Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 4

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 776 answers produced on 19 October 2026. For the other 44 planned combinations, Google produced no AI Overview or AI Mode answer.

questions
174
answers saved
776
collected
19 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, unchanged since 5 October.

    id, text, reference, axes, collectionSettings, enabled

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its complete original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement and assistant, including those where the statement was not made.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, paragraphs, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, assessment

  • Who to vote for: what each answer did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer read in full, with each behaviour marked. Behaviours overlap; the original answers supply the evidence.

    prompt_id, draft_id, platform, region, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, excerpts, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, answerId

  • Location and national answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per national and location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

  • Changes between editions

    party-change-tables.csv

    One row per answer and earlier edition, with the parties named then and now.

    earlier_edition, earlier_result_id, current_result_id, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, same_text, same_party_set, earlier_parties, current_parties, added, removed

  • Changes across editions

    trajectory-tables.csv

    One row per pair of editions, with how many of the same 776 answers changed their party line-up.

    earlier_edition, current_edition, denominator, changed_all17, changed_seven

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with the answers naming the party.

    panel, edition, platform, entity_id, party, numerator, denominator

  • Parties entering and leaving answers

    party-mention-flows.csv

    One row per party and assistant: answers that gained, lost or kept the party since 16 October.

    entity_id, platform, denominator, earlier, current, gained, lost, retained

  • Parties named by issue

    topic-presence-tables.csv

    One row per issue and party, with the answers naming the party.

    issue, entity_id, numerator, denominator

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national and location pair, comparison and edition.

    panel, edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, complete, national_result_id, location_result_id, same_party_set

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with answer length and the answers naming all six parties in Parliament.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, all_six_parliamentary

  • Voting guidance changes between editions

    guidance-change-tables.csv

    One row per voting-guidance answer and behaviour, on 16 and 19 October.

    draft_id, platform, measure, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier, current, changed

  • What changed for each voter

    case-assessments.csv

    One row per voter: what changed in the answer to their main question.

    case, transition, earlier_quote, quote, assessment

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per statement selected for checking, with why it was chosen and its primary source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Answers paired with Edition 3

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer, with the 16 October answer to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Source capture by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with whether its sources were captured and the websites recorded.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, scope

  • Websites by reach

    source-reach-tables.csv

    One row per website, with the answers associated with it.

    domain, answers, denominator

  • Websites by issue

    topic-source-tables.csv

    One row per issue and website, with the answers associated with it.

    issue, domain, answers, denominator

  • Party matches reviewed in context

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    One row per possible party match read in context, with whether it counted and why.

    result_id, party, include, state, reason, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_basis, contexts

  • Parties found in each answer

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with whether the party counted and the passage that shows it.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Comparisons each answer is in

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Claims Onsomble recorded

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per claim, with the parties it is about and its stance on each.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Answers read in full

    semantic-review-ledger.csv

    One row per answer and question a reviewer read in full, with the decision and the passage.

    result_id, dimension, state, decision, rationale, excerpt, reviewer, reviewed_on

  • Passages quoted in the analysis

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer passage the analysis quotes, with its reading.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Analysis findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding in the analysis, with its figure and the table it comes from.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, caveat, evidence, reportFile

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about GP access, rural hospitals and health workforce shortages outside main centres?

New Zealand’s 2026 election: rural healthcare and farm viability

For a farming household well outside a main centre, healthcare policy is about more than how much the Government spends. It is whether you can get a GP appointment without losing half a day’s work, whether your nearest rural hospital can treat you locally, and whether enough doctors, nurses and other health professionals will stay in the district.

For your voting decision, I would assess parties against five practical questions:

  • GP access: Will they make it easier to enrol with a practice, get timely appointments and afford consultations?
  • Rural hospitals: Will they maintain local services, emergency stabilisation and inpatient capacity, or concentrate more care in larger hospitals?
  • Workforce shortages: How will they recruit and retain rural GPs, nurses, midwives and specialists?
  • Distance and cost: Will they address travel, after-hours care, ambulance access and the cost of taking time away from the farm?
  • Delivery: Are their promises funded, staffed and backed by measurable commitments?

One important distinction: a party can promise more health funding without guaranteeing that a rural community will gain a doctor, keep its maternity service or have a local emergency department.

What the main parties are proposing

The following comparison uses policies and announcements available as of 19 October 2026. It distinguishes published commitments from broader political approaches; a proposal is not the same as a delivered service.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

More capacity, targeted investment and measurable access

National points to increased health funding, additional medical training places, overseas-trained doctors, funding to help GP practices take more patients and more urgent and after-hours clinics. National is delivering quality healthcareBudget 2026

For rural communities, its July 2026 announcements include more than $2.5 million for point-of-care ultrasound training, expanded emergency-response training for rural clinicians and $6 million to expand the national rural recruitment and locum service. Backing our frontline rural health workforce

What this could mean for your farm: better emergency assessment locally and more help covering vacant clinical positions.

What to scrutinise: whether your nearest practice or hospital actually gains staff, and what minimum local services will be maintained.

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Lower patient costs and a stronger primary-care workforce

Labour promises three free GP visits per person each year through a new Medicard, from July 2028, and removal of the $5 prescription charge from July 2027. It also promises a job for every eligible New Zealand-trained graduate nurse. Labour's Cost of Living PlanLabour's 2026 Election Policies

What this could mean for your farm: less direct cost when you or your family need routine care, particularly if consultation fees currently make you delay visits.

What to scrutinise: free visits do not create additional appointment slots by themselves. Check Labour's detailed commitments for rural GP recruitment, rural hospital funding, after-hours cover and travel support.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Accessible care, stronger public services and workforce support

The Greens' 2026 manifesto argues for properly supported health services and a workforce able to deliver timely care. Its wider approach emphasises access and investment in public services. Manifesto 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

What this could mean for your farm: potentially a stronger emphasis on universal access and addressing underinvestment, rather than leaving rural patients to absorb the consequences of service gaps.

What to scrutinise: the specific rural staffing, hospital-service and funding commitments, including how they would be paid for and implemented.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

More GP capacity, professional flexibility and use of different providers

On 18 October, ACT announced an additional $400 million for general practice over four years, intended to retain doctors in New Zealand, attract overseas doctors and increase GP appointments. ACT also supports allowing pharmacists and other health professionals to provide more everyday care, greater use of private providers to reduce waiting lists and stronger performance measurement. ACT New ZealandACT New ZealandElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

What this could mean for your farm: more options for routine treatment and potentially more GP availability, if the extra funding reaches rural practices.

What to scrutinise: how much of the funding would reach remote communities, and whether expanded pharmacy services complement rather than replace access to a doctor.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Prevention and reducing pressure on general practice

NZ First's September 2026 health plan proposes reducing administrative burdens and restoring professional autonomy in general practice, bringing health coaches into primary care, supporting nurses and shifting more attention towards preventing illness. NZFirst Campaign Announcement: The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”

What this could mean for your farm: if prevention and better-supported GP teams reduce avoidable illness and free up clinicians, there could be longer-term benefits.

What to scrutinise: concrete commitments for rural hospital viability, additional rural clinicians and guaranteed access to urgent care. Prevention alone will not solve an immediate staffing vacancy.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

Te Pāti Māori

Equitable access and Māori-led healthcare

Te Pāti Māori has published a dedicated 2026 health policy through the party's election platform. Its proposals should be assessed particularly for how they address access barriers and health services designed around community needs. Election 2026

What this could mean for your farm: potentially relevant if your district has significant unmet healthcare needs or relies on community-based providers.

What to scrutinise: the exact commitments to rural hospital funding, GP availability, workforce recruitment and services for remote communities. I could not verify enough detail to attribute a specific rural hospital guarantee to the party.

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Health reform and prevention

TOP has published a 2026 health policy under the title Healthy People. Its proposals are worth comparing with the major parties' approaches to health-system funding and prevention. Election 2026

What this could mean for your farm: the key question is whether its wider reform proposals would translate into more reliable local primary care.

What to scrutinise: specific, costed plans for rural clinicians, local hospitals and emergency services. I could not verify a firm commitment to preserve particular rural hospital services.

The rural hospital question deserves particular attention

Taranaki

Rural medicine the right fit for West Coast doctor  | University of Otago

Medical Centre | West Otago Health, Tapanui

9

Rural hospitals are not interchangeable with large urban hospitals. They may provide emergency assessment, inpatient beds, maternity care and rehabilitation, and help prevent long journeys for treatment. A 2025 report by 1News described 26 rural hospitals across New Zealand and highlighted concerns about staffing, ageing infrastructure, diagnostic access and funding. Some community-run hospitals also rely on local fundraising to cover financial gaps. Rural hospitals — the heartbeat in NZ regionsInside the challenges faced by rural healthcare providers

For your voting decision, I would look for commitments in three areas:

  • Reliable baseline funding: Will rural hospitals have funding that reflects their distance, small patient populations and the cost of maintaining essential services?
  • Clear service guarantees: Will the party commit to sustainable emergency, inpatient and maternity services where needed, rather than relying on ad hoc decisions when staffing or budgets get tight?
  • Support for the whole workforce: Can rural hospitals recruit and retain nurses, doctors, midwives and allied health staff, including locums to cover leave and vacancies?

The Ministry of Health's existing Rural Health Strategy already recognises the need for care closer to home, support for patients accessing services at a distance, and a valued, flexible rural workforce. The election question is how strongly parties will fund and implement those priorities. Rural Health Strategy

Which approach best addresses your priorities?

Your main concern Policies to look for
GP appointments are scarce Rural recruitment incentives, more training placements, funded GP positions and locum cover
GP fees are a burden Lower consultation costs and affordable prescriptions
The nearest hospital is far away Sustainable rural hospital funding, local urgent care and ambulance coverage
A local service might close Published service commitments, minimum staffing and transparent closure decisions
Health problems disrupt farm work After-hours care, telehealth where clinically appropriate, and fewer unnecessary long-distance trips

These distinctions matter because affordability and availability are separate problems. Free GP visits could help with the cost of a consultation, but they will not solve a shortage of doctors. More doctors nationally will not necessarily help your district unless recruitment and retention policies get them there.

My suggested way to compare the parties

Before deciding, I would use the independent rural-health sector's election priorities as a benchmark. Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network has published a 2026 Rural Health Election Manifesto and collected the parties' health-policy links. Election 2026

Ask each party or local candidate these four questions:

  1. What specific funding or staffing commitment will improve GP access in rural communities during the next parliamentary term?
  2. What will you do to ensure rural hospitals remain financially sustainable and can maintain essential local services?
  3. How will you recruit and retain rural doctors, nurses and other clinicians, rather than just increase national workforce numbers?
  4. What measurable improvement should rural patients expect, and by when?

You can also compare the published commitments on Policy.nz's 2026 health policy comparison.

My bottom line: if reliable local services are your highest priority, give the greatest weight to specific, funded commitments for rural staffing and hospital sustainability. If the cost of routine care is your biggest concern, compare the parties' patient-fee proposals as well. The strongest policy for your household is the one that addresses both the cost of getting care and whether that care will actually be available within a reasonable distance.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about GP access, rural hospitals and health workforce shortages outside main centres?

For rural and remote farming communities, access to reliable local healthcare is a major voting issue. Across the 2026 general election landscape, the political parties offer distinctly different approaches to tackling GP access, rural hospital stability, and health workforce shortages outside main centres.

National, ACT, and New Zealand First (The Coalition Government)

The current governing parties focus primarily on funding delivery, infrastructure support, and expanding the scope of existing workforces rather than large-scale structural overhauls.

  • Primary Care & Workforce: Rather than universal free GP visits, National’s strategy has centered on targeted capacity investments (such as primary care funding packages) and increasing the scope of work for pharmacists and physician associates. They are also progressing the establishment of a new medical school at the University of Waikato to help train more doctors domestically.
  • Rural Hospitals & Services: The coalition has focused on directing Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) to stabilize regional services and utilize private-public contracting to clear elective backlogs, though rural advocates note that smaller remote facilities continue to grapple with acute staffing deficits and reliance on locums.
  • ACT Party: ACT leans further into a market-oriented approach, emphasizing a government-as-purchaser model and promoting private sector incentives to relieve pressure on the public system.
  • New Zealand First: NZ First emphasizes regional equity, backing funding for urgent care training for rural doctors and nurses alongside a strong focus on cutting waitlists and supporting local health infrastructure.

Labour, The Greens, and Te Pāti Māori (The Opposition & Left Blocs)

Parties on the left propose interventionist, publicly funded expansions designed to eliminate cost barriers and directly subsidize rural practice ownership and staffing.

  • GP Access & Cost: Labour’s flagship 2026 health policy is the "Medicard," which provides every New Zealander with three free GP consultations per year (funded via a proposed capital gains tax). To address rural shortages specifically, Labour has proposed a Family Doctor Loan Scheme aimed at assisting doctors entering practice ownership in high-need or regional areas. They also plan to guarantee employment for all New Zealand-trained graduate nurses.
  • The Green Party: The Greens advocate going further by introducing unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded through a wealth tax, prioritizing community care clinics in high-need and isolated areas first.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on localized delivery, supporting free primary care for lower-income whānau and pushing for a dedicated Māori Health Card that links funding directly to rural and iwi-led health providers.

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

  • Primary Care & Youth/Rural Focus: TOP advocates lifting primary and community care funding significantly as a percentage of the total health budget, providing targeted support for rural doctors through Te Whatu Ora, and rolling out a "Teal Card" program to provide free primary healthcare to younger demographics.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about GP access, rural hospitals and health workforce shortages outside main centres?

For those living and farming well outside main centres, health access is a stark daily reality rather than an abstract debate. Across the 2026 election landscape, political parties have put forward varying approaches to tackle rural GP shortages, hospital capacity, and the tyranny of distance—sparking direct debate at sector forums like the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network panels.

The broad policy directions from the major and notable parties on rural and primary health care include:

National Party

  • Focus: Maintaining current system direction, rebuilding frontline capacity, and leveraging combined public-private capacity.

  • Rural & Primary Approach: National emphasizes meeting specific health targets and expanding general practice enrolments and urgent/after-hours care. Rather than major structural overhauls, their approach relies on funding injections targeted at operational output (such as increases in emergency department and inpatient delivery) alongside digital/online GP service expansions to ease regional pressures.

Labour Party

  • Focus: Cost-of-living relief paired with universal primary care entitlements.

  • Rural & Primary Approach: Labour’s headline health policy features three taxpayer-funded free GP visits per year for adults (backed by proposed revenue changes like a capital gains tax), alongside free prescriptions, free cervical screening, and maternity scans. For rural communities, debates have centered on whether making visits free alleviates cost barriers or if it risks overstretching clinics that are already grappling with severe physical staff shortages rather than a lack of patient demand.

ACT Party

  • Focus: Targeted workforce expansion and retention funding.

  • Rugged & Primary Approach: ACT has campaigned on a $400 million, four-year commitment specifically aimed at retaining existing doctors, recruiting more from overseas, and financially incentivizing clinics to deliver higher appointment volumes. ACT has heavily criticized policies like Labour's free GP visits, arguing that subsidizing visits does nothing if there is no physical doctor or nurse available in a local rural practice to see the patient. [NZ Herald]

Green Party

  • Focus: Prevention, equity, and transforming primary care funding.

  • Rural & Primary Approach: The Greens advocate moving progressively toward fully publicly funded primary and dental care. For rural and remote areas, their policy platform leans heavily on expanding mobile health units, localized mental health support, and community-led hauora providers, alongside a strong emphasis on pay parity and safe staffing codes for primary care nurses.

New Zealand First & The Opportunity Party (TOP)

  • New Zealand First: Continues to emphasize regional and provincial hospital service resilience, pushing back against centralization and advocating for tangible workforce backstops to keep local rural clinics viable.

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Advocates for a longer-term, 10-year cross-party health blueprint to lift overall health funding as a percentage of GDP, arguing that rural workforce shortages cannot be solved within standard three-year political cycles without consensus planning.

The Core Debate for Rural Voters

The fundamental divide across the political spectrum comes down to a choice of philosophy:

  • Demand-side vs. Supply-side: Some parties prioritize reducing the immediate cost of care at the clinic door (making visits cheaper or free), while others argue that the acute crisis in remote areas is entirely a workforce supply issue—meaning the priority must be direct recruitment, retention bonuses, and infrastructure (like digital connectivity and training hubs) to ensure a GP or nurse actually exists within a reasonable driving radius.

You can read the sector's specific expectations and scorecards via the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Manifesto. [NZDoctor]

Ask anything

Captured 19 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account