Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

New Zealand 2026 election: support for family carers

If you work part time while caring for an older family member every day, the key election issue is not just how much funding goes into healthcare. It is whether you can get reliable, coordinated support at home without having to organise everything yourself.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I'd compare parties on five practical questions:

  • One point of contact: Can someone coordinate the person's GP, hospital, specialist, home-care and community services?
  • Reliable home support: Are there proposals to improve access to personal care, household help, nursing visits and respite?
  • Support for unpaid carers: Would you have better access to financial assistance, leave, counselling, training or replacement care?
  • Joined-up healthcare: How would parties prevent gaps between hospital discharge, primary care, aged care and disability support?
  • Work and caring: Would their policies make it easier to keep working while meeting daily caring responsibilities?

One important distinction: a party promising more healthcare funding is not necessarily promising a named care coordinator, guaranteed home-care hours or regular respite for family carers. Those are separate policy commitments worth checking.

What the parties are proposing

The following is a comparison of publicly available positions as of 22 October 2026, focusing on older people receiving care at home and the family members who support them. The distinction between explicit commitments and broader policy direction matters, because some parties have not published detailed proposals on every aspect of family care. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Unpaid carers' strategy and consistent support services

National's government launched the Mahi Aroha Carers' Strategy Action Plan in September 2026. It covers carers' health and wellbeing, financial security, and recognition. National has also implemented a more consistent needs-assessment approach across disability support services, intended to make assessments and funding decisions clearer and less dependent on where people live. New roadmap for supporting unpaid carersDisability support improvements begin

What to look for: Whether National commits to specific improvements in respite availability, home-care hours, care coordination and practical help for carers who are also employed. The action plan is a framework for progress, not by itself a guarantee of additional services.

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

More affordable healthcare and a stronger care workforce

Labour's published 2026 policies include three free GP visits per year through a proposed Medicard, free prescriptions from July 2027, a Family Doctor Loan Scheme and a graduate nurse job guarantee. Labour has also announced a $4-an-hour pay rise for care and support workers, scheduled for January 2027, under its pay-equity policy. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

What to look for: How Labour would improve coordination between GPs, hospitals and home-care providers, and whether it would expand respite and practical assistance for unpaid carers. More affordable GP visits could reduce some costs, but they do not directly guarantee more home support.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Publicly funded care and investment in the care workforce

The Greens propose moving towards free public primary healthcare, including free GP care and prescriptions, and have committed to fully implementing the national dementia action plan over five years. They have also pledged to restore pay-equity legislation and fund a settlement for around 65,000 care and support workers. Their broader aged-care position emphasises dignified ageing and better in-home care. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersGreens commit to pay equity for care workersLong-term investment in aged care can't wait - delaying it will only increase the cost

What to look for: The funding and delivery details for respite, home-care visits, dementia support and a named coordinator who can help families navigate services.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Better coordination across care settings

New Zealand First has specifically identified better coordination between primary, community and aged care as a priority, alongside aged-care reform. It also proposes a Seniors Housing Plan and more options for older people to age in place. How parties stand on issues affecting older New Zealanders

What to look for: Whether its proposals translate into a single point of contact, shared care plans, dependable home-care services and accessible respite for family carers.

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT

Health services and individual circumstances

ACT's published health proposals include increasing the proportion of health spending devoted to medicines and enabling pharmacists to provide more services, including managing some long-term conditions within agreed limits. ACT did not provide a response to Grey Power's 2026 questionnaire for older New Zealanders. 2026 Election Policy SummariesHow parties stand on issues affecting older New Zealanders

What to look for: A specific commitment on respite, unpaid-carer assistance, in-home aged care and coordination across health and social services; the cited proposals do not establish those commitments.

Te Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2023 - Policy.nz

Te Pāti Māori

Whānau-centred and Māori-led support

The party's published policy direction includes support for Māori-led disability services and making disability support easier to access. However, it did not respond to Grey Power's questionnaire on older people's policies, so that source does not establish a detailed aged-care coordination or respite package for this election. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingHow parties stand on issues affecting older New Zealanders

What to look for: Concrete commitments for whānau carers, culturally appropriate home support, respite and help coordinating health and social services.

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Long-term planning and community-based healthcare

TOP proposes a 10-year, cross-party Health Plan for stable long-term funding, greater investment in primary and preventive care, and stronger community services so more older people can remain at home. Its October 2026 disability position also explicitly discusses carers' financial security, flexibility to balance work and care, better respite and planning for when ageing family carers can no longer provide support. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersOpportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026

What to look for: How its broad commitments would be funded and delivered for older people whose needs fall under aged-care services rather than disability support, and whether respite would be guaranteed or remain dependent on availability.

The most important policy gap to check

New Zealand's aged-care system is also under review. A government advisory group's 2026 report recommends several changes that would directly address the difficulties you've described:

These are advisory-group recommendations, not automatically commitments made by any political party. An important election question is which parties will adopt them, fund them and set timelines for delivery.

How to compare the policies against your own needs

Your concern What to check in each party's policy
You have to coordinate everything yourself Will you get a named care coordinator or navigator?
Support is unreliable Will there be guaranteed home-care hours and a plan when a worker cancels?
You need to keep working Is there financial help, employment flexibility or support for lost income?
You cannot take a reliable break Is respite available when needed, including in emergencies?
Your family member's needs are increasing Is there a pathway to more intensive home care without a crisis or hospital admission?

One further distinction is worth keeping in mind: older-person aged care and disability support are not interchangeable systems. The support available to your family member may depend on their assessed needs and which system they qualify for. Check that a party's carer promises actually cover your circumstances.

For your vote on 7 November 2026, I'd focus on the detail behind each promise: eligibility, funding, service availability and accountability. A policy that recognises carers is different from one that guarantees practical help when you need it.

I can also help you compare parties' specific respite and home-care commitments or check financial support available to unpaid carers.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

Navigating part-time work alongside unpaid caregiving for a family member at home is a significant balancing act, and finding reliable coordination between health, aged care, and community support is a major issue in the 2026 New Zealand General Election.

Major political parties have outlined distinct approaches to primary care, aged-care reform, and support systems for older New Zealanders and their carers:

1. Aged Care Reform and "Ageing in Place"

  • New Zealand First: Has identified aged-care reform as a primary election focus. They emphasize the need for better coordination between primary, community, and aged-care sectors, proposing a specific Seniors Housing Plan and enhanced options to support older people to age safely at home.
  • National Party: Emphasises continuity, target-driven healthcare delivery, and workforce capacity. Their recent administrative focus through the government has included rolling out updated carer strategies (such as working alongside the Carers Alliance on carer action plans), alongside boosting general healthcare delivery and capacity.
  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Advocates for structural overhauls, proposing a cross-party 10-year health plan ("Healthy People") to insulate long-term health, primary, and community care planning from short-term electoral cycles, alongside housing and rates-relief options for older homeowners.

2. Primary Healthcare Access and Cost Reductions

Because family carers spend considerable time managing doctor visits and prescriptions, primary care affordability and availability are central election points:

  • Labour Party: Has centered its health policy on reducing direct costs. Flagship proposals include the Medicard (providing three free GP or nurse visits per year for every New Zealander), removing the $5 prescription charge, and introducing a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to help retain and support GPs in local communities.
  • Green Party: Proposes a more expansive transformation of the public health system, aiming to transition services—including aged care, palliative care, and GP clinics—into entirely free, publicly owned services. They also emphasize fair wages and pay parity for care and support workforces.
  • ACT Party: Advocates for a "government-as-purchaser rather than provider" model, favouring structural market changes, private sector integration, and individualised funding approaches rather than universal subsidies.

Summary for Carers

While parties agree that the health and aged-care systems face immense pressure, they differ on the solution:

  • Parties like NZ First and TOP lean heavily into formal structural integration between community health and aged-care planning.
  • Labour and the Greens focus on lowering the financial barriers of primary care (free GP visits and prescriptions) and boosting workforce pay equity.
  • National focuses on clinical targets, building primary capacity, and working alongside established carer strategies.

Are there particular aspects of support—such as financial assistance, respite care availability, or navigating Home and Community Support Services (HCSS)—that you are hoping to see addressed?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

Political parties in New Zealand approach home-based care and family support through distinct philosophical frameworks, balancing health sector centralisation, individualised funding, and community-based respite.

Overview platforms and evaluations compiled by groups such as Policy.nz and the Disability Rights New Zealand Analysis outline how major parliamentary parties address coordination, support, and funding for family and unpaid carers:

Party Policy Positions for Family and Home-Based Support

  • National Party : Focuses on system stability, national consistency, and administrative efficiency across health and support services. Rather than major structural overhauls, National's approach relies on a refreshed Disability Strategy (2026–2030) , seeking to tighten budget predictability in Health New Zealand / Te Whatu Ora while offering targeted flexibility in how existing support packages are managed at the local level. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • Labour Party : Emphasises a rights-based, partnership model for care and support. Labour has pledged to repeal and replace recent restrictive legislative changes to disability and carer support services, promising to rebuild co-ordinated service delivery alongside disabled people and family/whānau carers to reduce friction in accessing daily home help and respite. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • Green Party : Offers the most comprehensive expansion of social and income support for carers and disabled New Zealanders. The Greens propose lifting baseline income support and carer recognition, expanding state-backed community and home support infrastructure, and enforcing stronger national accessibility and health coordination standards. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • ACT Party : Advocates for individual choice, market-driven flexibility, and reduced bureaucracy. ACT prioritises direct, individualised funding models that allow families to choose and purchase their own support services directly, aiming to strip away central agency waitlists and administrative red tape. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

Key Considerations for Working Carers

  • Coordination & Respite: Sourcing reliable daily relief (respite care) remains a persistent point of critique across all parties, with center-left parties (Labour, Greens) focusing on state-funded expansion and co-design, and center-right parties (National, ACT) focusing on operational efficiency or individual purchasing power.

  • Income & Employment Balance: Part-time workers juggling care responsibilities face distinct trade-offs between abatement thresholds for carer allowances/support and direct assistance for domestic home modifications or clinical coordination. Reviewing party manifestos directly on Policy.nz allows comparison of specific proposals affecting household income and caregiver allowances.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

AI Overview

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand General Election , political parties are addressing home-based care and healthcare coordination with differing approaches. While family caregiver advocacy groups note that concrete, standalone "family carer" policy packages have seen limited specific airtime compared to formal healthcare workforce policies, distinct party directions have emerged:

🇳🇿 National (Current Coalition Government)

The National Party's focus centers on structural funding and legislative frameworks for the broader health and disability sectors, rather than direct wage-style subsidies for informal family carers.

  • The Disability Support Services Bill: The coalition introduced this legislation to redefine funding structures and establish clearer boundaries around government vs. family responsibilities. While the bill incorporates carer needs into formal assessments, it explicitly outlines parameters to limit state liability regarding unpaid family hours exceeding allocated funding.

  • Forthcoming Carer Package: National has stated it will soon begin consulting on a dedicated carer’s package , building on the coalition's updated Carers' Strategy launched in late 2026.

  • Primary Care: National opposes universal free GP structures, preferring to direct targeted funding (such as Budget 2025’s $447M primary care boost) to increase general practice capacity and utilize roles like physician associates and pharmacists to relieve pressure.

🔴 Labour

Labour’s platform targets relief for families by focusing heavily on reducing primary healthcare costs and boosting the professional home care workforce that families rely on for respite.

  • Healthcare Access (Medicard): Labour proposes the Medicard system , providing three free GP visits a year for every New Zealander, alongside free prescriptions and an expanded "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to bring more GPs into local communities.

  • Home Support Workers: Labour has pledged to restore pay equity legislation and fund a $2.5 billion package to grant formal care and support workers an immediate $4-an-hour pay rise. While this targets employed workers, it aims to stabilize the currently strained sector to make reliable external support easier to secure.

  • Legislative Reversals: Labour vows to repeal the coalition's Disability Support Services Bill , which they argue unfairly restricts family support and shifts administrative burdens onto informal carers.

🟢 Greens

The Green Party approaches the issue through the lens of universal, public healthcare and enhanced social safety nets for informal workers.

  • Universal Free Care: The Greens propose fully funded, free public provision of aged care , palliative care, and general practitioner clinics.

  • Retirement Equity for Carers: A distinct policy from the Greens involves contributing to the KiwiSaver accounts of low-income informal carers regardless of their employee contribution status, aiming to mitigate the long-term financial sacrifice of unpaid caregiving.

  • Pay Equity Restoration: Similar to Labour, the Greens propose a massive investment ($4.5 billion over four years) to restore the previous pay equity regime and settle paused claims for the 65,000 workers supporting disabled and elderly individuals at home. They also oppose and promise to review the coalition's recent disability and health legislative changes.


If you would like to explore this further, let me know:

  • Whether your family member is currently receiving support through Health New Zealand (Aged Care) or Disability Support Services (Whaikaha)?

  • If you want to know how the parties propose to handle Individualised Funding (IF) or the Carer Support Subsidy?

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account