Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

New Zealand’s 2026 election: what could change your council rates?

For a retired homeowner relying mainly on NZ Super, the key distinction is that national parties can change the rules governing council rates, but councils still make many of the decisions that determine your actual bill.

There is already a major policy change to consider before the general election on 7 November 2026: the National-led Government announced a rates-capping system in August 2026. It is intended to make increases more predictable, but it does not guarantee that your individual rates bill will rise by no more than the cap. Government to cap ratesProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

Rates are only one part of the household budget you described. Insurance premiums, electricity prices and healthcare costs are affected by different rules and institutions, so a promise to restrain council rates should not be taken as a promise to reduce all your living costs.

1. What the proposed rates cap means for you

A target range of 2–4%

The Government has announced an initial annual target range for council rates increases. The plan is for councils to take it into account from 1 July 2027, with compliance required from 1 July 2029, subject to the legislation and exemptions. Government to cap ratesProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

It is not a cap on your personal bill

The system concerns average rates revenue per rating unit across a council, rather than guaranteeing a maximum percentage increase for every property. Changes in property valuations, targeted charges and the way a council allocates rates can still affect what you pay. Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportProposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

Water charges are a separate issue

Water-services charges are excluded from this rates cap and are governed by separate legislation. Your total council-related bill could therefore increase by more than the capped rate increase. Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportProposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

For perspective, if a council collected $100 million in rates, a 2–4% increase would mean an additional $2–4 million in total rates revenue. That is an illustration of the council-wide target, not a prediction of your personal rates bill.

2. What different national party policies could change

The important question is not simply which party promises lower rates. It is how each party proposes to control council spending, pay for infrastructure and distribute the costs between ratepayers, taxpayers and other users.

Party or group Relevant policy direction What to examine for your budget
National The current Government has introduced the proposed 2–4% rates target range. Government to cap ratesProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport How the cap will work in practice, which exemptions apply, and whether your individual bill and water charges still rise faster.
Labour Labour has indicated openness to rates capping, while arguing for other funding options for local infrastructure. Pacific MPs split over rates cap as cost-of-living pressure grows Whether alternative funding would reduce the amount councils need to collect from homeowners, and how that funding would be paid for.
Green Party The Greens have proposed enabling councils to introduce a visitor-accommodation bed levy, with local decisions on its design and rate. Greens back bed levy, National wants more car parks and Labour focuses on Elevate NZ Venture Fund Whether shifting some costs to visitors would reduce pressure on residential ratepayers in your area. It would not automatically reduce your bill.
ACT, New Zealand First and other parties Their broader positions on taxation, electricity, local-government reform and public spending may affect household costs or council funding. The effects depend on the specific policy and how it is implemented. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentSummary of 2026 election tax policies Look for explicit proposals about rates, water charges, infrastructure funding and local-government responsibilities rather than assuming general tax cuts will lower rates.

This is a comparison of documented policy directions, not a complete list of each party's final election commitments. Proposals may change during the campaign or coalition negotiations.

You can check party-by-party commitments in the 2026 election policy guide at Policy.nz, and the Government's explanation of the proposed rates-capping system.

3. What would still be decided by councils?

Even with a national rates cap, councils would retain significant control over local decisions. Proposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

  • Local services: rubbish and recycling, parks, libraries, pools, local roads and other council services.
  • Infrastructure investment: which pipes, roads, community facilities and other assets need maintenance, replacement or expansion.
  • How rates are distributed: councils retain the ability to set rates for individual properties and different property categories. A cap on average rates revenue does not mean every household receives the same increase.
  • Local spending priorities: how much to spend on services, maintenance and new projects, within the applicable laws and funding constraints.
  • Local consultation: councils prepare budgets and long-term plans and consult communities on significant decisions.

Central government sets the legal framework within which councils operate. A national government can change that framework, but a rates cap does not itself decide which local services should be reduced, delayed or protected.

That distinction matters because a cap could restrain average rates increases while also requiring councils to make difficult choices about the timing of repairs, service levels, other funding sources or applications for exemptions. The outcome would depend on local circumstances. Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportLocal government in New Zealand Local Government

4. How this connects to your other rising costs

A useful way to assess election promises is to separate the parts of your budget that Parliament can influence from those that councils control.

Council rates and water charges

National legislation can constrain rates increases or change infrastructure funding. Your council still determines local budgets and how costs are allocated. Water charges have a separate regulatory framework.

Electricity bills

National energy policy can influence market rules, generation investment and support for households. Compare specific proposals on electricity pricing and assistance rather than assuming a rates policy will affect your power bill.

Home insurance

Premiums reflect factors such as the property's risk exposure, rebuilding costs and insurer pricing. Government policies on natural-hazard resilience, building rules and disaster funding can affect these costs, but neither a council rates cap nor a general tax cut guarantees cheaper insurance.

Regular healthcare

Central government policy is particularly relevant to public healthcare funding, access to primary care, prescription costs and support for older people. These are separate questions from local rates policy.

5. Practical questions to ask before voting

For your circumstances, I would compare parties using these questions rather than relying on a single headline promise.

  • Rates: Is the proposed cap binding, when does it begin, and what exemptions are available?
  • Water: Are water-related charges included or excluded, and what might happen to those charges?
  • Infrastructure: If councils have less rates revenue, how will essential maintenance and repairs be funded?
  • Retirement income: Is there a specific measure to help people on NZ Super meet unavoidable housing costs?
  • Healthcare: What concrete changes are proposed to the cost and availability of the care you regularly need?
  • Total household costs: Does the policy reduce your actual outgoings, or does it shift costs from rates to another charge or tax?

It is also worth checking whether you qualify for the Government's Rates Rebate Scheme, which provides assistance to eligible ratepayers on lower incomes. Owning your home and relying mainly on NZ Super are reasons to check the criteria, although eligibility depends on the scheme's rules and your circumstances.

Bottom line

A national rates cap could make average council rates increases more predictable, but it is not a guarantee that your own bill will rise by only 2–4%, and it does not cap water charges. Councils would still decide many local spending priorities and how rates are distributed.

For your vote, the most informative comparison is therefore rates restraint plus a credible plan for essential services, water infrastructure and the other costs you cannot easily avoid. National parties influence the rules and funding arrangements; councils determine much of the local implementation.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

National Party policy introduces central government intervention on local authority rates, directly altering how much councils can increase their revenue from households.

What National Party Policy Changes About Local Rates

  • Rates Capping: National has advanced policy to cap annual council rates increases within a target range of 2% to 4%, backed by an independent regulator to monitor compliance.
  • Timeline: Councils are required to factor this target range into their long-term planning, with the formal capping system transitioning toward full enforcement to rein in double-digit rates hikes.
  • Core Services Focus: The policy aims to force local authorities to refocus on "back-to-basics" infrastructure and services (such as three waters, roads, and waste) rather than non-essential spending, aiming to ease cost-of-living pressures for fixed-income households.
  • Exclusions: Water services and specific costs outside a council's direct control are structurally separated or handled through distinct regulatory frameworks (such as separate water service entities) rather than being rigidly bound by the standard general rates cap.

What Stills Be Decided by Councils

Despite central caps on overall rates revenue increases, local councils retain autonomy and decision-making power over several core areas:

  • The Allocation of Rates Among Ratepayers: Councils independently decide how to distribute the total rates burden across different properties within their district—such as the ratio between general rates, uniform annual general charges (UAGCs), and targeted rates, as well as differential rates for commercial versus residential properties.
  • Service Levels and Local Spending Priorities: Within their restricted budgets, councils still choose how much to allocate to local amenities like libraries, parks, community halls, swimming pools, and local events.
  • Operational Delivery and Efficiencies: How a council manages its internal operations, staffing, asset sales, and contracting out of services remains a local decision, meaning councils must find internal savings or pare back discretionary projects to stay beneath the central government's percentage cap.
  • Community Consultation: Councils remain legally required to consult their local communities through their Long-Term Plans (LTPs) and Annual Plans to balance local priorities under the mandated financial ceiling.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

For a retiree living on NZ Super, tracking how central government policies intersect with fixed household costs like local rates is vital.

The National Party's local government and economic framework introduces direct constraints on how much rates can rise, while leaving foundational day-to-day decisions firmly in the hands of local elected councils.


What National’s Policies Could Change (Central Government Controls)

  • Annual Rates Increase Caps: National has introduced and advanced a policy framework to strictly cap annual council rate increases (targeting a framework between 2% and 4%). For households on a fixed income, this is designed to curb steep, unexpected spikes in general and targeted rates, aligning increases closer to general inflation targets.
  • Back-to-Basics Mandates: National's policy pushes councils to refocus strictly on core infrastructure and services (such as roading and rubbish collection) rather than non-essential spending. The intent is to stop councils from funding extraneous projects that drive up rate demands.
  • Performance Transparency and Benchmarking: Through regular publishing of localized council performance metrics (covering financial discipline, asset management, and service delivery), the government aims to expose cost blowouts and pressure councils into tighter fiscal management. [National Party]
  • Optional/Specific Financing Schemes: National has floated targeted mechanisms like low-interest household financing options for specific upgrades (such as solar installations) that can be voluntary and tied to property mechanisms rather than upfront general rate spikes.

What Would Still Be Decided by Councils (Local Autonomy)

  • The Core Budget and Spending Priorities: Individual local councils retain the authority to decide their total operating budgets, how much they spend on local amenities, and how they allocate funds within the government-mandated cap framework. [National Party]
  • Property Valuations and Rates Apportionment: Councils independently manage how individual property revaluations (done via Quotable Value or independent assessors) affect your specific property's share of the rates burden. A cap applies to the overall increase, but individual assessments can still shift relative burdens.
  • Service Levels and Local Infrastructure Choices: Decisions on local library hours, community grants, local parks maintenance, and regional consent processes remain local. If a council faces severe infrastructure deficits or unexpected local asset failures, exceeding caps requires strict regulatory approval or exceptional circumstances (such as natural disaster recovery). [National Party]
  • Exemptions and Remissions Policies: Policies regarding local rates rebates, hardship relief, or postponement for low-income seniors and beneficiaries are structured under broad national parameters, but local councils ultimately administer and shape local discretionary remissions.
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

AI Overview

Under the National Party's platform, the key tool for controlling local property costs is a central mandate on how much rates can rise, though local councils would still retain significant control over their operational decisions, asset management, and non-rates pricing.

The breakdown below outlines what a re-elected National Government plans to change nationally versus what remains under local council jurisdiction:

What National Party Policies Would Change Nationwide

  • A Hard Cap on Rates Increases: Under the proposed Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment Bill, the National Party plans to enforce a mandatory 2% to 4% target range on annual property rates increases. This is intended to stop the double-digit rates hikes that many regions have experienced recently.
  • Scope of the Cap: The cap will apply broadly to general rates, targeted rates, and uniform annual general charges (UAGCs).
  • Enforcement Timeline: The transition begins in 2027, with the strict regulatory model hitting full effect on 1 July 2029.
  • Independent Oversight: National plans to set up an independent regulator to monitor council compliance, review the cap ranges, and evaluate any rare applications for financial exemptions (such as emergency funding needed after a natural disaster).

What Individual Councils Will Still Decide

  • The Baseline Distribution of Rates: While the total increase across a district is capped, individual councils still determine how to split the bill between residential and commercial properties, and how much to charge via flat UAGCs versus valuation-based rates.
  • User Fees and Charges: The 4% cap strictly excludes water charges and other user fees. If your local council needs to balance its budget under a tight rates cap, it still holds the power to independently raise the costs of rubbish bags, public transport, parking, building consents, or entry fees for local facilities like pools and libraries.
  • Spending Priorities ("Core Services"): While National's policy explicitly pressures councils to cut "nice-to-haves" and focus on basics like pipes, roads, and waste management, your local elected councillors will still make the ultimate day-to-day decisions on what infrastructure to prioritize and what localized community programs to cut or keep.

If you would like to explore how this impacts other parts of your budget, let me know:

  • Would you like details on how the major parties' healthcare and prescription funding models differ for seniors?
  • Should we look at proposed policies regarding power bills and energy infrastructure?
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account