Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

New Zealand election 2026: what party policies could mean for a working sole parent

For a sole parent renting, working part-time and caring for a preschooler, the important question is not just which party promises higher incomes or more jobs. It's how much money you would actually have left each week after childcare, rent and any changes to your income support — and whether you could increase your work hours without losing too much support.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I'd examine party policies across five areas:

  • Income support: Sole Parent Support, Working for Families, Accommodation Supplement and how benefits change when you earn more.
  • Childcare: Help with preschool fees, childcare subsidies and eligibility rules.
  • Housing: Rent assistance, social housing and policies affecting rental costs.
  • Work incentives: Whether extra hours leave you better off after tax, benefit reductions and childcare.
  • Cost of living: Changes to family payments, transport costs and other everyday expenses.

An important distinction: existing government rules are not the same as a party's proposed election policy. I'll separate the current baseline from documented proposals, and note where a party has not yet published enough detail to calculate your likely weekly income.

1. The current rules that matter to you

These are the key parts of the system that party promises would need to change to make a practical difference.

Sole Parent Support and part-time earnings

If your youngest child is aged 3 or older, Sole Parent Support generally comes with obligations to seek suitable part-time work, normally at least 20 hours a week. If your child is under 3, the usual requirement is to prepare for work instead. The rules include consideration of your circumstances. Sole Parent Support obligationsWork or work preparation obligations

What to examine: whether a party would change earnings thresholds, benefit reductions, work obligations or sanctions, particularly when childcare limits the hours you can realistically work.

Working for Families

If you're receiving a main benefit, you may qualify for the Family Tax Credit and Best Start, but you generally cannot receive the In-Work Tax Credit at the same time as a main benefit. Your eligibility and payments depend on your circumstances and income. Working for Families and MSDIn-work tax credit

What to examine: whether a party would make child payments more generous, extend them to more families, or change the rules when you move between benefits and paid work.

Preschool and childcare costs

The government already provides some help with childcare costs, depending on eligibility. The 20 Hours ECE scheme and the Childcare Subsidy are separate forms of assistance with different rules.

What to examine: whether a proposal reduces the actual fees you pay, extends subsidised hours, or makes it easier to qualify for support while working part-time.

Rent and housing assistance

Accommodation Supplement eligibility and the amount payable depend on factors including income, accommodation costs, location and household circumstances.

What to examine: whether a party would increase housing assistance or expand access to affordable rentals, and whether rising rents could offset any increase in your income.

You can check the current eligibility rules through Work and Income and Inland Revenue's Working for Families information.

2. What the main parties' published positions could mean

The following is based on published 2026 election policies available as of 22 October 2026. These are policy directions, not a guarantee of what you would receive. A party's broader commitments also need to be distinguished from measures it has explicitly costed and committed to implement.

Party Published direction Potential relevance to your household
Labour Its 2026 platform includes a public-transport fare cap, a fuel-tax freeze and cost-of-living measures. It also has an early-childhood education policy focused on quality, access and teacher pay. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesEarly Childhood Education Lower transport costs could help if you commute to work. Check whether further commitments directly reduce your childcare bill or increase your net income.
National Proposes more intensive employment support for long-term Jobseeker recipients, stronger expectations for some long-term recipients from April 2028, and a five-year residency requirement for main benefits from April 2028. 2026 Election PolicyA firm, fair and affordable welfare system Employment support may matter if you want more hours. However, the proposed long-term payment reduction specifically concerns Jobseeker Support, not Sole Parent Support, so don't assume it applies to you.
Green Party Its 2026 manifesto emphasises liveable incomes, housing affordability and social support. Its ECE proposals include capped parent fees above the existing 20-hour entitlement, moving towards 35 hours of free ECE from 2029. Manifesto 2026Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide The childcare proposal could reduce the cost of taking extra shifts or extending your working week, depending on its final eligibility rules and whether your provider participates. Its wider income-support proposals are relevant to benefit adequacy and earnings reductions.
ACT Has proposed mandatory electronic money management for Jobseeker Support recipients who remain on the work-ready payment for more than four months, alongside tighter conditions in some other benefit areas. ACT New Zealand This proposal is specifically about Jobseeker Support, so it should not automatically be treated as a change to Sole Parent Support. Check the party's other commitments on benefit obligations and family support.
NZ First Proposes a substantial increase in Working for Families, including making the temporary $50 weekly In-Work Tax Credit increase permanent and adding another $70, for a proposed total of $120 per week. It also proposes annual minimum-wage increases at least in line with inflation. Our PolicyIncreasing Working for Families and Minimum Wage The extra payment is aimed at eligible working families. The critical question for you is whether you would qualify while receiving a main benefit, because the In-Work Tax Credit generally isn't available alongside one.

These parties' policies are not all directly comparable: some are detailed commitments, while others are broad directions or proposals with implementation details still to be confirmed. You can read the full positions through the official sites: Labour, National, Greens, ACT and NZ First.

3. The biggest issue: would taking more hours actually pay?

Consider a hypothetical week where you are offered an extra shift. The value of that shift isn't simply your hourly wage multiplied by the hours worked.

What an extra shift is really worth

Illustrative calculation — not a benefit entitlement estimate.

Extra take-home wages

+$160

Additional childcare

−$60

Additional transport

−$15

Benefit reduction or other payment changes

−$40

Extra money left over

After the hypothetical costs above

$45

The figures above are purely illustrative. Your actual result depends on your wage, tax, benefit abatement, Working for Families eligibility and childcare costs.

For your vote, three policy differences are especially important:

  1. Higher earnings thresholds or slower benefit reductions could let you keep more of each additional dollar you earn.
  2. Lower childcare fees or more subsidised hours could make additional shifts financially worthwhile in the first place.
  3. More generous family payments that remain available to eligible beneficiaries could improve your income even if you cannot increase your hours yet.

A policy that increases the headline benefit rate but leaves high childcare costs and steep earnings reductions unchanged may have a very different effect from one that makes work more affordable.

4. How to compare the parties on your actual circumstances

Use this checklist when reading a party's policy details or asking candidates questions.

Your election comparison checklist

0 of 6

Would I keep more money when my wages increase?

Would I qualify for family payments while receiving Sole Parent Support?

Would my childcare bill fall, including for hours beyond 20 Hours ECE?

Would my rent assistance or housing options improve?

Would the work obligations fit my child's age and the childcare I can actually access?

Is the policy fully costed, and when would it take effect?

You can also ask candidates a particularly useful question:

If I am a sole parent working part-time and receiving Sole Parent Support, how much more would I keep each week if I increased my hours, after tax, benefit reductions and childcare? Would your policy change that calculation, and when?

A party that can explain the mechanics and eligibility conditions gives you more to work with than one offering only a broad promise of help for families.

5. Let's make this specific to your situation

I can compare the likely financial effects more precisely if you share just a few details. You don't need to provide identifying information.

Your answers would help distinguish policies that could improve your weekly disposable income now from those that might help only if you work more hours, change childcare arrangements or wait for a future policy to take effect.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

For a sole parent in New Zealand renting, working part-time, and raising a preschooler, the debate around income support, benefit abatement rules, and childcare accessibility is a central focus of the 2026 General Election.

Different political parties propose distinct pathways for balancing part-time work with welfare and family assistance. The key policy approaches of the major political groupings affect your situation in several distinct ways:


1. Welfare Support & Part-Time Work Incentives (Abatement and Obligations)

When you combine a benefit like Sole Parent Support with part-time wages, your support is reduced (abated) once your earnings pass a certain threshold.

  • National-led/Centre-Right Approach: Current settings and centre-right policies emphasize moving beneficiaries into work and strengthening work obligations, supplemented by targeted employment funds (such as expanded case management and flexi-wage funding to help sole parents overcome barriers to work). The focus leans heavily toward incentivising financial independence through employment, adjusting thresholds, and tightening or enforcing obligations once children reach specific ages (under 3 versus older preschoolers).
  • Labour / Centre-Left Approach: Centre-left parties typically focus on lifting base benefit levels and Working for Families tax credits, while raising or indexing abatement thresholds so that part-time earners get to keep more of their wages before their benefits are reduced. They argue that higher baseline support prevents material hardship for renting families while building capacity to step up work hours safely.

2. Childcare Costs and Preschool Availability

Because your child is of preschool age, the cost and flexibility of early childhood education (ECE) dictate how many hours you can realistically work without your earnings being entirely wiped out by childcare fees.

  • Universal vs. Targeted ECE Subsidies: Parties differ on how ECE funding should be structured. Centre-right policies often favor targeted childcare assistance or tax-credit-based support to help lower-income families meet costs, tying assistance directly to work status.
  • Centre-left and progressive parties (like the Labour Party and the Greens) historically lean towards expanding universal access, protecting or broadening free or subsidized ECE hours (such as building on the 20 Hours ECE framework), and reducing out-of-pocket childcare barriers so that parents aren't financially discouraged from taking on extra shifts.

3. Housing and Cost-of-Living Pressures (Accommodation Supplement)

As a renter, housing costs consume a major share of a sole parent's budget.

  • Recent policy adjustments (such as Accommodation Supplement maximum rate adjustments and ongoing changes to emergency or social housing rules) reflect a dual focus: managing public spending while providing targeted relief.
  • Left-of-centre parties generally advocate for aggressive state and public house building, stricter regulation or controls on rental costs, and higher direct accommodation supplements for low-income tenants.
  • Right-of-centre parties emphasize supply-side housing reforms, market incentives, and targeted assistance rather than broad market interventions, alongside changes designed to streamline housing assistance and target support to those in greatest need.

What to Look Closer At When Voting

When evaluating party manifestos for the 2026 election, consider checking:

  1. Abatement Thresholds: How much can you earn part-time before your benefit starts dropping sharply?
  2. Childcare Subsidies: Do their policies offer direct relief for preschool childcare costs that match the part-time hours you want to work?
  3. Working for Families / Tax Credits: Look at adjustments to family tax credits and in-work tax credits, which directly boost the incomes of working sole-parent households.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

For a sole parent with a preschool child, renting privately or publicly, and working part-time while on income support (Sole Parent Support) , your financial situation sits at the intersection of three major policy levers: benefit abatement/rules , Working for Families tax credits , and early childhood education (ECE) / childcare subsidies.

Depending on which political bloc or parties you lean toward in New Zealand, the overarching approaches break down into distinct ideological and practical frameworks:


Key Policy Frameworks by Political Direction

1. Center-Right Parties (e.g., National, ACT, NZ First)

  • Work Expectations & Incentives: Emphasis strongly leans toward moving beneficiaries into paid work sooner or increasing hours as children grow older. Policies feature stricter work-test obligations, enhanced sanctions for non-compliance, or re-adjusting benefit indexation and abatement thresholds.

  • Abatement Thresholds & Tax Relief: Generally favors broad-based income tax relief (such as adjusting tax brackets or tax-credit assistance) rather than direct benefit increases. For a part-time worker, lower income tax rates can let you keep a bit more of your hourly wage before abatement hits hard, though abatement tapers still reduce your main benefit as your earnings rise.

  • Childcare & Housing: Focuses on targeted childcare assistance (like childcare subsidies through Work and Income) rather than universal free ECE expansions. Housing policies lean toward market-based supply, landlord incentives, and social housing prioritisation rather than massive state-led rent freezes or sweeping rent controls.

2. Center-Left and Left Parties (e.g., Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori)

  • Income Support & Abatement Rates: Historically favors raising main benefit rates or indexing them higher, and lifting or loosening benefit abatement thresholds (how much you can earn from part-time work before your weekly benefit starts reducing dollar-for-dollar or at high-percentage rates). This directly rewards taking on an extra shift or two without losing your safety net.

  • Working for Families & Cost of Living: Focuses on expanding Working for Families tax credits, Best Start payments, or targeted cost-of-living payments/food support.

  • Childcare & ECE: Advocates for expanding free or heavily subsidised early childhood education hours (e.g., universal or low-cost 20+ hours ECE or extended hours for preschoolers), which directly lowers the major barrier stopping sole parents from scaling up part-time hours to full-time work.

  • Renting: Favours stronger tenants' rights , restrictions on no-cause evictions, and increased public/state housing builds or rent subsidy adjustments.


How Policies Impact Your Specific Situation

Policy Area What to Look For Practical Impact on Your Part-Time Hours & Rent
Abatement Rates (How fast your benefit drops when you work) Higher thresholds let you earn more per week from part-time work before the benefit reduces. Stricter/lower thresholds mean extra hours reduce your benefit faster. Determines whether picking up an extra 5 hours a week actually leaves you better off or gets swallowed by benefit reductions and tax.
Childcare Subsidies / ECE Expanded free/low-cost ECE hours lower your out-of-pocket daycare bills for a preschooler. High childcare costs often act as a "trap" where working more hours costs more in daycare than you earn; subsidized ECE removes this ceiling.
Accommodation Supplement & Rent Adjustments to Accommodation Supplement thresholds or direct rent assistance. Directly affects your ability to cover private or public rental costs as housing inflation changes.
Working for Families (WFF) Adjustments to family tax credits and Best Start payments. Directly boosts your weekly household cash outside of the main benefit.

Questions to Ask Parties Before You Vote

When reviewing party manifestos or candidate debates for the 2026 election, check their explicit stances on:

  1. The Sole Parent Support abatement slope: Will they raise the weekly dollar amount you can earn before your benefit is reduced?
  2. Preschool childcare: Do they plan to subsidise or expand free ECE hours for under-3s or preschoolers to make working part-time financially viable?
  3. Accommodation assistance: How do they plan to address rising private-rent costs for beneficiaries?

If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

  • Roughly how many hours you currently work per week
  • Whether you receive the Accommodation Supplement or Working for Families right now

I can break down how specific party adjustments would affect your weekly bottom line.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party policies mean for a sole parent combining part-time work with income support?

AI Overview

For a sole parent balancing part-time work, income support, and childcare, the main political parties for the 2026 New Zealand General Election offer fundamentally different approaches to your situation.

Your primary concerns—how much you can earn before support drops, the cost of preschool care, and work obligations—are addressed by the major platforms through two distinct paths: incentivising workforce participation through targeted support versus guaranteeing baseline incomes and universal services.


1. National & the Coalition Government: Work Incentives and Targeted Relief

The National Party focus rests heavily on encouraging sole parents back into the workforce while providing targeted family relief.

  • Income Support & Obligations: National’s Budget 2026 allocated $93.3 million toward intensive case management to help 25,000 sole parents into work. If your youngest child is aged 3 or older, you face part-time work obligations (seeking 20 hours/week) under current rules, backed by stricter welfare compliance and sanctions.

  • Childcare Support: National maintains its FamilyBoost childcare subsidy, which provides up to $75 per week (or up to $120/week through broader coalition initiatives like NZ First's promises) to offset early childhood education (ECE) costs for low-to-middle-income working families.

  • Other Benefits: They also introduced a $1,500 KiwiSaver "Baby Boost" for children born from July 2027 and are gradually extending paid parental leave to 30 weeks by 2029.

2. Labour: Lowering Household Expenses & Workforce Rights

The Labour Party platform emphasizes reducing your out-of-pocket living costs directly rather than shifting core benefit structures.

  • Income Support: Labour intends to expand Working for Families Tax Credits to increase the money coming into your household. They advocate for smoother benefit-to-work transitions without punitive sanctions.

  • Childcare & Healthcare: Historically focused on expanding free ECE hours, Labour’s 2026 platform prioritizes general cost relief. They promise three free GP visits annually , free prescriptions, and free maternity scans.

  • Renting & Transport: As a renter, Labour's proposed 28% capital gains tax on investment properties aims to stabilize housing, while a $10–$20 weekly public transport fare cap would reduce your commuting costs.

3. Green Party: The "Income Guarantee" & Universal Free Care

The Green Party offers the most sweeping changes to the welfare and childcare systems, aiming to completely eliminate child poverty through wealth taxes.

  • Income Guarantee: The Greens promise that a sole parent's income would never fall below $735 per week after tax , regardless of whether you work. Additionally, they plan an enhanced family tax credit providing up to $215 weekly for your first child. They would lift the tax burden on your part-time wages by making the first $10,000 of income completely tax-free.

  • Childcare: The Greens plan to completely reshape ECE funding. They propose capping childcare fees at $10 a day by 2028 and making ECE completely free for up to 35 hours a week by 2029 , while phasing out state funding for for-profit childcare centres.

4. ACT: Lower Regulation & Compliance

The ACT Party focuses on cutting red tape within the childcare sector to naturally drive down prices, rather than increasing state subsidies. They favor strict adherence to work obligations for benefit recipients to encourage full workforce participation.


Policy Comparison Summary

Policy Area National & Coalition Labour Green Party
Childcare Support Up to $75–$120/week via FamilyBoost tax rebates. Focused on expanding affordable options and workforce pay. Free childcare up to 35 hours/week by 2029.
Welfare Approach Work-readiness support with strict compliance/sanctions. Higher Working for Families support; less punitive transitions. Guaranteed baseline of $735/week for sole parents.
Tax on Part-Time Work Standard current tax brackets; no new taxes. Tax system remains similar; targets landlords/investors. First $10,000 earned is tax-free.

If you want to look deeper into how these platforms change your exact weekly budget, let me know how many hours you currently work, your approximate hourly wage , or how much you currently spend on childcare. I can help you evaluate which platform shifts the numbers most in your favor.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account