Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What do parties propose for childcare, schools, learning support and tertiary education?

New Zealand 2026 election: Education policy comparison

As at 19 October 2026 · National election scheduled for 7 November 2026

The main differences between parties concern the cost of early childhood education (ECE), what children should learn at school, how to support students with additional needs, and how much financial help people should receive for tertiary study and training.

National is campaigning on improving foundational skills, changing qualifications and expanding learning support. Labour is emphasising stability in curriculum decisions, lower school-related costs and school building improvements. The Greens propose making ECE free, while Te Pāti Māori emphasises Māori-led education and removing barriers to learning. Teaching the basics brilliantlyRelease: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s educationGreen Budget: Early Childhood Education for EveryoneEducation & Training

The comparison below focuses on New Zealand-wide policies from the main parties and other parties with distinct education proposals. It distinguishes announced election commitments from policies that have not yet been clearly specified.

1. Childcare and early childhood education

A curriculum for all children

National

Proposes a school-readiness check for every child before starting school, clearer developmental milestones in ECE, and better reporting to parents. It would connect children needing extra help with expanded early intervention services and prohibit screens and individual device use in ECE settings. Teaching the basics brilliantlyNational will lift school leaving requirements

The Nest Stratford | Early Childhood Education Daycare

Labour

Has announced policies on children's screen use and support for parents, including age-appropriate guidance for ECE settings. Its broader education approach includes stable, evidence-led curriculum decisions. A comprehensive new ECE fee-free package was not confirmed in the sources reviewed. Keeping Kids off ScreensRelease: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s education

ᐅRemuera Childcare ᐅ ACG Remuera Early Learning School

Green Party

Proposes progressively making ECE free. Its announced plan would initially cap charges at $10 per day per child, on top of the existing 20-hour entitlement, and expand that entitlement to 35 hours a week by 2029, making ECE free within that plan. It also proposes shifting public funding away from for-profit operators towards public and community-based centres. Green Budget: Early Childhood Education for Everyone

The first kōhanga reo | Te reo Māori – the Māori language | Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand

Te Pāti Māori

Emphasises Māori-led education, proper inclusion of mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) in learning, and greater Māori governance and decision-making. Its published education summary does not specify a comparable nationwide ECE fee cap or free-hours timetable. Education & Training

Key distinction: The Greens have a specific proposal to reduce and eventually remove ECE fees. National's published commitments focus more on school readiness, developmental progress and early intervention. These are different approaches to affordability and early learning.

2. Schools: curriculum, teaching and school costs

Party Main proposals
National Continue its focus on reading, writing and maths, structured literacy and regular assessment. Replace NCEA with new national qualifications from 2028, require students to complete Year 11 or turn 16 (whichever is later), and introduce consistent school start and finish dates. Teaching the basics brilliantlyNational will lift school leaving requirements
Labour Establish an independent Council for Curriculum and Assessment, retain NCEA unchanged until 2029 while expert advice is considered, restore school boards' legal obligation to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and fund improvements at more than 2,000 schools. Release: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s educationRelease: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schoolsStart Work Now
ACT Emphasise academic standards, measurable achievement, school choice and accountability. Support charter schools and propose cheaper school uniforms and allowing children to use passing school buses with available seats. ACT also advocates stronger teacher powers to remove disruptive pupils from class. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
Greens Emphasise inclusive education, student wellbeing and education as a public good, within a broader approach that puts Te Tiriti and community participation at the centre of policy. Manifesto 2026
Te Pāti Māori Emphasise Māori-led decision-making and embedding mātauranga Māori throughout education, alongside Māori governance and solutions. Education & Training

School lunches, transport and uniforms

These policies could make a practical difference to family budgets:

One important distinction is that Labour proposes pausing further changes to NCEA until expert advice has been considered, whereas National plans to proceed with replacing it from 2028. Release: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s educationNational will lift school leaving requirements

3. Learning support and children with additional needs

Learning support covers children with disabilities, neurodivergence, developmental delays, behavioural or emotional needs, and difficulties with learning.

National

National has committed to expanding Learning Support Coordinators across all schools with Years 1–8 students from 2028, adding teacher-aide hours and training, and expanding early intervention. Its announced package builds towards two million additional teacher-aide hours annually from 2028. It has also reformed the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) funding model to guarantee funding for verified students with high and complex needs. Budget 2025: Largest boost to Learning Support in a generationTeaching the basics brilliantly

Labour

Labour's announced approach includes giving schools greater curriculum stability, using independent expert advice, restoring the legal commitment to Te Tiriti in schooling, and improving school buildings. These commitments may affect inclusion and school environments, but I did not find a directly comparable new nationwide teacher-aide-hours commitment in the policies reviewed. Release: Labour to give parents confidence in their children’s educationRelease: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schoolsStart Work Now

Greens and Te Pāti Māori

The Greens' manifesto emphasises inclusive education and supporting students' individual needs. Te Pāti Māori focuses on Māori-led education and removing barriers to learning. Their published summaries do not specify a directly comparable nationwide teacher-aide-hours target. Manifesto 2026Education & Training

For families who need specific support, the most useful questions to ask each party are:

  • Will children receive specialist help sooner, and will eligibility for support change?
  • Will funding cover all eligible children with high and complex needs?
  • Will schools have enough teacher aides, specialist staff and Learning Support Coordinators?
  • How will support work for neurodivergent children and students who struggle in mainstream classrooms?

The key distinction in the published commitments is that National has given relatively specific staffing and funding targets, while the other parties' summaries reviewed here are less specific on comparable measures.

4. Tertiary education, university fees and student support

This is one of the clearest differences between the major parties: should government support focus on reducing the cost of studying, or on helping graduates earn more and repay their loans?

Party Main tertiary proposals
National Reduce compulsory student loan repayments from 12% to 10% of income above the repayment threshold from 1 April 2027 for borrowers living in New Zealand. Introduce tougher recovery measures for borrowers overseas who default. Back Pocket Boost for Graduates
Labour Emphasises school-to-work pathways and trade training. Its education proposals include funding school improvements and supporting apprenticeships. A new comprehensive tertiary-fee or student-allowance package was not confirmed in the sources reviewed. Start Work NowKeeping Kids off Screens
Greens Propose a broader overhaul of tertiary education and student support. A specific new commitment announced in October 2026 would pay students $380 a week during compulsory placements for nursing, teaching, social work and other specified essential professions, plus a $1,500 relocation payment for eligible students who need to move. Manifesto 2026Greens announce paid placements for nurses, teachers, and social workers
ACT Emphasises choice and equal treatment in tertiary education, including opposing universities allocating support on the basis of ethnicity. ACT New ZealandPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026
Te Pāti Māori Emphasises Māori-led education and training, Māori governance and removing barriers that prevent whānau from accessing education. Education & Training
New Zealand First Its previously published education policy proposed shifting Fees Free from the first year to the third year for full-time students who successfully pass their coursework, alongside free apprenticeships in in-demand occupations. These are from its 2023 policy document, so check the party's latest election commitments before treating them as its 2026 position. 2023 Election Policies

An important change to Fees Free

The current government has announced that final-year Fees Free will end at the close of 2026. Budget 2026 redirects funding towards vocational pathways, including doubling Trades Academy places from 10,000 to 20,000 and providing 1,000 additional Youth Guarantee places for young people with no or low qualifications. Education - Budget 2026Budget 2026: Securing New Zealand's Future

These are government decisions already announced, rather than new promises unique to National's 2026 campaign.

For students and graduates, the differences to examine are:

  • Upfront affordability: whether tuition fees, living costs or compulsory placements receive additional support.
  • Student loans: whether repayments become smaller, or the loan balance is reduced or forgiven.
  • Trades and apprenticeships: whether training is free, subsidised or accompanied by financial support.
  • Access and equity: whether support is universal or targeted towards particular groups or professions.

5. At-a-glance comparison

Lower childcare costs

The Greens have the clearest published plan for progressively free ECE. National's commitments focus on developmental checks, readiness for school and early intervention.

School curriculum and qualifications

National wants to continue its current reforms and replace NCEA from 2028. Labour wants an independent expert council and to retain NCEA unchanged until 2029 while future decisions are considered.

Learning support

National has published specific commitments on teacher-aide hours, Learning Support Coordinators and early intervention. Other parties emphasise different aspects of inclusion, school stability or Māori-led provision.

University and tertiary costs

National proposes lower compulsory repayments for domestic student-loan borrowers. The Greens' new paid-placement proposal offers direct financial support during specified professional training. Te Pāti Māori focuses on removing barriers, while ACT emphasises equal treatment.

Where to check the full policies

These are useful sources for verifying the details and any new announcements made during the final campaign period:

One final caveat: election policies can change, and not every party has published an equally detailed plan in each of these four areas. The comparison reflects publicly available commitments as of 19 October 2026; where a specific 2026 commitment could not be verified, I have identified that rather than assuming an older policy remains current.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What do parties propose for childcare, schools, learning support and tertiary education?

Ahead of the November 7, 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have outlined distinct visions across the education spectrum—ranging from early childhood education (ECE) and schooling to learning support and tertiary settings.


1. Childcare & Early Childhood Education (ECE)

  • National Party: Focuses on strengthening developmental tracking prior to formal schooling. Proposals include introducing a "School Start Check" during ECE to catch developmental or learning needs early and feed into the Early Intervention Service.
  • Labour Party & The Greens: Focus heavily on public provision and equity. The Greens have advocated for phasing out public funding for private, for-profit ECE centres by 2028, expanding community- and not-for-profit services, and securing long-term funding for kaupapa Māori ECE providers.
  • NZ First & ACT: Generally favor choices that alleviate cost-of-living pressures for families, with ACT pushing for broad parental choice and market-driven models, while NZ First has historically weighed ECE funding structures around demographic incentives and workforce support.

2. Schools & Curriculum

  • National Party: Supports school choice, having restored charter (partnership) schools under the coalition government and allocating funding for up to 50 such schools. Their policy centers on maintaining core curriculum benchmarks and structured learning.
  • ACT Party: Strong advocate for school choice and charter school expansion. ACT’s proposals include Student Education Accounts, which would provide parents with roughly $12,000 per year in public funding to spend at any registered school of their choice, including private or charter options.
  • Labour & The Greens: Strongly oppose charter schools, with Labour pledging to scrap them again if returned to government, arguing they siphon resources away from the public system. Their policy emphasis is on bolstering the public school network, socio-economic equity, and culturally inclusive curricula (including mātauranga Māori).

3. Learning Support

  • Parties across the political spectrum have faced mounting pressure to address gaps in learning support, though specifics vary:
  • National emphasizes early identification via childhood developmental checks in ECE to streamline children into existing early intervention pathways.
  • Left-bloc parties (Labour and the Greens) consistently campaign on increasing direct funding for teacher aides, educational psychologists, and specialist learning support personnel in classrooms, arguing that current resourcing thresholds leave too many neurodivergent or disabled students unsupported.

4. Tertiary Education & Student Support

Tertiary funding and student debt frameworks are among the most sharply contested areas for 2026:

  • ACT Party: Strongly opposes free tertiary schemes, arguing they do not efficiently target disadvantaged students or yield public benefits. ACT supports keeping user-pays principles and has historically questioned interest-free student loans.
  • National Party: Maintains standard student loan repayment structures while adjusting parameters. National plans to cut the student loan repayment rate from 12% to 10% (starting April 2027) while increasing interest pressures for borrowers living overseas. (The previous broad "fees-free" first year policy was wound back in Budget 2026).
  • Labour Party: Campagnes on targeted relief, promising to write off 10% of student loan balances for New Zealand-based graduates who missed out on fees-free policies, with balances under $2,000 cleared entirely.
  • Green Party: Proposes a much more expansive approach, committing to work toward universal fees-free tertiary education, a complete student debt write-off, and the introduction of a universal student income.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for wiping student debt entirely for graduates who remain working in New Zealand for five years, alongside an immediate write-off of the living-cost component of student loans and a universal student allowance.

Are there specific policy details or a particular party's manifesto commitments you would like to explore further?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What do parties propose for childcare, schools, learning support and tertiary education?

As the 2026 New Zealand general election approaches on November 7, 2026, political parties have outlined distinct positions and proposals across early childhood education (ECE/childcare), schools, learning support, and tertiary education.

Early Childhood Education (ECE) & Childcare

  • National Party: Focuses on supporting families through targeted financial assistance, maintaining and refining the Early Childhood Education-focused regulatory settings, and ensuring accountability and choice in provider funding.

  • Labour Party: Emphasises public provision, workforce support, and strengthening funding for community-based and non-profit ECE services, alongside recent campaign pledges focused on children's wellbeing and limiting excessive screen time.

  • Green Party: Advocates for increased investment in public and community-owned ECE, better educator-to-child ratios, fair pay parity for all ECE teachers, and integrating early learning more closely with community health and social services.

  • ACT New Zealand: Favours a market-driven approach, aiming to reduce regulatory red tape for providers to encourage more supply and operational flexibility in the childcare sector.

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes shifting to quality-based contracting, enhancing funding for Playcentres, Kōhanga Reo, and Kindergartens, and enforcing stricter minimum staff-to-child ratios for infants and toddlers.

Schools & Curriculum

  • National Party: Emphasises core academic achievement, structured literacy/numeracy requirements, regular standardized assessment, and school infrastructure improvements.

  • Labour Party: Focuses on investing in teacher professional development, resource equity across state schools, and maintaining a localized curriculum that includes New Zealand history and Te Tiriti o Waitangi education.

  • Green Party: Proposes equitable resourcing for low-decile or high-index schools, expanding free school lunch programmes permanently, and removing administrative burdens on teachers.

  • ACT New Zealand: Supports greater operational autonomy for schools (such as partnership or charter-style authorization models) and parental choice regarding curriculum specifics.

Learning Support

  • Labour and the Green Parties: Both advocate for a significant expansion of dedicated learning support coordinators, educational psychologists, and specialized needs funding directly tied to student populations rather than contestable pools.

  • National and ACT: Generally support targeted funding models aimed at identifying high-needs students early, while seeking greater efficiency and direct resource delivery into classrooms rather than back-office bureaucracy.

Tertiary Education & Student Support

  • Labour Party / Green Party: Traditionally campaign on improving student financial allowances, increasing investment in public tertiary institutions (universities and Te Pūkenga/polytechnics), and expanding or reviewing fees-free schemes.

  • National Party: Focuses on fiscal restraint in tertiary funding while supporting practical vocational training, apprenticeships, and alignment between tertiary output and economic/workforce needs.

  • ACT New Zealand: Proposes re-evaluating tertiary subsidies and student loan schemes to ensure cost-effectiveness for taxpayers, placing higher emphasis on individual user contribution paired with targeted support. [Policy.nz]

For a detailed, interactive breakdown of individual party manifestos as they are officially released, voters can consult the comprehensivePolicy.nz guide or the Electoral Commission (Vote NZ) portal.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account