Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I run a small manufacturing business that exports and employs staff. We are considering new equipment but worry about demand, freight costs and finding skilled workers. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party immigration policies affect hiring skilled staff from overseas?

New Zealand’s 2026 election: how immigration policy could affect your manufacturing business

For a small New Zealand manufacturer that exports and employs staff, the key question is whether you’ll be able to recruit the skilled people you need from overseas, at what cost, and how reliably you can fill vacancies when deciding whether to invest in new equipment.

Immigration policy is only one part of that decision. Your business is also exposed to export demand, freight costs, wages, training availability and the cost of capital. For the 2026 general election, it’s useful to compare parties on how their proposals could affect those factors rather than assuming that a more restrictive or more open immigration policy will automatically be better for business.

The important distinction is between the rules in force today and what parties are proposing to change. Existing visa settings may affect your next hire immediately, while election promises would depend on legislation, implementation and any transition arrangements.

1. What the main parties’ proposals could mean for hiring

The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. The following comparison reflects published positions available as of 18 October 2026. These are proposals and stated policy directions, not a guarantee of what a future government would implement. NZ Election 2026: Immigration Policy by PartyThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Continue the current policy direction

National's approach is broadly to continue its skilled-migration reforms, including updated residence pathways and more targeted occupation settings. The government introduced new skilled residence pathways for tradespeople and technicians, alongside a skilled work-experience pathway, effective from 24 August 2026.

Potential effect on your business: continuity in the existing employer-sponsored recruitment system, with some routes for experienced overseas tradespeople to settle longer-term. Check whether your particular roles qualify. NZ Election 2026: Immigration Policy by PartyFinal details about changes to the Skilled Migrant Category Resident Visa and work to residence visas :: Immigration New Zealand

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Plan migration around workforce and infrastructure capacity

Labour proposes a government immigration policy statement based on workforce, housing and infrastructure needs. It also wants to strengthen the Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) system, allow migrants to move between accredited employers after three months, and extend the qualifying period for permanent residence from two years to four.

Potential effect on your business: greater emphasis on workforce planning and migrant protections, with a proposed rule that could make it easier for workers to change employers. That could help recruitment flexibility but also affect retention. The residence changes may matter if you want overseas specialists to settle permanently. Release: Labour to ensure an immigration system that works for New ZealandNZ Election 2026: Immigration Policy by Party

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

Keep skilled migration focused on demonstrated shortages

ACT proposes reviewing skilled-job categories annually, requiring evidence of demand to keep them open, extending basic English requirements across AEWV types, and charging temporary work visa holders an additional NZ$6 per day for infrastructure.

Potential effect on your business: a role recognised as a genuine skills shortage could remain eligible, but a role removed from the approved categories could become harder to fill. The proposed surcharge may also affect a migrant worker's willingness to accept a job or the overall recruitment package. ACT New ZealandNZ Election 2026: Immigration Policy by Party

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Replace the AEWV with a shortage-led Skilled Work Visa

NZ First proposes tying recruitment more explicitly to named occupations, regions and demonstrated shortages. It also proposes restoring a wage floor and tightening requirements around domestic recruitment and employer accreditation.

Potential effect on your business: overseas hiring could become more dependent on whether the government identifies your specific occupation and region as short of workers. The impact on a manufacturing firm would depend on how machinists, maintenance technicians, engineers and other relevant occupations are classified. The party has not fully specified the proposed wage floor or all implementation details. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform PoliciesNZ First’s employer work visa reset sounds dramatic. The detail is less revolutionary

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Emphasise migrant rights and broader social policy

The Greens have argued against treating migrants as the cause of low wages and have historically supported expanded humanitarian and climate-related migration pathways. The available published material provides less detail on specific changes to employer-sponsored skilled work visas than the proposals above.

Potential effect on your business: assess the party's eventual detailed work-visa and skills policy before assuming it would make manufacturing recruitment easier or harder. NZ Election 2026: Immigration Policy by PartyRecord high support for New Zealand Greens boosts chance of centre-left coalition, poll shows

These positions are not simply a choice between open and closed borders. National and Labour have both pursued skilled-worker pathways; ACT proposes more frequent tests of whether occupations remain in demand; and NZ First proposes a more explicitly shortage-led visa system. Coalition negotiations could materially change what is implemented. NZ Election 2026: Immigration Policy by PartyACT New ZealandNZ First’s employer work visa reset sounds dramatic. The detail is less revolutionary

2. What the rules mean for your next overseas hire

Regardless of which party you vote for, the current system is the starting point.

New Zealand's main employer-sponsored temporary work visa is the Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV). Under current rules, the process generally requires three steps: employer accreditation, approval of the specific job, and a visa application from the worker. Some jobs also require advertising and engagement with Work and Income before approval. Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) key information and statistics :: Immigration New ZealandOverview of AEWV employer accreditation and job check :: Immigration New Zealand

For a manufacturing business, that means:

  • Skilled machinists and CNC operators: check the occupation classification and whether the candidate meets the applicable qualification or experience requirements.
  • Maintenance technicians and engineers: investigate whether a relevant skilled residence pathway is available as well as a temporary work visa.
  • Specialist machine operators: don't assume that a job title alone makes the role eligible. The actual duties, skill classification, pay and evidence of experience matter.
  • Recruitment costs: budget for accreditation, job checks, visa processing, advertising where required, and the time spent documenting genuine recruitment efforts.

Immigration New Zealand's official guidance is the place to verify the requirements for the particular job. Final details about changes to the Skilled Migrant Category Resident Visa and work to residence visas :: Immigration New ZealandOverview of AEWV employer accreditation and job check :: Immigration New Zealand

Official resources: Employer accreditation and job checks and Skilled Migrant Category residence changes.

3. How to connect immigration policy to your equipment investment

Hiring is just one part of the investment decision. I'd examine these four questions alongside the parties' immigration proposals.

Can you staff the equipment reliably?

Identify the exact skills needed to install, operate and maintain the machine. Compare overseas recruitment with training existing employees, apprenticeships and hiring locally.

Can you absorb freight-cost increases?

Model how higher inbound shipping, export freight and delivery delays affect your margins. Immigration policy will not directly resolve these risks.

Will export demand justify the investment?

Test the business case at lower sales volumes, reduced selling prices and higher operating costs. Consider whether the machine can be introduced in stages.

Can you recruit in time?

Include visa processing, recruitment lead times, training and potential policy changes in the commissioning schedule. A machine that arrives before its skilled operator could create extra costs without extra output.

4. A practical way to compare parties before voting

Rather than deciding based on each party's overall immigration rhetoric, use your actual staffing needs as a test.

Question to investigate Why it matters to you
Will my specific occupation remain eligible? Determines whether you can recruit from overseas.
Will I need to prove a shortage in my region? Affects recruitment time and uncertainty.
What wages and employer costs will apply? Affects the cost per unit manufactured.
Can an experienced worker obtain residence? May help you retain people and protect training investment.
Will local training receive more support? Could reduce long-term dependence on overseas recruitment.
How predictable will the rules be? Helps you plan equipment purchases and production capacity.

The last question is particularly important for a small exporter: even if two parties would both allow you to recruit a skilled worker, differences in processing requirements, eligibility rules and policy stability could change the commercial risk.

My suggested approach: compare the parties' detailed policies against the occupations you actually struggle to recruit, then stress-test the equipment investment independently of the election outcome. No party's published immigration proposals can guarantee either skilled-worker availability or stronger export demand.

One detail would help make this comparison much more specific: which skilled roles are hardest for your business to fill — for example, CNC machinists, welders, maintenance technicians, production engineers or something else? I can then compare the likely implications of each party's proposals for those roles.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I run a small manufacturing business that exports and employs staff. We are considering new equipment but worry about demand, freight costs and finding skilled workers. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party immigration policies affect hiring skilled staff from overseas?

As a small manufacturing exporter balancing demand, freight costs, and skill shortages, your vote in the 2026 election involves weighing distinct philosophical approaches to immigration across New Zealand's political parties.

Parties differ sharply on how strictly to gatekeep overseas labor versus supporting businesses that cannot find local skills. The major political stances fall into clear categories that will directly impact your ability to hire skilled international talent:


1. Strict "Shortage-Led" and Restrictive Approaches

  • The Stance: Parties like New Zealand First advocate for a hardline "New Zealanders first" approach, emphasizing that immigration should strictly serve as a last resort rather than a routine labour-hire channel. They push for rigorous shortage-proof requirements, arguing that if a role can be filled locally or by lifting wages, international recruitment should be denied. ACT also supports bringing in workers for genuine skill gaps, but favors sunset clauses or yearly reviews where skilled-visa categories lapse unless continuous demand is re-proven.
  • Impact on Your Business: If you rely on specialized machinists, engineers, or technical operators whom you genuinely cannot source locally, tighter restrictions or higher proof-of-shortage hurdles could increase your compliance costs, administration time, and uncertainty. However, proponents argue these policies aim to pull from the domestic pool of underutilized or unemployed workers.

2. Streamlined Economic & Skill-Focused Approaches

  • The Stance: Parties like National emphasize maintaining and refining pathways to attract and retain skilled migrants—such as the recent Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) and Skilled Migrant Category adjustments (including the Trades and Technicians pathways). Their focus is on keeping settings responsive to business needs, fast-tracking critical technical skills, and easing residency transitions so businesses can lock in talent long-term.
  • Impact on Your Business: If your primary bottleneck is an absolute lack of specialized manufacturing skills domestically, a pro-business or center-right framework generally aims to reduce friction, making it simpler and more predictable to sponsor and retain overseas talent for technical roles.

3. Pro-Growth, Regional, and Flexible Approaches

  • The Stance: The Opportunities Party (TOP) and other progressive groupings tend to view immigration as a net economic driver. Some propose lowering minimum salary thresholds for specific skilled categories or introducing targeted regional visas designed to direct skilled workers outside of major metropolitan hubs like Auckland.
  • Impact on Your Business: For a regional manufacturer, regional-specific visa incentives could make it easier to attract international talent willing to settle outside main centers, helping you compete against larger city-based firms.

Key Considerations for Your Vote

When casting your party vote, consider how each party balances these competing priorities:

  • Compliance vs. Access: Do you prefer a system with lighter compliance and faster access to global talent (favoring National/ACT/TOP), or a system that places heavy friction on foreign hiring to force a stronger reliance on domestic training (favoring NZ First/Labour/Te Pāti Māori)?
  • Export Competitiveness: Manufacturing exporters often note that accessing global skill sets is vital to maintaining product quality and innovation against international competitors. Ask yourself whether a party's policy framework matches the speed and technical nature of your hiring needs.

Are you leaning toward a particular approach for your manufacturing business, or are there other pressures—like compliance costs or freight—influencing your decision?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I run a small manufacturing business that exports and employs staff. We are considering new equipment but worry about demand, freight costs and finding skilled workers. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party immigration policies affect hiring skilled staff from overseas?

Navigating the 2026 general election landscape as a manufacturing exporter means balancing your need for specialized talent against distinctly different philosophical approaches to immigration across New Zealand's political parties.

The major parties approach skilled migrant recruitment and employer access with varying degrees of facilitation versus restriction:

  • National Party: Focuses on maintaining and refining streamlined settings for high-skilled talent to support economic growth. Recent policy updates (such as targeted residence pathways and occupation lists) aim to give manufacturers stability and predictable access to international specialists where domestic shortages exist, while opposing sweeping cuts or the removal of permanent resident pathways. [www.livinginnz.co.nz]
  • ACT New Zealand: Proposes a more market-driven yet tightly regulated approach. They advocate for regular annual reviews of skilled job lists and stricter physical presence or structural conditions for permanent residency (such as altering permanent resident visa facilities) alongside welfare and benefit bars for new arrivals. [www.livinginnz.co.nz]
  • New Zealand First: Takes a sharply restrictive, nationalist stance. They propose scrapping the Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) system entirely in favor of a rigid, occupation- and region-specific "shortage-led" visa tied strictly to demonstrated local failure to recruit. They also push for a cap referendum on annual resident visas (e.g., targeting lower caps around 20,000) and much longer residency-to-citizenship timeframes.
  • New Zealand Labour Party: Tends to balance regulated access for essential industries with tighter integrity checks on employer accreditation. Their recent platform emphasizes careful management of workforce supply, supporting local apprenticeships (via programs like expanding Apprenticeship Boost) alongside targeted settings for permanent and temporary migration, and lengthening certain residency/citizenship qualifying paths.
  • Green Party / Te Pāti Māori: Generally emphasize human rights, a streamlined humanitarian approach, and opposition to restrictive or punitive anti-migrant rhetoric, while evaluating sustainable population growth alongside local infrastructure and housing capacities. [www.livinginnz.co.nz]

What This Means for Your Manufacturing Business

  • If you need fast, predictable access to specialized technical skills (e.g., advanced automation engineers or tooling specialists): Centre-right parties like National offer more continuity and streamlined accreditation pathways, making it easier to recruit directly from overseas. [www.livinginnz.co.nz]
  • If you are worried about compliance friction or a tighter, more bureaucratic approval process: Parties like NZ First or ACT propose higher friction, stricter compliance burdens, or rigid "shortage lists" that could slow down your ability to onboard international talent quickly if local labour market tests become more adversarial.

You can review a full breakdown of specific proposals on platforms like Policy.nz or follow ongoing updates through RNZ's Immigration Policy Guide. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

To help narrow down which party settings best fit your operations, could you tell me:

  • What specific tier of skilled roles is hardest for you to fill locally?
  • Do you primarily rely on temporary work visas transitioning to residency, or direct overseas recruitment?
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I run a small manufacturing business that exports and employs staff. We are considering new equipment but worry about demand, freight costs and finding skilled workers. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party immigration policies affect hiring skilled staff from overseas?

AI Overview

For a small manufacturing business looking to invest in new equipment and manage skilled worker shortages ahead of the 7 November 2026 general election , the political parties offer distinctly different approaches to skilled migration.

Depending on which party leads or influences the next government, your ability to recruit talent from overseas will be impacted by either a streamlined, business-driven approach or tightly regulated, infrastructure-linked caps.


Comparison of Party Immigration Policies for the 2026 Election

Political Party Policy Approach to Skilled Migrants Impact on Your Manufacturing Business
National Party Streamlined pathways & retention. Introduced new skilled residence pathways (effective August 2026) prioritizing NZ work experience and university qualifications. Strongly supports using targeted skilled migration to plug economic gaps. Easier recruitment and retention. Makes it easier to attract skilled operators or engineers and keep them long-term, boosting your confidence to invest in capital equipment.
Labour Party Capacity-linked planning & job flexibility. Wants an immigration system planned strictly around infrastructure and workforce data. Will extend the wait time for permanent residency from two years to four but allows migrants to switch accredited employers after 3 months to prevent exploitation. More regulation, flexible talent pool. Tighter overall planning based on macroeconomic needs. While skilled workers have a longer path to permanent residency, a local pool of migrant workers could become more mobile.
ACT New Zealand Demand-proven migration with strict welfare bounds. Backs immigration for genuine skill shortages but requires skilled visa categories to be re-proven annually to ensure locals can't fill the roles. Imposes a 5-year welfare stand-down and physical presence requirements to maintain residency. Targeted but administratively rigorous. You can still bring in specialized technical staff, but your business must continually prove local shortages exist, and temporary workers face strict conditions.
New Zealand First Strict nationalism and massive reductions. Proposes scrapping the Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) entirely for a strict "shortage-led" visa. Pushing for a binding public referendum to cap total resident visas at 20,000 per year. Extending residency requirements to 5 years and citizenship to 10 years. High barriers and significant uncertainty. A hard cap of 20,000 visas across all sectors would spark intense competition for talent across NZ industries, making it much harder and slower to source offshore manufacturing skills.
Green Party Humanitarian focus. Opposes anti-migrant rhetoric and supports higher refugee quotas and broad humanitarian rights. Opposes setting blunt caps or treating immigration purely as an economic tap. Indirect impact. Focuses less on targeted business visa pathways and more on social cohesion, settlement rights, and prioritizing the upskilling of the local domestic workforce first.

Core Business Takeaways

  • If you want maximum ease in hiring and retaining global talent: The National Party's framework focuses on giving businesses direct pathways to keep skilled workers in New Zealand.
  • If you prefer state-managed, system-wide capacity planning: The Labour Party aims to tightly sync immigration volumes with housing and infrastructure capacity while introducing structural adjustments to residency timelines.
  • If you are concerned about overall high net migration figures: Parties like ACT and NZ First are championing much tougher border and welfare rules, which could contract the pool of available international candidates for niche manufacturing operations.

If you would like to look deeper into specific operational factors, please let me know:

  • What specific skilled roles (e.g., CNC machinists, industrial engineers, freight logistics managers) you are struggling to recruit?
  • Whether you currently hold Accredited Employer status with Immigration New Zealand?

I can tailor more precise insights into how these proposed changes might disrupt or improve your specific workflow.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account