Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

New Zealand 2026 election: How parties differ on healthcare

If you're voting for the first time, healthcare is a useful issue to compare because parties can agree that people need timely medical care while disagreeing about how to pay for it, who should provide it, and how to reduce waiting times.

There are two main things to understand:

  • Seeing a doctor: Can you afford a GP appointment, get one when you need it, and access medicines or tests without excessive cost?
  • Getting hospital treatment: How long do you wait for a specialist appointment or an operation, and how much public hospital capacity is available?

A party's promises also need to be separated from what it has actually delivered. And because the 2026 general election is still ahead, current government policies and parties' upcoming election promises are not the same thing.

The main parties compared

These are the key differences in the parties' published 2026 health policies, checked against a medical journal's election analysis and the New Zealand Resident Doctors' Association's policy comparison, current to October 2026. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

1. National Party

Focus: more treatment capacity

National emphasises reducing waiting times through measurable targets, more doctors and nurses, expanded after-hours and online GP services, and using both public and private hospitals for operations. It also proposes an extra $604 million for medicines, funded by reducing foreign aid outside the Pacific. Timely, quality healthcareNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

In everyday terms: Get more people treated using the existing system and additional providers, while expanding staffing and medicines funding.

South Island Election Conference 2026

2. Labour Party

Focus: lower costs for patients

Labour proposes three free GP visits a year for eligible people through a new Medicard, removing the $5 prescription charge from July 2027, and funding referred maternity scans and cervical screening. It also proposes loans to help doctors establish or buy into local practices, more GP appointments, and repairs to hospital buildings. Its plan includes a targeted tax on profits from specified property investments to fund healthcare commitments. Affordable HealthcareElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

In everyday terms: Make it cheaper to see a doctor and obtain medicines, while trying to increase the availability of GPs.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

3. Green Party

Focus: publicly funded care

The Greens propose a much broader expansion of free, publicly funded healthcare, including GP and adult dental care. They also emphasise mental health services, prevention, more health workers, better working conditions and culturally appropriate care. Manifesto 2026Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

In everyday terms: Reduce the amount people pay themselves and expand the range of services available through the public system.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

4. ACT New Zealand

Focus: choice and efficiency

ACT supports public and private providers working together to reduce waiting lists. It wants pharmacists to handle more everyday health needs, proposes increasing the share of health spending devoted to medicines, and supports comprehensive cancer centres in Auckland and Christchurch. It emphasises measurable results and allocating care according to individual clinical need. ACT New ZealandElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

In everyday terms: Let different providers do more of the work and try to get more treatment from the resources available.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

5. New Zealand First

Focus: medicines and waiting lists

NZ First proposes an additional $1.3 billion for medicines and a $925 million annual waiting-list reduction fund. Under its proposal, GPs would be able to purchase approved specialist consultations and operations for patients waiting for treatment. It also promotes prevention, nutrition and health coaches in primary care. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

In everyday terms: Give GPs more ability to arrange specialist care and operations, while increasing access to medicines and focusing more on preventing illness.

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

6. Te Pāti Māori

Focus: Māori-led healthcare

Its published priorities include prevention and whānau wellbeing, strengthening Māori-led health services and governance, and making services more accessible and culturally safe. It also supports gender-affirming healthcare within the public system. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

In everyday terms: Change how healthcare is designed and delivered, with Māori communities having greater control over services intended to meet their needs.

7. The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Focus: long-term planning

TOP proposes a cross-party, 10-year health plan, increasing health funding as a share of the economy and directing a larger share to primary care. It also emphasises prevention and earlier diagnosis. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

In everyday terms: Try to give healthcare longer-term funding and planning that continues beyond a single government's term.

What these differences mean for you

If your main concern is… Policies worth comparing
GP appointments cost too much Labour's three free GP visits; the Greens' broader free-care proposal
Waiting too long for an operation National's use of public and private capacity; ACT's provider-choice approach; NZ First's proposed waiting-list fund
Paying for medicines Labour's prescription-charge removal; National's proposed medicines funding increase; ACT's and NZ First's medicines policies
Not enough doctors or nurses National's workforce expansion; Labour's GP-practice support and graduate nurse jobs; the Greens' staffing and employment proposals
Preventing illness before it becomes serious The Greens' broad prevention approach; NZ First's nutrition and health-coach proposals; TOP's long-term plan
Māori health services and unequal access Te Pāti Māori's Māori-led approach; the Greens' emphasis on equitable, culturally appropriate care

These are comparisons of stated policies, not guarantees that a proposal will be implemented or that waiting times will improve. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

Three practical questions to ask about any party's promise

The New Zealand Medical Journal highlights an important distinction: making healthcare free doesn't automatically make it accessible if there aren't enough doctors, nurses or appointments. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

  1. Will I actually be able to get an appointment? Look for plans to recruit and retain staff, expand GP capacity and provide services in rural areas as well as larger centres.
  2. Will I wait less time for treatment? Check whether a promise covers only the first specialist appointment or also the operation, diagnostic tests and follow-up care.
  3. How will the plan be paid for? Look at whether the party identifies a funding source and explains how it will provide enough staff and facilities.

One further point: under New Zealand's MMP voting system, your electorate vote and party vote serve different purposes. The party vote largely determines each party's share of seats in Parliament, and parties may need to negotiate to form a government. That can affect which policies are ultimately implemented.

Where to check the details

My suggestion for comparing policies: Start with the problem that matters most to you — GP costs, specialist waiting times, hospital operations or medicines. Then compare what each party proposes, how it would fund the change, and whether it has explained how enough healthcare workers will be available to deliver it. You don't need to understand every political term to make an informed choice.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

Welcome to voting! It is completely normal to find political terms confusing, and wanting clear, practical answers is a great place to start.

When it comes to seeing a doctor (primary care) and getting hospital treatment (secondary care), New Zealand’s political parties generally disagree on how to pay for services, whether to use private hospitals to clear waitlists, and how much the government should directly provide versus purchase.

Here is how the main parties approach these issues in plain terms:


1. National (Current Government)

  • Seeing a Doctor: Focuses on building up the existing workforce and primary care capacity through targeted funding rather than blanket free visits.
  • Hospital Treatment: Focuses on using health targets, boosting public capacity, and partnering with private hospitals (outsourcing surgeries) to clear hospital waitlists and shorten wait times for operations.

2. Labour

  • Seeing a Doctor: Their major policy is introducing a "Medicard" to give every New Zealander three free GP visits per year, alongside bringing back universally free prescriptions. They also propose loan schemes to support doctors taking over local practices.
  • Hospital Treatment: Prefers strengthening the public health system directly. They generally criticize long-term outsourcing of surgeries to private hospitals, arguing those funds should stay within the public system.

3. Green Party

  • Seeing a Doctor: Goes further left on funding by proposing unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded by a wealth tax.
  • Hospital Treatment: Strongly opposes using private hospitals to do public work, calling it a distraction from properly funding the public sector. They emphasize preventative community care and health equity.

4. ACT Party

  • Seeing a Doctor: Does not support government-funded free GP visits. Instead, they lean toward a "government as a purchaser" model and have floated ideas like health savings accounts or incentives for people to use private insurance.
  • Hospital Treatment: Strongly supports expanding private sector involvement to reduce wait times, believing market competition and private providers make the overall system more efficient.

5. New Zealand First

  • Seeing a Doctor: Historically open to lowering the cost of primary care, but their primary 2026 election focus for health is heavily weighted toward a large waitlist reduction fund and faster diagnostics.
  • Hospital Treatment: Focuses heavily on resource management, cutting administrative bloat, and ensuring public hospitals are properly resourced to handle urgent cases and regional waitlists.

6. Te Pāti Māori

  • Seeing a Doctor: Supports free primary care and dental for lower-income whānau (e.g., those earning under $60,000) and introducing a specific "Māori Health Card" to target funding directly to patients.
  • Hospital Treatment: Focuses on kaupapa Māori health services and rebuilding independent Māori-led health authorities to address structural inequities in health outcomes.

Summary Checklist to Help You Decide:

  • Do you want direct subsidies/free visits at the doctor (like Labour or the Greens propose), or do you prefer targeted funding and private sector partnerships to cut hospital queues (like National and ACT)?
  • Do you think the government should rely more on private hospitals to get people treated faster, or should all money go exclusively into building up the public system?

Would you like to explore how any of these specific policies might affect your local area or household?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

Welcome to voting! It is completely normal to find political talk confusing. When it comes to healthcare—seeing a family doctor (GP) or getting hospital treatment—the political parties approach the problem in quite different ways.

The core debate in New Zealand centers on whether to fix the system by pouring more money and direct subsidies into public care, using private clinics to clear waiting lists, or shifting the system toward independent and private choices.

The primary approaches from the main parties include:

  • The National Party focuses on building up frontline capacity within the existing public-private mix. They emphasize setting clear health targets, training more local doctors (such as through a new medical school at Waikato), funding more after-hours urgent care clinics, and paying private providers to help clear public hospital waitlists for surgeries.

  • The Labour Party proposes direct financial relief for patients through a "Medicard" system, which would give every New Zealander three free doctor or nurse visits a year, plus free prescriptions and certain scans, funded by a targeted capital gains tax on investment property. They also back student loan support for family doctors and guaranteed jobs for graduate nurses.

  • The Green Party advocates for expanding public healthcare much further, pushing for unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded through wealth taxes. They place a heavy emphasis on fully staffing public hospitals by filling vacancies rather than relying on private outsourcing.

  • The ACT Party favors a market-oriented approach, preferring a system where the government acts as a purchaser and private options are encouraged. They have proposed financial incentives (such as a tax/savings credit) for people who choose to opt out of the public health system and use private health insurance instead. [WhichParty NZ]

  • Te Pāti Māori focuses heavily on a structural shift toward preventative health and community wellbeing. They champion independent Māori-led health authorities and culturally safe care, alongside student loan write-offs for healthcare workers who stay and work locally.

How to research further:
If you want to look into these details or compare how different policies affect your local area, you can visit Policy.nz to see a side-by-side breakdown of party promises, or check out the neutral overview on Vote NZ regarding election day on Saturday, 7 November 2026.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account