Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

I'm sorry you're facing this. Losing a job after years in the same industry can be especially difficult when rent still needs to be paid and the next step isn't obvious. You're weighing two different needs: getting income coming in quickly and building a more secure path into the future. A good employment plan should address both, rather than assuming you can afford to retrain full-time or that similar work will be available straight away.

For New Zealand's 2026 general election, I'd assess the parties against what they actually offer someone in your position: help finding work, financial support while unemployed, affordable retraining, and a realistic route back to stable earnings.

I wouldn't choose a party for you or declare one the winner, but I can compare their documented policies and show you what evidence to check before deciding which approach fits your circumstances.

What the main parties are offering

The policies below are proposals for the 2026 election, not guarantees of future outcomes. I've focused on measures that could affect employment, retraining and your ability to cover living costs.

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour — public investment and apprenticeships

Labour's Good Jobs plan proposes accelerating social housing construction, repairs to more than 2,000 schools and hospital repairs, alongside support for nearly 30,000 apprentices. It also proposes expanding Apprenticeship Boost, a $1,000 toolbox grant and Māori-led vocational training funding. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesGood Jobs - NZ Labour's Plan to Grow the Economy

What to check: Would your existing skills qualify you for the work being created? When would projects and training places actually become available? Much of this package focuses on construction, trades and particular occupations.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National — employment services and economic growth

National proposes more intensive, work-focused support for 30,000 work-ready people who have received a benefit for more than a year. It identifies primary industries, construction, infrastructure, tourism and hospitality as growth areas. Its welfare policy also proposes reduced payments for some people who have received Jobseeker Support for two of the previous three years, from April 2028. A firm, fair and affordable welfare system2026 Election Policy

What to check: Does its employment support reach you early enough after redundancy? What individual services would you receive, and how would its proposed benefit changes affect you if finding a job takes longer than expected?

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party — better-paid training and worker support

In an announcement dated 17 October 2026, the Greens proposed abolishing the training wage, a $2,000 equipment grant for apprentices, a $2,000 completion bonus for employers supporting apprentices, and an additional $30 million a year for Māori- and Pasifika-led training. Green Party to abolish training wage and provide more support for apprentices

What to check: Would you be able to access this support in your intended field? What would your take-home income be while training, and how many training places and subsequent jobs would be available?

These are three distinct approaches: creating work through public projects, focusing on employment services and wider economic growth, and improving the affordability and support available during training. They overlap in some areas, and none of these announcements alone establishes how quickly an individual made redundant would return to work.

For a broader comparison across Labour, National, the Greens, ACT, New Zealand First, Te Pāti Māori and Opportunity, see Policy.nz's 2026 incomes and employment comparison. It lets you compare policies by issue rather than relying on party slogans. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising

What should you check before trusting a party's plan?

Use this checklist when reading a manifesto, watching a debate or hearing a campaign promise.

Your policy credibility checklist

0 of 7 checked

Eligibility: can someone recently made redundant access the programme immediately?

Speed: is help available within weeks, or only after a long period on a benefit?

Money: are training fees, equipment, travel and living costs covered?

Job outcomes: are there named employers, real vacancies and evidence of people getting jobs?

Fit: does the plan help experienced workers transfer existing skills, not just new entrants?

Funding: is the policy costed, and are its budget and delivery timetable published?

Risks: what happens to benefits, rent support or household income if the job search takes months?

Reset checklist

One especially important distinction is between a promise to create jobs and a programme that directly helps a redundant worker get one. A large infrastructure project might create employment overall, for example, but that does not guarantee a vacancy for someone in your profession or a job soon enough to cover next month's rent.

Also distinguish party claims from independent evidence. Look for published costings, implementation dates, eligibility rules, independent scrutiny and measurable outcomes. The Policy.nz comparison is a useful starting point, but verify consequential details against the party's full policy and the relevant government agency.

Don't wait for the election to get support

There are practical steps you can take now, regardless of which party you eventually vote for.

  • Contact Work and Income: Its redundancy support service says it can help with job matching, employer connections, CVs, training opportunities and financial support between jobs. You can contact it before your job actually ends.
  • Check financial assistance: You may qualify for Jobseeker Support, the Accommodation Supplement or Temporary Additional Support, depending on your circumstances. Use the official eligibility checker or contact Work and Income to discuss your options. Redundancy supportHow to apply for Jobseeker Support
  • Check your redundancy entitlements: Read your employment agreement for notice and redundancy pay, and check that your final pay includes unused annual holidays and other amounts owing. Redundancy compensation is not automatically required unless provided for in your agreement. RedundancyRedundancy and income tax

How I'd approach the career decision

Before committing to retraining, compare the likely time to your first pay packet in three scenarios:

  1. A similar role using your existing experience.
  2. An adjacent role that uses most of your current skills but requires a short course or qualification.
  3. A new career requiring substantial retraining.

Compare realistic vacancies, expected earnings, training costs and how long you could cover rent in each scenario. You may find that a short, targeted qualification alongside a job search is less financially risky than either retraining full-time or waiting indefinitely for the same type of role.

The key voting question is which party's actual policies best bridge the gap between redundancy and sustainable employment for you. The answer will depend on your industry, the skills you already have, and how much time and money you can afford to invest in training.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

Facing redundancy after years in a single industry is a stressful position, particularly when you have immediate financial pressures like rent. Choosing the "most convincing" party plan depends heavily on whether you lean toward retraining for a new sector or re-entering the workforce quickly in similar work, as political parties approach this dilemma through very different economic lenses.


Overview of Competing Approaches

Different political blocs offer distinct paths for workers facing redundancy:

  • Centre-Left Parties (e.g., Labour, Greens):
    • Focus: Stronger government intervention in job creation, targeted retraining/apprenticeship support, and enhanced worker safety nets.
    • For someone in your position: Policies often feature direct extensions or expansions of industry training incentives (such as expanded apprenticeship or targeted trades support), alongside policies aimed at bolstering job security and easing immediate costs of living (like healthcare or transport changes).
    • Trade-off: Their economic models often rely on broader tax changes (such as capital gains or asset taxes), which critics argue can dampen business confidence and slow down private sector hiring.
  • Centre-Right / Right-Leaning Parties (e.g., National, ACT, NZ First):
    • Focus: Economic growth driven by business confidence, tax relief, reducing compliance costs for employers, and streamlining employment regulations to encourage hiring.
    • For someone in your position: The theory is that a thriving, unencumbered private sector creates an abundance of open roles across various industries organically, making it easier to find alternative employment without needing state-directed retraining.
    • Trade-off: Critics argue these approaches offer less direct, safety-net protection or state-subsidized income support for individuals caught in structural industrial decline or transition.

What to Check Before Trusting a Party’s Judgement

To cut through campaign rhetoric and see which plan actually holds water for your personal situation, ask yourself (and check the fine print of their policies) the following:

  1. Immediate Cashflow vs. Long-Term Payoff:
    • Check: Does the party offer immediate bridge support (like temporary income support, training allowances, or housing/accommodation assistance), or do their solutions assume you can afford months of unpaid or low-paid retraining? Rent doesn't wait for a 2-year qualification.
  2. Targeted vs. Broad-Brush Retraining:
    • Check: If they promise "retraining," is funding tied to industries experiencing actual, verified labor shortages in New Zealand, or is it a generic voucher? Look for concrete links between training programs and guaranteed employer pathways.
  3. Regional vs. National Relevance:
    • Check: Some job-creation or infrastructure packages are heavily concentrated in specific regions or major centres. Ensure their policies align with the job market where you live or are willing to move.
  4. Implementation Timeline:
    • Check: How quickly can these policies take effect? A policy that rolls out new training infrastructure over three years does little to help you pay next month's rent.
  5. Funding and Economic Viability:
    • Check: Look at independent economic commentaries (such as analyses from NZIER, Infometrics, or specialized sector breakdowns) to see if the party's revenue model adds up, or if it risks triggering inflation or public service cuts that could inadvertently hurt the broader job market.

Are you leaning more toward completely retraining for a fresh career path, or are you hoping to find a role that values your years of accumulated experience in a similar field?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

Navigating redundancy after a long tenure in one industry is a high-stress position, particularly with rent and daily living costs pressing down. Deciding whether to pivot and retrain or stay the course in a familiar field is a major fork in the road.

When looking at the 2026 New Zealand general election , determining which party has the "most convincing" plan is subjective, as different political blocks approach the dilemma of displaced workers through contrasting economic philosophies.

Rather than declaring a single "most convincing" plan, it helps to look at how the major political approaches differ on your specific dilemma—retraining versus direct re-employment—and what independent checks you should run before casting your vote.


Comparing the Approaches for Displaced Workers

Different parties frame the solution to workforce transitions through distinct lenses:

  • Center-Right / National-led approach: Typically focuses on broader economic settings—stimulating business growth, reducing regulatory and compliance costs for small-to-medium enterprises, and streamlining business confidence to organically create jobs. The emphasis here is usually on getting the private sector moving so that market-led hiring absorbs displaced workers quickly, alongside support for apprenticeships and workplace-based training rather than broad state-directed retraining programs.

  • Center-Left / Labour approach: Generally leans into active labor market policies, direct government-backed job creation, industry-specific transition support, and targeted retraining subsidies or polytechnic/skills-training funding to help workers shift into high-demand or green-transition sectors.

  • Greens and Minor Parties: Often propose targeted interventions, such as specific grants or stipends for people entering trades or targeted public/conservation/community job schemes, alongside stronger income safety nets for those out of work.

Note: You can review and compare specific party policies side-by-side using non-partisan tools likePolicy.nz.


What to Check Before Trusting a Party's Plan

When you have rent to pay next week, political rhetoric about "five-year economic growth plans" can feel abstract. Before putting your trust in a party's pitch to get you back to work, verify these practical dimensions:

  1. Immediacy vs. Long-Term Horizon: Does their policy provide immediate income or training support (e.g., changes to main benefits, Training Incentive Allowance adjustments, or short-course subsidies), or does it rely on macro-economic changes (like tax cuts or business deregulation) that take years to translate into hiring? If you have immediate financial pressure, you need short-term bridges as well as long-term pathways.
  2. Funding and Realism: How is the retraining or job-support scheme funded? Check if the funding is ring-fenced, realistic, or reliant on optimistic revenue forecasts. Independent economic commentary (such as from the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) or academic policy analysts) often reviews whether party fiscal plans stack up.
  3. Recognised Credentialing: If a party promotes "retraining," check if their plan partners with recognized providers (like Te Pūkenga/polytechnics, industry training organizations, or universities) whose qualifications are actually demanded by employers in your region, rather than generic short-term programs that don't lead to real job placement.
  4. Track Record and Practical Implementation: Look at past performance. Have similar labor-market or retraining schemes managed by these parties in the past successfully transitioned older, industry-displaced workers into sustainable employment, or did people get stuck in administrative loops? Check reporting from independent news and analysis sites like Newsroom or The Spinoff for deep dives into policy feasibility.

To help narrow down which party's approach best fits your situation, tell me:

  • What was your previous industry?
  • Do you have a new industry you are already leaning toward, or are you starting from scratch?

I can help you look up specific policy details or immediate work and income support options available right now.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

AI Overview

Facing redundancy and balancing immediate living costs like rent makes voting a highly pragmatic decision. In the 2026 New Zealand General Election , political parties offer fundamentally different approaches to employment and workforce retraining.

The choice of which plan is most "convincing" depends on whether you believe your path back to employment is better served by stimulating business hiring (reducing costs for employers to take on workers) or state-funded upskilling and worker protections (direct subsidies for retraining and safety nets).

How the Major Parties Plan to Help You Back to Work

The parties generally split into two distinct economic philosophies regarding workforce re-entry:

Party Core Strategy for Job Seekers / Redundancy Key Workforce & Training Policies
National Employer-Led Growth: Focuses on reducing business compliance costs to make it easier for companies to hire new staff, take on apprentices, and create market-driven roles. • Lowering student loan repayment rates (from 12% to 10% in 2027) to keep more cash in workers' pockets.
• Expanding apprenticeships and speeding up employment dispute resolutions.
Labour Targeted Transition Programs: Emphasizes direct state support to funnel workers into high-demand areas or protect them while entering new sectors. • Retaining and expanding the Apprenticeship Boost scheme.
• Implementing specific employment programs like Start Work Now and backing workers into skilled or tech roles via an AI Action Plan.
Greens Direct Training Subsidies: Focuses heavily on the financial viability of retraining, ensuring adults switching careers aren't financially penalized. • Abolishing the training wage so adult apprentices receive full adult minimum wage immediately.
• Providing a $2,000 apprentice equipment grant for tools/materials and offering incentives for employers to retain older or retraining workers.
ACT Deregulation and Flexibility: Believes a highly flexible labor market creates the most jobs. Focuses on making it easier for businesses to operate dynamically. • Freezing the adult minimum wage and introducing a lower training wage for under-20s.
• Reducing employer risk through rules like the "golden handshake" rule for easier contract terminations.

What You Should Check Before Trusting a Party's Plan

To evaluate which policy best solves your specific dilemma (retraining vs. immediate job hunting), look past the campaign slogans and verify these three critical realities:

  • Immediate Financial Survival (The "Rent Gap"): Look closely at the parties' welfare policies. Redundancy pay is not legally mandatory in NZ unless specified in your contract. Check how each party handles Jobseeker Support and the Accommodation Supplement. If a party plans to tighten welfare criteria or reduce safety nets, it may force you into the first available job rather than giving you the financial breathing room to retrain.

  • The Viability of Retraining Subsidies: If you choose to retrain, check if your target industry qualifies for direct government funding (such as Labour's Apprenticeship Boost or the Greens' equipment grants). Weigh this against the time it takes to complete the training while paying rent.

  • Labor Market Protections: Consider the structural changes enacted or proposed by the parties. For example, recent legislative updates in 2026 restricted personal grievance settings. If you value high job security when entering a new role, look at how parties stand on employment trial periods and worker termination laws.

Immediate Practical Support Available to You Right Now

Regardless of how you choose to vote, you do not have to wait until the election to access help. You can currently utilize the following state-funded services:

  • MSD Redundancy Support: The Ministry of Social Development offers a dedicated Redeployment Support Service. They can assign a staff member to assist you with tailored CV updates, connect you directly with hiring employers, and coordinate transition-to-work grants.

  • Employment NZ Guidelines: Ensure your redundancy was handled legally. You can review your baseline rights and the required workplace change consultation steps via Employment New Zealand.

If you would like to explore this further, let me know what industry you just left or what field you are thinking of retraining into. I can give you more specific details on what sector-targeted policies each party is proposing.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account