Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

New Zealand 2026 election: schools and support in smaller communities

For someone living and working in a small town, the education question is about more than classroom results. It is whether children can attend a nearby school, whether that school can recruit and keep teachers, whether children who need extra help can get it locally, and whether families have to drive long distances when school transport is reduced.

The New Zealand general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. The parties have made some specific commitments on rural school transport, teacher training and learning support, although not every party has published a detailed plan for keeping small schools open. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

I'll focus on the policies most relevant to smaller towns and rural communities across New Zealand, rather than assuming you live in a particular region.

What the parties are proposing

1. National — more learning support and teacher training

Published 2026 education commitments

National's education plan focuses on literacy, numeracy, attendance, classroom learning and additional support for children.

  • Learning support: Learning Support Coordinators (LSCs) for all schools with Year 1–8 students from 2028.
  • Teacher aides: Additional hours and training, building to two million extra hours annually from 2028, for children with behavioural, emotional and neurodiverse needs.
  • Early intervention: Expand the Early Intervention Service.
  • Teacher recruitment: Expand school-based teacher training and provide pathways for people in rural and isolated communities to train online while remaining in their communities.
  • School facilities: Invest in warmer, drier classrooms and school property. Teaching the basics brilliantlySchool Onsite Training Programme to provide 704 places every year from 2028

What to check for your town: These measures could increase access to learning support and help train teachers locally. The published commitments do not, by themselves, guarantee that every small school will remain open or have a permanent specialist on site.

Sources: National's education policy · Teacher training expansion

2. Labour — restoring rural school bus routes

Published 2026 commitments

Labour has made a specific commitment to rural transport for schoolchildren.

  • School buses: Work to restore all rural school bus routes that have been cut, or develop a suitable alternative with rural communities and local councils if restoration is not possible.
  • Getting to school: Cap public transport fares, with a stated cap of $10 a week outside Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.
  • School lunches: Restore fresh, locally made school lunches from Term 1 2028, using school kitchens, iwi and hapū partners or local caterers.
  • Local employment: Labour also proposes expanding apprenticeship support, which is relevant to its wider approach to creating work opportunities. Labour's Cost of Living PlanLabour's Cost of Living Plan

What to check for your town: The bus commitment is directly relevant if families have lost a route or now have to drive children to a bus stop. Labour says it will work with communities where a route cannot be reinstated, but the final arrangements would matter.

Source: Labour's 2026 cost-of-living plan

3. ACT — making better use of existing school buses

ACT's 2026 education commitments address practical problems for families, including school transport.

  • School buses: Its Let the Kid on the Bus policy proposes allowing children to use passing school buses with spare seats, rather than restricting access to buses designated for their particular school.
  • Classroom conditions: ACT also proposes giving teachers stronger powers to remove seriously or persistently disruptive students from classrooms, with supervised arrangements and consequences for serious misconduct.
  • School choice: ACT supports charter schools as an alternative for families where an existing school is not meeting their needs. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

What to check for your town: The spare-seat proposal could reduce unnecessary driving if the route and timing work for local families. It is not the same as guaranteeing a new route, restoring a cancelled service or retaining a small school.

Source: ACT's education policies

4. Green Party — inclusive education and community wellbeing

The Greens' 2026 manifesto describes education as a public good and commits to an inclusive system intended to support every learner.

  • Inclusive education: Its stated approach is to support students' different needs and help all learners reach their potential.
  • School lunches: Restore, extend and permanently fund Ka Ora, Ka Ako, with locally provided lunches and an expansion to approximately 400 additional schools, reaching 150,000 more children.
  • Regional communities: The party's broader approach includes social investment and more affordable regional transport options. Manifesto 2026Green Party announces plan for free and nutritious school lunches

What to check for your town: The Greens' published approach emphasises inclusion and community-based provision. The sources reviewed here do not establish a specific guarantee to keep every small school open, or a quantified commitment to place specialist learning-support staff in every isolated community.

Sources: Green Party 2026 manifesto · School lunch policy

What about New Zealand First and Te Pāti Māori?

I couldn't verify a sufficiently specific, current 2026 commitment from the sources reviewed to describe either party's position on retaining small schools, rural teacher staffing or specialist learning support with the same level of detail. That is a gap in the comparison, not evidence that either party opposes those things.

You can check their latest education policies and compare them with the other parties through Policy.nz's 2026 election guide. It allows you to explore individual school policies and see which parties support them. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

What matters most for a small town?

Rather than comparing education promises in general, it may help to assess them against four concrete questions.

  1. Will the local school stay open?

Look for an explicit commitment on school closures, mergers, enrolment thresholds and consultation with local communities. None of the four parties' policies summarised above provides a blanket guarantee that every small school will remain open.

  1. Can the school attract and keep teachers?

Check for rural teacher-training places, financial incentives to work in isolated communities, relief-teacher availability and support for multilevel classrooms.

  1. Will children get learning support locally?

Ask whether funding provides a dedicated specialist, shared regional staff or only limited hours. National's LSC commitment is relevant here, but the practical allocation to small schools is important.

  1. Will families spend less time and money travelling?

Compare bus-route restoration, access to spare seats, eligibility rules, transport assistance and whether specialist services can be delivered locally or remotely.

One existing policy detail is worth knowing: the Ministry of Education's published learning-support funding provides for small schools with 100 students or fewer to access a Learning Support Coordinator for one day a week as the new provision is rolled out. That is a specific allocation under the existing programme, not a promise of a full-time coordinator at each small school. Learning support

How to use this when deciding your vote

New Zealand voters have two votes: a party vote, which determines each party's share of parliamentary seats, and an electorate vote, which chooses your local MP. You can assess both parties' national commitments and what local candidates say they will do for smaller communities. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The most useful follow-up is to compare the parties against your particular concern. Is it primarily keeping the local school open, recruiting teachers, getting specialist help for children, or avoiding long drives because school transport and services are disappearing? Those issues overlap, but they require different policy commitments.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

In New Zealand’s small towns and rural communities, keeping local schools viable, recruiting teachers, and securing adequate learning support are persistent challenges, often compounded by long travel distances for families.

Political parties approach these issues through distinct lenses—ranging from school choice models and funding overhauls to workforce planning and community-focused infrastructure.

1. School Retention and Community Infrastructure

  • National and ACT (Coalition Government Context): The current government framework has focused on infrastructure upgrades across thousands of schools and expanding educational choice, including the re-establishment of charter schools. For rural and small-town families, ACT has also championed policies like allowing students to catch any passing school bus rather than being restricted strictly to single-school designated buses, which can ease transport logistics in remote areas.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP) and Minor Parties: Some parties advocate for long-term, cross-party planning (such as a 10-year education plan) to protect community-based education settings and prevent regional facilities from facing sudden funding instability. Parties like the Greens and Te Pāti Māori strongly oppose alternative models like charter schools, arguing that public funds should be tightly concentrated on reinforcing the core public school network in regions.

2. Teacher Recruitment, Retention, and Workload

  • Addressing Shortages: Teacher shortages acutely impact small towns where attracting and retaining specialized staff is difficult. Several parties and sector groups (such as NZEI Te Riu Roa) are pushing for structural workforce planning. This includes increasing regional training pathways—such as training student teachers directly in schools while studying—and addressing baseline remuneration and high workloads.
  • Classroom Management: Parties like ACT emphasize disciplinary tools, such as giving teachers explicit legal powers to remove disruptive students from classrooms, arguing that this protects teacher retention and morale in challenging environments.

3. Learning Support in Remote Areas

  • Access to learning support coordinators, educational psychologists, and speech therapists is historically more scarce in provincial and rural schools compared to major urban centers. While broader policy debates often focus on increasing overall funding pools or introducing dedicated classroom support (such as union-backed calls for a teacher aide in every class), smaller communities often rely heavily on regional equity funding formulas. Parties differ on whether to allocate this through centralized public resourcing or via contestable funding and parental choice models.

Are you interested in how specific parties propose to tackle healthcare access or local transport infrastructure in provincial towns as well?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

In the context of New Zealand's general election, political parties approach the challenges facing smaller towns, rural schools, and localized learning support through distinct ideological and programmatic lenses. While broad national policies often focus on core curriculum, funding models, or school operations, their practical impacts on smaller communities vary significantly.

An overview of how the major political groupings generally approach the retention, staffing, and support of schools in smaller and remote communities highlights these differences:

  • National Party / Governing Coalition Approach: Focuses heavily on infrastructure investment, operational flexibility, and school choice. Their policies emphasize maintaining physical network integrity while addressing achievement standards through structured literacy, regular attendance monitoring, and localized accountability. For small communities, they tend to support existing operational funding models while enabling alternative pathways (such as partnership/charter schools) or variable transport/bus options to help rural students access educational facilities.

  • Labour Party Approach: Tends to emphasize centralized public funding, direct staffing entitlement protections for smaller/isolated schools, and public provision of learning support services. Labour historically resists models that decentralize funding into independent accounts or private/charter alternatives, arguing that equitable resourcing for rural and provincial schools relies on guaranteed central staffing ratios, centrally coordinated learning support co-ordinators (LSCs), and public infrastructure investment.

  • ACT New Zealand Approach: Advocates for structural market-based reforms, such as Student Education Accounts or expanded partnership/charter school models, arguing that choice and direct funding allocation give rural and provincial parents more leverage. They emphasize reducing central bureaucracy and allowing schools greater autonomy over how they source and manage teaching resources. [WhichParty NZ]

  • Green Party Approach: Strongly opposes charter or private alternatives, championing fully resourced, public community hubs. For smaller towns, the Greens emphasize equitable baseline funding, expanding mental health and learning support professionals directly inside public schools, and integrating local environmental and community resilience into the education framework. [WhichParty NZ]

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on Tiriti-led education frameworks, advocating for regional authority models (such as a Māori Education Authority) and localized, culturally grounded kura and school resourcing that addresses the specific disparities faced by rural and isolated whānau. [Policy.nz]

To explore and compare specific, up-to-the-minute party manifestos, candidate stances, and granular policy toolkits for the current election cycle, you can check the neutral electoral comparison platform Policy.nz.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

AI Overview

In the 2026 New Zealand general election campaign, major political parties offer distinct approaches to supporting schools, retaining teachers, and addressing learning support in regional and smaller communities.

Because your family drives long distances for services and faces limited infrastructure, policy differences regarding local accessibility, staffing, and community control will directly impact your lifestyle.


Core Education Proposals by Party (2026 Election)

Political Party Staffing & Teacher Retention Learning Support & Curriculum School Accessibility & Costs
National Party Expands the School Onsite Training Programme to 660 places annually from 2028 to train teachers directly within understaffed schools. Mandates a knowledge-rich curriculum with one hour daily each of reading, writing, and maths ; requires students to complete Year 11. Focuses on standardising school calendars and basic outcomes while continuing fiscal consolidation on non-frontline services.
Labour Party Focuses heavily on reducing school-related household expenses to ease local financial pressures. Promises to pause the government’s curriculum overhaul and establish an Independent Council for Curriculum and Assessment (ICCA). Pledges to restore 43 rural school bus routes and bring back fresh, locally-made school lunches by 2028.
ACT New Zealand Promotes regulatory deregulation, making it easier for schools to operate with less central ministry oversight. Strongly supports Charter Schools and proposes Student Education Accounts (~$12,000/yr) for parental school choice. Aims to shrink central bureaucracy, shifting funding ownership directly to parents rather than regional ministries.
Green Party Advocates for universal stipends for training teachers and support staff to build a robust local public workforce. Opposes standardized curriculum and assessment overhauls, arguing they leave rural, neurodivergent, and Māori students behind. Focuses on inclusive education and funding public services by taxing mega-corporations and the super-rich.

How These Proposals Impact Smaller Communities

1. Retaining and Attracting Teachers

  • National addresses persistent staffing challenges by shifting teacher training to an onsite, practical classroom-based model , designed to anchor trainee teachers into local communities early.
  • The Greens aim to solve systemic shortages by offering universal student income support during training placements, making it financially viable for locals in smaller towns to retrain as teachers or health workers without moving away.

2. Managing Learning Support and Overhauls

  • Labour argues that smaller schools are overwhelmed by rapid curriculum changes and intends to freeze the current NCEA and curriculum overhauls. This temporary pause is designed to allow local educators to catch their breath and rely on an independent body of experts rather than political directives.
  • The Greens explicitly critique "one-size-fits-all" standardized assessment models, pushing instead for locally-shaped education frameworks that accommodate neurodivergent and regional students who lack access to urban clinics.

3. School Accessibility and Operational Freedom

  • Labour’s policy addresses the physical realities of living far from services by promising to reinstate canceled rural school bus routes and capping uniform costs, which reduces the logistical and financial strain on families who travel long distances.
  • ACT views central government systems as rigid and inefficient for small communities. By funding families directly through Student Education Accounts , their model seeks to allow smaller towns to set up alternative, flexible schooling structures (like charter options) that aren't bound by standard Ministry of Education rules.

If you would like to explore these dynamics further, let me know:

  • Which specific aspect (rural transport, funding models, or special needs support) matters most to your family?
  • If you want a breakdown of party policies on regional healthcare and local job creation to match your broader living constraints.
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account