions into private rentals where appropriate.

An important financial detail: Budget 2026 announced an increase in the minimum income-related rent contribution for social housing tenants from 25% to 30% of income, beginning 1 April 2027 and phased in over 12 months. The Government estimated an average increase of about $31 a week for affected households.

National has also introduced a more nationally consistent disability-support assessment process. However, the housing reforms do not themselves establish a specific accessible-home quota or guarantee an accessible private rental. Delivering fairer social housingDisability support improvements begin

Sources: Social housing reforms · Disability support changes

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Public housing, affordable homes and Māori-led disability support

Its published policy priorities include building and supporting more public and affordable homes, making it easier to build on Māori and ancestral land, and addressing land speculation.

The party also emphasises Māori-led disability services and decision-making. These positions are relevant to housing access and support for tāngata whaikaha Māori, although I could not verify a specific nationwide commitment to accessible private-rental quotas or a defined home-modification funding scheme. PolicyHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Sources: Te Pāti Māori policies · The Spinoff's 2026 disability-policy comparison

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Income security, independent living and accessibility

TOP's October 2026 disability statement proposes a Citizens' Income alongside a Disability Allowance and possible needs-based top-ups. It also supports reviewing and improving home modifications, equipment provision, supported-living pathways and accessibility in housing and transport.

For a renter, the potential relevance is the combination of income support and practical help to make a home usable. The details to investigate are the final payment amounts, eligibility rules and whether the proposed support would cover your particular modifications and ongoing costs. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Source: TOP's disability position statement, October 2026

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT New Zealand

Housing supply and disability-support settings

ACT is part of the current governing coalition, but I could not verify a detailed 2026 ACT housing proposal specifically promising accessible rental homes, a universal-design requirement or additional home-modification funding.

To compare its position fairly, distinguish general housing-supply policies from enforceable accessibility standards and guaranteed support for disabled tenants. The party's detailed commitments should be checked directly before drawing conclusions about what it would fund. Disability Policies of NZ Political PartiesBlind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

Sources: Disability-policy overview · Blind Low Vision NZ's review

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Accessibility standards legislation

In July 2026, NZ First announced an Accessibility Standards Bill intended to identify, prevent and remove barriers to participation. That is relevant to the broader accessibility of public buildings and services.

However, a proposal for general accessibility standards does not by itself confirm that private rental homes would have to meet specific accessibility requirements. I could not verify a separate detailed NZ First commitment on accessible rental supply or home-modification grants. Establishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyoneHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Source: NZ First's Accessibility Standards Bill announcement

These are summaries of published policies and announcements, not a ranking of the parties. A missing or unverified commitment is not proof that a party opposes the idea.

2. The issues that matter most for your independence

Here is a practical way to compare the proposals against the needs you described.

What matters to you What to look for in party policies
Affordable rent A rent-increase cap, adequate income support, or an increase in affordable housing supply.
A home you can physically use Binding accessibility or universal-design standards, including step-free entry, accessible bathrooms and suitable doorways.
Staying in your current home Timely, adequately funded home modifications, with clear rules about landlord consent and responsibility for costs.
Security as a renter Protection against unfair eviction, predictable rent and the ability to make necessary accessibility changes.
Getting around independently Affordable accessible public transport, Total Mobility taxi subsidies, wheelchair-accessible vehicles and reliable service availability.
Living independently with support Disability funding that gives you choice and control over where you live, rather than making access to support dependent on living in a particular setting.

The Greens' housing proposals explicitly address several of these issues together. TOP also addresses modifications and independent living, while other parties have proposals relevant to housing supply, public housing or broader accessibility. The key distinction is whether a party has made a specific, funded commitment or expressed a general objective. A home forOpportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026Establishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyone

3. Three questions worth asking every party

If you contact candidates or read their full manifestos, these questions can help reveal what the policies would mean in practice.

Will you guarantee more accessible homes for renters?

Ask whether there will be a measurable target for accessible new public and private homes, how compliance will be monitored, and whether existing homes will receive funding for adaptations.

How will you keep accessible housing affordable?

Ask about rent increases, the Accommodation Supplement, income support and whether disabled renters will have access to modification funding without lengthy delays or unaffordable contributions.

How will you protect independent living beyond the front door?

Ask about Total Mobility, accessible public transport, community support and whether your disability funding will enable you to choose where you live.

4. Where to check the latest commitments

Election policies can be updated during a campaign. These resources are useful for checking the detail before you vote:

My suggested approach to comparing the policies

For your circumstances, it may help to assess each party across four separate areas rather than treating housing as just a question of building more homes:

  1. Affordability: Could you continue paying the rent on your income?
  2. Accessibility: Would you have a realistic choice of suitable rental homes?
  3. Independence: Could you adapt a home and receive the support you need without having to move into supported accommodation?
  4. Mobility: Could you travel to appointments, shops and social activities reliably and affordably?

One especially important distinction is between promising to build more housing and guaranteeing that a proportion of those homes will be accessible and affordable to disabled renters. Those are different commitments, and the published policy should make clear which one is being offered.

You do not have to decide which party is best overall to make an informed choice. You can identify which commitments are most important to you, then check whether each party has specified funding, eligibility rules, timelines and accountability for delivering them.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about accessible, affordable housing for disabled people?

When evaluating political party proposals regarding accessible, affordable housing and independent living for disabled people ahead of the 2026 general election, different parties approach the issue through distinct regulatory and economic frameworks.

A summary of how various parties approach accessible housing and related support for independent living includes the following positions:

  • Green Party: Advocates for large-scale public and community housing builds with mandatory universal design standards for new housing to increase the supply of accessible homes, alongside stronger renter protections and enforceable accessibility standards for buildings and transport.
  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Supports increasing the overall housing supply, constructing public housing with improved accessibility features, and reforming the Building Code to make new homes accessible by default. They also support co-designed accessibility legislation.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on community-led housing models, large-scale investment in Māori housing and papakāinga (housing on ancestral land), and ensuring homes meet both specific accessibility needs and broader whānau living structures.
  • Labour Party: Emphasizes a large public housing build programme incorporating some accessibility enhancements, though it has traditionally stopped short of mandating universal accessibility across all new private builds. Their broader platform often emphasizes rights-based frameworks aligned with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
  • National, ACT, and New Zealand First: These parties generally lean toward market-led housing supply solutions, regulatory reduction, or supporting older/disabled people to remain in their existing homes through general support systems rather than imposing mandatory accessible design standards or universal mandates on private developments.

Where to Learn More

To review specific party manifestos, candidate statements, or independent sector analyses as they are released for the election, you can explore resources from disability advocacy organizations or general voter portals:

Are there specific support services or independent living policies (such as individualized funding or transport) you would also like to compare across party platforms?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about accessible, affordable housing for disabled people?

As a renter with a mobility impairment looking to maintain independent living, navigating the 2026 New Zealand general election means looking closely at how political parties approach disability rights, accessible housing, income support, and transport infrastructure.

A breakdown of what major parties and sector analyses highlight regarding accessible and affordable housing for disabled people reveals distinct approaches:

Green Party

  • Approach: Features an explicitly rights-based platform focusing heavily on systemic accessibility and income security.
  • Housing & Living: Advocates for dedicated, accessible housing and pushes for legally enforceable accessibility standards across the built environment. [The Upper Hutt Connection]
  • Support & Income: Proposes lifting main benefit levels to a livable income and implementing timely, easily accessible income support specifically tailored to cover disability-related living and medical costs.
  • Transport: Proposes making urban public transport fare-free (starting with the disabled community) and co-designing mobility infrastructure with disabled people to meet universal national accessibility standards. [Blind Low Vision NZ]

New Zealand Labour Party

  • Approach: Centers its disability framework around the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and the Enabling Good Lives approach. [Blind Low Vision NZ]
  • Housing & Living: Generally commits to supporting accessible, timely housing and the Enabling Good Lives principles for service evaluation, though specific standalone technical policies detailing mandatory building quotas or new rental stock targets for physical mobility are limited in current sector breakdowns. [Blind Low Vision NZ]
  • Accessibility: Has signaled support for introducing enforceable accessibility legislation and factoring disability impacts into regulatory assessments. [Blind Low Vision NZ]

New Zealand National Party

  • Approach: Focuses broader disability provisions within mainstream health, housing, and economic policy rather than distinct standalone reform packages.
  • Housing & Living: Current analyses note no specific enforceable accessible-housing requirements or disability-specific income/transport reforms explicitly itemized in their core platform. Their recent oversight has emphasized refreshing the New Zealand Disability Strategy (2026–2030) and general public housing supply, but without mandatory accessibility mandates for private or general public rentals. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

ACT Party & New Zealand First

  • Approach: Emphasize smaller government, individual choice, and economic/infrastructure management rather than targeted disability manifestos.
  • Focus: Disability support is generally addressed through general health or senior/welfare settings. Specific policies addressing accessible rental housing design standards or targeted transport subsidies for mobility-impaired renters are not a core feature of their current platforms.

Key Questions to Ask Candidates

When engaging with local candidates ahead of the election, you may want to press them on practical measures for independent living:

  1. Enforceable Standards: Will your party commit to legally binding accessibility standards for new rental and public housing developments?
  2. Income & Cost-of-Living: How will your welfare and disability support policies ensure that rising private rental costs do not price disabled people out of suitable, accessible homes?
  3. Transport Connectivity: What specific funding is committed to ensuring local public transport networks remain fully accessible and affordable for people relying on mobility aids?

To review specific party manifestos directly, you can visit the Green Party Manifesto or check non-partisan sector breakdowns from organizations like Blind Low Vision NZ and Disability Rights New Zealand (DRNZ). For details on how to cast your vote accessibly, refer to the Electoral Commission's Access 2026 Action Plan. Manifesto 2026 - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealandaccessibility action plan for the 2026 General Election

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about accessible, affordable housing for disabled people?

AI Overview

As you consider your vote for the 7 November 2026 New Zealand general election , housing accessibility and the ability to rent while living independently are core pillars of the debate. Because the private rental market currently has no mandatory accessibility or universal design standards for residential builds, your choice will influence how the next government handles modifications, rental rights, and support integration.

The table below outlines what the major political parties are proposing regarding accessible, affordable housing and transport for disabled people:

Party Policy Comparisons

Political Party Accessible Housing Proposals Transport & Renting Commitments Support Services Approach
National Party Focuses on executing the New Zealand Disability Strategy 2026–2030 , which promises a review of social housing accessibility. No new mandatory rules for private rentals. Focuses on broader housing supply rather than distinct rental caps or disability-specific transport reforms. Emphasizes stabilizing the funding system after the 2024–2026 structural updates to flexible funding.
Labour Party Opposes the government's social housing changes. Proposes rewriting disability framework legislation via rights-based laws co-designed with the community. Criticizes recent cuts to the Total Mobility scheme and advocates for stronger renter protections. Focuses on reversing restrictions to flexible funding and halting potential income/asset testing for support services.
Green Party Advocates for enforceable accessibility standards across all new builds and public homes. Supports a Rental Warrant of Fitness. Pledges to restore and elevate the Total Mobility taxi scheme subsidy to 75% nationwide. Backs a Te Tiriti-based disability rights framework with locked-in, flexible funding tied to the Enabling Good Lives (EGL) principles.
ACT New Zealand Focuses on deregulating building materials to lower overall construction costs. Opposes government interventions like rent caps or specialized private property mandates. Advocates for strict fiscal discipline and streamlined public spending across ministries.
New Zealand First Supports incentives for seniors and disabled individuals to stay home but lacks explicit mandates for universal residential design. Focuses on broad infrastructure spending and regional transport access. Tends to absorb disability health needs within general health and senior care portfolios.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) Promotes housing affordability through broader tax reforms (e.g., land value tax) rather than specialized building regulations. Relies on systemic economic shifts rather than targeted public transport subsidies. Proposes replacing existing benefits with a Universal Basic Income alongside a $6,000 annual universal disability allowance.

Key Issues Impacting Independent Renters

  • The Fight for Mandatory Standards: The Green Party and disability advocacy groups continue to push for the Building Act to mandate universal design, whereas National and ACT prefer market-led solutions and increasing the general housing supply to lower costs.
  • The Cost of Public Transport: For an independent lifestyle, transport is a massive factor. If you rely on specialized transport, Labour and the Greens are campaigning heavily on restoring or protecting the Total Mobility scheme , which faced cost pressures and policy scrutiny leading up to 2026.
  • Support Integration: National’s implementation of the New Zealand Disability Strategy 2026–2030 embeds the Enabling Good Lives (EGL) approach into future social housing reviews. However, the left-leaning parties argue that tighter operational restrictions on flexible funding make it harder to hire independent, customized in-home care.

Note on Voting: Remember that you must be enrolled by midnight Sunday 25 October 2026 to vote in this election. The Electoral Commission’s Access 2026 Action Plan provides targeted resources (like Easy Read, NZSL, and physical assistance options) to ensure you can cast your ballot independently.

If you would like to explore this further, let me know:

  • If you want to check your local electorate candidates' specific track records on disability advocacy.
  • If you need the exact criteria or a guide on how to request Home Modification Funding under the current system.
  • If you want a deeper look at the financial allowances (like the Accommodation Supplement vs. TOP's proposed disability allowance).
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account