Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

New Zealand’s 2026 election: what could change your rates and water bills?

For a household with a mortgage, school-age children and two incomes already committed to essentials, the key question is whether a party’s policies would reduce the bills you actually pay — or mainly change how councils fund services.

There are three separate things to examine:

  • Council rates: the annual property-based charges that help fund local roads, libraries, parks, community facilities and other services.
  • Water charges: what you pay for drinking water, wastewater and stormwater services, whether through rates or separate charges.
  • Your total household costs: even if a policy reduces one bill, it may shift costs elsewhere, affect service quality or take years to make a difference.

The important distinction is that the national government sets much of the legal and funding framework, but your local council still makes many decisions about budgets, service levels and the rates it needs to collect.

1. National: a proposed limit on ordinary council rates increases

National has made rates capping a specific 2026 election commitment. Its proposed legislation would place annual increases in a 2–4% target range for non-water rates, with an independent regulator and limited exemptions. National says the full system would take effect from 2029. The bill has passed its first reading, but is not yet enacted. Keeping rates affordableGovernment to cap ratesHave your say on the Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment Bill

What this could mean for your household

Potential benefit: more predictable non-water rates

If your council would otherwise increase its average non-water rates by substantially more than the cap, the policy could constrain that increase.

Timing: not an immediate bill reduction

Councils would start taking the target range into account from July 2027, with full compliance proposed from July 2029. The range is a limit on increases, not a promise that rates will fall.

Limitation: your individual bill could still rise more

The proposed cap applies to average rates revenue per rating unit across a council, not to every home's bill. Property valuations, targeted rates and how charges are allocated can affect your result.

Sources: National's policy and the government's technical explanation of the proposed scheme. Keeping rates affordableProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportGovernment to cap rates

There is another important trade-off. The proposal does not eliminate the need to pay for roads, parks, libraries or infrastructure. Councils would still decide their priorities, and might have to defer projects, change service levels or seek an exemption when they cannot fit their spending plans within the target range. Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportProposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

2. Water: the rates cap does not protect you from water-cost increases

This is probably the most important distinction for your budget.

National's rates-capping proposal excludes drinking water, wastewater and stormwater charges. Water costs are being handled through a separate reform programme, called Local Water Done Well. Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportLocal Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

New Papakura treatment plant boosts Auckland’s water supply by 12 million litres

Drinking water

Councils and their water providers must fund safe supply, maintenance and upgrades. The new framework includes stronger regulatory oversight and requirements for financially sustainable water services.

Warkworth Wastewater Pump Station - McConnell Dowell

Wastewater and stormwater

Ageing pipes, treatment upgrades and capacity for growth can all require substantial investment. Those costs are not automatically limited by the non-water rates cap.

Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportLocal Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

The new framework requires councils to separate water-service revenue and expenditure and choose a sustainable delivery model. That may involve a council-run service or a council-controlled organisation, depending on the local arrangements. Water charges may therefore be presented differently from traditional rates, even when the household is still paying for the same essential services. Local Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportLocal Water Done Well

What this means when comparing parties: don't treat a 4% non-water rates cap as a 4% limit on your total council bill. Ask whether each party's water policy would reduce the actual cost of supplying water, how the required infrastructure would be funded, and when households would see any savings.

3. How do the main parties compare?

For the 7 November 2026 election, it is useful to separate a party's explicit commitments from the policies already in place. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

Party What the published policy means for rates and water
National Explicitly backs the 2–4% non-water rates target range, with full implementation proposed from 2029. Water charges are excluded. Keeping rates affordableGovernment to cap rates
Labour Its published 2026 policy platform focuses on living costs, health, transport and other services. I could not verify a comparable, specific 2026 commitment to a rates cap or a replacement water-charges model in the published policy material reviewed. Labour's 2026 Election Policies
Greens, ACT, New Zealand First and other parties Their positions should be checked against their latest specific local-government and water policies. I could not verify a complete set of comparable, detailed 2026 commitments for these parties from the sources reviewed.

This is not a claim that parties without a listed commitment have no position. It means there isn't enough verified information here to make a reliable, like-for-like comparison of their proposed effects on your bills.

One distinction worth checking with Labour in particular is its approach to the previous Three Waters reforms. The current system, Local Water Done Well, replaced the previous government's water-entity legislation in 2024 and established the present framework under the 2025 Acts. Local Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

4. What remains a council decision?

Even with national legislation in place, councils retain important powers over how local services are provided and funded. Proposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportLocal Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

Your ordinary rates bill

Councils set their budgets, choose spending priorities and determine how rates are distributed among properties under the applicable rules. The proposed cap would constrain average non-water rates increases, not dictate the exact bill for your home.

Your water charges

Local arrangements determine the water delivery model, how charges are structured and how investment is financed, within national legal and regulatory requirements. The required infrastructure work can still put upward pressure on costs.

Local services and infrastructure

Councils decide which roads to maintain, what facilities to fund, what improvements to prioritise and how to respond to local growth. National rules can restrict their options without removing the underlying costs.

Your local council election is therefore relevant as well as the general election: national government sets the framework, while councillors make many of the decisions that determine the services and charges in your area.

5. What should you look at before voting?

For a household with little spare income after the mortgage and essentials, I'd focus on the following questions rather than just the headline rates percentage.

  • How much could the total bill rise? Look for a combined estimate covering ordinary rates and water charges, rather than a rates-only figure.
  • When would any benefit begin? A policy starting in 2029 won't necessarily ease your budget in 2027 or 2028.
  • Where does the water funding come from? Check whether a party proposes to fund investment through water bills, council borrowing, central-government contributions or another mechanism.
  • What happens if costs exceed the cap? Find out whether the policy allows exemptions, defers maintenance or changes service levels.
  • What does the policy mean for your property? The council's allocation of rates and water charges can matter as much as the national policy.

For context, the Taxpayers' Union's 2026 dashboard estimated an average 6.92% increase in ordinary rates for 2026/27, and 7.23% when its estimated water-cost changes were included. These are nationwide estimates, not a prediction for your home, and the dashboard is an advocacy organisation's analysis rather than an official national forecast. Rates Dashboard 2026

The bottom line

National's proposed cap could make future non-water rates increases more predictable, but it does not guarantee a lower total council bill. Water charges remain outside the cap, and infrastructure investment may continue to increase what households pay.

The most useful comparison for your vote is therefore each party's credible estimate of the combined household cost over the next three to five years, alongside the services and infrastructure that cost would fund.

You can check the government's explanation of the rates-capping proposal and Local Water Done Well for the rules currently being developed and implemented.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

For a household managing a mortgage and a tight budget with school-age children, understanding how central government policies intersect with local council decisions is crucial.

National Party policies introduce specific mechanisms intended to rein in council spending, while leaving key operational responsibilities and ownership with local authorities.


What National Party Policies Would Change

  • Proposed Rates Capping System: The National-led government introduced the Rates Capping Bill (which passed its first reading), aiming to target annual local authority rates increases.
    • Under this framework, councils will be required to consider an initial target range for annual rate increases of 2% to 4% when preparing their long-term plans starting 1 July 2027, with caps taking full effect by 1 July 2029.
    • An independent regulator will monitor compliance and handle exemption applications for costs outside a council's control.
  • Refocusing on Core Services: National’s local government policy explicitly emphasizes pushing councils to refocus strictly on delivering "core services" (such as infrastructure, roads, and waste) to prevent the creep of non-essential spending that drives up household rates.
  • Water Services Delivery (Local Choice): Following the repeal of the previous government's centralized "Three Waters" mandates, National's framework allows local councils to voluntarily decide how to structure, manage, and fund their water services—either independently or by grouping together into council-controlled organizations (similar to Watercare or Wellington Water) to achieve economies of scale and access efficient financing.

What Remains a Council Decision

Despite central policy guardrails like a rates-capping target range, many fundamental choices remain firmly in the hands of your local elected council:

  • Water Services Are Excluded from Rates Caps: National’s proposed rates-capping system explicitly excludes water services, which continue to be regulated and funded separately. How much your household pays for water supply, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure—and whether your council chooses to fund these via targeted rates, volumetric water meters, or council-controlled enterprise models—remains a local decision.
  • Property Valuations and Rating Valuations: Councils independently determine how the total rates requirement is distributed across individual properties based on council-administered capital or land values.
  • Service Levels and Community Spending: While national policy encourages a focus on core infrastructure, local councils still decide the level of investment for community assets such as local parks, libraries, swimming pools, and public events, which directly feed into your overall rates bill.
  • Consultation and Local Trade-offs: Councils retain the responsibility of consulting their specific communities on long-term plans, weighing whether to trim local services or seek exemptions if infrastructure costs exceed the standard national target range.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

For a household running on two wages with a tight household budget, understanding how central government policy intersects with local council bills is critical. National Party policy introduces direct central intervention on general council rates, while water costs operate under a separate national regulatory and structural framework.


What National Party Policies Would Change (Central Government Control)

  • Rates Capping Framework: The National Party has advanced policy to cap general annual council rates increases within an initial target range of 𝟐 % to 𝟒%. The stated aim is to force local authorities to prioritize core services (like roading, rubbish collection, and parks) and curb steep rates hikes.
  • Exemptions to the Cap: The proposed rates-capping system allows for time-bound exemptions under strict criteria:
  • Exceptional circumstances (such as severe natural disasters requiring un-plannable infrastructure recovery).
  • Prudent financial management exemptions where a council can credibly justify a distinct operational need outside the target range. [National Party]
  • Exclusion of Water from the Cap: Water services are explicitly excluded from the National Party’s general rates-capping system. Drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater levies are regulated separately, meaning water-related cost increases do not fall under the

2

-- 4% general limit.


What Remains a Council Decision (Local Authority Control)

  • Water Service Delivery and Charging Structures: Under local government water frameworks (such as the Local Government (Water Services) Act), decisions on how water is managed and billed remain with local authorities or their dedicated water organizations/council-controlled entities (CCOs). Whether a council funds water via traditional fixed charges on property, moves to fully volumetric (metered) water charging, or establishes specific hardship and debtor policies is decided locally.
  • Service Level Trade-offs within the Cap: If the rates cap is enforced, local councils retain the autonomy—and the burden—of deciding which local services, community grants, or non-essential amenities get scaled back or cut to stay within the

2

-- 4% boundary.

  • Community Consultation on Rates and Budgets: Councils are still legally required to consult their local communities on their Long-Term Plans (LTPs) and Annual Plans, balancing infrastructure backlogs against what local ratepayers can realistically afford. [National Party]
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

AI Overview

As a household with a tight budget, balancing a mortgage and school-age children on two wages, the rising cost of local infrastructure directly impacts your weekly baseline. In the 2026 general election , the National Party's core local government policies focus on enforcing financial discipline on local councils to limit unexpected cost-of-living shocks.

The central government framework changes how rates and water are governed, but execution and final pricing remain distinct local council decisions.


1. Local Council Rates

National’s marquee policy for local government is a hard restriction on general household costs.

  • What National changes: The National-led government introduced the Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment Bill. This law legally mandates that councils must keep their annual per-capita rates increases within a strict target range of 2% to 4%. The full regulatory penalties and cap model will be fully active by 2029. It explicitly forces councils to shift funding back to "core basics" like pothole repairs, rubbish collection, and local parks.
  • What remains a Council decision: Your local council still retains the power to decide how it structures its internal budget to meet that cap. Councils decide exactly what non-essential services get cut or deferred to stay under the 4% ceiling. Furthermore, councils can apply to the central regulator for exceptions to exceed the cap under severe financial hardship or extreme natural disasters.

2. Water Costs (Drinking, Wastewater, Stormwater)

Following the complete repeal of the previous Labour government's centralized "Three Waters" program, National passed the Local Government (Water Services) Act 2025 under their "Local Water Done Well" framework.

  • What National changes: National's model forces councils to make water financially separate from their general operations. Water assets must remain locally owned, but councils are encouraged to pool resources into consumer trusts or council-controlled water organizations. Crucially, to stop water infrastructure from blowing out council debt limits, these new water organizations can borrow significantly more money independently to spread out infrastructure costs over decades rather than spiking your current bill.
  • What remains a Council decision: Water costs are explicitly excluded from National's 4% rates cap. Your local council ultimately decides how to bill you for water. They decide whether to keep water funded through a separate targeted rate on your property bill, or transition your household to an independent user-pays metered system run by a new water organization.

Summary Comparison

Expense Category National Party Central Framework Remaining Local Council Autonomy
General Council Rates Mandates a strict 2% to 4% annual cap on increases. Decides which local community projects or services to cut to balance the budget.
Water & Infrastructure Mandates financial separation and opens up independent long-term debt borrowing. Sets the explicit price of water and chooses the billing structure (targeted rate vs. metered use).

If you want to look closely at your household budget, would you like to explore how National's other 2026 election policies (like student loan changes, KiwiSaver updates, or childcare assistance) could impact your take-home pay?

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account