Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are the parties proposing about learning support, specialist staff and support for children with additional needs?

New Zealand 2026 election: learning support for children with additional needs

For your family, the key question is not just whether a party supports inclusive education. It is whether your child can get the right help at school, from trained people, when they need it — and whether that support reduces the pressure on you to cut back paid work.

As at 19 October 2026, New Zealand's general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

There are three particularly important areas to compare:

  • Learning support in ordinary schools: access to Learning Support Coordinators, teacher aides and specialist help.
  • Specialist services: educational psychologists, speech-language therapists, early intervention, and support for children with high or complex needs.
  • Family and carer support: whether policies recognise the practical and financial effects on parents who provide additional care.

I'll distinguish specific election commitments from policies already being implemented, and note where a party's published position is less clear.

1. What the parties are proposing

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Specific commitments published

National's 2026 education policy includes:

  • Learning Support Coordinators for all schools with Years 1–8 students by 2028.

  • Additional teacher-aide hours and training for children with behavioural, emotional and neurodiverse needs, building to two million extra hours annually from 2028.

  • An expanded Early Intervention Service, with earlier identification of children needing support.

    Source: National's 2026 education policy. Teaching the basics brilliantlyDana Kirkpatrick - Update

    What this could mean for you: more in-school coordination and teacher-aide time are explicit goals. The key practical questions are when your child's school receives support, how hours are allocated, and whether specialist services can meet demand.

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Labour's published 2026 policy programme emphasises education quality, stability and giving parents confidence in their children's learning. It has also pledged to restore the legal obligation for school boards to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Release: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s educationRelease: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schoolsLabour's 2026 Election Policies
I couldn't verify a specific new 2026 commitment from Labour covering the number of teacher-aide hours, Learning Support Coordinators, or additional specialist staff.
What to check: whether Labour would expand learning support capacity, reduce waiting lists, and guarantee sufficient support for children with high and complex needs.

Sources: Labour's 2026 policies and its school commitment.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

The Greens' 2026 manifesto calls for an inclusive education system and for disabled people and their whānau to have access to services that support dignity, autonomy and participation. They have also opposed the Government's 2026 Disability Support Services legislation, arguing that disabled people and carers should be involved in decisions affecting them. Manifesto 2026Greens oppose rushed disability support law changes
What this could mean for you: their published approach puts emphasis on inclusion, disability rights and family involvement. I couldn't verify a specific new 2026 numerical commitment for teacher-aide hours or school-based specialist staffing.

Sources: Green Party 2026 manifesto and its disability support position.

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT

ACT's education policy focuses on foundational skills, measurable achievement, parental choice and greater freedom for schools. Its 2026 announcements also address classroom disruption and teacher authority. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
What to check: how ACT would provide additional specialist capacity for children whose needs cannot be met through ordinary classroom teaching. I couldn't verify a specific new 2026 commitment to expand teacher-aide hours or Learning Support Coordinator coverage.

Sources: ACT education policy and its classroom policy announcement.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

New Zealand First's published education policies include a focus on learning difficulties, completing Learning Support Coordinator coverage across schools, improving screening for conditions such as dyslexia and autism, and increasing funding for the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS). These commitments appear in its 2023 policy material, so they should not automatically be treated as new 2026 election pledges. 2023 Election Policies
The party has also introduced a 2026 Accessibility Standards Bill, which concerns accessibility more broadly rather than being a specific school staffing plan. Establishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyone
What to check: whether its 2026 manifesto renews the earlier commitments, and what funding and staffing increases it would deliver.

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

Opportunity Party (TOP)

Opportunity's October 2026 disability statement explicitly recognises that families and unpaid carers should not have to fill gaps in the support system. It proposes improving financial security and flexibility for carers, respite support, and a better-connected system across disability services, health and education. Its education policy also identifies specialist support, including Learning Support Coordinators, Resource Teachers: Learning and Behaviour (RTLBs), speech-language therapists and psychologists. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026Future fit Education
What this could mean for you: Opportunity has stated positions on both specialist support and the pressures on unpaid carers. Check the detailed policy for specific funding, eligibility and implementation commitments.

Sources: Opportunity's disability position statement and Future-Fit Education.

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori's 2026 disability policy calls for Māori-led disability services and decision-making, easier access to support, and funding that reflects whānau circumstances rather than relying solely on bureaucratic categories. Policy
What this could mean for you: the party's stated emphasis is on culturally grounded, whānau-led support and making disability services easier to access. I couldn't verify a specific nationwide target for school teacher-aide hours or specialist staffing in the material reviewed.

Source: Te Pāti Māori policies.

2. What is already funded, regardless of the election

It is worth separating campaign promises from services and funding already announced. The Ministry of Education's Budget 2026 information records several existing or planned investments in student support. Student supportBudget 2025 - Summary of Initiatives

Area Government funding or provision announced
Early intervention Expanded services into Year 1, with additional specialist staff and funding to address demand.
High and complex needs Additional places and specialist capacity for Te Kahu Tōī, the Intensive Wraparound Service.
Health needs at school $22 million over four years for the School High Health Needs Fund, including support from teacher aides.
Deaf education $3 million to address service pressures, including additional early support and NZSL immersion places.

Sources: Ministry of Education, Budget 2026 student support and Budget 2025 initiatives. Student supportBudget 2025 - Summary of Initiatives

National's commitments to expand Learning Support Coordinator coverage and teacher-aide hours build on this wider learning-support system. The important distinction is that a funding announcement does not necessarily mean your child's school already has the staff, hours or specialist appointments needed.

3. The questions that matter most for your family

Given that you sometimes reduce paid work to care for your child, I'd compare the parties on these specific, practical questions rather than relying only on broad statements about inclusion.

  1. Who will be available at school?

Will every school have a Learning Support Coordinator? Will teacher-aide hours increase, and how will those hours be allocated to children with different needs?

  1. Will specialist help arrive sooner?

What specific commitments exist for educational psychologists, speech-language therapists, RTLBs and early intervention? Are there targets for reducing waiting lists?

  1. Will support be reliable and sufficient?

What happens if a child's allocated teacher-aide hours are insufficient, a specialist is unavailable, or their needs change? Does the party propose guaranteed funding for eligible children with high and complex needs?

  1. Will parents and carers receive practical support?

What help is available with respite, financial security, flexibility around paid work and coordinating services? Are these firm commitments or proposals to investigate options?

4. How to check the details before voting

One final point: under New Zealand's MMP system, you have a party vote and an electorate vote. You can compare national policy commitments using the party vote, while also asking your electorate candidates what they would advocate for locally. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The most useful next step is to look at what kind of learning support your child needs most. Is the main issue getting enough teacher-aide time in class, accessing specialists such as speech-language therapists or educational psychologists, support for autism or ADHD-related needs, or help with the extra care and lost income at home? That distinction would help narrow the policy comparison without assuming which party you should vote for.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are the parties proposing about learning support, specialist staff and support for children with additional needs?

Navigating the education system while securing appropriate learning support for a child with additional needs is a significant challenge, and it is completely understandable how this responsibility impacts your career and hours in paid work.

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have distinct approaches and policy proposals regarding learning support, specialist staff, and resourcing for children with additional needs. Because party platforms and detailed manifestos continue to roll out leading up to the election, the landscape is best understood through the core approaches of the major political blocs:


1. National (Incumbent / Government)

  • Focus: Early intervention, expanding specialized workforce hours, and scaling up school-based coordination.
  • Key Policies & Direction: The government's recent funding packages (such as Budget investments carried into this term) heavily emphasize a social investment lens. This includes:
    • Extending Early Intervention Services (EIS) from early childhood education through to the end of Year 1 to bridge the transition gap for children with additional needs.
    • Expanding the rollout of Learning Support Coordinators (LSCs) in primary and intermediate schools to help navigate student needs between families, schools, and specialists.
    • Funding increases for specialist roles—such as speech-language therapists, psychologists, and significantly scaled-up teacher aide hours annually across the school network.
  • Implication for Families: The emphasis is heavily on expanding frontline workforce capacity and early identification, though the sector continues to debate whether these increases match the high volume of waitlists.

2. Labour & Progressive Parties (Green Party / Te Pāti Māori)

  • Focus: Systemic equity, guaranteed resourcing, and addressing waitlists and workforce shortages through centralized public funding.
  • Key Policies & Direction: Parties on the center-left typically criticize current funding models for being overly bureaucratic or reliant on schools having to "compete" or wait for tightly rationed Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) funding. Their approach generally emphasizes:
    • Moving toward fully funded, guaranteed entitlements for learning support rather than capped or contestable pools.
    • Strengthening the public health-education interface to ensure early access to educational psychologists, speech therapists, and neurodiversity assessors without families having to shoulder private costs.
    • Culturally responsive learning support, including targeted resourcing for Kaupapa Māori and Pacific education settings where specialist shortages are acute.
  • Implication for Families: The focus is on reducing barriers to access, cutting down lengthy wait times for assessments, and providing more reliable, long-term staffing stability directly inside schools.

3. ACT & New Zealand First

  • Focus: Core education "basics," operational flexibility for schools, and targeted funding efficiency.
  • Key Policies & Direction: These parties generally prioritize streamlining back-office bureaucracy and focusing heavily on core academic achievement (the "basics"), while balancing support for students with distinct behavioral or physical needs.
    • ACT often emphasizes choices in education, ensuring that funding follows students or that schools have greater autonomy over how they utilize operational funds to manage classroom dynamics and special needs.
    • New Zealand First historically emphasizes ensuring that special education needs and disability obligations under international conventions are met, advocating for practical, needs-based funding structures and ensuring that physical or sensory disabilities (such as vision, hearing, and neurodiversity) receive direct, practical resource allocation in mainstream environments.

What to Look For When Deciding Your Vote

As you weigh your options keeping your child's schooling and your own career flexibility in mind, you may want to look closely at specific party commitments regarding:

  • Wait Times for Assessments: Parties offering explicit targets to reduce educational psychologist and specialist waitlists (which currently can take many months).
  • Teacher Aide and Specialist Security: Whether parties are proposing permanent, baseline funding for teacher aides so schools do not have to constantly fundraise or juggle operational budgets to keep them.
  • Respite and Family Support Intersections: How parties plan to support families economically (such as through tax credits, carer support, or flexible work legislation) to ease the financial strain when parents have to reduce paid hours.

Are there specific types of support (such as neurodiversity resources, physical disability adaptations, or behavioral intervention) that your child needs most right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are the parties proposing about learning support, specialist staff and support for children with additional needs?

Navigating the learning support system for a child with additional needs while balancing your career is a significant challenge. Ahead of the 2026 general election, New Zealand’s political parties approach learning support, specialist staffing, and inclusive education through distinct philosophical lenses.

The primary positions of the major and notable parties on learning support and additional needs include:

  • National Party: Emphasises recent and planned investments via ongoing budgets (such as funding increases for Learning Support Coordinators [LSCs] and expansions to the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme [ORS]). Their approach targets rolling out more on-the-ground resource capacity within mainstream settings and pursuing greater national consistency rather than structural system overhauls. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • Labour Party: Focuses on a rights-based expansion of learning support and ORS funding. Labour highlights gaps in current service delivery and transitions (including school-to-employment pipelines), pledging broader agency alignment and stronger partnerships with disabled persons and advocacy groups in education and disability support reform. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • Green Party: Proposes a fully-funded inclusive education model. Their platform treats learning support and accessibility as core human rights issues, pushing for guaranteed, ring-fenced resourcing for specialist staff (like educational psychologists, speech-language therapists, and needs coordinators) across all schools rather than contestable or rationed pools. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • ACT Party: Generally approaches learning assistance through broader mainstream education reform and individual choice. ACT tends to favour smaller government, reduced central bureaucracy, and operational flexibility for schools over top-down specialist workforce mandates. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • Te Pāti Māori: Centres tāngata whaikaha Māori (Māori with disabilities) and whānau hauā , advocating for culturally grounded, self-determined, and Māori-led delivery of health, social, and educational support services. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • New Zealand First: Tends to address disability and additional needs indirectly through general health, senior, or regional policies rather than distinct, standalone learning-support manifestos. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

To compare specific candidate positions or explore non-partisan tool breakdowns of party education platforms, you can check Policy.nz. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

If you'd like, I can:

  • Detail the current mechanics of the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) or Learning Support Coordinator (LSC) roles.
  • Outline general financial/carer support assistance available from Work and Income (MSD) for parents reducing work hours.

Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are the parties proposing about learning support, specialist staff and support for children with additional needs?

AI Overview

In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election , the major political parties are presenting distinct approaches to managing learning support funding, specialist staff, and classroom environments. Navigating a school-age child's additional needs while managing your work hours is highly demanding, and knowing where each party stands can help you make an informed choice.

Here is a direct comparison of what the main political parties are proposing regarding learning support and specialist staff for the 2026 election:

Party Policies on Learning Support and Specialist Staff

Political Party Proposed Core Strategy & Funding Specialist Staff & Training Initiatives
National Party • Focuses on expanding the current $1.67 billion learning support envelope by 2028/29.
• Expanding Special Schools across New Zealand for the first time in years. • Enacting the rollout of dedicated Learning Support Coordinators (LSC) across all primary and intermediate schools.
• Focuses on standardizing structured literacy and numeracy teaching practices across the board to lift baseline achievement.
Labour Party • Pledges to pause upcoming curriculum overhauls for a year to check in with the education sector.
• Intends to establish an Independent Council for Curriculum and Assessment (ICCA) to take the politics out of classroom planning. • Advocates for giving teachers stronger legal powers to remove disruptive students from classrooms to ensure safety.
• Prioritizing general teacher recruitment by increasing school-based student training slots.
Green Party • Focuses heavily on the systemic strain within the sector, pushing to significantly increase frontline funding based on recent sector reports.
• Promotes an overarching mandate for an inclusive education system where resources follow the child seamlessly. • Proposes a $380-a-week universal stipend for trainee teachers and social support workers during their practical placements.
• Aims to fix the specialist workforce pipeline by preventing student dropouts in high-demand fields like special education.

What this means for your family's situation

  • Getting suitable help at school: The National Party is banking on standardized structured learning frameworks and a finalized rollout of dedicated Learning Support Coordinators to catch needs early. The Green Party is arguing that the current system is at a breaking point and is focused on building up the numbers of qualified specialist staff through paid training incentives. The Labour Party is aiming to stabilize the wider system by pausing curriculum shifts and offering teachers more classroom management tools.
  • Support for reducing paid work / caring at home: None of the major parties have released a policy specifically targeting targeted financial compensation or new specialized allowances for parents reducing hours for a school-age child with learning needs. However, broad working-family changes are on the table, such as National's updates to Paid Parental Leave flexibility and the Greens' / Labour's wider plans for reducing early childhood or after-school care costs.

To help you drill down into what matters most for your vote, would you like to look closer at the eligibility criteria for ORS funding under the current system, or explore wider welfare and workplace policies that might ease the financial pressure of reducing your hours?

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account