Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

New Zealand 2026 election: How the parties differ on housing

As of 19 October 2026, the central divide in the 7 November general election is whether to improve housing affordability mainly by building more homes and encouraging private investment, or by strengthening renters’ protections, expanding public housing and changing how property is taxed. There are also important differences in help for first-home buyers and the treatment of people who already own homes. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked

Here’s how the main parties’ published policies compare, focusing on renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners.

1. At a glance

Party Renters First-home buyers Existing homeowners
National Emphasises more housing supply and private rental investment Expand eligibility for 5% deposit First Home Loans No new taxes; proposes a rates cap
Labour Fairer, more secure renting and more social housing Make buying a first home easier; increase housing supply Family home exempt from its proposed capital gains tax
Green Party Cap annual rent increases at 2%; end no-cause evictions Build public housing and reverse landlord tax breaks More tax on wealth and investment property; broader tax changes
ACT Encourage private rental investment by reducing tax restrictions Emphasises housing supply and lower building costs Favourable tax treatment for rental investors; opposes new taxes
New Zealand First Focuses more on ensuring developments have adequate infrastructure More housing development, subject to infrastructure requirements No single new homeowner-specific measure identified in its housing announcement
Opportunity (TOP) Proposes a universal Citizens’ Income that renters could use toward rent Lower land costs may help affordability, but the transition would be significant Proposes annual land-value tax, including on owner-occupied property
Te Pāti Māori Proposes taxes on vacant homes and land banking Proposes a stamp-duty exemption for eligible first-home buyers Proposes a land-banking tax, vacant-house tax and residential stamp duty

These are summaries of announced policies, not guarantees of what a future government would implement. The detail and scope of some proposals differ, and coalition negotiations could change the final package. National is backing first home buyersCapital Gains Tax to Level the Playing Field for Businesses, Create Jobs and Fix New Zealand's Health SystemGreens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisACT New ZealandNZFirst Policy Announcement: Changes to Fast-Track Residential ApprovalsTax Tips: 2026 General ElectionPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

2. What each party is proposing

National — more supply and easier access to deposits

Aerial view Housing Development in New Zealand

For renters: National’s approach is to increase housing supply by easing planning restrictions and encouraging development. It has restored mortgage-interest deductibility for residential landlords, supporting the economics of rental investment. It does not propose the Greens’ 2% rent cap. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, rankedPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

For first-home buyers: National announced on 6 September that it would lift the income cap for the First Home Loan scheme to $300,000, allowing more eligible buyers to purchase with a 5% deposit rather than the usual 20%. National is backing first home buyers

For existing homeowners: National promises no new taxes and has proposed a rates cap. Its approach favours protecting the existing tax treatment of family homes and property investment.

Key distinction: National relies on additional supply, private investment and access to mortgages rather than direct rent controls.

Labour — affordability, more secure renting and targeted property taxation

“Hard to fault” Kāinga Ora developments win property industry awards :: Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities

For renters: Labour promises fairer, more secure renting and additional social housing. Its September announcement committed to at least 6,000 more social housing places over four years, including $2.9 billion for Kāinga Ora to build state houses. Affordable homes for allNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked

For first-home buyers: Labour says it will make first-home ownership easier and increase housing supply. Its wider approach includes changing the tax incentives around investment property, although it has not announced a new general rent cap in the material reviewed. Affordable homes for allCapital Gains Tax to Level the Playing Field for Businesses, Create Jobs and Fix New Zealand's Health System

For existing homeowners: Labour proposes a 28% capital gains tax on gains from commercial and residential investment property realised on sales, applying only to gains made after 1 July 2027. The family home, including lifestyle blocks, is exempt. Labour has also said it will not reverse the current restoration of landlord interest deductibility. Capital Gains Tax to Level the Playing Field for Businesses, Create Jobs and Fix New Zealand's Health SystemTax Tips: 2026 General Election

Key distinction: Labour combines extra public housing and greater security for renters with a targeted tax on investment-property gains, rather than taxing gains on the family home.

Green Party — stronger renter protections and a larger public-housing sector

“Hard to fault” Kāinga Ora developments win property industry awards :: Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities

For renters: The Greens propose capping rent increases at 2% annually, reversing no-cause evictions and introducing an independently enforced Rental Warrant of Fitness. They also want to build tens of thousands of public homes. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisManifesto 2026

For first-home buyers: The party wants to reverse landlord tax breaks it says favour property investors over people trying to buy their first home. Increasing public and affordable housing is also part of its plan. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis

For existing homeowners: The Greens propose removing interest deductibility for residential investment properties and restoring the 10-year bright-line test. Their wider wealth-tax programme would also change the tax treatment of substantial wealth. The family home is treated differently from investment property under their proposed wealth-tax settings. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionManifesto 2026

Key distinction: The Greens place greater emphasis on limiting rent increases, strengthening tenants’ security and treating housing primarily as a place to live rather than an investment asset.

ACT — private investment, lower costs and fewer rental tax restrictions

Just how long does it take to build a home in NZ?, All things property, under OneRoof

For renters: ACT argues that more private investment and more homes will improve rental choice and affordability. It proposes abolishing rental-loss ring-fencing, allowing qualifying residential rental losses to be offset against other taxable income. ACT New Zealand

For first-home buyers: ACT emphasises increasing supply, reforming resource-management rules and opening access to building materials to reduce the barriers to construction. ACT New ZealandPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

For existing homeowners: ACT opposes new taxes and supports private property investment. Its rental-loss proposal primarily affects landlords, including owners of existing rental properties and new builds, rather than owner-occupiers. ACT New Zealand

Key distinction: ACT’s position is that reducing costs and restrictions for property providers will help renters and buyers through increased supply, rather than rent caps or new taxes on wealth.

New Zealand First — development that comes with infrastructure

Studio Wainui

For renters: Its announced housing policy focuses on getting developments built with appropriate infrastructure, rather than introducing specific rent controls.

For first-home buyers: It supports additional housing development but wants roads, water, wastewater and other essential services to be available or funded before fast-track projects are approved.

For existing homeowners: Its latest housing announcement focuses on infrastructure capacity and the approval process, rather than proposing a new tax on the family home. NZFirst Policy Announcement: Changes to Fast-Track Residential Approvals

Key distinction: New Zealand First puts more emphasis on ensuring that new housing developments have the infrastructure communities need, even if that adds requirements to the approval process.

Opportunity (TOP) — land-value tax and a Citizens’ Income

Faringdon - Rolleston — BG Contracting

For renters: TOP proposes a universal Citizens’ Income of $19,400 a year. Renters would receive it too, helping them cover housing and other living costs.

For first-home buyers: The party proposes an annual land-value tax of 1.75% on urban land and 0.5% on rural land, alongside wider tax and income reforms. Because the tax applies to land rather than buildings, it would change the relative cost of owning property.

For existing homeowners: Owner-occupied homes would not be exempt from the proposed urban land tax. Some asset-rich but cash-poor owners, including certain retirees, would have access to deferral arrangements. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentTax Tips: 2026 General ElectionNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked

Key distinction: TOP proposes a more fundamental restructuring of the tax system. The land tax could create a substantial new annual cost for some owners, while the Citizens’ Income would provide an offsetting payment.

Te Pāti Māori — taxing land banking and vacant homes

Community & Social Housing — Signature Commercial

For renters: Its published tax proposals include a 2% vacant-house tax, intended to discourage leaving residential property unused, and a 33% land-banking tax.

For first-home buyers: It proposes exempting qualifying first-home buyers purchasing homes under $1 million from a 5% stamp duty on residential sales.

For existing homeowners: It proposes the same 5% residential stamp duty more broadly, alongside the vacant-house and land-banking taxes. The exact effect would depend on the scope and exemptions in the final legislation. Tax Tips: 2026 General Election

Key distinction: Te Pāti Māori’s announced approach uses taxes to discourage vacant homes and land banking, while giving eligible first-home buyers preferential treatment on residential purchases. A complete official housing-policy package was not available in the sources reviewed. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, rankedTax Tips: 2026 General Election

3. What the differences mean for you

If you rent

The biggest policy differences to examine are rent increases, eviction security and the availability of public housing. The Greens have the clearest explicit proposal for a 2% annual rent cap. Labour emphasises secure renting and social housing, while National and ACT rely more on expanding private rental supply.

If you want to buy your first home

National’s proposed $300,000 income cap for 5% deposit loans is a concrete mortgage-access measure. Labour and the Greens focus more on affordability and housing supply, with the Greens also seeking to change investment-property tax incentives. Te Pāti Māori proposes a stamp-duty exemption for qualifying first-home purchases under $1 million.

If you already own a home

The crucial distinction is whether you own only your family home or also investment property. Labour’s proposed capital gains tax exempts the family home. TOP’s land-value tax would apply to owner-occupied land too. National opposes new taxes, while the Greens propose broader wealth taxation and changes to investor tax concessions.

4. The three questions worth checking before voting

  • Rent security versus rental supply: Would you prioritise limits on rent increases and eviction protections, or policies intended to encourage more landlords and developers to provide housing?
  • Help to buy versus broader affordability: Is your main barrier saving a deposit, qualifying for a mortgage, or the purchase price itself? A lower deposit requirement addresses a different problem from policies intended to reduce prices.
  • Tax on property versus protection of ownership: Would a proposed tax affect only investment gains, or would it create an annual cost for the land under your own home?

One final caution: a party’s stated aim is not the same as a guaranteed outcome. More construction does not automatically mean lower rents in every area, and stronger renter protections do not by themselves guarantee more available homes.

For the full policy wording and updates, the independent election guide at Policy.nz — Housing is a useful place to compare the parties’ proposals side by side. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, housing policy has emerged as a major battleground. The political parties offer starkly different visions that directly impact renters, first-home buyers, and existing homeowners/investors.


1. First-Home Buyers

First-home buyers are a primary focus for centre-right parties looking to ease entry barriers, while minor and left-bloc parties focus more on cooling the broader market to reduce competition.

  • National: Focuses heavily on expanding access to homeownership. Its headline policy is to significantly expand the First Home Loan scheme (allowing a 5% deposit) by lifting the household income eligibility threshold to $300,000 (up from previous caps of $95,000 for singles and $150,000 for couples).
  • ACT: Advocates for supply-side solutions, arguing that the best way to help first-home buyers is to drastically lower building costs, cut red tape, reform the building consent process, and incentivize councils (e.g., sharing GST on new builds) to unlock land.
  • Labour / Greens / TOP: Generally argue that lowering demand from property speculators is key to helping first-home buyers compete. Parties like The Opportunity Party (TOP) propose structural market shifts like a Land Value Tax intended to structurally moderate or lower house price growth over time, while Labour's tax changes target investor demand.

2. Renters

Policies affecting renters largely revolve around tenancy regulations, government-backed housing supply, and rental costs.

  • Labour & The Greens: Tend to champion stronger regulatory protections for tenants and direct state intervention. Labour has emphasized growing social and state housing supply (such as funding thousands of additional Kāinga Ora and social housing places). The Greens and Te Pāti Māori push for stronger tenant rights and measures like rent controls to limit surging rental costs.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Has proposed specific interventions for renters, including rent controls and an annual tax on residential homes left empty for extended periods.
  • ACT & National (Landlord-Friendly Settings): Generally favor market-led rental supplies via private landlords. National previously restored interest deductibility for residential landlords, and ACT strongly supports landlord rights and fewer prescriptive tenancy restrictions, arguing that a healthy private rental supply keeps rent increases in check through market competition.

3. Existing Homeowners and Property Investors

The dividing line for homeowners and property investors is sharply drawn around taxation, wealth accumulation, and investment costs.

  • Labour: Proposes a major tax shift with a 28% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) applying to residential investment properties and commercial property (excluding the family home) for gains made after July 1, 2027. Labour has also committed to retaining its existing rules around interest deductibility.
  • National & ACT: Position themselves as pro-property owner and investor-friendly. National has maintained its restoration of interest deductibility and shortened the bright-line test. ACT opposes capital gains or wealth taxes entirely, seeking lower tax rates for trusts and top earners to benefit property owners and developers.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes replacing parts of the traditional tax system with a 1.75% annual Land Value Tax on urban land (paired with a Citizen's Income), which would structurally change holding costs for landowners and investors.

Would you like a deeper breakdown of how a specific party's policy proposals compare across these three groups?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties are divided into two main philosophical camps: parties focusing on direct market intervention, rent controls, and public housing (such as the Green Party and Te Pāti Māori) versus parties focusing on supply-side deregulation, zoning reform, and demand-side assistance (such as National and ACT), with parties like Labour sitting in a middle space.


Strategic Approaches by Party Block

  • Green Party / Te Pāti Māori: Emphasise direct market controls, stronger legal protections for renters, mandatory housing standards, capital gains and land taxes, and massive expansions in public and community housing.

  • National / ACT: Emphasise cutting red tape, revamping land-use zoning to spur private development, lowering barriers to building supply to drive down competition-led prices, and opposing rigid price caps or new property taxes.

  • New Zealand Labour Party: Balances support for public and social housing supply expansion with renter security measures, while historically iterating on first-home buyer loan parameters.


Impact on Renters, First-Home Buyers, and Existing Homeowners

Housing Group Greens & Te Pāti Māori Approach National & ACT Approach Labour Approach
Renters Proposes strict rent increase limits (e.g., capping annual rent hikes), an independently enforced Rental Warrant of Fitness , and heightened security of tenure. Focuses on increasing overall rental supply through private construction rather than price caps, arguing controls shrink the market. Supports renter security enhancements and standards while scaling up public rentals.
First-Home Buyers Prefers public/community housing growth and raising income thresholds for lower deposit requirements, while opposing speculative demand-side inflation. Advocates for widening access to 5% deposit schemes (such as expanded First Home Loan eligibility) and zoning overhauls to make building cheaper. Maintains and adapts low-deposit home loan settings alongside targeted KiwiSaver/savings initiatives.
Existing Homeowners Proposes tax changes such as a capital gains tax (excluding family homes in some proposals) or land banking/stamp duty levies. Opposes new property taxes or capital gains taxes, focusing instead on property rights and easing regional development constraints. Generally protects primary family homes from broad capital gains sweeps while adjusting broader housing tax settings.

Detailed Breakdown by Constituency

For Renters

  • Greens: Advocate for direct market intervention including caps on annual rent increases (such as a 2% limit in specific platforms), compulsory Rental Warrants of Fitness , and phasing out reliance on private landlords via state housing.

  • National & ACT: Warn that heavy rental regulations and rent controls reduce the incentive for private landlords, potentially shrinking rental stock and driving rents higher. Their solution is unlocking land for more homes.

For First-Home Buyers

  • National: Backs expanding access to lower deposit options like 5% deposits under the First Home Loan scheme combined with aggressive municipal zoning and red-tape reduction to flood the market with build-ready sections.

  • Greens & Te Pāti Māori: Skeptical of pure demand-side stimulus (which they argue bids up purchase prices), instead channeling state capital into public and affordable builds and widening low-deposit access paired with targeted support.

For Existing Homeowners

  • Tax and Investment Policies: The Greens and aligned progressive parties push for structural tax shifts—such as land banking taxes, stamp duties, or capital gains structures—to cool speculative property hoarding.

  • Property Value & Supply Views: Centre-right parties (National and ACT) campaign on protecting existing home equity through supply-led moderation rather than punitive property taxes, letting market competition address affordability.

Track ongoing platform updates and compare candidate profiles viaPolicy.nz.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account