Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

New Zealand 2026 election: GP access, hospital waiting times and health funding

Policy snapshot: October 2026 · General election: 7 November 2026

The main divide in the election is between parties proposing to make healthcare more affordable and expand publicly funded services, and parties emphasising prevention, earlier treatment, medicines funding and making existing health resources go further.

Labour is proposing three free GP visits a year and a job guarantee for eligible New Zealand-trained graduate nurses. The Greens advocate free healthcare and a larger public system, while National is emphasising medicines, screening and prevention. ACT and NZ First have proposed changes to how primary care is delivered, and Opportunity has proposed a substantial long-term increase in health spending. Te Pāti Māori focuses on prevention and Māori-led healthcare. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Labour's 2026 Election Policies

One important distinction: making a GP appointment cheaper is not the same as making an appointment available sooner. Reducing hospital waiting lists also requires sufficient doctors, nurses, specialists, operating theatres and funding to deliver additional treatment.

1. What each party is proposing

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Affordability, primary-care capacity and nurse recruitment

  • GP access: Three free GP visits each year for every New Zealander through a proposed Medicard system. Labour also proposes up to 50 loans a year to help doctors buy into owner-operated practices.

  • More appointments: A plan to free up more than 4.5 million GP appointments annually through phone triage, technology support and targeted funding.

  • Hospital capacity: Clear the backlog of hospital repairs and invest in buildings and essential systems.

  • Staffing: Guarantee eligible New Zealand-trained graduate nurses a health-system job from 2027, with roles of at least 0.8 full-time equivalent.

  • Funding: Labour says its healthcare commitments will be funded by a targeted 28% capital gains tax on investment and commercial property, excluding the family home and several other asset categories. It also pledges to return the government accounts to surplus in 2028/29. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's Cost of Living Plan2026 Election Policy Summaries

    Important timing: Labour's detailed policy pages specify July 2028 for the three free GP visits, despite the policy being promoted as an election commitment. Check the implementation date in the final policy details.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Prevention, medicines and earlier intervention

  • GP access: Emphasises earlier care and preventive health measures rather than Labour's promise of three free GP visits.

  • Hospital treatment: Proposes earlier diagnosis through expanded screening, including lowering the bowel screening age to 50, extending breast screening to age 74 by 2029, and introducing prostate and lung cancer screening pilots.

  • Staffing: The party's current approach includes expanding healthcare training capacity and changing how services are delivered; the health-policy summary does not identify a comparable new nationwide hospital-staffing guarantee.

  • Funding: Pledges an additional $604 million for Pharmac's medicines budget, funded by reducing foreign aid spending outside the Pacific. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

    National's published headline commitments in the sources reviewed do not set out a new quantified reduction in overall hospital waiting lists or a comprehensive new workforce funding package.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Free care, public provision and workforce investment

  • GP access: Wants free, accessible diagnosis and treatment, including a transition towards fully funded, publicly owned GP clinics and other health services.
  • Waiting lists: Emphasises prevention and increasing the health workforce. Its published workforce proposals specifically include training and employing more mental-health professionals to eliminate therapy waiting lists.
  • Staffing: Increase the number of people entering health professions, improve retention, support Māori health-professional training, and invest in fair pay, pay parity, reasonable workloads and better working conditions.
  • Funding: A broader expansion of public healthcare rather than a narrowly targeted GP subsidy. The policy summary does not give a single quantified nationwide hospital waiting-list target or total cost for this package. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

More services through pharmacies and changes to health administration

  • GP access: Proposes letting pharmacists treat everyday conditions, manage long-term conditions, order blood tests and adjust medicines within limits set by a patient's GP. The aim is to make more care available without requiring every issue to be handled by a doctor.
  • Hospital waiting lists: Its published health priorities reviewed here focus more on medicines, service delivery and cancer care than on a new numerical target for reducing general hospital waits.
  • Staffing: The approach includes using different healthcare professionals to deliver a wider range of services.
  • Funding: Increase the share of the health budget spent on medicines by one percentage point annually, aiming to reach 12% in 2033, funded from existing baseline health spending. ACT also proposes consolidating health administration under a Ministry of Health and Wellbeing. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Prevention and greater professional autonomy

  • GP access: Proposes health coaches in primary care and restoring professional autonomy in general practice.
  • Waiting lists: Its published health programme stresses preventing illness and reducing barriers to earlier care rather than specifying a new national hospital waiting-list target.
  • Staffing: Health coaches would add another type of support within primary care, although the reviewed summary does not specify a large new doctor or nurse recruitment target.
  • Funding: Proposes preventive-health initiatives and changes to medicines regulation and access. The reviewed summary does not specify a comparable overall health-budget increase. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

A long-term funding commitment

  • GP access: Increase the share of health funding directed to primary care, with earlier detection and treatment as a priority.
  • Hospital waiting lists: Its approach is to strengthen the health system over time, rather than relying only on short-term waiting-list initiatives.
  • Staffing: A long-term plan is intended to support a more sustainable health system, though the summary does not specify a new nationwide number of doctors or nurses.
  • Funding: Proposes a cross-party, 10-year health plan that would raise health spending from a stated 7.4% of GDP to 9% of GDP and direct more funding to primary care. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Prevention, whānau wellbeing and Māori-led services

  • GP access: Focuses on making services accessible, culturally safe and accountable to Māori, supported by Māori-led health solutions.
  • Waiting lists: Emphasises prevention and whānau wellbeing to reduce reliance on crisis-based care.
  • Staffing: Its health proposals support Māori-led services and solutions, but the Resident Doctors' Association's summary records no specific workforce commitments in its response.
  • Funding: The published summary does not provide a directly comparable overall health-budget figure or a new numerical hospital waiting-list target. 2026 Election Policy Summaries2026 Election Policy Summaries

2. What do the proposals mean for waiting times?

The policies address three different problems, which are worth separating.

Issue Main approaches in the election
Getting a GP appointment Labour's extra appointment capacity and free visits; ACT's expanded pharmacy services; NZ First's health coaches; TOP's increased primary-care funding.
Getting hospital treatment sooner Greens' workforce investment and public-service expansion; Labour's hospital repairs; National's earlier diagnosis and screening measures.
Having enough staff Labour's graduate-nurse job guarantee; Greens' recruitment, retention and employment-condition proposals; other parties' training, prevention or alternative-service-delivery approaches.
Paying for the changes Labour's proposed property capital gains tax; National's reprioritisation of foreign aid for medicines; ACT's use of existing health funding; TOP's proposed higher long-term health spending.

2026 Election Policy SummariesLabour's 2026 Election Policies2026 Election Policy Summaries2026 Election Policy Summaries

What is the current GP access target?

The government introduced a primary-care health target on 1 July 2026: more than 80% of people should be able to access a general-practice appointment within one week by 2030. The first national results were scheduled for publication in late 2026. Primary care health target

That provides a useful benchmark for judging the parties' plans. A promise to make visits free addresses affordability, while the existing target measures how quickly people can get an appointment.

For hospital waiting times, the key questions are whether a party commits to measurable reductions in specialist appointment and planned-treatment waits, and whether it will fund the staff and capacity needed to deliver them. The party summaries reviewed here do not provide directly comparable new numerical targets for reducing overall hospital waiting lists.

3. What should voters look for on staffing and funding?

Three details help distinguish the proposals:

  • Recruitment versus retention: Labour's graduate-nurse job guarantee addresses employment for new graduates. The Greens also explicitly address retention, pay and working conditions. Neither commitment alone establishes how quickly shortages across all hospital specialties would be resolved. 2026 Election Policy SummariesLabour's 2026 Election Policies
  • New money versus redirected money: TOP's proposal would increase health spending as a share of GDP. National and ACT have specific commitments that redirect or reprioritise existing public funds. These are different funding approaches and should not be treated as equivalent increases in total health spending. 2026 Election Policy Summaries2026 Election Policy Summaries
  • Announced policy versus delivered results: Appointment targets, workforce promises and budget announcements are commitments, not evidence that waits have already fallen. Implementation dates, staffing numbers and published results will matter.

Official and independent sources to compare

Bottom line: The clearest differences are in how parties propose to improve access, recruit and retain health workers, and pay for additional care. Labour has specific commitments on GP costs, appointment capacity and graduate nurses; the Greens emphasise free public services and workforce conditions; National focuses on earlier care and medicines; ACT and NZ First propose alternative ways to deliver primary care; TOP proposes a higher long-term health-spending level; and Te Pāti Māori prioritises Māori-led, preventive care. Their ability to reduce actual waiting times will depend on implementation, available staff and the capacity funded under each plan.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

Health and the performance of the public health system are central issues in the 2026 New Zealand general election, with parties sharply divided over how to fix primary care accessibility, manage hospital waitlists, and resource the workforce.

Different political parties approach GP access, hospital wait times, staffing, and funding through distinct strategies:


1. Improving GP Access and Affordability

  • Labour Party: Promotes a flagship policy introducing the "Medicard," which would provide every New Zealander with three free general practitioner (GP) visits each year. To prevent overwhelmed clinics, Labour proposes rolling out clinical phone triage systems and administrative tech support intended to free up millions of appointments annually, alongside a "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to support practice ownership.
  • Green Party: Goes further by advocating for unlimited free GP visits (alongside universal free dental care), prioritizing community care clinics in high-need areas first, funded via a wealth tax.
  • National Party / Coalition Government: Emphasizes targeted infrastructure and capacity investments rather than universal blanket subsidies, arguing that unfunded universal models risk overwhelming an already strained primary network.
  • Te Pāti Māori & The Opportunities Party (TOP): Te Pāti Māori supports free primary care for lower-income whānau (under $60,000) backed by a Māori Health Card. TOP champions a "Teal Card" program to provide free primary healthcare, mental health, and dental care for everyone under 30.
  • ACT Party: Opposes universal free-GP schemes, instead promoting structural market reforms like a government-as-purchaser model, individual health savings accounts, and incentives for private health coverage.

2. Reducing Hospital Waiting Times and Backlogs

  • National Party / Coalition Government: Relies heavily on structured performance metrics and the private sector. The government has formalised contracts with private providers (such as the "Elective Boost" initiative and 10-year private hospital agreements) to outsource surgeries and cut elective backlogs. They also maintain strict clinical health targets, including requirements for emergency department throughput and maximum waits for first specialist assessments and elective treatments.
  • Labour & The Green Party: Strongly criticize private outsourcing, arguing it diverts critical resources away from the public system. They argue that fixing hospital waitlists requires strengthening upstream primary care (so fewer people end up acute in emergency departments) and directly injecting capital into public infrastructure and staffing.
  • New Zealand First: Places substantial focus on a dedicated waitlist reduction fund and ensuring rapid diagnostics, while emphasizing public system resourcing.

3. Staffing and Workforce Strategies

  • Labour Party: Has pledged to guarantee employment to eligible New Zealand–trained graduate nurses and aims to increase training slots for specific bottlenecks, such as trainee sonographers for maternity scans.
  • National / Government Approach: Focuses on immigration settings, international recruitment pathways for doctors and nurses, and training pipeline adjustments to alleviate chronic shortages.
  • Broader Debate: Across the political spectrum, health experts emphasize that any expansion of care or reduction in wait times is intrinsically throttled by severe workforce shortages across nursing, general practice, and specialist fields. Parties disagree on whether the solution lies in aggressive public sector recruitment guarantees or broader structural market shifts.

4. Funding Models

  • Labour: Proposes funding its primary care and health commitments through a targeted capital gains tax (28%) on specific commercial and residential investment properties (excluding family homes and farms).
  • The Greens: Propose higher progressive wealth and corporate taxes to dramatically expand public health funding.
  • National & ACT: Focus on fiscal restraint, prioritization, and reprioritizing existing health baselines alongside private partnerships, warning that broad new taxes damage economic productivity.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account