Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties differ on farming, biosecurity and access to services in rural New Zealand?

New Zealand 2026 election: farming, biosecurity and rural services

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, the key differences between parties are likely to centre on three questions: how much flexibility farmers should have, how New Zealand should protect its primary industries and environment from biological threats, and how reliably people in rural communities can access essential services.

These issues overlap. For example, freshwater and emissions rules affect farm operating costs; biosecurity affects the livelihoods of farmers, growers and rural businesses; and access to healthcare, schools, transport and telecommunications affects whether rural communities can retain workers and families.

An important distinction when comparing parties is between their current policies for the 2026 election, their record in government, and their longer-term principles. The comparison below focuses on those differences rather than predicting an election result.

1. Farming and environmental regulation

The central divide is between parties that emphasise reducing regulatory costs and increasing production, and parties that place greater emphasis on environmental limits, climate obligations and changes to farming practices.

Nation of Debt: High dairy prices drive sharp fall in NZ farm debt - NZ Herald

National

Focuses on export growth, farm profitability, simpler rules and greater flexibility over land use. Its published programme includes national farming standards, simpler consenting for activities such as water storage, and support for agricultural innovation. National says production can grow while meeting environmental obligations. Land Use Flexibility: Improving the environment while producing moreNational sets out plan to double exports by 2034Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary Sector

Farm Tours | Beresford Heights & Rise Farm, Owaka, New Zealand

ACT

Emphasises property rights, reducing compliance costs and limiting climate-related burdens on farmers. Its 2026 rural policies include cutting carbon-tax and net-zero requirements, introducing national standards for everyday farming, and providing greater certainty around freshwater limits. It has also proposed a rural workforce visa. ACT New ZealandACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

Fencing waterways - DairyNZ | DairyNZ

Labour

Emphasises farm profitability and practical, predictable policy, while acknowledging pressures from costs, biosecurity risks and extreme weather. Labour says it would not restore the controversial 2020 freshwater rules in their previous form, so its approach should not simply be equated with returning to its earlier policies. Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary Sector

Grant-Wills-Farm-C | Earth Sciences New Zealand | NIWA

Green Party

Puts stronger environmental protection at the centre of its farming policy. Its 2026 manifesto supports sustainable and regenerative food production, healthier freshwater, nature restoration and stronger action on agricultural climate pollution. This implies greater emphasis on changing high-impact farming practices than the National–ACT approach. Manifesto 2026Manifesto 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Community meeting - Methven | Draft Long Term Plan 2024-34 | Our place - Tōtātou Wāhi

New Zealand First

Emphasises the economic contribution of farming, forestry, fishing and other primary industries, alongside regional investment. It highlights water storage, irrigation, flood protection, port upgrades and returning more economic benefits to the regions. Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary SectorNZFirst Campaign Announcement: The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”

What this means for farmers

  • Compliance and operating costs: National and ACT focus on simplifying rules and giving farmers more discretion. Labour stresses practical, predictable rules. The Greens give more weight to environmental outcomes that may require changes to current practices.
  • Water and land use: National emphasises national consistency and productive land use; ACT emphasises property rights and certainty around limits; the Greens prioritise freshwater health. Labour says it would develop a different approach from its 2020 freshwater policy.
  • Emissions: National has removed agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme under its current programme. ACT proposes broader changes to climate policy. The Greens advocate stronger emissions reductions, while Labour's precise 2026 commitments should be checked against its detailed policy releases. Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary SectorACT New ZealandManifesto 2026

2. Biosecurity: protecting farms, exports and native species

Biosecurity is especially important in New Zealand because an incursion can damage farm productivity, disrupt exports and threaten native ecosystems. The Ministry for Primary Industries' biosecurity action plan covers border protection, surveillance, research, pest management and cooperation between government, industry and communities. The biosecurity system action planProposed amendments to the Biosecurity Act

The main distinction is not necessarily whether a party supports biosecurity—protecting the country is a shared objective—but how it prioritises funding, responsibilities, research and responses to threats.

Party Relevant emphasis
National Supporting the primary sector, innovation and export growth, alongside the existing government-led biosecurity system.
Labour Identifies biosecurity risks as one of the pressures on farm businesses and rural communities; stresses resilience and practical support.
ACT Emphasises practical tools, reduced regulatory burdens and productive land management, including pest-control approaches such as targeted grazing on eligible conservation land.
Greens Emphasises tighter prevention of invasive species, biodiversity protection and the restoration of ecosystems.
New Zealand First Emphasises primary-sector resilience and agricultural innovation, including research into soil health and sustainable production.

Sources: Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary SectorACT New ZealandPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026The biosecurity system action planNZFirst Campaign Announcement: The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy” These are broad policy emphases, not a claim that each party has published a fully specified, comparable biosecurity funding package.

Questions worth checking in each party's detailed policy

  • Who pays for surveillance, eradication and long-term pest management: taxpayers, affected industries or a shared arrangement?
  • How quickly would the government respond to a serious incursion, and how would it compensate affected businesses?
  • What investment is promised for border checks, diagnostic laboratories, research and regional response teams?
  • How will policy protect both agricultural production and native plants, animals and ecosystems?

These details matter because a general pledge to support biosecurity does not necessarily guarantee faster responses or more resources for a particular industry.

3. Access to services in rural New Zealand

For rural households, access means more than having a service somewhere in the country. It means being able to see a GP without a long trip, get an ambulance when needed, keep children connected to school, access reliable mobile coverage and broadband, and travel on safe roads.

The parties differ in how they approach affordability, public investment and service delivery.

Munro Road Resilience Project: Lessons learned and our commitment to improvement

National

Emphasises infrastructure, economic growth and making existing services work more efficiently. Its broader approach includes investment in transport infrastructure and changes to planning rules. For rural voters, the key question is which local roads, bridges, water projects and connectivity improvements receive funding. A more practical planning system for food and fibre productionPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Rural health in Coromandel under pressure | New Zealand Doctor

Labour

Has announced three free GP visits per person each year through its proposed Medicard, removal of prescription charges from July 2027, and a weekly public transport fare cap. It also proposes jobs for eligible New Zealand-trained graduate nurses. These measures target healthcare costs and affordability, although they do not by themselves ensure that a GP or public transport service is available nearby. Labour's Cost of Living PlanLabour's 2026 Election Policies

Relief for parents and students as Ministry of Education pauses school bus reviews | RNZ News

ACT

Has explicitly proposed allowing children to take any passing school bus, rather than only a bus designated for their own school. It also emphasises rural workforce access and lower compliance costs. The practical impact would depend on eligibility, capacity and implementation. ACT New ZealandPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Community | Raetihi

Green Party

Emphasises accessible, properly supported healthcare and public investment in essential services. Its manifesto also stresses affordable transport, energy and housing. For rural communities, the relevant test is how national commitments translate into staffing, outreach services and reliable transport outside the main centres. Manifesto 2026Manifesto 2026

Hawke's Bay residents outraged over council's proposed water rate hike | RNZ News

New Zealand First

Makes regional development a central theme, highlighting regional infrastructure funding, flood protection, water storage and irrigation. Its 2026 health announcements also emphasise prevention, primary care and reducing administrative burdens for GPs. Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary SectorNZFirst Campaign Announcement: The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”

Rural service issues to compare closely

Issue What to look for in party commitments
Healthcare Rural GP and nurse recruitment, after-hours care, ambulance coverage, hospital travel and telehealth
Schools Rural school viability, teacher recruitment, school buses and access to trades training
Roads and transport Rural road maintenance, bridge upgrades, public transport and access to essential services
Broadband and mobile Coverage gaps, reliability, resilience during emergencies and the cost of rural connections
Energy and water Affordable electricity, dependable supply, drinking-water infrastructure, irrigation and drought resilience

A distinction worth keeping in mind is that lower healthcare costs and better healthcare access are not the same thing. A free appointment is of limited practical value if there is no local clinician available. Similarly, funding for roads does not necessarily address mobile black spots or limited public transport.

4. At-a-glance comparison

This table summarises the broad policy direction, rather than rating parties or implying that every policy has been fully costed and implemented.

Party Farming Biosecurity and nature Rural services
National Productivity, exports, simpler rules Support for primary industries and the existing biosecurity system Infrastructure and economic development
ACT Property rights, reduced regulation, flexibility Practical pest control and productive land management School-bus access, workforce flexibility and reduced barriers
Labour Farm viability, cost pressures, practical regulation Farm resilience and protection against incursions Lower healthcare costs, prescriptions and transport fares
Greens Sustainable farming and stronger environmental safeguards Prevention, biodiversity and ecosystem restoration Accessible healthcare and investment in essential services
New Zealand First Primary industries, regional economic development Agricultural innovation and resilient production Regional infrastructure and a greater focus on prevention in healthcare

Sources: party policy announcements and manifestos, plus Rural News' October 2026 comparison of primary-sector commitments. Election 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary SectorACT New ZealandManifesto 2026Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesNZFirst Campaign Announcement: The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”

5. Where to verify the details before voting

Because the election is approaching and policy announcements are still being released, these sources are useful for checking the actual commitments and any updates.

The key questions for rural voters

When comparing the parties, three questions can help cut through campaign language:

  1. Will the policy improve the viability of your farm or rural business? Look at the actual rules, compliance costs, labour availability, water security and biosecurity response arrangements.
  2. Will it protect the land and natural resources that rural livelihoods depend on? Consider freshwater quality, soil health, climate resilience and the control of invasive pests and diseases.
  3. Will it make essential services more accessible where people live? Look for specific commitments on local healthcare staffing, school transport, connectivity, roads and emergency services.

The most important distinction is that parties can share the same stated goal—thriving rural communities—while proposing quite different ways to achieve it. Comparing the specific commitments, funding and delivery arrangements is more informative than relying on party labels alone.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties differ on farming, biosecurity and access to services in rural New Zealand?

In New Zealand, political parties approach rural issues through distinct philosophical lenses—balancing primary sector productivity and economic growth against environmental bottom lines, biosecurity protection, and equitable delivery of regional and social services.

The major political parties differ across farming, biosecurity, and rural access to services in the following ways:


1. Farming and Environmental Regulations

  • National and ACT: Focus heavily on deregulation, reducing compliance costs, and boosting export profitability. National emphasizes replacing the Resource Management Act (RMA) with frameworks that explicitly recognize food and fibre production goals, cutting red tape, supporting on-farm water storage, and keeping agriculture out of direct livestock pricing mechanisms. ACT pushes for even deeper structural reform, arguing for the removal of what it views as unnecessary regulatory barriers, process-heavy environmental rules, and bans on practices like live animal exports.
  • New Zealand First: Adopts a "back-to-basics" approach for the primary sector, prioritizing land-use flexibility, reliable water and irrigation infrastructure, and protecting productive land from widespread conversion into carbon forestry. They also champion regional development initiatives, such as returning a portion of mining royalties directly to the regions.
  • Labour, Greens, and The Opportunity Party (TOP): Emphasize a more cautious balance between agricultural productivity and environmental preservation.
    • Labour argues for maintaining strict environmental bottom lines (such as freshwater quality protections) alongside supporting farmers, while acknowledging administrative bottlenecks—such as long wait times for approving modern, safer agricultural chemicals.
    • The Greens advocate for transition support toward sustainable and regenerative farming practices, stricter regulation of agrichemicals to safeguard waterways, and curbing whole-farm conversions to exotic forestry.
    • TOP targets technology adoption and innovation via targeted tax incentives (like investment tax credits for small businesses and farms) alongside evidence-based environmental regulations.

2. Biosecurity

  • Primary Sector Alignment: Across the political spectrum, parties recognize biosecurity as a vital shield for New Zealand’s export economy, though they differ on resourcing and execution.
  • National and ACT lean toward streamlining regulatory frameworks and easing the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) bottlenecks so that farmers and growers can access newer, safer crop protection tools and veterinary medicines faster.
  • New Zealand First and Labour emphasize strengthening border protections and biosecurity surveillance, viewing biosecurity investment as essential infrastructure to insulate primary industries from exotic pests, diseases (like Mycoplasma bovis or fruit fly incursions), and climate-driven risks.

3. Access to Services in Rural New Zealand

  • Regional Infrastructure and Healthcare: Rural health, education, telecommunications, and transport services are major flashpoints.
  • National and Right-Leaning Parties tend to focus heavily on economic enablers—such as investing in roading, local infrastructure, and cutting compliance costs for rural enterprises—while supporting community-led wellbeing initiatives (like funding for Rural Support Trusts and Farmstrong). They argue that economic growth and lower taxes are the best ways to sustain provincial towns.
  • New Zealand First strongly advocates for provincial and regional equity, arguing that regions generating export wealth must retain a fairer share of revenue (e.g., via regional royalties) to fund local infrastructure and services.
  • Labour, Greens, and Left/Centrist Parties place a greater emphasis on direct government funding for public services in the regions. This includes safeguarding rural healthcare access, supporting regional schools, maintaining public transport connectivity, and backing localized community health and mental health funding to counteract isolation and economic volatility in remote farming districts.

Are there specific aspects of these rural policies—such as freshwater management or regional health funding—that you would like to explore further?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties differ on farming, biosecurity and access to services in rural New Zealand?

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties diverge significantly on how they approach the primary sector, environmental regulations, biosecurity, and the viability of regional and rural communities.

1. Farming and Regulatory Approach

  • The National Party focuses on reducing compliance costs and "getting Wellington out of farming". As outlined by agriculture spokesperson Todd McClay, National emphasizes standardizing rules via 19 new national standards covering areas like vegetable growing, fertiliser application, and on-farm water storage, while keeping agriculture out of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and promoting land-use flexibility.

  • The ACT Party similarly emphasizes property rights, deregulation, and practical risk-based rules. ACT highlights its work in government via figures like Andrew Hoggard, pushing for simpler freshwater farm plans, recognizing existing industry assurance schemes, and expanding access to seasonal labour such as RSE workers.

  • The Labour Party takes a mixed approach, balancing support for primary producers with climate and environmental accountability. Commentary indicates Labour has stated it would not campaign on putting agricultural emissions directly into the ETS, though the stringency of its environmental positions remains tied to potential coalition dynamics with the Green Party.

  • The Green Party prioritizes strict environmental safeguards, climate action, and transitioning toward regenerative farming. The Greens advocate for fair regulation of agrichemicals to protect freshwater quality alongside targeted financial and research support for farmers shifting to low-impact, regenerative practices. [NZKGI]

  • New Zealand First positions itself as a staunch advocate for traditional primary industries (farming, fishing, forestry, and mining), emphasizing that export-driven sectors must be protected from excessive bureaucracy and valued as the backbone of the national economy. [Rural News Group]

2. Biosecurity and Pest Management

  • ACT and National emphasize practical, industry-aligned biosecurity implementation and operational efficiency, aiming to reduce duplication and costs for growers while maintaining strict border protection alongside industry partners.

  • New Zealand First strongly emphasizes robust border biosecurity and domestic pest/disease management as a matter of national security and economic protection for primary producers.

  • Labour and the Greens generally support robust, science-led biosecurity systems funded adequately by the Crown, with the Greens placing additional emphasis on ecological protection and managing environmental vectors that interact with biosecurity risks.

3. Access to Services and Regional Infrastructure

  • New Zealand First highlights its track record of utilizing coalition leverage to secure dedicated regional funding pools—such as historical Provincial Growth Funds and the Regional Infrastructure Fund—to support local infrastructure, connectivity, and community resilience.

  • The National Party points to targeted support for rural mental health and wellbeing through funding streams like Farmstrong, Rural Support Trusts, and the Rural Wellbeing Fund, alongside investments in local catchment groups.

  • Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori place a heavier focus on public service accessibility in rural areas, including regional healthcare, local transport, education, and social infrastructure, framing rural service delivery as an equity issue for remote and provincial populations. [Rural News Group]

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account