Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

New Zealand 2026 election: Māori education, te reo Māori and support for tamariki

For a whānau balancing work, household costs and children's needs, it helps to compare more than what parties say about education in general. The key questions are whether your tamariki can learn in the language and setting you want, whether they can get extra help at school, and how much say Māori have in shaping the education system.

New Zealand's general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026. The comparison below focuses on published policies and documented government decisions available as of 19 October 2026. It is a guide to the differences, not a recommendation about how to vote. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

1. How the main parties compare

The clearest distinction is between parties proposing Māori-led education structures and stronger te reo Māori commitments, and parties placing greater emphasis on common academic standards, individual learning needs or a more uniform education system.

Party Māori-medium education and te reo Māori Support for tamariki at school Māori participation and Te Tiriti
Te Pāti Māori Proposes a Māori Education Authority, stronger Māori-medium pathways, and te reo Māori as a core subject through Year 10. Proposes expanded school lunches, free public transport and free in-school counselling for students. Proposes Māori-led education governance and stronger legal accountability for Te Tiriti. Education: party comparison 2026PolicyTe Tiriti Entrenchment
Labour Party Has committed to restoring Te Tiriti obligations in the schooling system; this is distinct from a specific promise to make te reo compulsory. Emphasises public services and education, but the sources reviewed do not establish a directly comparable 2026 package for school lunches or learning support. Promises to restore the legal obligation for school boards to give effect to Te Tiriti, working with schools, kura and communities. Release: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schoolsPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026
Green Party Supports Māori rights and language revitalisation; the material reviewed here does not establish a complete, comparable 2026 Māori-medium education package. Its wider platform emphasises social investment and reducing living costs. Check the detailed education manifesto for specific school-level commitments. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 Places Māori representation and Te Tiriti-related issues within its policy agenda. Verify specific governance proposals in its current policy documents. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government
National Party The current government has funded teacher te reo Māori development, new kura resources and support for Māori-medium teaching. Proposes learning support coordinators in all schools with Years 1–8 from 2028, plus additional teacher-aide hours for children with behavioural, emotional and neurodiverse needs. Emphasises a nationally consistent curriculum and academic achievement. Its approach to Te Tiriti in school governance differs from Labour's proposed restoration. Māori education package and draft curriculum release as school startsTeaching the basics brilliantlyRelease: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schools
ACT New Zealand Emphasises schools' discretion to teach Māori language and local histories rather than imposing additional Treaty-related obligations on school boards. Emphasises reading, writing, maths and student achievement; supports school choice, including charter schools. Opposes Labour's proposed restoration of a legal Te Tiriti obligation for school boards and advocates its own constitutional approach. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
New Zealand First I could not verify a sufficiently detailed, current party commitment on Māori-medium education from the sources reviewed. Its wider 2026 platform includes cost-of-living and public-service issues, but I could not verify a directly comparable school-support package. Its wider political positioning should not be treated as a substitute for a specific education or Te Tiriti policy. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentAs New Zealand First pushes culture-war policies, analysts warn of limited appeal

A note on fairness: This table compares documented commitments, not how well a policy will work. Where I could not verify a detailed commitment, I have said so rather than assuming the party has no position. National's funded initiatives are existing government actions; proposals such as Labour's bill and National's promised future learning-support expansion are different types of commitment.

Official party policies and the independent election comparison at Policy.nz — education are useful places to check the full detail. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Education: party comparison 2026

2. What the differences mean for your whānau

If Māori-medium education is a priority

The important questions are whether a party will expand access to kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa Māori, wharekura and Māori-medium pathways, and whether it will fund the kaiako, teaching resources and specialist subjects needed as children progress.

  • Te Pāti Māori: explicitly proposes Māori-led education authority and greater Māori decision-making.
  • National: has funded Māori-medium teaching resources, curriculum development, teacher language training and STEM support for wharekura.
  • Labour and the Greens: compare their detailed current commitments on the availability and funding of Māori-medium pathways, rather than relying only on general statements of support for te reo Māori.

National's Budget 2025 Māori education package included $36.1 million in funding and reprioritisation for five areas of work, including teacher capability, online STEM teaching and curriculum support. That is an existing government programme, not a promise unique to the next election. Māori educationMāori education package and draft curriculum release as school starts

If you want te reo Māori protected and strengthened

There are two different issues to consider:

  • Learning te reo: access to qualified kaiako, quality teaching materials, and opportunities to continue learning at secondary school.
  • The status of te reo and Te Tiriti: whether schools have legal obligations to reflect Te Tiriti, and how much authority Māori have in decisions about language and education.

Labour has specifically promised to restore the legal obligation for school boards to give effect to Te Tiriti. ACT has publicly opposed that change, arguing that schools should prioritise educational achievement and that boards should not be required to interpret contested Treaty principles. These are materially different approaches to school governance. Release: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schoolsACT New Zealand

If your main concern is getting tamariki the help they need

Look beyond language policy to the practical support available to children.

National has proposed learning support coordinators for all schools with Years 1–8 from 2028 and a substantial expansion of teacher-aide hours. Te Pāti Māori has proposed school lunches, free public transport and free in-school counselling. These commitments address different needs, so consider which would make the greatest difference to your children and your household. Teaching the basics brilliantlyEducation: party comparison 2026

3. Questions worth asking before you vote

For a working whānau, I would suggest checking each party's published policy against these five practical questions:

  • Access: Will there be a suitable kōhanga reo, kura or Māori-medium pathway available to our children, including at secondary level?
  • Quality: What funding is committed to kaiako, te reo Māori resources, maths and literacy support, and specialist learning needs?
  • Affordability: What will the party do about school lunches, transport, uniforms, devices and other costs that families face?
  • Rangatiratanga: Will Māori, iwi, hapū and whānau have decision-making authority, or mainly opportunities to give feedback?
  • Delivery: Is the policy already funded, legislated, or operating, or is it an election promise with details still to be worked out?

For independent comparisons, visit Policy.nz's Te Ao Māori policies alongside its education policies. For the official government position on Māori-medium education, see the Ministry of Education's Māori Education information.

One final distinction matters: a party can support te reo Māori while disagreeing about who controls education decisions, how Te Tiriti obligations should be applied, or how funding is allocated. Those are separate questions, and it is reasonable to weigh each separately when deciding how to cast your two votes.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

For a Māori parent in a working household weighing your options for the 2026 New Zealand General Election, the choices across political parties involve distinct approaches to household living costs, local services, Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and support for tamariki in schools and kura.

Here is how the major political blocs and parties compare on these key priorities:


1. Māori-Medium Education and Te Reo Māori

  • Te Pāti Māori: Approaches education through the lens of tino rangatiratanga (self-determination). Their policy platform features the creation of an independent Māori Education Authority to shift governance and decision-making into Māori hands. They advocate for making te reo Māori a core subject up to Year 10 and embedding mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge systems) across all learning.
  • The Green Party & Labour Party: Labour’s 2026 education platform includes partnering more closely with Māori in education and backing kaupapa Māori training delivered by marae and iwi trusts. The Greens also support culturally grounded education and resourcing for indigenous knowledge systems, aligning more closely with Māori-led educational models.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First (The Current-Term Coalition / Centre-Right): Generally emphasize a "back-to-basics" curriculum focus (such as mandatory structured literacy and math hours in English-medium schools). While kura kaupapa Māori and wharekura operate under state funding frameworks, the centre-right parties have historically been more critical of race-based or co-governed authorities (like a separate Māori Education Authority), preferring mainstream public schooling choices alongside alternative models like charter (partnership) schools, which they have reintroduced and expanded.

2. Support for Children at School and Household Costs

As a working household dealing with cost-of-living pressures, the parties offer very different mechanisms to ease school expenses and family budgets:

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on reducing direct household out-of-pocket costs. Their 2026 pledges include cutting back-to-school costs by providing cheaper uniforms, restoring and expanding healthy school lunch funding, reinstating rural school bus routes, and capping public transport fares ($20/week in main centres).
  • Te Pāti Māori: Proposes expanding free school lunches, providing free in-school counselling, and introducing free public transport for students alongside broader systemic economic relief (such as targeting wealth taxes to fund social provisions for whānau).
  • National & ACT: Focus more on fiscal restraint, broad economic management, and choice. While the coalition government adjusted or scrutinized various universal programs to manage government books, they emphasize household tax relief, targeted support, and expanding school choice (such as charter schools and parent education accounts) as the best ways to empower families.

3. Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Māori Participation in Decisions

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for a fundamental constitutional transformation based on Matike Mai, making Te Tiriti o Waitangi entrenched and binding on the Crown, establishing an independent Te Tiriti Commissioner, and ensuring absolute Māori sovereignty over public service delivery (health, education, justice).
  • Labour and the Greens: Support the principles of Te Tiriti and partnering with iwi and hapū. They generally favor co-design and co-governance arrangements in public services (like health and conservation) to honor Treaty obligations, though their implementation models vary in radical scope compared to Te Pāti Māori.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First: Express skepticism toward co-governance, arguing for a uniform standard of citizenship where public services are delivered on the basis of individual need rather than ethnicity. ACT, in particular, has pushed for a formal legislative referendum/debate defining the "Principles of the Treaty," reflecting a philosophy that rejects race-based governance mechanisms in favor of equal public rights.

Summary for Your Vote

  • If your priority is Māori-led authority (tino rangatiratanga), mandatory te reo in schools, and structural Te Tiriti protection, Te Pāti Māori (and to an extent the Greens) strongly mirror those aspirations.
  • If your priority is relieving household costs (cheaper lunches, transport, and school expenses) coupled with structured partnerships with Māori providers, Labour features targeted cost-of-living policies for families.
  • If your priority is mainstream economic management, choice in schooling (like charter options), and universal public service delivery without separate governance structures, the National-led side of the house aligns more closely with that approach.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

As a working Māori parent navigating household costs and looking toward the 2026 general election, your focus on Te Tiriti o Waitangi , mārauranga Māori , and tamariki wellbeing sits at the heart of distinct ideological approaches among Aotearoa’s political parties.

Here is how the major parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori , and student support systems for the 2026 election:

  • Te Pāti Māori:

  • Māori Education & Te Tiriti: Proposes a flagship policy to establish an independent Māori Education Authority to return decision-making and self-determination (tino rangatiratanga) over Māori education directly back to Māori. They advocate for embedding mātauranga Māori deeply throughout the education system.

  • Te Reo Māori: Pledges to make te reo Māori a core, compulsory curriculum subject through to Year 10.

  • Student Support: Advocates for expanding the Ka Ora, Ka Ako school lunch programme, introducing free school counselling, and offering free public transport for students.

  • Green Party (Te Rèmana):

  • Māori Education & Te Tiriti: Supports working toward a co-designed Māori Education Authority and resetting recent curriculum/assessment reforms in close partnership with tangata whenua.

  • Student Support: Commits to expanding and protecting student and child support measures, including the universal Ka Ora, Ka Ako school lunch programme in schools.

  • Labour Party:

  • Māori Education & Te Tiriti: Commits to a partnership model with Māori in education, criticizing previous unilateral curriculum shifts by the incumbent government as breaching Te Tiriti principles due to a lack of direct engagement. They also pledge targeted Māori-led trades training and grant funding for iwi and marae trusts.

  • Curriculum/Support: Proposes freezing ongoing systemic curriculum overhauls and NCEA changes to bring stability for students and teachers.

  • National Party (Incumbent / Center-Right):

  • Focus & Approach: Focuses its education framework heavily on standardized achievement metrics, structured literacy, and baseline foundational basics. Their curriculum and policy changes have faced criticism from opposition parties and the Waitangi Tribunal regarding the depth of direct Māori consultation and the integration of te Tiriti frameworks. They generally emphasize universal support mechanisms rather than race- or ethnicity-specific targeted governance models. [NZ Labour Party]

  • ACT & New Zealand First:

  • Focus & Approach: Generally advocate for removing race-based or ethnicity-targeted co-governance and funding distinctions across public services, favoring universal public service delivery. They tend to prioritize standard core subjects (English and mathematics) over mandatory integration or expansion of te reo Māori requirements in mainstream settings.

To help compare official manifestos or look up your local electorate candidates ahead of voting, you can explore the non-partisan voter tools on Vote NZ or detailed policy comparisons on Policy.nz.

If you'd like, we can narrow this down further by looking at:

  • How each party's cost-of-living and tax policies might impact a working household budget
  • Specific policies affecting early childhood education (Kōhanga Reo) vs. primary/secondary schooling

Let me know which area you'd like to explore next.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

AI Overview

As you weigh your options for the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have drawn distinct battle lines around the role of te Tiriti, the expansion of Māori-medium education, and how te reo Māori should be resourced or supported in schools.

For a working household, these education policies intersect heavily with your values regarding Māori participation in decision-making and tangible, everyday school support for your tamariki.

Māori-Medium Education & Governance

The divide on how much authority Māori should have over education systems has become a central focus of the 2026 campaigns.

  • Te Pāti Māori: A core priority for the party is returning decision-making directly to Māori communities. They have pledged to establish an independent Māori Education Authority. This authority would oversee a massive $1.25 billion investment into Māori-medium settings, including kōhanga reo , kura kaupapa Māori , wharekura , and wānanga.
  • Labour: Promises to reverse recent legislative rollbacks by restoring a clear legal commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi in school governance. Labour has committed to freezing the current government’s fast-tracked national curriculum overhaul and NCEA changes, pointing to a Waitangi Tribunal report finding that previous overhauls breached Treaty principles by shutting out Māori voices.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Advocates for a 10-year cross-party education plan that is legally grounded in Te Tiriti o Waitangi and genuine partnership with iwi. TOP supports increasing core funding specifically for community-owned services like Playcentre and Kōhanga Reo.
  • National: Focuses on choice and targeted funding rather than sweeping structural changes. Their policy includes continued funding for kōhanga reo and kura kaupapa , alongside individual funding pools like a $3,000 grant for parents during a child’s first 1,000 days, which can be applied toward early childhood settings like kōhanga reo.
  • ACT: Promotes an education model centered on local autonomy and the elimination of mandates. ACT advocates for the expansion of Māori-led charter schools (stating they provide strong outcomes for Māori learners without state-mandated constraints), and supports removing legal Treaty requirements from school boards so they can choose their own level of integration.

Te Reo Māori in Mainstream Schools

The parties differ heavily on whether te reo Māori should be a core compulsory requirement or a funded opt-in choice in mainstream English-medium schools.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Firmly campaigns to make te reo Māori a core compulsory subject through to Year 10. They argue that normalising the language within schools is critical to cultural identity and identity in Aotearoa.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Supports the compulsory integration of te reo Māori teaching across all standard schools, aiming to use the education system to break down institutional bias.
  • Labour: Focuses on restoring professional development funding for teachers. They have pledged to reinstate the $30 million for Te Ahu o te reo Māori —a fund supporting teachers and kaiako to safely and confidently use the language in classrooms—which faced cuts under the current coalition.
  • National: Supports the inclusion of te reo Māori through curriculum integration and opt-in frameworks. They have supported targeted funding for curriculum advisors to assist kaiako with indigenous language texts and the rollout of opt-in Māori Studies subjects for senior high school years.
  • NZ First & ACT: Oppose any form of language compulsion, explicitly labeling compulsory te reo Māori as "coercive" or "social engineering". NZ First supports expanding the training pipeline for te reo teachers to meet general demand voluntarily, while ACT maintains that local school boards should have full authority to decide how much tikanga or reo they want to teach.

Direct Support for Tamariki and Households

For a working household looking at the direct cost of schooling, policies on wraps-around services and school food programs provide immediate relief.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Combines educational infrastructure with direct cost-of-living relief, proposing expanded free school lunch programmes , free public transport for all students , and free, universal school counselling services.
  • Labour: Focuses on economic protection via trades training, proposing $21 million per year for Māori-led trades training. This grant-based fund would allow marae and iwi trusts to deliver direct vocational training pathways for young people entering the workforce.
  • National & ACT: Prioritize structural standards, pushing for structured literacy models, limits or bans on screen time for younger primary school classes (Years 1 to 3), and standardizing attendance protocols to keep children in classrooms.

To help narrow down how these policies might affect your budget or your local options, let me know:

  • Would you like a breakdown of how these parties plan to address broader household costs (like tax changes or energy credits) for working families?
  • Are you interested in how they plan to handle local services like primary healthcare and Māori health initiatives?
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account