Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

New Zealand election 2026: Grocery prices and household bills

As of 22 October 2026 · General election: 7 November 2026

The main divide in this election is how to make everyday essentials more affordable. National, Labour, the Greens, ACT and New Zealand First all address grocery competition, but disagree over whether the solution is to restructure supermarkets, regulate prices, make it easier for competitors to enter the market, or use more direct public intervention. Other policies target costs such as fuel, public transport, healthcare and energy. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentLabour's 2026 Election Policies

1. The main parties' approaches to grocery prices

New PAK'nSAVE Opens In Warkworth - Supermarket News

National — create a third major competitor

National proposes separating Foodstuffs' New World/Four Square businesses from PAK’nSAVE so they compete more independently, alongside Woolworths. It says the change could save shoppers an average of $560 a year.

The separation would proceed only if the Commerce Commission independently confirms it would benefit consumers and is practical to implement. More grocery competitionElection 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Core idea: stronger competition between supermarkets.

What a basket of essential groceries costs around the world today | lovemoney.com

Labour — regulate excessive prices and open up wholesale supply

Labour proposes making excessive pricing of essential goods and services illegal for large companies with substantial market power. It also wants to separate the wholesale operations of Foodstuffs and Woolworths from their retail operations, with the aim of giving independent grocers fairer access to products and prices.

Its broader cost-of-living plan includes a three-year fuel-tax freeze and public-transport fare caps. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Core idea: stronger rules against market power, alongside competition reform.

PAK'nSAVE Warkworth | 	Best Design Awards

Green Party — a publicly owned supermarket chain and price controls

The Greens propose establishing KiwiMart, a publicly owned grocery chain using 120 stores and two distribution centres acquired from the major supermarket groups. They also support rules against excessive supermarket pricing and stronger enforcement of competition law.

The party's wider food policy emphasises local production, food security and Māori food sovereignty. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Core idea: direct public-sector competition and stronger consumer protections.

Foodstuffs expands with $380m in projects, new North Shore Pak’nSave planned – Property Insider - NZ Herald

ACT — make it easier for new supermarkets to open

ACT opposes government-directed supermarket break-ups. It favours reducing regulatory barriers and speeding up the consenting process for new supermarkets, alongside accepting certain overseas food-label standards to make market entry easier.

Its approach relies on more potential competitors putting pressure on existing chains. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Core idea: less red tape and more market entry.

Cost of Living in New Zealand 2026: Groceries, Rent & Food Budgets | NZ Navigator

New Zealand First — split Foodstuffs and toughen enforcement

NZ First proposes splitting Foodstuffs into two competing cooperatives: one for New World and Four Square, and one for PAK’nSAVE. It also advocates tougher penalties for competition breaches and faster investigations by the Commerce Commission.

Its grocery proposal overlaps with National's on restructuring, but NZ First places particular emphasis on stronger enforcement. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorWinston Peters - “The Labour, Green, Māori, Opportunity

Core idea: structural change backed by tougher enforcement.

Good food is only right | Otago Daily Times Online News

Te Pāti Māori — Māori-owned food retail and targeted food support

Te Pāti Māori proposes a $3.1 billion Kai Sovereignty package, including support for Māori-owned supermarket chains and other food businesses, plus a kai tax credit for people earning $60,000 or less. The party says the credit would provide support equivalent to up to eight weeks of food a year. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Core idea: community ownership and targeted help with food costs.

2. What about power, petrol, transport and other household bills?

The grocery debate is only part of the cost-of-living contest. Here are some of the other differences.

Party Wider household-cost approach
National Emphasises economic stability, competition and private-sector-led growth. Its grocery proposal is a targeted intervention, subject to regulatory approval. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentMore grocery competition
Labour Proposes a three-year fuel-tax freeze, public-transport fare caps, free prescriptions, three free GP visits a year and SolarSaver to remove upfront solar costs. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies
Greens Focuses on affordability through stronger market regulation, public ownership and investment in community wellbeing. Its food policies also emphasise local production and food security. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorElection 2026: Political polarisation on energy and climate, except solar
ACT Favours reducing regulatory barriers and relying more on private enterprise and competition. It opposes compulsory supermarket break-ups. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government
New Zealand First Combines intervention in grocery markets with energy-security proposals, including spending $1 billion exploring for oil and gas. Election 2026: Here's how the multi-party leaders’ debate unfoldedWinston Peters - “The Labour, Green, Māori, Opportunity
Te Pāti Māori Emphasises targeted food support, Māori ownership of food businesses and reducing the tax burden on lower-income households. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorElection 2026: Here's how the multi-party leaders’ debate unfolded

3. What would the grocery proposals actually mean for shoppers?

The parties' proposals differ in how they expect lower prices to happen, and none can guarantee a particular reduction in your supermarket bill.

More supermarket competition

National and NZ First want to split Foodstuffs' supermarket brands into competing businesses. The intended effect is more pressure to offer better prices and specials.

More regulation of pricing and supply

Labour and the Greens want stronger action against excessive prices and changes to wholesale arrangements. The aim is to limit the ability of dominant businesses to exploit their market position.

More choice through new entrants

ACT wants to make opening supermarkets easier and faster, hoping new competitors will put downward pressure on prices.

Public and community alternatives

The Greens and Te Pāti Māori propose different forms of publicly or community-oriented food retail, intended to give shoppers alternatives to the existing major chains.

These approaches also carry different risks. Restructuring could duplicate distribution and technology costs; price regulation depends on how excessive pricing is defined and enforced; and attracting new entrants or establishing publicly owned stores takes time. The Consumer NZ comparison discusses these trade-offs. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorMore grocery competition

4. How to compare the promises as a voter

When examining party announcements before 7 November, it is worth asking five practical questions:

  • Timing: When would a policy take effect? Would it help household budgets immediately or only over several years?
  • Actual savings: Is the figure an independently assessed estimate, a party's own projection, or a guaranteed payment?
  • Who benefits: Does it help every household, only drivers or public-transport users, or mainly lower-income families?
  • How it is funded: What would the policy cost the government, and how would that be paid for?
  • What happens if it fails: Is there an independent review, an enforcement mechanism or a way to change course?

One important distinction: a lower grocery bill is not the same as a lower overall cost of living. Fuel-tax changes, transport fares, energy costs, healthcare charges and direct food support affect different households in different ways.

For the official details, start with the parties' published policies: National's grocery competition plan and Labour's 2026 policy programme. Consumer NZ's comparison of the parties' grocery proposals provides a useful cross-party view.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

Heading into the 2026 New Zealand general election, the cost of living and high household bills—particularly grocery and food prices—are central voter concerns. New Zealand’s major political parties approach the grocery duopoly (Woolworths New Zealand and Foodstuffs) and broader household expenses through distinct economic frameworks, ranging from structural market interventions to supply-chain reforms and tax strategies.

The competing party approaches focus on several key areas:

1. National Party (Incumbent Government)

  • Market-Led Structural Competition: National’s approach leans toward increasing structural competition within the existing framework. Specifically, National has focused on exploring ways to break apart or spur competition within the Foodstuffs cooperative system (such as pursuing structural separation between New World and PAK'nSAVE operations) so that they compete more aggressively against each other.
  • Broader Household Relief via Fiscal Management: Rather than targeting individual sectors with price controls, National emphasizes keeping overall economic management disciplined—cutting public service operating costs, lowering debt, and avoiding new taxes to ease general household pressures. They have also targeted other household expenses, such as rolling out energy plans to help lower home power bills.

2. New Zealand Labour Party

  • Wholesale Market Separation and Supplier Protections: Labour’s policy centers heavily on cracking down on the major supermarket supply chains. They propose forcing Woolworths and the two Foodstuffs cooperatives to legally separate their wholesale supply arms from their retail storefronts.
  • Banning "Junk Fees" and Restrictive Contracts: Labour plans to outlaw unfair supplier contract rules (which prevent individual stores like Four Squares from lowering prices or changing banners) and ban complex "junk fees" and unreciprocated charges levied on food producers. They also intend to make explicit corporate price gouging illegal across major uncompetitive sectors.

3. Green Party

  • Public Ownership / State-Backed Competitor ("KiwiMart"): The Greens propose the most interventionist approach to the food system. Their policy involves forcing Woolworths and Foodstuffs to divest at least 120 stores and distribution infrastructure into public ownership to establish KiwiMart—a state-backed supermarket chain with a singular mandate to drive prices down.
  • Anti-Price Gouging Legislation and Transparency: The Greens have advocated for mandatory pricing accuracy codes, strict transparency requirements around supermarket profit margins, and a legislative ban on excessive grocery pricing backed by enhanced Commerce Commission enforcement powers.

4. ACT New Zealand

  • Productivity and Tax Reduction over Market Interventions: ACT rejects heavy regulatory intervention or state-owned competitors, arguing that grocery prices and cost-of-living pressures are symptoms of a wider economic productivity crisis driven by government spending and red tape.
  • Broader Economic Fixes: ACT’s solution centers on radically downsizing government expenditure, streamlining regulations, and implementing broad tax reforms (such as a simplified two-rate income tax) to increase net disposable household incomes.

5. New Zealand First & Te Pāti Māori

  • NZ First: Focuses broadly on economic nationalism and tackling essential utility and banking costs alongside food, historically favoring strict oversight of corporate behaviour and targeted relief.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Proposes structural systemic shifts to food affordability, including removing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) from all basic food items, introducing a sweeping wealth tax, and establishing a tax-free income threshold to directly increase lower- and middle-income household purchasing power.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, the cost of living and rising grocery prices have emerged as central campaign issues. The main political parties have outlined distinct approaches to address supermarket market dominance and consumer household bills.

The Major Party Approaches

  • National Party

  • Approach: Market restructuring and incentivising competition. National has pledged to split the Foodstuffs cooperative structure into separate entities if the Commerce Commission determines consumers would benefit. The party also focuses on facilitating a third major player entering the market alongside broader economic management targeting inflation without introducing new taxes.

  • Source/Detail: Outlined in National Party Policies and reported by Bloomberg. New Zealand Cost Crisis Drives Election Vows to Rein In Business2026 Election Policy | National Party

  • Labour Party

  • Approach: Wholesale separation and anti-price gouging laws. Labour’s policy proposes forcing Foodstuffs and Woolworths to legally separate their wholesale and retail operations into independent entities (e.g., creating distinct wholesale and retail arms) to ensure smaller competitors and alternative grocers gain guaranteed access to wholesale products on fair terms. Labour also intends to empower the Commerce Commission to investigate dominant companies for excessive pricing and make price gouging illegal across essential sectors.

  • Source/Detail: Detailed on the NZ Labour Party Policy Pages and analyzed by Consumer NZ. Fairer Grocery Prices - NZ Labour

  • Green Party

  • Approach: Public ownership and market divestment. The Greens propose an "Affordable Kai" policy involving the creation of "KiwiMart," a publicly owned supermarket chain. This would be achieved by forcing Foodstuffs and Woolworths to divest roughly 120 stores and distribution centers. Additionally, the Greens aim to expand the Commerce Commission's powers, increase its funding, and introduce a mandatory pricing accuracy code with automatic consumer compensation for overcharging.

  • Source/Detail: Reported by RNZ and Consumer NZ. Election 2026: Political parties target supermarkets, NZ Super and more with fresh policy announcements | RNZ

  • ACT New Zealand

  • Approach: Cutting red tape and easing foreign compliance. ACT rejects government-mandated corporate break-ups, labeling them counterproductive. Instead, their approach centers on lowering entry barriers for new supermarket competitors by establishing a fast-tracked, one-stop consenting process for store approvals and liquor licenses (aiming for months rather than years) and automatically accepting food product labels approved by trusted overseas regulators.

  • Source/Detail: Analyzed via Consumer NZ. [Consumer NZ]

  • New Zealand First

  • Approach: Tougher enforcement and structural review penalties. NZ First backs investigating the breakup of major supermarket cooperatives while heavily empowering the Commerce Commission. They propose lifting corporate penalties for serious market breaches to align with Australian standards (including higher turnover-based fines) and establishing streamlined frameworks for swift industry rule changes.

  • Source/Detail: Summarized by Consumer NZ and Bloomberg.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account