Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

New Zealand 2026 election: GP access, hospital waiting times and health funding

Policy snapshot: October 2026 · General election: 7 November 2026

New Zealand's parties are offering different approaches to two closely linked problems: getting a timely appointment with a GP and reducing delays for hospital treatment.

The main divide is over how to expand access. Labour and the Greens emphasise reducing the cost of primary care; National emphasises increasing service capacity and meeting measurable targets; ACT supports wider use of pharmacists and private providers; and NZ First proposes a dedicated fund to help patients on specialist and surgery waiting lists. Opportunity and Te Pāti Māori offer alternative approaches to funding and delivering care. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryAccess to GPs and primary careHealth Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

The comparison below draws on parties' published policies and a health-sector review published on 9 October 2026. These are campaign commitments, not guarantees of what a future government will deliver.

1. How the parties propose to improve GP access

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

More capacity, digital access and workforce training

  • Expand access to online and after-hours GP services.
  • Support additional GP appointments through targeted primary-care funding and technology.
  • Increase the supply of doctors through expanded medical training, including the Waikato medical school, and pathways for overseas-trained doctors.
  • Increase the range of conditions pharmacists and other health professionals can manage.

National's approach is to make existing and additional health resources go further, rather than introduce universal free GP visits. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryAccess to GPs and primary care

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Three free GP visits per year

  • Introduce a Medicard providing three free GP or doctor/nurse consultations annually for each person eligible for publicly funded healthcare.
  • Offer up to 50 loans annually to help doctors buy into owner-operated general practices, starting in July 2027.
  • Free up more than 4.5 million GP appointments a year through phone triage, technology support and targeted funding.
  • Expand nursing capacity through a Graduate Nurse Job Guarantee.

Labour argues that reducing fees needs to be accompanied by measures that expand the number of appointments available. It says its health package would be funded through a targeted capital gains tax. 2026 Election Policy SummariesLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Move towards free, publicly funded primary care

  • Transition GP clinics and other essential health services towards fully funded public provision, free at the point of use.
  • Increase recruitment and retention across the health workforce.
  • Improve pay, staffing conditions and workload, including for primary-care nurses and hauora providers.
  • Strengthen Māori-led services and community-based care.

The Greens' approach is a broader change to how primary care is funded, rather than a fixed number of free visits. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

Expand the range of professionals providing care

  • Enable pharmacists to treat more everyday conditions, manage long-term conditions, order blood tests and adjust medicines within limits set by a GP.
  • Remove barriers to opening new pharmacies.
  • Support greater use of private and community providers, with an emphasis on efficiency and clinical outcomes.

This model aims to increase the effective capacity of the system by allowing different health professionals to take on more work. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First (NZ First)

More flexible local and digital services

  • Recruit more doctors internationally; the party estimates about 2,000 additional doctors are needed.
  • Develop nurse practitioner-led digital health clinics in areas where staffing is difficult.
  • Reduce administration and give GPs more autonomy.
  • Introduce health coaches into primary care.

NZ First has not made universal free GP visits its main 2026 commitment. Its headline funding proposal is aimed at people waiting for hospital treatment. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryHealth Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

Posts with replies by Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) / X

Te Pāti Māori

Affordable care and Māori-led delivery

The party supports free primary care and dental care for whānau earning under $60,000, alongside a Māori Health Card model linking funding to the patient. Its broader approach places emphasis on Māori governance and the delivery of services designed around whānau needs. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryHealth Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

More primary-care funding and long-term planning

  • Negotiate a cross-party, 10-year health plan.
  • Increase the share of health funding going to primary and preventive care.
  • Progressively increase total health spending to 9% of GDP.
  • Provide free primary healthcare for under-30s through its proposed Teal Card programme.

TOP's central argument is that primary care needs more stable funding and that health planning should extend beyond a single parliamentary term. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryHealth Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

2. How the parties propose to reduce hospital waiting times

Party Main approach
National Increase planned-treatment capacity using both public hospitals and private providers; track performance through health targets. Budget 2026 was intended to support 24,000 additional planned-care treatments, as well as additional inpatient and emergency-department activity. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
Labour Improve the flow of patients through emergency departments, increase GP appointments and nursing capacity, and repair hospital buildings and essential systems. Its ED Recovery Plan is part of its broader healthcare package. Labour's 2026 Election Policies2026 Election Policy Summaries
ACT Use private providers and greater service efficiency to reduce elective-treatment backlogs. It also proposes national cancer-centre campuses in Auckland and Christchurch, supported by a mix of private investment, public-private partnerships and existing health funding. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors
NZ First Establish a $925 million annual GP-controlled Waitlist Reduction Fund, allowing GPs to purchase approved specialist consultations and operations for patients waiting for treatment. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
Greens Strengthen publicly funded services, community care and the health workforce. The party also emphasises prevention and improving access to treatment, rather than relying solely on hospital throughput. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors
Opportunity (TOP) Increase investment in primary and preventive care through a long-term, cross-party health plan, aiming to reduce the need for more intensive hospital treatment. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
Te Pāti Māori Emphasise Māori-led healthcare, equitable access and whānau-centred services. The published material reviewed here does not establish a directly comparable, quantified national hospital-waitlist reduction target. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryHealth Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

One important distinction: a hospital waiting-list policy is not necessarily a promise of a shorter wait for every patient. Funding extra procedures, improving emergency-department flow and reducing the number of people who need hospital treatment are different interventions.

3. What parties say about staffing

Staffing is central to whether any of these plans can work. New funding alone cannot create more GP appointments, operating-theatre sessions or specialist consultations if there are not enough qualified staff.

4. How they propose to pay for healthcare

The funding question reveals some of the clearest differences between the parties.

National — targeted investment within existing fiscal priorities

National's Budget 2026 measures are intended to expand treatment capacity, while its broader approach emphasises fiscal restraint and getting more out of health spending. It has also proposed a $604 million increase in the medicines budget, funded through reduced foreign aid spending outside the Pacific. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery2026 Election Policy Summaries

Labour — new tax revenue for affordability and access

Labour says its affordable-healthcare package, including free GP visits, free prescriptions, the ED Recovery Plan and nursing commitments, would be funded by a targeted capital gains tax. It proposes removing the $5 prescription charge from July 2027. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

Greens — a larger publicly funded system

The Greens propose moving towards fully funded, free public healthcare, including GP and dental services. That implies a broader public funding commitment than Labour's three-free-visits model; the detailed fiscal implications would need to be assessed against the full policy costing. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

ACT — reprioritisation and mixed funding

ACT proposes increasing the share of the health budget spent on medicines by one percentage point each year, reaching 12% in 2033, funded from baseline health spending. Its proposed cancer centres would combine private investment, public-private partnerships and existing health funding. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

NZ First — a dedicated hospital-waitlist fund

NZ First's proposed $925 million annual Waitlist Reduction Fund would give GPs purchasing power to arrange approved specialist consultations and operations. The practical questions include how patients would be prioritised, what services would qualify and how the fund would interact with existing public and private capacity. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Opportunity — increase total health spending

TOP proposes a 10-year cross-party plan that would increase health spending from a stated baseline of 7.4% of GDP to 9% of GDP, with a greater share allocated to primary care. This is a system-wide funding goal, not a hospital-waitlist appropriation alone. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery2026 Election Policy Summaries

Te Pāti Māori — funding shaped around Māori health needs

Its proposals emphasise Māori-led provision and targeted access to primary and dental care, including the Māori Health Card model. The sources reviewed do not establish a directly comparable total funding commitment for reducing hospital waiting times. Health Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

5. What to compare when assessing the promises

The New Zealand Medical Journal's October 2026 election analysis highlights an important implementation issue: making care free does not automatically make appointments available, and extra hospital funding does not automatically create more clinicians or operating capacity. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Four questions help distinguish the proposals:

  • Immediate access: Will the policy create more appointments and treatments in the next year or two, or mainly increase workforce supply over a longer period?
  • Staffing: Are there specific plans to recruit, train and retain the doctors, nurses and specialists needed to deliver the extra services?
  • Funding: Is the proposed spending additional, funded by a new revenue source, or redirected from existing budgets?
  • Accountability: Are there measurable targets for appointment availability, time to specialist assessment, elective treatment waits and the number of patients treated?

For a fuller comparison, two useful independent resources are the NZ Resident Doctors’ Association's 2026 health and workforce policy guide and Policy.nz's 2026 party policy comparison.

In summary: the key difference is not simply who promises more healthcare spending. It is whether parties prioritise making GP visits more affordable, expanding the workforce, purchasing more hospital treatment, or increasing the overall public funding of the system. Those choices will shape both how quickly people can see a GP and how long they wait for hospital care.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

Healthcare and the state of the public health system are central issues in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Parties have put forward sharply contrasting approaches to fixing GP access, hospital waiting lists, workforce shortages, and overall funding.


1. Improving GP Access and Primary Care

The cost and availability of seeing a general practitioner (GP) have driven several distinct policy responses:

  • Labour Party: Pledges a headline "Medicard" system, providing every New Zealander with three free GP (doctor or nurse) visits per year, alongside removing the $5 prescription fee. To build primary capacity, they propose a Family Doctor Loan Scheme (offering interest-free loans to help doctors buy into practice ownership) and technology support intended to free up millions of appointments.
  • The Green Party: Proposes going further by offering unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, prioritizing community care clinics in high-need areas first.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports free primary care for whānau earning under $60,000 and advocates for a "Māori Health Card" that ties funding directly to individual patient needs.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes a Teal Card program providing free primary health care, dental, and mental health care specifically for those under 30, alongside a 10-year health strategy.
  • National and ACT (Current Coalition Government): Generally oppose universal free GP models, criticizing them as costly or untargeted. Instead, they focus on increasing primary capacity through targeted budget injections, expanding the scope of practice for pharmacists and other health professionals, and reducing administrative hurdles.

2. Hospital Waiting Times and Elective Surgeries

With emergency departments (EDs) and surgical waitlists under intense strain, parties diverge on how to clear backlogs:

  • Labour Party: Pledges an immediate review of hospital wait times, bed shortages, and ED safety. Their hospital overhaul plan includes opening more beds, tackling discharge bottlenecks, and funding "early supported discharge teams" to help older patients recover safely at home.
  • National-led Government: Emphasizes utilizing the private sector to bring down waitlists. Health Minister Shane Brown directed Health New Zealand to offer private hospitals long-term (10-year) contracts, and the government's "Elective Boost" program has outsourced thousands of surgeries to private providers to hit targets for cancer treatment and elective procedures.
  • NZ First: Focuses on a waitlist reduction fund and rapid diagnostics, prioritizing resourcing the public system.
  • The Greens & Left-Bloc Parties: Strongly oppose private-sector outsourcing, arguing that state funding should be entirely retained to build up public hospital capacity rather than supporting private providers.

3. Staffing and Workforce Solutions

Severe workforce shortages among doctors, nurses, and rural health professionals have prompted direct recruitment pledges:

  • Labour Party: Has committed to ending the nurse hiring freeze and guaranteeing jobs to every eligible New Zealand-trained graduate nurse starting in 2027 (roughly 2,400 graduates annually), alongside doubling funding for graduate nursing positions in community and primary care.
  • National-led Government: Focuses on workforce expansion via ongoing training initiatives, international recruitment, and broadening the responsibilities of allied health roles (such as pharmacists and physician associates) to ease clinical bottlenecks.
  • Sector Calls (RNZCGP & NZRDA): Professional bodies like the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners have warned that chronic workforce instability disproportionately harms rural and Māori communities, urging incoming leadership to commit to long-term funding, fair pay parity, and culturally safe workforce planning.

4. Funding Approaches

Underpinning these service pledges are fundamentally different ideas on how to raise and allocate health revenue:

  • Labour: Proposes funding its expanded primary care packages (like the Medicard and free prescriptions) via a targeted Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on specified residential investment and commercial property profits, ring-fencing all generated revenue for health.
  • The Greens: Propose funding universal free healthcare services (including dental and mental health) via a broader wealth tax.
  • The Opportunity Party: Advocates lifting total health funding up to 9% of GDP via a cross-party long-term plan.
  • National & Coalition Partners: Prioritize fiscal restraint, opting to reprioritise existing baselines (such as funding a $604m boost to Pharmac's medicines budget by cutting foreign aid outside the Pacific) and squeezing administrative efficiencies out of Health New Zealand rather than introducing new broad-based taxes.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have put forward distinct proposals to address pressures on primary care (GPs), hospital waiting times, workforce staffing, and overall health funding.

New Zealand National Party (Incumbent / Governing)

  • GP Access & Primary Care: Focused on expanding urgent and after-hours services, integrating online general practice care, and extending prescription durations to up to 12 months where clinically appropriate to reduce non-urgent GP visits.

  • Hospital Waiting Times & Capacity: Emphasised the Elective Boost programme utilizing both public and private capacity, alongside explicit health targets to drive system performance. Continuing large-scale hospital infrastructure projects (such as the Dunedin Hospital rebuild, Nelson Hospital, and rapid-build wards).

  • Staffing & Funding: Total health funding exceeds $20 billion annually. National highlights recruiting additional frontline clinical staff, including thousands of nurses and hundreds of doctors over recent cycles, while shifting resources away from back-office administration into frontline delivery. [Facebook]

New Zealand Labour Party

  • GP Access & Primary Care: Centred around its flagship Medicard policy, which provides every eligible New Zealander with three free doctor or nurse visits per year at their enrolled practice. Also proposes a Family Doctor Loan Scheme (up to 50 loans a year) to assist practitioners in buying into owner-operated general practices, alongside phone triage expansion to free up appointments.

  • Hospital Waiting Times & Capacity: Aims to relieve wider systemic blockages by redirecting primary care strain, removing prescription fees (the $5 co-pay), and making targeted preventative services (like cervical screening and maternity scans) completely free to catch issues before they require acute hospital care.

  • Staffing & Funding: Proposes funding its primary care and prevention extensions via a targeted 28% capital gains tax on commercial and residential investment property profits, ring-fenced entirely for health. [NZ Labour Party]

ACT New Zealand

  • GP Access & Primary Care: Proposes market-based reforms, including expanding pharmacist scopes of practice to treat minor conditions and ease GP strain.

  • Hospital Waiting Times & Capacity: Favours public-private partnerships, such as a proposed National Cancer Centre with Auckland and Christchurch campuses.

  • Staffing & Funding: Suggests a government-as-purchaser model featuring a $6,000 incentive for private health insurance opt-outs and increasing the drug budget share to match Australia.

Green Party

  • GP Access & Primary Care: Advocates for unlimited free GP visits and universal free dental care, prioritizing high-need community clinics.

  • Hospital Waiting Times & Capacity: Concentrates on resolving infrastructure degradation and repair backlogs while investing in community clinical hubs.

  • Staffing & Funding: Proposes a comprehensive wealth tax on high-net-worth individuals to fund universal care expansions.

New Zealand First

  • GP Access & Primary Care: Supports stabilizing community care networks.

  • Hospital Waiting Times & Capacity: Emphasizes direct funding injections to resolve emergency department and elective surgery backlogs.

  • Staffing & Funding: Focuses on a dedicated $925 million waitlist reduction fund. [WhichParty NZ]

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account