Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, the key distinction for someone living and working in a small town is between making healthcare cheaper, bringing more services closer to home, and ensuring rural communities have enough health professionals to deliver those services. A party can promise better healthcare nationally without having a detailed plan for the distance and workforce problems faced by smaller communities.

The election is on Saturday 7 November 2026, and parties have published policies that address different parts of this problem. The rural health sector has also issued a specific election manifesto calling for better access to care, stronger rural staffing and funding that recognises the higher cost of delivering services in rural areas. Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Hauora Taiwhenua calls for a commitment to the health of rural communities

Which parties have relevant healthcare plans?

The following comparison focuses on published 2026 policies and how directly they relate to the problems you've described, rather than ranking parties or recommending a vote.

South Island Election Conference 2026

1. Labour Party

Focus: affordability and keeping local GP practices viable

Labour proposes three free GP visits per year for every person eligible for publicly funded healthcare, free prescriptions from July 2027, and a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to help doctors buy into and operate general practices. Affordable Healthcare

Why it matters for small towns: Supporting local GP ownership could help practices remain open or expand. However, three free visits do not guarantee that a doctor is available locally, and the loan scheme's impact depends on whether it attracts practitioners to underserved towns.

Policy: Labour's healthcare plan

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

2. National Party

Focus: workforce growth, urgent care and digital access

National points to additional medical training places, overseas-trained doctors working in GP practices, more funding for practices to enrol patients, and an expansion of urgent and after-hours services. Its new Waikato medical school is intended to help train doctors for community and rural practices. It also offers a 24/7 digital health service. National is delivering quality healthcareElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Why it matters for small towns: These policies address the shortage of clinicians and access to care outside normal hours. Online consultations may reduce some journeys, although they cannot replace every physical examination, diagnostic test or emergency service.

Policy: National's healthcare plan

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

3. Green Party

Focus: publicly funded community care and prevention

The Greens propose expanding publicly funded healthcare, including GP and dental services, alongside increased investment in health professionals, better workforce conditions and community-based services. Their wider health programme also addresses mental health and health inequities. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Why it matters for small towns: Expanded community care could reduce financial barriers and the need to travel for some services. Check the party's detailed commitments for how mobile services, rural staffing and the additional operating costs of isolated practices would be funded.

Policy information: Green Party policies

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

4. ACT New Zealand

Focus: pharmacies and alternative ways to access care

ACT proposes allowing pharmacists to treat everyday conditions, manage long-term conditions, order blood tests and adjust medicines within limits set by a GP. It also proposes reducing barriers to opening pharmacies and increasing funding for medicines. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

Why it matters for small towns: Where a pharmacy is closer than a GP practice, expanding pharmacists' scope could make some routine care more accessible. It would not by itself resolve shortages of doctors, specialists or hospital services.

Policy: ACT's health policies

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

5. New Zealand First

Focus: prevention and primary-care reform

Its published health programme includes health coaches in primary care, greater professional autonomy in general practice and a shift towards preventive care. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Why it matters for small towns: Health coaches and prevention could help people manage ongoing conditions closer to home. The important question to check is whether the party has specific commitments on rural recruitment, travel distances and the funding of small practices.

Policy: New Zealand First policies

Te Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2023 - Policy.nz

6. Te Pāti Māori

Focus: Māori-led and whānau-centred healthcare

Te Pāti Māori's health platform focuses on improving Māori health outcomes and supporting Māori-led approaches to healthcare. Its proposals are relevant to considering how local providers and community-led services are funded. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Why it matters for small towns: This may be particularly relevant where rural Māori communities depend on local iwi and kaupapa Māori health providers. Check the full policy for specific funding and service-delivery commitments in your circumstances.

Policy: Te Pāti Māori's health policy

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

7. Opportunity Party

Focus: long-term health funding and primary care

Opportunity proposes a cross-party, 10-year health plan, progressively increasing health spending towards 9% of GDP and directing a greater share of funding towards primary care. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Why it matters for small towns: A longer-term funding plan could help with workforce and service planning beyond a single parliamentary term. The key detail to verify is how much funding would reach rural services and whether there are measurable access targets.

Policy: Opportunity's Healthy People plan

What about the specific challenges of rural healthcare?

Hauora Taiwhenua, New Zealand's Rural Health Network, has published a dedicated Rural Health Election Manifesto for this election. It sets out six priorities that are particularly relevant to someone who works in a small town rather than on a farm. Election 2026Hauora Taiwhenua calls for a commitment to the health of rural communities

Rural staffing and training

More doctors, nurses and other health professionals recruited and retained in rural communities, with training opportunities that support rural practice.

Services closer to home

Healthcare designed around local needs, including the wider range of clinical skills needed in small communities.

Fair funding for rural services

Recognition that delivering care to small, dispersed populations can cost more than delivering it in a city.

Digital healthcare and better evidence

Using technology to improve access and gathering evidence to guide rural health policy.

Read the full rural health election manifesto and watch the party representatives' discussion. The discussion is useful because it asks parties to explain how they would address rural access, staffing, training and technology, rather than just describing their general health priorities.

How to compare the parties against your own needs

When reviewing the policies, I would separate four questions. These are practical tests you can apply to any party, not a ranking of their proposals.

Your concern What to look for in a policy
Long drives for healthcare Specific commitments to local clinics, mobile services, outreach, diagnostics or telehealth
Difficulty getting a GP appointment Funding for rural practices, recruitment incentives and commitments to retaining clinicians
Limited specialist and hospital services Plans for local diagnostic services, visiting specialists, referral pathways and patient transport
Limited local jobs Broader plans for regional employment, vocational training, infrastructure and economic development, alongside health workforce commitments

One important caution: a free appointment is not the same as an available appointment. The New Zealand Medical Journal's October 2026 analysis of election health promises highlights the importance of funding, staffing and the capacity to deliver services, not simply announcing new entitlements. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Where to look before voting

The central question for your situation is not just which party promises better healthcare, but which specific commitments would mean fewer long trips, reliable local access to a doctor and sustainable services in smaller communities. It is also worth checking whether those commitments have a clear funding source, staffing plan and timetable.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

When considering how the major political parties plan to address healthcare access, affordability, and workforce shortages in smaller towns and rural communities for the 2026 general election, their approaches vary across broader primary care reforms, workforce incentives, and regional health delivery models.

Labour Party

Labour’s health platform targets the direct cost and availability of primary care, which heavily affects provincial and smaller-town residents who often face higher travel distances to general practices:

  • Primary Care Costs: Introduces a "Medicard" providing three free GP visits a year for all eligible New Zealanders, alongside restoring universally free prescriptions.
  • Workforce & Practice Ownership: Proposes a Family Doctor Loan Scheme intended to support doctors entering practice ownership and stimulate primary care capacity in regional areas where recruitment is difficult.
  • Maternity & Screening: Pledges free maternity scans and additional trainee sonographer positions, alongside free cervical screening.

National Party

National's approach centers on capacity building, continuity, and expanding the scope of existing health professionals rather than sweeping structural overhauls:

  • Workforce & Training: Focuses on bolstering the health workforce pipeline (including supporting the new Waikato medical school and increasing training slots) to address chronic shortages of doctors and nurses in provincial regions.
  • Service Delivery: Emphasizes utilizing alternative roles—such as expanding the scope of practice for pharmacists and physician associates—to help fill gaps in areas where full-time GPs are sparse.
  • Targeted Funding: Directs funding toward primary care capacity and waitlist reduction initiatives to ease the burden on regional facilities transferring patients to larger centers.

Green Party

The Greens focus heavily on equity, localized delivery, and expanding public health infrastructure to underserved areas:

  • Mobile and Community Clinics: Proposes funding mobile healthcare clinics to physically reach isolated smaller towns and rural pockets that lack permanent facilities.
  • Universal Access: Works toward fully free, publicly delivered primary care and dental services, reducing financial barriers for low-income rural and provincial households.
  • Staffing & Wages: Pledges increased, sustained funding to ensure fair wages and safe staffing levels for healthcare workers in provincial and rural settings to combat retention issues.

ACT Party

ACT focuses on a model where the government acts as a purchaser rather than a direct provider, emphasizing alternative delivery methods and private-public integration:

  • Prescription & Medicine Access: Proposes closing the medicines funding gap with Australia and introducing secure 24-hour prescription lockers, which can benefit remote towns with limited pharmacy operating hours.
  • Clinical Need Focus: Strongly opposes race- or geography-based prioritisation, arguing for resource allocation strictly based on clinical need.

New Zealand First

NZ First concentrates heavily on core public system delivery, regional accessibility, and reducing bottlenecks:

  • Waitlists & Diagnostics: Prioritizes a major waitlist reduction fund and rapid diagnostic access to ensure provincial patients aren't stranded indefinitely on regional hospital waiting lists.
  • Universal Standard: Emphasizes a single, universal public health system based purely on clinical need, opposing separate regional or ethnic health structures.

Te Pāti Māori

While focusing heavily on indigenous health equity, Te Pāti Māori proposes decentralized models that impact rural and small-town Māori communities:

  • Māori-Led Health Authority & Commissioning: Advocates for restoring a Māori health authority and transferring a percentage of health and ACC funding to localized, Māori-led systems and community health providers to better serve rural whānau experiencing health disparities.
  • Targeted Relief: Supports free primary care and dental for lower-income whānau.

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

  • Long-Term Planning: Focuses on stability by pushing for a cross-party, 10-year health and education plan to prevent regional medical training, infrastructure, and workforce strategies from changing every three years with election cycles.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

When looking at healthcare access for small towns and rural communities in New Zealand, the major political parties approach the structural and workforce challenges through different mechanisms—ranging from workforce training incentives and primary care funding models to community-led or regional delivery models.

An overview of how the key parties address regional, small-town, and rural health access includes the following positions and proposals:

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on the direct cost and availability of primary care. Their policies target regional and cost-of-living barriers by proposing targeted primary care support (such as structured free or low-cost GP visits schemes like their "Medicard" concept) and ring-fencing funding for the public health system to support staffing and service delivery outside major urban centers.

  • Green Party: Emphasises a structural expansion of publicly funded health, specifically highlighting regional and rural access through mobile health services, expanded community mental health, and localized hauora (Māori health) providers. Their platform includes moving toward fully publicly funded primary and dental care, alongside addressing workforce shortages by improving pay parity and conditions for rural and primary care nurses. [The New Zealand Medical Journal]

  • National Party: Generally prioritises primary care funding injections and administrative support for general practices alongside public-private partnerships (such as contracting independent or regional providers) to clear waitlists and expand capacity. Their approach relies heavily on strengthening the existing general practice network and workforce stabilization rather than sweeping structural overhauls.

  • ACT New Zealand: Advocates for alternative primary care funding models, such as opt-out funding incentives for healthcare and encouraging private-sector integration to ease pressure on public systems. They focus on reducing administrative burdens on GPs to improve practice viability in smaller regions.

  • New Zealand First: Tends to emphasize regional equity, funding pools targeted at reducing waiting lists, and retaining local infrastructure. They have historically prioritized regional resilience and local access to emergency and general practice services. [WhichParty NZ]

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on localized, whānau-led, and iwi/kaupapa Māori healthcare models. For small towns, their policies advocate for dedicated funding for Māori health outcomes and re-establishing autonomous regional health authorities to better target underserved rural and remote populations.

Where to Compare Detailed Policies

To review specific, up-to-date manifesto commitments and compare side-by-side stances as parties finalize their regional and rural platforms, you can check:

  • The neutral voting comparison tool Policy.nz to filter health policies by category.

  • Sector-specific manifestos and tracking via the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network, which outlines rural health priorities and specific commitments relevant to provincial and remote towns.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

AI Overview

As you evaluate your vote for the 2026 New Zealand general election , health equity in small towns and rural communities remains a major battleground. Because delivering care across remote areas requires unique infrastructure, the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network recently pressed major political parties on specific solutions for digital "black spots," rural training hubs, and travel-barrier mitigation.

Here is how the political parties' platforms address healthcare access and infrastructure for non-farming rural residents and smaller towns:

🩺 Left-Leaning Parties (Focus on Free Access and Mobile Services)

  • The Green Party: The Greens emphasize building out infrastructure explicitly tailored for smaller communities. Their health policy includes expanding mobile healthcare, community-based mental health, and dental units to reach towns without static facilities. They advocate for funding parity for rural nurses to prevent local staffing shortages and support unlimited free general practitioner (GP) and dental visits for all New Zealanders.

  • Labour Party: To address the need to drive long distances for primary care, Labour has proposed the Medicard , which provides every resident with three free GP consultations per year, alongside restoring universally free prescriptions. To solve local workforce shortages in smaller clinics, they propose a "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to financially incentivize doctors to enter practice ownership in underserved areas.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Their platform targets systemic access gaps by introducing Marae-based health clinics and mobile health units to bypass regional transportation barriers. They advocate for free primary and dental care for any whānau earning under $60,000, tied to a personalized Māori Health Card to make funding mobile.

🏥 Right-Leaning and Coalition Parties (Focus on Workforce and Local Capacity)

  • National Party: Rather than backing free-visit models, National’s strategy centers on strengthening structural capacity. During their term, they prioritized regional healthcare investments, such as allocating $447 million in Budget 2025 directly toward primary care capacity. They also back the establishment of a regional medical school at the University of Waikato specifically aimed at training doctors prone to practicing in regional and provincial settings.

  • ACT New Zealand: ACT emphasizes structural policy alignment to support regional clinics. They point to their previous leadership in embedding a dedicated Rural Health Strategy into the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022. To combat the local shortage of clinicians, ACT’s primary policy mechanism is loosening immigration red tape, making it significantly faster for doctors trained in equivalent overseas jurisdictions to immediately practice in regional New Zealand.

  • New Zealand First: Under their 2026 "Make NZ Healthy" framework, NZ First focuses on preventative care and early intervention to alleviate pressure on small local hospitals. In rural candidate forums, the party has voiced historic support for alleviating barriers to primary care and has focused their immediate funding pledges on a $925 million waitlist reduction fund to cut down times for specialist care.


If you want to look deeper into a specific party's plan, let me know:

  • Would you like to see how they plan to address rural digital connectivity for telehealth?

  • Are you interested in their specific policies regarding local employment and jobs in small towns?

  • Do you want more detail on travel subsidies or transport caps for long-distance healthcare trips?

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account