Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, the key distinction for your situation is between help for your child at school and financial support for you as a parent who may have to reduce paid work to provide care. Some parties have detailed proposals on inclusive education and disability support, while others have not yet set out a specific policy to compensate parents for lost earnings.

The election is scheduled for Saturday, 7 November 2026. The comparison below reflects policies and public statements available as of 22 October 2026. Party policies, simplified: EducationParty policies, simplified: Disability funding

1. What the parties propose

These are the most relevant proposals for families navigating learning support, disability services and the financial consequences of caring.

Support for parents and carers

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

TOP has explicitly proposed a Citizens’ Income of up to $370 a week for adults, alongside disability, child, housing and single-parent support. Its October 2026 disability statement says this approach could improve financial security for unpaid carers, reduce benefit rules that penalise paid work, and improve respite care. The precise eligibility, payment interactions and implementation details matter, so this should not be treated as a guaranteed carer payment of $370 on top of existing benefits. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026Party policies, simplified: Disability funding

Relevant question: how the proposed income would work for a parent who can work only part-time.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

The Greens propose increasing benefits to liveable levels, removing benefit sanctions, and making benefit entitlements individual rather than dependent on a partner’s income. Their disability policies also call for accessible, timely support for disability-related living and medical costs. These are relevant to a household losing earnings because of care, although they are not a specific wage-replacement payment for parents of children needing learning support. Party policies, simplified: Disability fundingBlind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori proposes doubling baseline benefit levels to the upper range of the Welfare Expert Advisory Group’s recommendations, removing financial penalties and work-test obligations, and individualising benefits so eligibility does not depend on relationship status. It also proposes more whānau-centred disability support. These measures could affect the financial circumstances of caring families, but they are not a dedicated payment for parents who reduce their hours to care. Party policies, simplified: Disability fundingParty policies, simplified: Education

South Island Election Conference 2026

New Zealand Labour Party

Labour says disabled people and carers should be able to access meaningful support. Its published disability policy includes ending annual benefit renewals for people with verified permanent disabilities and creating a rights-based disability support framework with disabled people, carers and disability organisations. However, the available commitments do not specify a new payment to replace earnings lost by a parent who reduces paid work. DisabilityParty policies, simplified: Disability funding

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

New Zealand National Party

National points to its expanded learning-support provision, including more children receiving high-needs and early-intervention support, and more Learning Support Coordinators in schools. Its announced education programme addresses the help children receive, but the sources reviewed do not establish a new general payment to compensate parents for reducing paid employment to provide care. Government Expands Learning Support for Thousands of ChildrenParty policies, simplified: Education

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT New Zealand

ACT emphasises targeted support and independent medical certification for health and disability benefits. Its published fiscal plans include reductions in disability funding over 2028–2031. The policies reviewed do not set out a specific income-replacement payment for parents providing unpaid care. Eligibility and reassessment rules would be important to examine if your household relies on disability-related support. Party policies, simplified: Disability fundingBlind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

The party has not provided detailed answers to the disability-funding questions in the election comparison reviewed. I could not verify a specific proposal to compensate parents for earnings lost through caring. That is an absence of a verified commitment in these sources, rather than proof that no relevant policy exists. Party policies, simplified: Disability fundingBlind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

2. Which parties have specific proposals for school learning support?

Because getting appropriate help at school is your main concern, these differences are also relevant.

Party Relevant education proposal
Greens Expand eligibility for learning support; establish a single agency to coordinate and resource specialist support for learners with health and disability needs.
Labour Has pledged to hire 1,000 more teacher aides and says it would progress the findings of the Highest Needs Review to address issues with the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS).
Te Pāti Māori Establish a Māori-led taskforce on disability, neurodivergence and learning differences, with support teachers, accessible environments and professional development.
National Continue delivering 142 new specialist classrooms, three new specialist schools and redevelopments at six existing specialist schools if re-elected.
ACT Emphasises family choice outside mainstream education, including charter schools.
New Zealand First Expressed a commitment to inclusive learning but did not provide a specific new education proposal in the comparison.
TOP Proposes a 10-year cross-party plan for health and education.

Sources: The D*List's October 2026 party-policy comparison, including its 22 October update on Labour's teacher-aide commitment. Party policies, simplified: Education

The distinction worth keeping in mind is that more school support may reduce the amount of care you need to provide yourself, but it does not necessarily replace income you have already lost or compensate you for hours spent coordinating your child's support.

3. What financial support should you check alongside election promises?

You do not necessarily have to wait for the election to find out whether you qualify for existing assistance.

  • Child Disability Allowance: a payment for eligible parents or caregivers of children who need constant care and attention because of a serious disability. Eligibility is not based simply on needing additional learning support at school.
  • Carer Support: respite funding that may help an eligible full-time carer arrange a break. It is not a general wage-replacement scheme.
  • Supported Living Payment: may be relevant in certain circumstances where someone provides full-time care for a person who would otherwise need hospital-level or residential care. Ordinary school learning-support needs alone would not establish eligibility.
  • Working for Families and other income-tested assistance: worth checking if reducing your working hours has lowered your household income.

Eligibility depends on the scheme's specific criteria and your circumstances. You can start with Work and Income's disability allowance and carer support information and the Ministry of Education's learning-support information.

4. The questions that may matter most for your vote

Based on the policies published so far, I would separate your priorities into three questions rather than assume that a party's disability policy covers all of them:

  1. School support: Will the party expand access to teacher aides, specialist services and learning support, and reduce delays in getting help?
  2. Lost earnings: Will it provide a specific payment or more generous income support for parents who must reduce paid work to care for a child?
  3. Flexibility and respite: Will it improve access to respite care and ensure that doing some paid work does not unnecessarily reduce a family's support?

The clearest distinction in the policies reviewed is that TOP explicitly discusses financial security and flexibility for unpaid carers, while the Greens and Te Pāti Māori propose broader income-support changes that could benefit some caring households. Labour has commitments on disability rights and school support. National's identified commitments focus particularly on expanding education services. These are differences in the published proposals, not an overall ranking of the parties.

One important caveat: a child can need substantial additional learning support without meeting the eligibility criteria for disability-related financial assistance. It is therefore worth asking parties specifically about parents who lose earnings because their child needs additional supervision, advocacy or care, even when the child does not qualify for disability benefits.

That question may reveal more about how a party's policies would affect your family than its general promises about disability or education.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

For parents and caregivers in New Zealand who reduce their paid work to care for a school-age child with additional learning support or disability needs, political parties approach the intersection of caregiving, welfare, and education support through very different lenses.

When considering your vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election, the major parties’ policies and proposals affecting parents in your situation generally break down as follows:


1. National Party (and the current Coalition Government)

  • Focus on School-Level Support: National’s core strategy for easing the burden on parents is centered on scaling up learning support directly within the school system so that children receive more hours covered at school. Their current program includes expanding Learning Support Coordinators to more schools, uncapping the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) for high-needs students, funding more teacher aide hours, and utilizing contracted private specialists to reduce wait times. The underlying premise is that by increasing institutional and classroom support, the out-of-school care burden on parents can be mitigated.
  • Welfare & Employment Stance: National generally emphasizes workforce participation and financial stability. Their welfare framework includes stricter expectations around job-seeking and benefit compliance (such as increasing non-entitlement periods for those leaving employment without good and sufficient reason). They do not propose dedicated financial stipends or baseline benefit expansions specifically for parents who choose to step back from paid work to care for a child, instead relying on general tax relief and economic management.

2. Labour Party

  • Rights-Based Support & System Reform: Labour approaches disability and learning support from a rights-based perspective, aligned with the Enabling Good Lives principles. They have pledged to repeal recent government disability support legislation and co-design a revamped framework in partnership with disabled people and their families.
  • Carer and Income Support: While Labour has historically supported targeted increases to main benefits and individualised funding models, they have generally maintained standard partnered means-testing for welfare. Their emphasis is on rebuilding public health, education infrastructure, and specialized support services rather than implementing a universal paid caregiver's salary for parents who exit the workforce.

3. Green Party

  • Direct Welfare Overhaul & Income Security: The Greens offer the most explicit platform for income support and caregiving recognition. They propose systemic welfare overhauls, including significantly increasing baseline benefit levels (moving toward a liveable rate/Guaranteed Minimum Income) and abolishing punitive benefit sanctions.
  • Individualised Benefits: Crucially for parents with partners, the Greens advocate for individualising benefit entitlements so that a caregiver's financial support is not conditional on or reduced by a partner's income. They also support fully funded inclusive education, expanded learning support structures, and policies aimed at removing structural societal barriers for disabled children and their families.

4. ACT Party

  • Targeted Efficiency and Welfare Obligations: ACT emphasizes tighter welfare obligations, encouraging workforce participation, and reducing long-term reliance on state income support.
  • Individualised Funding Preference: Within disability and support services, ACT generally favors streamlined, individualised funding models that give families more direct control over how support packages are spent, while cutting bureaucratic overhead. However, they do not support broad increases to baseline welfare payments or special allowances for parents who choose to leave the workforce.

5. Te Pāti Māori

  • Whānau-Centric and Welfare Reform: Te Pāti Māori advocates for sweeping structural changes to social security. Their policy platform includes doubling baseline benefit levels, removing work-test obligations and financial sanctions, and individualising benefit entitlements so caregivers are not penalized by relationship status. Their education and support policies emphasize self-determination (rangatiratanga) and localized, community-led solutions for whānau caring for tamariki with high needs.

Summary Checklist for Voters

  • If you want relief via stronger, school-based professional resourcing (teacher aides, learning support coordinators, and specialist access) to keep your child supported during school hours, look closely at the governing parties' educational rollout.
  • If your primary concern is direct financial compensation, higher baseline benefits, and individualised support that isn't docked based on a partner's income because you had to leave your job to care full-time, the policy platforms of the Green Party or Te Pāti Māori align more closely with those specific welfare reforms.

Would you like to explore how specific local or regional support services currently operate while you navigate these schooling and career decisions?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

Navigating school-age learning support while managing paid work is a significant balancing act. In the 2026 general election context, New Zealand's political parties approach the intersection of learning support, caregiving, and financial assistance through different lenses—focusing variously on direct school resourcing, welfare adjustments, or broader structural reforms.

The general approaches and proposals put forward by major parties concerning learning support at school and assistance for caregivers include the following:

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on direct resourcing within the state education system. Labour has pledged major investments into school staffing, including commitments to hire significantly more teacher aides (such as a recent pledge for an additional 1,000 teacher aides) to boost capacity for children needing extra attention in classrooms, aiming to relieve the pressure on both schools and families.

  • Green Party: Advocates for a systemic overhaul toward inclusive education. Their policy platform includes expanding the criteria to access learning support, establishing a single dedicated agency to coordinate and resource specialist care for learners with health and disability needs, and fully implementing the Ministry of Education's Framework for Action: A quality education for all.

  • National Party: Emphasizes scaling up existing funding channels and delivery tracking within the mainstream system. They point to recent expansions in Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) high-needs support, early intervention wait-time reductions, and hundreds of thousands of delivered teacher aide hours, aiming to streamline access rather than restructuring the framework entirely. [RNZ]

  • ACT New Zealand: Focuses primarily on structural choice and alternative pathways. Rather than expanding centralized state-run learning support interventions, ACT promotes educational choice by enabling alternative models, such as charter schools, to give families options outside of the traditional mainstream system if their needs are unmet. [The D*List]

  • Opportunities Party (TOP) / Advocacy Groups: Beyond mainstream schooling, minor parties and groups (aligned with recommendations from organizations like the Child Disability Action Group and Child Poverty Action Group) have campaigned on broader financial safety nets for caregivers, such as universal basic incomes or increases to the Child Disability Allowance and removal of partner income tests on main benefits, which indirectly affect parents forced to cut back on paid work.

To help tailor this information, could you tell me:

  • Are you looking for support specifically targeted at in-school funding/teacher aide resources , or income/benefit support for reduced work hours?
  • Is your child currently accessing the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) or Early Intervention services?
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

AI Overview

In the 2026 New Zealand general election campaign, the political parties present distinct visions for managing disability funding, school-level support, and the financial security of parents and whānau who must reduce paid work to provide care.

The primary policy division centres around the coalition government's legislative frameworks versus opposition proposals for rights-based overhauls and increased direct income support.


National Party (Incumbent Government)

The National Party focuses its strategy on system financial sustainability, structural consistency, and legislative frameworks.

  • Disability Support Services Legislation: The government passed the Disability Support Services Bill , establishing a formal statutory framework intended to deliver a standardized, nationwide needs-assessment process. National states this framework provides clear operating parameters for public funding, ensuring essential services remain stable and reliable.

  • Assessment & Carer Recognition: System changes incorporate a uniform assessment process across all Needs Assessment Service Coordination (NASC) organizations and Enabling Good Lives (EGL) locations. The updated criteria factor in the specific needs and pressures of family, whānau, and primary carers when calculating individual support allocations.

  • School Support: National's focus remains on maintaining existing structured funding models, including the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) and High Health Needs programs, while implementing the Ministry of Education’s broader educational frameworks.

Labour Party (Opposition)

The Labour Party centers its platform on self-determination, rights-based legislation, and rolling back structural restrictions.

  • Repealing Government Legislation: Labour has formally pledged to repeal the Disability Support Services Act if elected. The party argues that current frameworks grant excessive authority to ministers and restrict user flexibility and choice.

  • Co-Designed Policy: Labour promises to replace the current system with rights-based legislation built in direct partnership with disabled people and their carers, adhering to the principle of "nothing about us without us".

  • Navigators and System Integration: To reduce administrative strain on families, Labour plans a “Tell Us Once” platform so parents do not have to repeat their circumstances across multiple bodies. They also propose allowing families to choose a dedicated "navigator" to coordinate services across health, disability support, education, and ACC.

Green Party (Opposition)

The Green Party offers an explicitly rights-based platform aimed at significantly expanding financial safety nets and direct welfare support.

  • Income Support & Welfare Reform: The Greens propose easily accessible, timely income support to cover all living and medical expenses associated with disabilities, specifically aiming to alleviate the financial strain on parents who reduce work hours to care for a child.

  • Ending Relationship Financial Penalties: The party supports ending partner income testing for disability-related benefits, helping to protect the financial autonomy of households where a primary earner scales back employment.

  • School-Level Enforcement: In education, the Greens support implementing needs-based, predictable funding for disabled ākonga (learners) in mainstream classrooms. This includes fully funding teacher aides, specialist support, and mandatory Universal Design for Learning (UDL) frameworks in all state schools.

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

  • Universal Citizen's Income: TOP proposes a foundational structural shift by introducing a universal basic income of up to $370 per week for adults over 18 to replace standard core benefits.

  • Disability Allowance Top-Ups: This base income would be paired with a universal disability allowance projected at roughly $6,000 annually , alongside extra needs-based top-ups. This is intended to give parents absolute financial certainty independent of their workforce participation.


Summary of Party Approaches

Political Party Primary Stance on Disability System Key Strategy for Caregivers / Parents School-Age Learning Support Strategy
National Party System stability through central statutory frameworks and nationwide consistency. Universal assessment processes that factor in whānau/carer pressures. Consistent resource allocation through existing Ministry frameworks and ORS funding.
Labour Party Repeal existing legislative frameworks; transition to co-designed, rights-based laws. Streamlined system access via a "Tell Us Once" mechanism and dedicated family-selected navigators. Streamlining structural silos between health, ACC, and education systems.
Green Party Enforceable, Te Tiriti-based disability rights legislation. Broad expansion of income support and removing partner income-testing barriers. Needs-based, predictable funding for teacher aides and mandatory accessible learning centres.
The Opportunity Party Overhaul of the broader welfare state into a universal system. A $370/week citizen's income coupled with an added $6,000/year disability allowance. Preserving specialized, separate funding pools for assistive educational tech and transport.
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account