Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

2026 New Zealand election: Pacific children’s education and learning support

For a Pacific family in a multigenerational household, education policy is about more than what happens in the classroom. It can affect whether children get help early, whether learning difficulties are recognised, whether school meals ease the grocery bill, and whether young people can afford to continue into university, trades or other training.

The New Zealand general election is on Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting beginning on 26 October. The parties are offering different approaches to school achievement, specialist learning support, family costs and pathways into further education. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

One important distinction: a policy that benefits children generally is not necessarily a policy specifically designed for Pacific learners. I’ll separate those where possible.

1. What the main parties are proposing

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Focus: early identification and core academic skills

National proposes:

  • A school-readiness check for every child before starting school.

  • Expanded early-intervention services for children needing extra help.

  • Learning Support Coordinators in every school with Year 1–8 students from 2028.

  • Two million additional teacher-aide hours annually from 2028, with training to support children with behavioural, emotional and neurodiverse needs.

  • A new senior-secondary qualification system, beginning in 2028. Teaching the basics brilliantly
    What to examine: How quickly children will receive assessments and support, whether staffing will meet demand, and how well the approach serves Pacific children and families.

    Source: National's education policy

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Focus: affordability, school facilities and future opportunities

Labour's published 2026 commitments include:

  • Limiting compulsory branded school-uniform items and requiring affordable alternatives.

  • Restoring fresh, locally made school lunches from Term 1 2028 for the existing programme of approximately 244,400 students in 1,014 schools.

  • Improving buildings and grounds at nearly every school.

  • Cutting eligible student loan balances by 10%, with balances of $2,000 or less cleared under the policy's eligibility rules.

  • Expanding apprenticeship support and funding a toolbox grant for eligible apprentices. Release: Labour will cut the cost of getting kids back to schoolLabour's Cost of Living PlanStart Work NowLabour's 2026 Election Policies
    What to examine: Whether these measures reduce your household's actual school expenses, and what targeted help is available for children who need additional learning support. The commitments above are not all Pacific-specific.

    Sources: Labour's 2026 policies · School-cost proposals

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Focus: inclusion, learner wellbeing and reducing barriers

The Greens' 2026 manifesto supports an inclusive education system. Its published education positions include:

  • Expanding eligibility for learning support and establishing a single agency for specialist support for learners with health and disability needs.

  • Supporting a long-term education workforce plan and staffing levels that enable quality teaching.

  • Restoring, extending and permanently funding the Ka Ora, Ka Ako school-lunch programme, with a proposed expansion to around 400 additional schools, reaching 150,000 more children.

  • Wider measures to address household living costs, including electricity and transport affordability. Manifesto 2026Green · PalotaGreen Party announces plan for free and nutritious school lunches
    What to examine: Whether specialist support will be available promptly, how Pacific families will participate in decisions, and whether the funding will reach children in your circumstances.

    Sources: Green Party 2026 manifesto · School-lunch policy

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

Focus: academic standards, school choice and classroom learning time

ACT's education policies emphasise:

  • Clear expectations for reading, writing and mathematics, with parents informed about progress.

  • Charter schools and greater choice for families seeking alternative schooling approaches.

  • Allowing children to use otherwise available rural school-bus seats.

  • Proposed measures addressing classroom disruption, including giving teachers stronger powers to remove disruptive students from class. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
    What to examine: How learning support would be funded and delivered for children with disabilities or additional needs, and what practical choices families would have if their local school could not provide adequate support.

    Source: ACT's education policy

What about New Zealand First and other parties?

New Zealand First and The Opportunities Party (TOP) also contested issues affecting Pacific families during the campaign. At a September 2026 Pacific voter forum, candidates from both parties joined National, Labour, the Greens and ACT to discuss housing, jobs, education and living costs. However, the available forum report does not set out detailed learning-support commitments for each party, so I would not treat their participation as evidence of a particular education policy. pmn.co.nz

For a broader, regularly updated comparison, see Policy.nz's 2026 education policy guide.

2. What is specifically relevant to Pacific children?

New Zealand already has a government framework called the Action Plan for Pacific Education 2020–2030. It aims to make education inclusive, equitable and responsive to diverse Pacific learners and families. Its priorities include:

  • Growing Pacific bilingual and immersion education pathways.
  • Confronting racism and discrimination in education.
  • Helping teachers develop culturally responsive skills.
  • Partnering with families to shape learning and career opportunities.
  • Growing and retaining teachers and education leaders of Pacific heritage. Refresh of the Action Plan for Pacific Education 2023

This framework provides a useful benchmark for evaluating election promises. The key question is not just whether a party promises to improve education overall, but whether it explains how Pacific children and families will benefit.

For example, ask parties whether they will support Pacific languages, strengthen relationships between schools and families, and monitor learning-support access and outcomes for Pacific students.

3. How the proposals connect with your household priorities

Household costs

Compare school uniform rules, lunch provision, transport, early-childhood costs and assistance with tertiary study. A policy's eligibility conditions and start date matter as much as its headline promise.

Space and a stable home

Crowded housing can make homework, sleep and study difficult. School policies alone cannot resolve that, so compare each party's housing and family-support proposals alongside its education policies.

Access to healthcare

For children who need developmental assessments, disability services or specialist support, examine the connection between education and health services. Also consider healthcare affordability and access for older relatives, who may share caring responsibilities.

Children's learning and future opportunities

Look at early intervention, teacher-aide availability, school attendance, culturally responsive teaching, Pacific-language learning and pathways into university, apprenticeships and employment.

4. Questions worth putting to candidates

When comparing the parties, these questions can help distinguish a general aspiration from a commitment that would make a practical difference:

  1. Learning support: How long should a child wait for an assessment, and what additional staffing or funding will ensure help is available?
  2. Pacific families: Will Pacific families and community organisations have a role in designing education services, including bilingual education?
  3. School costs: What will change for families paying for uniforms, transport, lunches and early-childhood education?
  4. Health and education: How will schools coordinate with health and disability services when a child's learning difficulties need specialist attention?
  5. Future pathways: What practical financial support will help Pacific students complete tertiary study or apprenticeships while contributing to their households?
  6. Accountability: What outcomes will be measured, and will results be reported separately for Pacific learners?

5. Where to check the details before voting

The central distinction to keep in mind: National has published specific commitments for learning-support coordinators and teacher-aide hours; the Greens have published proposals to broaden access to specialist support; and Labour's highlighted commitments include reducing school costs and supporting future study and training. ACT places particular emphasis on academic standards, classroom order and school choice. These are different policy approaches, and their practical effects depend on implementation, eligibility and funding. Teaching the basics brilliantlyGreen · PalotaRelease: Labour will cut the cost of getting kids back to schoolACT New Zealand

Rather than treating any one promise as decisive, compare the details against what your children and wider household actually need, and check which commitments are funded, when they would begin and how progress would be measured.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

For a multigenerational Pacific household navigating household costs, space, and healthcare, education and learning support for children are central to future well-being. Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have outlined distinct approaches to early childhood education (ECE), school learning support, and opportunities for Pacific and minority communities.

Because New Zealand operates under MMP, government policy is often shaped by coalition agreements, meaning smaller parties can directly influence the final direction. Here is how the major parties approach learning support, early childhood opportunities, and equity for children:


1. National, ACT, and NZ First (Current Coalition Approach)

  • Early Intervention & Assessments: The National Party has emphasized implementing structured checks early on—such as introducing school-start or developmental milestone checks within ECE to identify children who may need additional learning support before they transition to primary school.
  • School Choice & Charter Schools: The coalition has prioritized expanding educational choice, notably restoring charter schools (now designated as partnership schools) to give communities alternative models of learning. ACT has further proposed student-focused funding mechanisms to allow parents more choice in where public funding is directed.
  • Focus on Foundational Basics: The current government's broader education platform heavily emphasizes structured literacy, regular progress reporting to parents, and a back-to-basics curriculum framework, arguing that early targeted monitoring is key to catching learning delays.

2. Labour Party

  • Targeted Support & Equity: Labour’s approach traditionally focuses on bolstering state-funded schooling, investing directly in teacher aides, and expanding learning support coordinator roles within public schools to assist children with additional behavioral or learning needs.
  • Community-Led & Inclusive Access: Labour emphasizes public service provision that reduces out-of-pocket costs for working families, aligning with policies that protect public infrastructure and strengthen wrap-around services in lower-socioeconomic or high-density Pacific neighborhoods (such as South Auckland or Porirua).

3. Green Party

  • Well-Resourced Public Education: The Greens advocate for significantly increased funding for learning support specialists (such as educational psychologists, speech language therapists, and needs assessors) to eliminate long waiting lists for children who need extra help.
  • Holistic & Culturally Safe Environments: Their policy framework emphasizes well-being surveys in schools, culturally responsive learning environments, and removing systemic barriers that disproportionately affect Māori and Pacific children. They strongly oppose funding models that divert resources away from the public schooling system.

4. Te Pāti Māori

  • Self-Determined & Indigenous Models: Te Pāti Māori places a heavy emphasis on culturally grounded education, advocating for Māori and Pacific-led educational authorities and solutions.
  • Whānau-Centered Support: Their policies are built around removing barriers that block families from education, integrating identity and language properly across learning spaces, and ensuring that community-governed and language-nurturing environments receive equitable state resourcing.

What This Means for a Multigenerational Pacific Household

When considering your vote, parties generally fall into two broad philosophies on education and learning support:

  1. The Coalition Parties (National, ACT, NZ First) lean toward structured monitoring, standardized milestone checks in early childhood, and expanding school choice (such as charter/partnership schools) to lift student achievement.
  2. The Opposition/Progressive Parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) lean toward increased direct funding for public school learning support staff, specialized professionals (like speech therapists), and protecting or expanding community-led and culturally anchored learning environments.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

Major political parties in the 2026 New Zealand general election approach learning support and Pacific educational opportunities through contrasting models of targeted community resourcing, universal standards, and early childhood funding.


Key Party Approaches to Pacific Learning Support & Opportunities

  • Labour Party: Focuses on expanding targeted learning support in schools, maintaining and growing Pacific bilingual and immersion pathways, and increasing resourcing for Pacific early childhood education (ECE) such as language nests to strengthen identity and achievement.

  • National Party: Emphasizes a core-curriculum focus with structured literacy and numeracy targets, baseline achievement tracking across all students, and targeted tutoring or structured intervention rather than race- or ethnicity-specific programs. [Policy.nz]

  • Green Party: Proposes expanding equitable funding for learning support coordinators in schools, increasing mental health and wellbeing services embedded in education, and boosting funding for Pacific and Māori early learning providers and language nests.

  • ACT Party: Advocates for greater school autonomy, choice through charter-style or partnership models, and streamlining administrative overheads in education agencies rather than centralized or identity-targeted funding streams.

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Advocates for increasing core funding directly for Pacific language nests , playgroups, and early learning services, alongside structural changes to early childhood staff-to-child ratios. [The Office of ECE]


Addressing Broader Household Priorities (Costs, Space, and Healthcare)

For a multigenerational Pacific household, education policies do not sit in isolation from your wider family needs:

  • Household Costs: Parties like Labour and the Greens propose cost-of-living relief measures (such as targeted GST removals on essentials or income support adjustments), whereas National and ACT emphasize broad fiscal restraint and tax-threshold adjustments.

  • Housing and Space: Housing affordability and overcrowded or multigenerational living spaces intersect with educational outcomes (quiet study space for children), with parties split between increasing social/public housing builds (Labour, Greens) and market-incentivized supply or regulatory reform (National, ACT).

  • Healthcare Access: Access to primary and community health services—crucial when older relatives and children share a home—features heavily in party platforms ranging from free or low-cost GP visits and increased Pharmac funding to regional health workforce backing.

You can compare side-by-side party stances on education, health, and community support on Policy.nz, check your enrolment status or find multi-language voter information through Vote NZ, and review broad policy breakdowns on the NZ Policy Hub. Information in multiple languages - Vote NZ

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

AI Overview

As a Pacific voter in a multigenerational home, balancing household costs, living space, and healthcare means ensuring your children receive strong educational support without putting extra pressure on your family budget.

For the 2026 New Zealand General Election , major political parties are offering distinct approaches to learning support and opportunities tailored for children from Pacific communities.

National Party (Current Coalition Lead)

The National Party's focus relies on structured, standardized educational baselines designed to lift achievement for those furthest behind.

  • Focus on Key Basics: National has implemented a mandated daily hour of reading, writing, and maths, alongside structured literacy. Supporters argue these consistent baselines directly help Pacific learners who need targeted academic support.
  • Compulsory Year 11: National is proposing that students must finish Year 11 (or turn 16, whichever is later) before they can leave school. This aims to give young Pacific people a more secure foundation of skills before entering the workforce.
  • Classroom Support: The party plans to increase teacher aide hours to over 2 million by 2028.
  • Cost Constraints: Under the coalition government, funding was stopped for some targeted Pacific-led programs (such as Pacific Reading Together) as part of wider ministry savings. They have also reintroduced charter schools , which allows alternative school structures that communities can operate.

Labour Party

The Labour Party argues that the government's swift curriculum overhauls lack sufficient community consultation. They focus on local learning and reducing household barriers to education.

  • Equity and Social Factors: Labour emphasizes that addressing poverty and household costs is the single largest way to lift academic achievement for Pacific and Māori students.
  • Curriculum and Localized Learning: Labour plans to pause the ongoing school curriculum rollout for a year. They want to give schools breathing room to ensure the curriculum features more localized learning that reflects cultural identities, including Pacific learners.
  • Reduced Financial Pressure: To help multigenerational households handle school costs, Labour has promised targeted policies to cut the cost of getting kids back to school and to reinstate locally provided school lunches.

Green Party

The Green Party focuses heavily on systemic equity, universal free support systems, and supporting Pacific families from the ground up.

  • Universal Free Systems: The Greens are campaigning on free, universal early childhood education and entirely free school food. This is intended to eliminate any financial barriers to early learning for Pacific families.
  • Community-Led Education: They oppose "one-size-fits-all" academic models. They advocate for education shaped entirely by communities to meet the distinct cultural and learning needs of individual children.
  • Support for Future Careers: For older children entering tertiary study, the Greens are proposing paid placements ($380 a week) for trainee teachers, nurses, and social workers—fields heavily populated by Pacific students who often balance study with church, work, and multigenerational family obligations.

Te Pāti Māori

  • Kaupapa-Based Learning: Te Pāti Māori centers its education plans on educational self-determination and absolute equity for Māori and Pacific learners. They strongly advocate for culturally immersive, community-governed spaces over a standardized market model of schooling.

Overview of Party Positions

Party Core Strategy for Learning Support Direct Financial Relief for Families
National Daily mandated reading/math hours, structured literacy, and compulsory completion of Year 11. Funding targeted toward teacher aides and school infrastructure (classrooms).
Labour Pausing curriculum changes to build in localized, culturally relevant learning; Independent Curriculum Council. Policy to cut back-to-school costs and reinstate locally provided school lunches.
Green Party Free universal ECE, community-led learning, and paid placements for vital workforce training. Free school food, universal student income, and tertiary debt write-offs.
Te Pāti Māori High equity focus; cultural immersion and community-controlled education for Māori and Pacific students. Total student debt write-off for those working locally; universal student allowance.

The Electoral Commission provides official details on the voting process. For the 2026 General Election , advance voting runs from 26 October to 6 November , with Election Day on Saturday 7 November 2026. Ensure you are enrolled to vote by the final deadline of midnight, 25 October 2026.

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account