Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

New Zealand 2026 election: home care, aged care and respite

If you're working part-time while providing daily unpaid care for an older family member, three things are particularly important when comparing election policies: reliable help at home, dependable respite when you need a break, and financial and workplace support for family carers.

The New Zealand general election is on Saturday 7 November 2026. The key distinction to look for is whether a party proposes specific changes to these services, broader investment in health and aged care, or financial support for unpaid carers. Those approaches could affect your household in different ways. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government2026 Election Policy Summaries

1. How the parties compare

The table below focuses on published 2026 positions that are relevant to your situation. It distinguishes specific proposals from broader commitments; a policy announcement does not guarantee that services will become more available.

Party Relevant published position What it could mean for your situation
National Launched the Mahi Aroha Carers’ Strategy Action Plan in September 2026, covering carers’ health and wellbeing, financial security, and recognition. It has also temporarily increased mileage payments for home and community support workers. New roadmap for supporting unpaid carersIncreased mileage rates for home and community support workers A formal programme for recognising unpaid carers, alongside support for the home-care workforce. Check what additional respite, financial assistance and service commitments are funded and when they will take effect.
Labour Promises to restore pay equity legislation within its first 100 days in government and give care and support workers an immediate $4-per-hour pay rise from 1 January 2027. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesPay Equity Focuses on the pay and retention of the people providing care. Better workforce conditions could help service sustainability, but the pay promise itself does not guarantee you more home visits or respite.
Green Party Has called for long-term investment in aged care, including both in-home and residential care, and better employment conditions for the aged-care workforce. Its broader health policy supports publicly funded, publicly owned aged care. Long-term investment in aged care can't wait - delaying it will only increase the cost2026 Election Policy Summaries Relevant if you want a more publicly funded aged-care system and a long-term plan for delivering care at home. Look for specific funding, workforce and respite commitments in its detailed policies.
Opportunity Party Its October 2026 disability policy proposes exploring financial support for unpaid carers, reducing penalties associated with working while receiving support, more flexibility to balance work and care, and improved respite. It also proposes restoring fairer pay-equity rules for care workers. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026Pay Equity Directly addresses the combination of paid work and unpaid caring. However, the policy uses terms such as “look for ways” and “aim to improve”; it does not establish a guaranteed payment amount or a specific number of respite hours.
New Zealand First Has announced proposed retirement-village legislation for the next parliamentary term, focused on resident protections, security and housing options. Common sense must prevail for retirement village reform Relevant if retirement-village arrangements may form part of your family member’s future. This announcement is not, by itself, a commitment to expand in-home support or respite.
ACT The available material reviewed for this comparison does not establish a specific 2026 commitment to increase respite or home-based aged care. National’s coalition partner has supported changes to disability-support administration and funding. Bill to strengthen disability supportFamily and social policy: party comparison 2026 Ask whether ACT would expand care availability, change eligibility or funding rules, or focus primarily on managing existing services and expenditure.
Te Pāti Māori Its published health direction emphasises prevention, whānau wellbeing and Māori-led healthcare. The material reviewed does not establish a specific quantified 2026 commitment for additional older-person respite or home-care hours. 2026 Election Policy SummariesFamily and social policy: party comparison 2026 Potentially relevant if culturally appropriate, whānau-led support is important to your family. Seek details on delivery, funding and eligibility.

An important distinction: a party may support carers in principle without promising a new entitlement. I could not verify a specific, quantified national increase in home-care hours or respite days across all these parties from the material reviewed. Where no specific commitment is identified, that means it was not established by these sources—not necessarily that the party opposes it.

2. The policies that matter most to you

Given that you work part-time and provide daily care, I would compare parties against these practical questions rather than looking only at their general health spending.

Reliable help at home

Will the party fund more home and community support hours, make it easier to obtain an assessment, and address missed visits or workforce shortages? Does it propose regular help with personal care, meals, mobility or household tasks?

Respite you can actually use

Will respite be available when you need it, including short breaks, planned time off and urgent cover? Check whether proposals include more funded places, home-based respite workers or more flexible funding.

Financial security while caring

Does the party propose a carer payment, a more flexible benefit or income-support system, help with the costs of respite, or retirement-savings support for people whose caring reduces their paid work?

A sustainable aged-care workforce

Will there be enough qualified support workers, nurses and residential-care places? What funding, pay arrangements and workforce plans would help care providers recruit and retain staff?

For your circumstances, the key question is not simply whether a party says it values carers. It is whether its policies would give you predictable cover for your family member without forcing you to give up paid work or pay unaffordable amounts for help.

3. A major issue to watch: the future of aged care

An independent Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group report released in August 2026 recommends substantial reform of New Zealand's aged-care system. Its proposals include:

  • Developing a more advanced model of in-home care, with funding that can respond more flexibly to people's needs.
  • Introducing restorative support and training for family carers.
  • Improving arrangements for short-term residential admissions and respite.
  • Removing contributions towards the cost of residential respite for a defined period, subject to the proposed rules.

These are recommendations for reform, not automatically adopted election promises. An important question to put to each party is whether it supports the recommendations, which it would implement, and how it would fund them. Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group media release: Major reform needed to secure New Zealand’s aged care futureA place to grow old: Securing the future of aged careAged Care Ministerial Advisory Group: Frequently asked questions September 2026

Read the Ministry of Health's aged-care reform announcement and the full report.

4. Support you may be able to access now

You do not have to wait for the election to investigate existing support.

Visionwest Home Healthcare (North Shore) - Home help & personal care. Making Life Easier at Home for New Zealand Seniors – Eldernet

Home and community support

Contact your family member's GP or local Health New Zealand needs assessment service (NASC) to request an assessment for funded home support. Ask specifically about personal care, household assistance and the number and timing of visits available.

Short Term Respite Henderson | Edmonton Meadows Care Home, West Auckland

Residential respite

Eligible older people may receive up to 28 days of funded respite care per year, following assessment. Immediate respite may also be possible in some circumstances. Availability at a suitable facility can still be a practical obstacle.

Source: Health New Zealand — Respite care for older people.

Capella Housewww.capellahouse.co.nz

Carer Support subsidy

If you provide more than four hours of unpaid care a day, you may qualify for a subsidy towards replacement care or other respite expenses. Eligibility depends on assessment and the circumstances of the person receiving care.

Source: Health New Zealand — Carer Support subsidy.

5. Where to compare the policies before voting

These resources let you check new announcements and read the original party documents:

One further consideration: under New Zealand's MMP system, the party you vote for may need to negotiate with other parties to form a government. You can therefore ask not only what a party promises, but what it would make a priority in coalition negotiations. How does New Zealand's electoral system work and does it favour coalitions?PartyMap: New Zealand election guide 2026

A question that could help narrow the comparison

When you think about the next government's effect on your life, which change would make the biggest practical difference?

Your answers would help distinguish policies that might improve the support available to your family from those that primarily address the wider aged-care system.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

Navigating part-time work alongside daily, unpaid caregiving for an older family member is a demanding balancing act, and finding reliable home support, aged care, and respite options is a central issue for many households in the 2026 New Zealand General Election.

While all major parties acknowledge the demographic pressures of an aging population and the vital role of family carers (often responding to advocacy groups like Grey Power), their approaches, funding philosophies, and priorities for home-based care, aged care, and respite differ.


Major Parties' Approach to Aged Care, Home-Based Care, and Respite

1. The National Party (Incumbent / Government)

  • Focus & System Approach: National centers its aged and community care strategy on financial sustainability, achieving national consistency in service delivery, and supporting "ageing in place".
  • Home-Based & Aged Care: Their approach emphasizes improving the efficiency and consistency of assessment and allocation processes nationwide to clear regional disparities. They focus on stabilizing the broader support and health infrastructure rather than major structural overhauls, aiming to restore flexibility within existing funding models.
  • Respite & Carer Support: Support for family carers is largely addressed through broader health and disability system stability, aiming to ensure community providers remain viable to deliver routine and crisis relief.

2. The Labour Party

  • Focus & System Approach: Labour takes a rights-based and equity-focused approach inspired by the Enabling Good Lives framework, emphasizing individual choice, control, and accessibility.
  • Home-Based & Aged Care: Labour has campaigned on making healthcare more affordable and heavily emphasizes strengthening the workforce—specifically addressing pay parity and contract stability for care workers to combat severe staff shortages in home-based support.
  • Respite & Carer Support: Labour’s platform places stronger direct emphasis on expanding access to day programmes and regular respite care so that informal and family carers can stay connected to the workforce without reaching burnout.

3. New Zealand First

  • Focus & System Approach: NZ First identifies aged-care reform and senior advocacy as a core pillar of its political platform.
  • Home-Based & Aged Care: They advocate for better coordination between primary, community, and aged-care sectors. Their policies heavily target "ageing in place" through a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan and ensuring older New Zealanders—particularly in rural and provincial areas—have robust access to public health and community support services.
  • Respite & Carer Support: Focuses heavily on lifting the standard and availability of state-supported aged-care services and relieving the systemic pressures on older adults and their supporting whānau.

4. The Green Party

  • Focus & System Approach: The Greens champion a strongly rights-based, accessible model centered on wellbeing, robust social safety nets, and increased funding for community-led health services.
  • Home-Based & Aged Care: They support expanding individualised funding models, granting disabled people and older home-care recipients full choice and control over how care packages are managed, moving away from rigid, deficit-based assessments.
  • Respite & Carer Support: The Greens advocate for significant enhancements to income support and caregiver recognition, aiming to reduce the financial penalty often borne by those who step away from full-time work to provide unpaid care.

5. ACT New Zealand

  • Focus & System Approach: ACT's philosophy centers on fiscal restraint, reducing state bureaucracy, and driving efficiency through choice.
  • Home-Based & Aged Care: ACT generally favors direct, individualised, cash-like funding models handed directly to individuals/families rather than channeled through large provider bureaucracies, giving families the flexibility to purchase the exact care they need.
  • Respite & Carer Support: Emphasizes streamlining the system to remove administrative blockages, allowing families more direct purchasing power over respite and support services.

Key Questions to Ask Local Candidates

When deciding how your vote aligns with your day-to-day reality as a working caregiver, consider asking local candidates standing in your electorate the following questions:

  1. Workforce & Reliability: What specific funding or pay-equity commitments does your party have to ensure home-support agencies can attract and retain workers, stopping the constant cancellation of care shifts?
  2. Respite Access: How will your party expand guaranteed, easy-to-access respite care so that part-time working caregivers can maintain employment without facing burnout?
  3. Funding Flexibility: Will your party support more flexible, individualised funding so families can directly choose and pay the support people who best fit their household’s specific culture and needs?

Are there particular pain points you experience most often—such as consistency of home-help workers, booking respite care, or managing your part-time hours alongside caregiving—that you would like to explore further?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

Navigating part-time work while providing daily, unpaid care for an older family member is a demanding balancing act, and the systemic strain on home-based and respite care is a major talking point in the Grey Power Election 2026 Questionnaire.

Major political parties approaches to home-based care, aged care, and support for family/whānau carers break down across the following policy positions:

  • National focuses its approach on broad economic management, stabilizing overall healthcare delivery, reducing wait times, and addressing workforce pressures. Their strategy generally leans toward sustainable funding models for residential care alongside broader economic drivers, though they face calls from advocacy groups to clarify specific funding increases for expanding home-support hours and direct carer respite.

  • Labour places emphasis on protecting and expanding public healthcare access and affordability. Their focus centers on strengthening the health workforce and supporting ageing-in-place initiatives through public health funding, aiming to ease the bottlenecks in home-based support allocations. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • Green Party places a distinct emphasis on community-based health services and direct support for family and whānau carers. They advocate for stronger resourcing for ageing-in-place, which includes expanded access to reliable home support and more robust, accessible respite care options to prevent carer burnout. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • New Zealand First has positioned aged-care reform and support for seniors as a core priority. They propose specific measures like a Seniors Housing Plan and enhanced practical choices for ageing in place, aiming to tackle systemic gaps in regional and domestic support networks. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP) emphasizes structural shifts toward community-level health delivery, supporting family carers, and modernizing community-based care structures to make ageing in place more practically achievable. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • ACT did not complete the comprehensive Grey Power 2026 Policy Survey due to resource capacity, but generally aligns with market-driven delivery, choice, and operational streamlining within the broader health sector.

  • Te Pāti Māori did not return the structured Grey Power questionnaire, though their broader health platform emphasizes whānau-centred care models, kaupapa Māori health providers, and localized support for indigenous and community caregivers. [Grey Power New Zealand Federation Inc.]

Across the board, while most responding parties express support for care workforce pay equity and ageing-in-place principles, they vary on the speed, funding mechanisms, and direct relief structures dedicated to unpaid family carers requiring regular respite. You can review detailed candidate stances and sector analyses directly through resources like Grey Power New Zealand or Inclusive World NZ. [greypowermag.co.nz]

Would you like to explore specific party manifestos regarding carer tax credits/financial relief, or do you want to look into local respite availability and support infrastructure in your region?

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

AI Overview

Political parties in the 2026 New Zealand general election are split on how to address the growing crisis in home-based support, respite infrastructure, and residential aged care. The debate centers around a major independent report released by the Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group (chaired by former Labour health minister David Cunliffe), which warned that the current system is underfunded and fragmented.

The primary policy positions, workforce strategies, and funding approaches of the major parties are compared below.

Policy Comparison on Aged Care and Support

Party Home-Based Support & Aging in Place Aged Care Funding & Structural Reform Respite & Carer Support Workforce & Pay Equity
National Party Focuses on healthcare delivery via 24/7 digital health and after-hours clinics. Overseeing the progression of Retirement Villages Act rule changes to cap exit fee deductions and speed up equity paybacks. Commits to a bipartisan approach to fund standard rest-home beds based on the Ministerial Advisory Group's 2026 recommendations. Pushing for economic growth and health system management via Health NZ. Relies on existing public health frameworks and targeted cost-of-living adjustments, like raising rates rebates up to $800. Focused on broad healthcare recruitment, promising to hire 2,000 nurses and additional GPs/nurse practitioners. Supports pay equity in principle but focuses on general economic relief.
Labour Party Pledges to make primary care cheaper by offering three free GP visits and free prescriptions. Championing a member's bill to force retirement villages to return capital within 3 months. Expresses deep concerns that the current National-led coalition is rushing the Te Whatu Ora aged care redesign. Demands full transparency and higher public funding models to prevent facility closures. Pledges greater institutional funding for community-based health networks and day programmes. Promises to restore pay equity legislation specifically targeting care and support workers with an immediate $4 an hour pay boost.
New Zealand First Strongly advocates for "aging in place" via a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan and asset protections. Identified aged care reform as a core priority. Committed to endorsing and implementing the refreshed 2026–2031 Dementia Action Plan to standardise clinical pathways. Demands an increase in local capacity, including access to regular, government-funded respite care so whānau can remain in the workforce. Supports pay equity measures for aged-care staff to fix the ongoing workforce shortage.
Green Party Places primary emphasis on community-integrated care to let seniors safely age at home. Argues that the core crisis in aged care stems from the severe underfunding and misprioritisation of the health system. Strongly advocates for structural, wraparound wellbeing support and flexible funding for unpaid family carers. Backs immediate pay equity corrections and robust job security for essential healthcare and community carers.

Key Information for Unpaid Carers

Regardless of which party wins, you may currently be eligible for existing government-funded tools designed to give you flexibility:

  • Individualised Funding (IF): Since April 2026, New Zealanders using flexible funding have expanded choice and control. IF allows your family member to manage their budget directly and potentially employ qualified family/whānau members aged 16+ as paid carers.
  • Respite Allowances: Health NZ funds planned facility-based respite care (up to 28 days per year) to give full-time unpaid carers a break. This requires a Needs Assessment and Service Coordination (NASC) evaluation.

If you would like to explore how these individual platforms align with your specific situation, please let me know:

  • Has your family member already undergone a Health NZ NASC assessment?
  • Are you looking for more details on how to register as a paid family carer under the current system?
  • Do you want to see the specific details of the Retirement Villages Act dispute changes?
Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account