Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on housing-cost support for older people with limited income?

If NZ Super is your main income and you rent privately, two issues matter especially for your 2026 election decision: how much help you receive with rent, and how secure and affordable your housing will be if your rent rises or you have to move.

Those are related, but they are not the same. A party might offer more financial assistance without protecting you against rent increases, while another might promise stronger rental protections without increasing your weekly income.

The New Zealand general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. The parties' published policies give you several different approaches to compare. New Zealand election scheduled for Nov. 7 with the costs of living and housing the top issuesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The key differences between parties

The comparison below focuses on private renters on limited incomes, including older people receiving NZ Super. It distinguishes announced election policies from measures the current Government has already adopted.

Party Published approach relevant to your situation
Green Party Proposes limiting annual rent increases to 2%, building enough public housing to clear the public housing waitlist, and extending income-related rent subsidies to council housing. These are proposals, not current entitlements. Leave our homes alone!Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis
Labour Promises fairer, more secure renting and more affordable housing. It has also announced a $950 million guarantee to help community housing providers build more homes, including housing for older people. Its published policies reviewed here do not specify a new weekly rent payment for older private renters. Affordable homes for allRelease: Labour backs community housing to build more homes
National The current Government's Budget 2026 provides for higher maximum Accommodation Supplement rates for private renters from 1 April 2027, alongside more social housing. However, it is also increasing the minimum income-related rent contribution for social housing tenants from 25% to 30% of income. Social Housing and Welfare - Budget 2026Delivering fairer social housing
ACT Supports the Government's shift towards higher Accommodation Supplement rates for private renters, alongside higher social housing rents. ACT also advocates reducing restrictions on rental property investment, arguing that this can support rental supply. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
New Zealand First Its previously published housing policy supports social housing, particularly housing for seniors, and public rental housing projects. I could not verify a new 2026 commitment to a specific increase in rent assistance for older private renters. 2023 Election PoliciesNZFirst Policy Announcement: Changes to Fast-Track Residential Approvals

These are the main documented differences I could verify. Te Pāti Māori and other parties may also be worth comparing, but I would not attribute a specific rent-support promise to them without checking their current policy details.

What this could mean for you

1. Help paying your rent now

The Accommodation Supplement is particularly important if you receive NZ Super and rent privately. It is a weekly payment based on your income, assets, accommodation costs and circumstances. The maximum for a single person aged 16 or over currently ranges from $70 to $165 a week, depending on the area. You must meet the eligibility requirements, and the maximum is not the amount everyone receives. Accommodation SupplementAccommodation Supplement

The Government's Budget 2026 plans to increase the maximum rates by $10–$30 a week, depending on the area, from 1 April 2027. That is a change to the maximum available, not a guaranteed increase of that amount for every recipient. AS – Increasing maximum rate factsheet Budget 2026Budget 2026 – for the housing and urban system - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport (Formerly Te Tūāpapa Kura Kāinga

When comparing parties, ask:

  • Would the maximum assistance increase, and by how much?
  • Would the income or asset rules change?
  • Would support keep pace with rising rents, or could your rent increase faster than your assistance?

2. Protection against rent increases

This is where the parties' approaches differ more clearly.

  • The Green Party's proposed 2% annual rent-increase limit is a direct response to your concern about sudden rent increases.
  • Labour's stated approach is to make renting more secure, but you should check the specific proposed protections and whether they would limit the size of increases.
  • National and ACT emphasise rental supply and changes to the housing-support system rather than a general 2% rent cap.

A rent cap could offer more predictability, but it is worth checking precisely how it would apply to existing tenancies, new tenancies and changes of landlord. Claims about its wider effects on rental supply are contested, so distinguish the policy itself from parties' arguments about its consequences. Leave our homes alone!Affordable homes for allACT New Zealand

3. Reducing the risk of having to move

If the main worry is being forced out of an affordable home, public and community housing policies also matter.

National's Budget 2026 provides funding for approximately 1,800–2,250 additional social homes over three years. However, the Government's wider social housing reforms also seek to direct social housing towards people with the greatest barriers to accessing private rentals and to encourage some tenants to move on. Budget 2026 - Securing Our FutureDelivering fairer social housing

Labour has announced support for community housing construction, while the Green Party has committed to expanding public housing and extending income-related rent subsidies. These approaches differ in how they seek to improve access and affordability, and new housing does not necessarily mean an immediate offer to an individual applicant. Release: Labour backs community housing to build more homesLeave our homes alone!

A practical way to compare the parties before voting

I'd suggest using these three questions as your personal checklist rather than looking only at general promises to make housing more affordable.

You do not have to settle for a general promise about affordability. The most useful comparison for your circumstances is whether a party has a concrete plan to leave you with more money after rent, give you greater certainty about future increases, or improve your access to secure housing.

You can also check your current eligibility for assistance through Work and Income's Accommodation Supplement information, without waiting for the election.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on housing-cost support for older people with limited income?

For older New Zealanders who rely primarily on NZ Superannuation and rent in the private market, housing costs represent a major source of financial vulnerability. Recent research (such as the 2026 Older Persons Poverty Monitor) highlights that a growing number of older people live in rented accommodation and face severe pressure after housing costs.

Political parties approach the intersection of senior incomes, housing stability, and financial support through distinctly different lenses.


Key Policy Approaches by Party Groupings

1. National, ACT, and NZ First (Center-Right to Nationalist)

  • Focus on Economic Growth and Supply: Parties like National and ACT generally emphasize increasing overall housing supply through planning and zoning reforms to moderate market rents over time, rather than heavy intervention in rental price caps.
  • NZ Super Settings: National and ACT support long-term adjustments to the superannuation age or settings to manage fiscal sustainability, though NZ First strongly guards the eligibility age at 65.
  • Targeted Assistance: Support for low-income renters heavily relies on the existing Accommodation Supplement (AS) framework and income-related rent systems. Recent legislative changes have focused on tightening alignment across housing assistance and managing public housing settings. Historically, NZ First has advocated specifically for dedicated seniors' housing planning to address the rising demographic of older renters, while center-right parties look to targeted benefit management and fiscal restraint.

2. Labour, The Greens, and Te Pāti Māori (Center-Left to Left)

  • Direct Renter Protections: These parties place heavy emphasis on protecting private renters from rapid cost increases. Their policy toolkits frequently feature proposals for rent stabilization or limits on annual rent increases, enforcing a mandatory Rental Warrant of Fitness to guarantee minimum quality standards, and establishing landlord registries.
  • Social Housing Expansion: They prioritize large-scale state and public housing construction to provide secure, income-related rent options (where rent is pegged to a fixed percentage of income) so that older beneficiaries are less exposed to private market volatility.
  • Income Support & Living Costs: Labour and its allies lean toward bolstering supplementary income support, expanding healthcare/pharmaceutical access (such as free GP visits or targeted medical cards), and protecting NZ Super settings to offset the cost-of-living squeeze on fixed incomes.

3. The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • Systemic Tax & Income Restructuring: TOP proposes broader structural changes, such as a universal citizen’s income backed by a land value tax, designed to replace or simplify various legacy welfare and supplementary assistance categories while providing specific top-ups for superannuitants. They also advocate strict measures on housing affordability and urban land use.

Key Questions to Consider When Voting

When evaluating how parties match your concerns about rent increases and housing security, consider weighing these priorities:

  1. Market Intervention vs. Supply: Do you favor parties that want to directly regulate the rental market (e.g., rent increase caps, rental warrants of fitness) or parties that focus on broader housing supply and economic settings?
  2. Public Housing vs. Direct Subsidies: Do you prefer policies focused on building more public/social housing units (which offer income-protected rents), or policies centered on enhancing cash-support mechanisms like the Accommodation Supplement for private renters?
  3. Cost-of-Living Offsets: Look closely at whether parties offer complementary relief for fixed-income earners—such as subsidies for healthcare, energy, or rates—that free up cash to absorb shifting housing costs.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on housing-cost support for older people with limited income?

Navigating renting on NZ Superannuation carries significant financial weight, and housing costs are a central discussion point for older New Zealanders. Main political parties approach rental affordability, income support, and housing security for seniors through distinct lenses:

  • National Party : Emphasizes broader economic supply-side housing reforms to moderate market costs, alongside pointing to existing mechanisms like the Accommodation Supplement and expanded rates rebates (which primarily assist older homeowners, but signal general cost-of-living alignment). Their focus leans toward increasing overall housing supply to ease rental price pressures over time. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • New Zealand First : Focuses specifically on older demographics through proposals for a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan. They have advocated looking into increasing the Accommodation Supplement specifically for older New Zealanders in rental accommodation holding SuperGold cards, alongside supply incentives for landlords.

  • Green Party : Concentrates heavily on direct renter protections and public stock. Their platform includes capping annual rent increases at 2%, expanding accessible public housing, and proposing a state-owned, not-for-profit retirement village or housing options to provide non-market alternatives for seniors.

  • Labour Party : Centers much of its cost-of-living platform on universal relief measures that indirectly benefit fixed-income seniors—such as energy-efficiency and heating support and public transport fare caps—while supporting public housing growth. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP) : Proposes structural reform by replacing the traditional Accommodation Supplement framework with a universal housing payment model, alongside boosting social housing availability. [greypowermag.co.nz]

You can review a comprehensive breakdown of competing party manifestos on platforms like Policy.nz or advocacy insights via Grey Power Magazine.

Would you like to explore how specific policies like the Accommodation Supplement or rent controls/caps would directly impact a weekly budget on NZ Super?

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on housing-cost support for older people with limited income?

AI Overview

It is entirely understandable to feel anxious about rental security and rising costs while living on a fixed income like NZ Superannuation. Data from Te Ara Ahunga Ora Retirement Commission highlights that retirees who rent are significantly more vulnerable to financial stress, often spending 40% or more of their superannuation on housing.

For the 2026 General Election , political parties offer distinctly different approaches to structural housing support, tenant protection, and the [Accommodation Supplement](workandincome.govt. income).


Party Comparison on Renter and Housing Cost Support

The following table summarizes where the major parties stand on policies impacting senior renters with limited incomes:

Political Party Accommodation Supplement / Rent Subsidies Rent Control & Tenant Security Public & Social Housing Supply
National Increasing Accommodation Supplement by $10–$30/week for private renters from April 2027 (funded by rising social housing rents). Focuses on broader market supply to ease long-term rental market pressures. Reinvesting in 2,250 additional social homes via Budget 2026.
Labour Will reverse National's changes ; vows to stop the 2027 social housing rent hikes and the private rent subsidy trade-off. Emphasizes general cost-of-living relief, household energy savings, and retirement village exit transparency. Committed to building at least 6,000 new social housing places over 4 years.
Green Party Supports heavily subsidized, expanded public support targeted at low-income individuals. Proposes a strict 2% annual cap on rent increases alongside an independently enforced Rental Warrant of Fitness. Pledges thousands more accessible public homes and a state-owned, not-for-profit retirement village system.
ACT Favors reducing government intervention and driving costs down via private sector competition. Opposes artificial rent caps or strict landlord regulations, aiming to boost rental supply instead. Prefers devolving housing responsibilities away from state-run entities like Kāinga Ora.
NZ First Generally supports maintaining current safety nets while protecting the foundational value of NZ Super. Backs local government rates rebates that indirectly lower background property operating costs. Prioritizes reserving social housing assets for New Zealand citizens first.
TOP (The Opportunities Party) Proposes a Universal Housing Payment to entirely replace the current Accommodation Supplement model. Argues their proposed 1.75% land value tax would pressure high property values downwards, making renting more financially viable. Actively supports expanding the market footprint of community housing providers.

Crucial Direct Impacts for Retired Renters

1. The Budget 2026 Housing Shake-up (National vs. Labour)

The current National-led coalition implemented a structural overhaul in Budget 2026 that goes into effect on April 1, 2027.

  • If you rent a private property: National's policy will increase your Accommodation Supplement by $10 to $30 a week. However, Labour has committed to reversing this entire operational package if elected, calling the supplement an indirect "subsidy for private landlords".
  • If you live in public/social housing: Under National, the minimum income-related rent contribution shifts from 25% up to 30% of your total income. This means social housing tenants will see an average rent increase of roughly $31 a week. Labour has explicitly pledged to block this increase to protect low-income tenants. (Note: This change does not apply to Temporary Additional Support for superannuitants).

2. Protection Against Rent Increases and Moves

If your primary concern is an unexpected rent hike or forced relocation:

  • The Green Party offers the most direct protection by promising a legislative 2% limit on annual rent increases , giving you high predictability over your fixed budget.
  • Labour and the Greens both place a stronger emphasis on expanding state-owned social housing stock (6,000+ units), which provides long-term tenure security compared to the private rental market.
  • National and ACT argue that capping rents artificially damages the market. Their strategy relies on slashing development red tape to encourage landlords to build more properties, thereby lowering rental prices through increased competition.

To help tailor this look at your options, are you currently renting a private property or living in social housing , and do you currently qualify for the Accommodation Supplement?

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account