Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

For someone living in a small New Zealand town, the fuel question is about much more than the price at the pump. If you need to drive to another town for a doctor, specialist appointment, groceries, school activities or work, using less petrol may simply not be realistic.

As you consider your vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election, I would focus on three questions:

  • Immediate relief: Would a party reduce the cost of petrol or diesel, or help people with unavoidable travel expenses?
  • Fairness for small towns: Would its policies recognise that people without practical public transport alternatives cannot easily change how they travel?
  • Long-term options: Would it improve access to healthcare, jobs and essential services locally, reducing the need for long drives in the first place?

It's also worth distinguishing policies that lower the price of fuel for everyone from targeted assistance for people who have to drive long distances. They can have very different effects on a household budget.

What the main parties are proposing

These are the positions I could verify from party announcements and election coverage available as of 22 October 2026. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. Summary of 2026 election tax policiesWhere the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

South Island Election Conference 2026

1. New Zealand Labour Party

Direct fuel-cost relief

  • Freeze fuel excise tax for three years. Labour estimates an average family would save $520 a year by 2030.
  • Make fuel-company price gouging illegal and require refunds where companies have overcharged.
  • Cap public-transport fares at $10 a week outside Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, from July 2027.
  • Restore rural school bus routes that it says have been cut. Labour's Cost of Living PlanFreeze Fuel Tax

Why it matters to you: Of the policies listed here, the fuel-tax freeze is a clear, direct proposal to limit the tax component of your driving costs. It would not protect you from increases in international oil prices.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

2. New Zealand National Party

Delay tax increases while maintaining transport funding

  • The Government announced on 31 August that there would be no fuel-excise increase in 2027.
  • Increases are scheduled to resume with 5 cents per litre from January 2028, followed by further staged increases and then annual increases from 2030. Equivalent changes are planned for road-user charges.
  • It says it will compensate the transport fund for lost revenue rather than cut road maintenance, public transport and infrastructure funding. Government cancels fuel tax hike

Why it matters to you: This gives short-term relief from a planned tax rise, but it is not a permanent fuel-tax freeze. Reliable roads and regional connections are also important if your family has to travel long distances.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

3. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Targeted rural assistance and alternatives to driving

Why it matters to you: The rural relief proposal is particularly relevant to your circumstances. Check the final eligibility rules, payment amount and whether it remains a funded election commitment; a proposal made during the fuel crisis is not necessarily a permanent entitlement.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

4. ACT New Zealand

Roads, transport efficiency and vehicle affordability

  • Its Keep New Zealand Moving policy prioritises road maintenance, building roads ahead of growth, and getting better value from transport spending.
  • ACT says unnecessary regulations can price families out of reliable vehicles. ACT New Zealand

Why it matters to you: Better roads and more affordable vehicles may help, particularly in a car-dependent town. I could not verify a comparable, specific commitment to ongoing rural household fuel assistance in the material reviewed.

Te Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2023 - Policy.nz

5. Te Pāti Māori

Its stated transport commitment is to make public transport free for everyone within five years, with disabled people among the first groups to benefit if the change is phased in. Party policies, simplified: Transport

For you: This could help if suitable services reach your town and the places you need to visit. Free fares alone will not help much if there is no usable bus or train route.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

6. New Zealand First

In the transport comparison published by The D*List on 19 October, New Zealand First did not provide a direct response to the questions asked about transport policy. Party policies, simplified: Transport

For you: I couldn't verify a specific current commitment to reduce fuel costs for rural households, so I wouldn't assume it shares another party's proposal.

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

7. The Opportunity Party (TOP)

TOP has publicly advocated free public transport, but it did not directly respond to The D*List's transport-policy questions. Party policies, simplified: Transport

For you: Free transport could help where services exist, but I couldn't confirm a specific fuel rebate or rural driving subsidy.

What matters most for your situation?

A fuel-tax policy is only one part of the picture. Here is how I would compare the options against the needs you've described.

Your priority What to look for
Keeping petrol costs down now A fuel-tax freeze, targeted fuel assistance or action against excessive fuel margins
Driving to medical appointments More accessible local healthcare, outreach clinics, telehealth where suitable and help with patient travel costs
Finding work closer to home Investment in local employment, vocational training and regional businesses
Keeping your car and roads reliable Road maintenance, affordable vehicle repairs and dependable regional connections
Reducing dependence on driving More frequent regional buses, practical school transport and better inter-town services

One important distinction: a general fuel-tax freeze benefits people who drive, but a targeted rural payment can direct more help towards people who have no realistic alternative. The Greens' rural relief proposal stands out on that second measure, while Labour's three-year freeze is a clearly specified option for broad-based relief. National's current plan delays rather than permanently removes the next tax increases. Greens Offer Votes To National Party For Immediate Relief In Fossil Fuel CrisisFreeze Fuel TaxGovernment cancels fuel tax hike

Also consider the funding trade-off. Fuel excise helps pay for transport infrastructure, so freezing it requires the government to find revenue elsewhere or change spending. For someone dependent on a car, cheaper fuel is valuable, but so are maintained roads and reliable access to neighbouring towns.

Questions worth asking candidates before you vote

  • Will you provide direct financial help to people on low or modest incomes who must drive long distances for work and healthcare?
  • Will that help cover ordinary petrol costs, or only exceptional increases during a fuel crisis?
  • How will you improve access to GPs, specialists and employment without requiring families to travel so far?
  • If you freeze fuel taxes, how will you maintain local roads and regional transport services?

For official policy details, start with Labour's 2026 policy page, the National Party's fuel-tax announcement and the Green Party's 2026 manifesto. Treat announced policies as proposals rather than guaranteed outcomes: the final result will depend on election results, coalition agreements and implementation.

My bottom line: Given your circumstances, I would put the greatest weight on policies that recognise unavoidable driving costs and improve healthcare and employment access in small towns. A promise of cheaper fuel is useful, but a policy that helps your family avoid some of those long journeys could save you money year after year.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

For people living in small towns and rural or provincial areas who rely heavily on private vehicles due to limited public transport, fuel costs and road maintenance are central election issues. Political parties approaching the 2026 New Zealand general election propose distinct approaches to addressing these cost-of-living and transport pressures:

1. Centre-Right and Coalition Parties (National, ACT, New Zealand First)

  • Focus on Roading Infrastructure and Supply Resilience: Parties in or supporting the current government emphasize maintaining and upgrading core roading networks rather than universal fuel subsidies. They argue that safe, resilient state highways and local roads are vital for provincial connectivity, freight, and access to regional healthcare and services.
  • User-Pays and Road User Charges (RUC): The approach heavily features user-pays mechanics, such as transitioning more vehicles (including EVs) toward electronic road-user charges to fund infrastructure. While this ensures direct contribution from road users, rural advocates closely scrutinize how RUC and tolling impact households that have no choice but to drive long distances.
  • Cost Management: These parties generally lean toward economic management through spending restraint rather than direct market price caps on fuel, aiming instead to ease overall inflation and support regional economic growth.

2. Centre-Left and Opposition Parties (Labour)

  • Fuel Tax Freezes: Labour has put forward specific cost-of-living relief targeting fuel, committing to freeze fuel taxes for three years to directly curb price spikes at the pump for motorists.
  • Regional Balancing: While Labour also proposes urban public transport fare caps (such as nationwide weekly caps), its direct fuel tax freeze is structured to offer immediate relief to households in provincial and rural areas where switching to public transport is not a viable option.

3. Green Parties and Left-Leaning Alternatives (Green Party)

  • Expansion of Rural and On-Demand Transport: The Green Party addresses regional isolation by pushing for structural alternatives, including funding for affordable interregional and rural bus services and on-demand public transport in areas lacking fixed transit lines.
  • Targeted Relief over Broad Fuel Subsidies: Rather than subsidizing fossil fuel consumption, the Greens focus on lowering transport vulnerability by expanding fare-free schemes for specific groups (such as students, Community Services Card holders, and lower-income beneficiaries) and scaling up incentives for electric vehicles and e-bikes to help households escape high oil-price exposure over the long term.

Summary for Voters in Your Situation

If you are weighing your options in a small town with limited services:

  • Labour offers direct relief at the pump via a multi-year fuel tax freeze.
  • National, ACT, and New Zealand First focus heavily on the quality, safety, and resilience of provincial roads and infrastructure to ensure reliable access to distant hubs.
  • The Greens emphasize introducing new rural public transport options and on-demand services to reduce long-term car dependency.

Are you more interested in parties offering immediate relief at the pump, or those focusing on long-term regional roading and alternative rural transit options?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

Living in a small town with limited local services, healthcare, and public transport means that high fuel prices and vehicle running costs hit your household budget directly. Heading into the 2026 general election, New Zealand's political parties approach the pressures of regional transport and fuel costs through different lenses—focusing variously on road investment, public/regional transport alternatives, or broader systemic changes like road user charges (RUC).

The general approaches and proposals from key political parties regarding regional mobility, fuel, and transport costs include:

  • National Party (Coalition Government lead):
  • Focus: Infrastructure investment, road resilience, and economic efficiency.
  • Approach to Costs: National generally emphasizes building and maintaining major and regional roading networks to improve connectivity and reduce inefficiencies for freight and motorists. Rather than direct ongoing subsidies for fossil fuels at the pump, their broader transport framework leans into the ongoing transition of the vehicle fleet to the Road User Charges (RUC) system (aiming for a universal per-kilometre structure rather than petrol excise duties). The emphasis is on keeping roads safe and functional rather than capping fuel prices.
  • Labour Party:
  • Focus: Cost-of-living relief and public transport accessibility.
  • Approach to Costs: Labour’s transport package for 2026 heavily targets public transport affordability, featuring proposals like weekly fare caps (such as a $20 weekly cap in major areas). While these heavily benefit urban commuters with access to public networks, their broader focus remains on household budget relief through measures targeting health costs (like free prescriptions or GP visit policies) rather than direct tax cuts on petrol or diesel for rural/provincial motorists.
  • Green Party:
  • Focus: A "fossil fuel crisis" response centering on expanding public and regional transport alternatives.
  • Approach to Costs: The Greens propose shifting investment away from major new highway expansions and into mass rapid transit, regional and rural bus network strengthening, and the re-establishment of regional and intercity passenger rail (e.g., connecting regions like Auckland-Wellington overnight or Christchurch- Dunedin). For households dependent on private cars, their policies do not subsidize petrol, but rather aim to provide alternative low-cost public networks where feasible and free travel for specific cardholders.
  • New Zealand First:
  • Focus: Regional development, provincial connectivity, and practical infrastructure.
  • Approach to Costs: As part of the current parliamentary landscape, NZ First places a strong emphasis on regional resilience, supporting investment in provincial infrastructure, regional roads, and domestic energy/fuel security. They traditionally advocate for practical, pragmatic support for provincial and rural communities who rely on vehicular transport, aiming to ensure regional infrastructure doesn’t fall behind major centres.
  • ACT Party:
  • Focus: Free-market pricing, infrastructure funding reform, and opposition to heavy regulatory costs or regional fuel taxes.
  • Approach to Costs: ACT generally opposes targeted regional fuel taxes or heavy-handed interventions at the pump, favoring user-pays models for roads and cutting red tape on infrastructure delivery to lower long-term economic friction.

What this means for your vote

If you are looking for direct relief on the price of petrol or diesel at the pump, major party platforms in 2026 place less emphasis on direct fuel subsidies and more on structural shifts: either expanding regional transit alternatives (Greens/Labour) or focusing on long-term road network quality, economic management, and the rollout of universal road user charge frameworks (National/NZ First). Reviewing individual party manifestos closer to the ballot box can help clarify specific regional development or community transport grants proposed for isolated towns.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

AI Overview

Political parties approach fuel costs, long-distance driving, and regional accessibility through different strategies for the 2026 general election:

New Zealand Labour Party

  • Fuel Tax Freeze: Pledges a three-year freeze on fuel excise taxes to immediately curb pump prices.

  • Price Monitoring: Proposes making fuel price gouging illegal and mandating weekly fuel price reporting.

  • Regional Public Transport: Offers a $10 weekly public transport fare cap outside the major metropolitan centers (and a $20 cap in Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch) to help where regional transit exists.

  • Support for EV Adoption: Introduces the SolarSaver program, offering low-interest finance and subsidies for home solar and batteries to lower household energy costs.

New Zealand National Party & Current Coalition Government

  • Distance-Based Road User Charges (RUC): Continues rolling out a structural shift to move all light vehicles (including petrol cars) to a digital, distance-based Road User Charge system to replace petrol excise duty. While removing fuel excise can lower base petrol prices at the pump, motorists pay per kilometre traveled instead.

  • Road Infrastructure Focus: Prioritizes investment in major road construction, regional road maintenance, and road safety networks rather than broad fuel subsidies.

Green Party

  • Rural and Interregional Transit: Funds affordable interregional and rural bus services, as well as on-demand public transport options for smaller communities.

  • Active and Shared Transport: Pledges targeted subsidies for electric cargo bikes and community e-bike sharing, alongside free or heavily discounted fares (such as a $2 adult fare policy).

  • Vehicle Transition: Reintroduces financial incentives for electric vehicles and expands rural/regional EV charging infrastructure.

New Zealand First

  • Cost-of-Living Relief: Focuses on permanent boosts and increases to in-work tax credits (such as Working for Families adjustments) to offset broader household expenses like fuel.

  • Market Competition: Proposes breaking up major energy and fuel-retail market dominances to drive down fuel and living costs.

If you'd like, let me know:

  • What region or district you live in
  • Whether your household uses petrol, diesel, or an EV

I can give you more specific details on how these policies affect your specific travel needs.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account