Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

Comparing New Zealand parties on healthcare, household costs and Pacific family needs

For a multigenerational Pacific household, deciding how to vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election involves more than comparing headline tax or health-spending promises. The practical questions are whether your family can afford everyday essentials, find a home with enough room for children and older relatives, and access healthcare without cost, transport, language or waiting-time barriers.

A useful comparison looks at three connected areas:

  • Affordable healthcare: GP visits, prescriptions, dental care, specialist appointments and hospital waiting times.
  • Housing and household costs: rent or mortgage payments, overcrowding, power bills, food costs and support for families with children.
  • Accessible services for Pacific families: Pacific-led health providers, culturally safe care, interpreting, community outreach and support for older people and carers.

I'll distinguish established policies and government records from promises for the 2026 election. A policy announcement is not the same as a funded, implemented service, and a national policy does not necessarily guarantee the same access in every community.

1. How the main parties compare

The following comparison uses published 2026 election policies and a health-sector summary dated 9 October 2026. It covers the main parliamentary parties and Opportunity, which is also contesting the election. These are policy differences, not rankings of which party is best for your family. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Focus: reducing direct costs and expanding public services

Labour proposes three free GP or nurse visits per person each year through a new Medicard system, removing the $5 prescription charge from July 2027, free cervical screening for eligible ages 25–69 from October 2027, and free referred maternity scans from July 2028. It also proposes more GP appointments through changes to primary-care delivery and investment in hospital repairs. Labour's Cost of Living Plan2026 Election Policy Summaries

For your household: The GP and prescription proposals could reduce costs across several family members, particularly if children or older relatives need regular appointments or medicines. Check the implementation dates, eligibility and whether three visits would cover your household's actual needs.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Focus: universal access and wider social support

The Greens propose free, accessible diagnosis and treatment, a transition to publicly funded services including GP care, dental care, ambulances, aged care and mental health services, and expanding the health workforce. Their 2026 manifesto also prioritises affordable housing, electricity, transport and groceries, with tax changes intended to fund social services and reduce income tax for most people. 2026 Election Policy SummariesManifesto 2026The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

For your household: Their proposals cover a broad range of needs, including dental care and aged care as well as routine doctor visits. Ask how the transition would be funded, phased in and staffed, and what the timetable would be for services that currently cost money.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Focus: medicines, screening and targeted prevention

National proposes increasing the Pharmac medicines budget by $604 million, extending breast screening to age 74 by 2029, lowering the bowel-screening age to 50, and free cervical screening for ages 25–69 from March 2027. It also proposes cancer clinical-trial initiatives and a Healthy Kiwis programme offering coaching for exercise and healthier eating. 2026 Election Policy SummariesNational Party - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

For your household: The medicines and screening proposals are particularly relevant if older relatives need ongoing prescriptions or age-appropriate screening. Compare these with policies that reduce GP fees directly, and ask how the additional medicine funding would translate into the medicines your family needs.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

Focus: medicines access and alternative ways to deliver care

ACT proposes increasing the share of the health budget spent on medicines towards 12% by 2033, allowing pharmacists to manage more everyday conditions and some long-term care within set limits, and supporting a national cancer centre with public-private funding. 2026 Election Policy Summaries2026 Election Policy Summaries

For your household: Pharmacy-based care could be useful for some everyday health needs and medicine access. Check which conditions pharmacists would treat, what fees would apply, and how people with complex conditions or multiple medicines would be supported.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Focus: prevention and changes to how services operate

Its published health proposals emphasise prevention, nutrition, health coaches in primary care, restoring professional autonomy in general practice, and changes intended to reduce barriers to medicines access. It has also proposed breaking up one of the major supermarket operators and restructuring large electricity companies. 2026 Election Policy SummariesThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

For your household: The grocery and electricity proposals are relevant to household budgets, while prevention and health coaching may help with long-term wellbeing. Ask for clear details on direct GP costs, Pacific-specific services, and how the proposed market changes would lower bills.

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Focus: community-led approaches and equity

Its 2026 campaign identifies health, housing, education and environmental protection as priorities, alongside Māori self-determination and community-led solutions. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentTe Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

For your household: Examine the detail of its proposals for primary care, housing and community-based support, rather than assuming that policies designed around Māori health needs automatically provide the same services to Pacific peoples. Ask specifically what funding, access and delivery commitments apply to Pacific communities.

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

Opportunity (TOP)

Focus: long-term health-system funding and primary care

Opportunity proposes a cross-party, 10-year health plan to increase health spending as a share of GDP from 7.4% to 9%, with a greater share going to primary care. It also emphasises prevention and earlier detection and treatment. 2026 Election Policy SummariesThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

For your household: The primary-care focus is relevant if family members struggle to get timely appointments. Look for detail on how the funding increase would be phased in, where the workforce would come from, and how access for Pacific families would be measured.

Important distinction: These are not equivalent types of promises. Some specify a particular service and start date; others describe a longer-term direction or a proposed change to service delivery. None, by itself, guarantees shorter waits or a Pacific provider near your home.

2. What matters specifically for Pacific families

New Zealand already has a legislated Pacific Health Strategy, Te Mana Ola, which sets out long-term priorities for equitable Pacific health and wellbeing. It emphasises prevention, community involvement, timely and high-quality care, and a health workforce that reflects the people it serves. The Ministry of Health reports that Pacific peoples' life expectancy is 5.5 years lower than that of Europeans, with inequities linked partly to access to timely care and socioeconomic conditions. Te Mana Ola: The Pacific Health StrategyPacific health

Use that existing strategy as a benchmark when assessing each party.

Access for children and adults

Ask whether the party will reduce GP fees, make prescriptions affordable, improve after-hours care and shorten specialist waiting lists. Find out whether the policy covers all eligible household members or is subject to age, income or other conditions.

Pacific-led and culturally safe services

Look for explicit funding for Pacific health providers, community outreach, language support, prevention programmes and care that involves families when appropriate. A general promise of better healthcare does not necessarily commit funding to these services.

Older relatives and long-term care

Compare policies on prescription costs, chronic-condition management, specialist appointments, dental care, disability support, home-based care and aged care. Also ask whether older people can get help close to home rather than relying on family members to travel or take time off work.

Enough space for a multigenerational household

Check commitments on social and affordable housing, healthy rental standards, overcrowding, housing supply and support for families who need several bedrooms. More homes being built does not necessarily mean that larger households can afford suitable homes.

3. Housing and living costs: what to compare

For a household sharing costs across generations, the key issue is not just whether a party promises cheaper housing. It is whether the policy helps you afford a home with enough bedrooms, reasonable power bills and reliable access to services.

Party Relevant policy direction Question to ask
Labour Cost-of-living relief, transport affordability and public-service investment. Labour's Cost of Living PlanThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government What support reaches a family with several dependants, and when?
Greens Affordable housing, lower household energy costs, public services and grocery-price measures. Manifesto 2026The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government How will the proposals reduce the actual rent, power and food bills we pay?
National Housing supply and economic management, alongside its health and family-policy commitments. National Party - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 Will new housing be affordable and suitable for larger families, not just more plentiful?
ACT Market-oriented reforms and changes to government spending and regulation. 2026 Election Policy SummariesThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government What direct assistance is available if our housing and essential costs remain high?
NZ First Changes to grocery and electricity markets, alongside prevention-focused health policy. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government2026 Election Policy Summaries What specific changes will lower household bills, and how will savings reach consumers?
Te Pāti Māori Housing, health and community-led solutions. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentTe Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 What concrete commitments address overcrowding and access to suitable housing for Pacific families?
Opportunity Land-value taxation and broader economic reform. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 How would the tax changes affect our housing costs, income and ability to move into a larger home?

These are broad policy directions, not a complete assessment of each party's housing manifesto. For detailed, comparable proposals on rent, housing quality and social housing, use Policy.nz's 2026 housing comparison.

4. A practical checklist before deciding

When you read a party's promises or question a local candidate, consider these six questions:

Your family priorities

0 of 6

Will our household pay less for GP visits, prescriptions and other routine healthcare?

Will there be more timely appointments, specialists and after-hours care?

Is there explicit funding for Pacific-led, culturally safe and community-based services?

What help is available for older relatives who need ongoing or home-based care?

Will we have a realistic path to a larger, warm, affordable home?

Are the policies costed, funded, and accompanied by clear delivery dates?

Copy checklist

For an independent starting point, compare the detailed policies at Policy.nz and read the Ministry of Health's Te Mana Ola Pacific Health Strategy.

Remember that New Zealand uses MMP: your party vote determines each party's share of seats in Parliament, while your electorate vote chooses your local representative. You can consider both the national policy programme and whether your local candidate will advocate for accessible services in your community.

The central comparison for your family is how each party proposes to balance immediate household savings against long-term healthcare capacity, suitable housing and specific commitments to Pacific communities. Checking the details of implementation and funding will help you judge those trade-offs without relying on campaign slogans alone.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

For a multigenerational Pacific family balancing household costs, space, and healthcare access in the 2026 general election, political parties offer starkly contrasting philosophies. Their approaches range from universal cost-relief and targeted community care models to market-driven efficiencies and private-sector integration.


1. Cost-Relief and Primary Healthcare Access (GP Visits & Prescriptions)

Household costs heavily dictate whether families can afford to see a doctor early, preventing minor issues from escalating into major hospital needs.

  • Labour: Focuses on reducing direct medical costs for households through universal and targeted measures. Their flagship 2026 health policy introduces the Medicard, providing every New Zealander with three free GP (doctor or nurse) visits per year. They also pledge to remove the $5 prescription fee entirely for those entitled to free public healthcare, alongside free cervical screening and maternity scans.
  • The Greens: Propose a more expansive universal model, advocating for unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded via a wealth tax. They emphasize building and resourcing community care clinics directly in highest-need areas first, which heavily benefits low-income and high-density Pacific neighborhoods.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on equity for whānau, advocating for free primary care and dental care for all whānau earning under $60,000, alongside a specific Māori Health Card framework designed to attach funding directly to patients.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes a Teal Card program guaranteeing free primary healthcare, mental health, and dental care tailored specifically to under-30s, which can ease cost pressures for younger members of a multigenerational home.
  • National (Coalition Government): Opposes broad universal subsidies like Labour's Medicard—criticizing them as unfocused—and instead favors direct capacity funding and boosting frontline resources. Their approach targets investment into primary care capacity and expanding Pharmac’s medicines budget to subsidize more treatments, arguing this ensures services remain fiscally sustainable.
  • ACT: Disagrees with universal free doctor visits, preferring a system where the government acts as a purchaser rather than a direct provider. They emphasize expanding the role of pharmacists and letting pharmacies take on more primary care duties to reduce costs, alongside long-term structural shifts toward health savings accounts.

2. Service Delivery, System Structure, and Equity

Access for Pacific families is tightly linked to culturally safe care and how health services are structured, funded, and managed across communities.

  • Parties on the Left (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Prioritize public ownership and culturally tailored care models. They argue that public health funding must explicitly prioritize high-need populations and community-governed providers to bridge historical health inequities. Te Pāti Māori and the Greens strongly advocate for restoring independent, self-determined health authorities and ring-fenced funding for minority and high-need communities to ensure services are culturally safe.
  • Parties on the Right and Current Government (National, ACT, NZ First): Emphasize streamlining the centralized health agency (Health NZ) and reducing administrative bloat to push resources to the frontline. To tackle waitlists, the current government has leaned into public-private partnerships and contractual arrangements with private hospitals (such as the "Elective Boost" program) to outsource surgeries and cut wait times. NZ First similarly focuses on bolstering rapid diagnostics and resourcing a substantial waitlist reduction fund.

3. Intersections with Household Costs and Housing Space

While direct health policies matter, a multigenerational household's ability to access adequate space and manage daily costs is heavily influenced by wider party platforms:

  • Cost of Living & Incomes: Left-bloc parties emphasize income support, increases to working-for-families packages, and market regulations (such as grocery and energy sector overhauls) to address core household expenses. Right-bloc parties focus primarily on tax relief, adjusting tax thresholds, and stimulating economic growth through business investment to lower the cost of living.
  • Housing Space: For households squeezed into overcrowded dwellings—a significant health risk factor for respiratory issues among children and older relatives—parties offer contrasting housing solutions. Left-leaning parties push for massive state and public housing builds and stricter renter protections. Right-leaning parties focus on cutting red tape for private property development, freeing up land supply, and encouraging private housing market activity.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

Navigating the 2026 general election as a Pacific voter balancing the needs of children, older relatives, and rising household costs means looking closely at how different political parties approach healthcare affordability, workforce capacity, and community access.

An overview of major party positions relevant to these priorities highlights distinct approaches:

Labour Party

  • Healthcare Cost & Access: Proposes direct cost-relief policies, including 3 free GP visits per year via a "Medicard", free prescriptions, free cervical screening (from 2027), and free maternity scans (from 2028).

  • Workforce & Services: Promises guaranteed graduate nurse jobs and funding aimed at bolstering public health delivery. [NZ Labour Party]

  • Household Costs Connection: Ties healthcare savings to broader cost-of-living measures like a $20/week public transport cap and anti-price-gouging rules on essentials. [NZ Labour Party]

National Party

  • Healthcare Cost & Access: Focuses heavily on frontline clinical delivery, with targeted investments into cancer care and serious illness treatment rather than universal free GP schemes.

  • Workforce & Services: Emphasizes infrastructure and capacity building, such as backing a new Waikato medical school to train more domestic doctors and streamlining credentials to ease workforce shortages.

  • Household Costs Connection: Centers household relief on fiscal management, avoiding new taxes, supporting first-home buyer deposit access (5% deposits), and boosting grocery competition to lower weekly shopping bills. [National Party]

ACT Party

  • Healthcare Cost & Access: Advocates for market-driven and targeted funding solutions rather than broad subsidies, arguing that direct handouts do not fix underlying doctor shortages.

  • Workforce & Services: Pledges a $400 million investment over four years specifically targeted at retaining existing doctors, recruiting international medical professionals, and incentivising clinicians to increase appointment availability.

Green Party & Te Pāti Māori

  • Healthcare Cost & Access: Generally advocate for free comprehensive primary healthcare (including universal free GP visits and prescriptions) and increased funding explicitly allocated to Māori and Pacific community health providers (Te Aka Whai Ora / iwi-Pacific health models).

  • Household Costs Connection: Focus on systemic poverty reduction, lifting core benefits or abolishing punitive structures like the training wage, and investing heavily in insulated, healthy public and private housing to reduce respiratory illnesses common in overcrowded, multigenerational homes.


Key Questions for Your Household to Consider:

  • Immediate Relief vs. Capacity: Do you prefer policies that directly subsidize the cost of visiting the doctor right now (like Labour's free GP visits), or policies focused purely on training and retaining more doctors so appointment wait times drop (like ACT's and National's workforce focus)?

  • Multigenerational Housing & Prevention: Look at which parties connect healthcare with housing quality and cost-of-living support (groceries, energy funds), which directly impact the day-to-day wellness of older relatives and children under the same roof.

You can compare specific candidate and party policies side-by-side using tools like Policy.nz as you weigh your two votes ahead of polling day on 7 November 2026.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand General Election , political parties are addressing the precise intersection of healthcare affordability, household space, and cost-of-living relief that directly impacts multigenerational Pacific households.

The primary care costs, childhood checkups, and eldercare access required by large, multi-tier families are central points of difference among the major party platforms.


Healthcare Affordability & Pacific Services

The parties differ significantly between structural funding increases, universal free access models, and targeted community-led care systems.

Party Primary Healthcare Costs Pacific & Community Services
Labour 3 free GP visits annually via the "Medicard" program; free prescriptions, free cervical screening, and free maternity scans. Focuses funding on regional networks; aims to restore care-worker pay equity ($2.5B over 4 years) which impacts the Pacific healthcare workforce.
National & ACT (Coalition) Argue against universal free visits ("free GPs for millionaires"). Emphasize targeted frontline funding based on clinical need and invested $447M into primary care capacity in Budget 2025. ACT proposes a private-insurance opt-out incentive. Replaced centralized bureaucratic structures like Te Aka Whai Ora earlier in the term, focusing instead on broader frontline resources.
Greens Unlimited free GP visits and free universal dental care for everyone, funded by a proposed wealth tax. Prioritizes rolling out community care clinics in highest-need geographic areas first to support underserved families.
Te Pāti Māori Free primary healthcare and dental care for any whānau/household earning under $60,000. Advocates for by-Pacific and by-Māori healthcare delivery networks, mobile medical units, and Marae-based clinics.
NZ First Focuses health policy on a $925M waitlist reduction fund and regional healthcare infrastructure rather than universal free visits. Emphasizes expanding community and localized services tailored explicitly to older citizens and families.

Housing Space & Household Costs

For a multigenerational household, finding large enough physical housing space without incurring crippling weekly expenses is a critical factor.

  • Labour: Proposes delivering at least 6,000 additional social housing places over four years with a $4B budget. They also propose strict anti-price-gouging rules and grocery competition reforms to ease food bills for large households.
  • National & ACT: Focus on increasing overall land supply and reducing development costs to encourage private home building, alongside stricter expectations around tracking school attendance and foundational literacy/maths for children.
  • Green Party: Campaigns heavily on tenant protections, public housing expansion, and energy-efficient home retrofits to reduce power bills, alongside rent increase caps tied to 2% annually.

🗳️ Voting Deadlines & Resources

To ensure your household can participate, keep these essential Electoral Commission timelines in mind:

  • Enrolment Deadline: You must be enrolled by midnight on Sunday, 25 October 2026 to vote.
  • Advance Voting: Early in-person voting opens on Monday, 26 October 2026.
  • Election Day: Final in-person voting takes place on Saturday, 7 November 2026 , closing at 7:00 PM.

You can check your status or update your address online at theVote NZ Enrolment Portal.

Learn more

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account