Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

New Zealand 2026 election: food and the cost of living

If you're voting for the first time, food prices and household bills are a useful place to start. You don't need to know all the political jargon to compare parties or make an informed choice.

The key thing to understand is that parties can agree that groceries, power, rent and other essentials are expensive, but disagree about what is causing the problem and what the government should do about it.

I'll explain the differences in everyday language, focusing on the 2026 New Zealand general election and the policies that could affect household budgets. I'll also distinguish between promises a party makes and changes that would actually put money in your pocket.

1. What parties want to do about grocery prices

The big disagreement is whether to change how supermarkets are organised, put stricter limits on what big companies can charge, or make it easier for more supermarkets to compete. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

National wants to separate the New World and PAK’nSAVE businesses so they compete more directly for customers. It says this could save shoppers an average of $560 a year, if the Commerce Commission confirms the split would benefit shoppers.

In simple terms: create stronger competition between existing supermarket brands. More grocery competition

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour Party

Labour wants to make excessive pricing by powerful companies illegal, including in groceries. It also wants big supermarkets to separate their wholesale supply businesses from their retail stores, making it easier for smaller shops to buy stock on fair terms.

In simple terms: tougher rules against overcharging and a fairer chance for smaller competitors. Labour's Cost of Living PlanElection 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

The Greens want a publicly owned supermarket chain called KiwiMart, created by bringing some existing supermarket stores into public ownership. They also support tougher rules against excessive supermarket pricing and stronger consumer protections.

In simple terms: introduce a government-owned competitor and regulate big supermarkets more strictly. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

NZ First wants to split Foodstuffs, the group behind PAK’nSAVE, New World and Four Square, into two competing cooperatives. It also proposes tougher penalties for companies that break competition rules.

In simple terms: restructure a major supermarket group to encourage more competition. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT New Zealand

ACT opposes forcing supermarket businesses to split up. Instead, it wants to make it easier and quicker for new supermarkets to open by reducing approval delays and other barriers.

In simple terms: encourage new competitors to enter the market rather than breaking up existing companies. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori supports community-focused approaches to food affordability and greater community control over food systems. Its proposals should be checked alongside its full current policy programme for the specific measures and eligibility rules.

In simple terms: focus more on communities' ability to access and provide affordable food. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Would any of these make your groceries cheaper?

Possibly, but not automatically. More competition can encourage lower prices, while stricter pricing laws can penalise companies that break the rules. But splitting businesses can also add operating costs, and supermarket prices are affected by things like transport, weather and international food costs. Consumer NZ notes that no policy can guarantee a particular reduction at the checkout. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

That distinction matters: a party's estimate of possible savings is a promise or forecast, not money you are guaranteed to save.

2. What parties want to do about power bills and everyday expenses

Groceries are only part of the picture. The other question is whether a party wants to lower the price of essentials, increase the money households keep, or help people invest in ways to reduce their bills.

Party Main approach to household bills
National Increase electricity supply and competition, make it easier to build renewable power, and offer low-interest loans to help households improve their energy independence. Affordable power Kiwis can rely on
Labour Offer low-interest loans for solar panels and batteries, extra support for eligible low- and middle-income households, and make excessive pricing of power and fuel illegal. Labour also proposes freezing fuel tax for three years. Labour's Cost of Living Plan
Greens Establish a publicly owned electricity company called Kiwipower, support community-owned energy and rooftop solar, and offer zero-interest clean-energy loans. Green Party launches plan to cut power bills and take power back from the big energy companies
NZ First Break up large electricity companies that generate and sell power, with the aim of increasing competition and limiting their control over prices. Our Policy
ACT Focus on growing the economy, reducing government spending and taxes, and removing regulations that it believes make it harder or more expensive for businesses to operate. ACT New Zealand
Te Pāti Māori Consider its broader approach to household affordability, community wellbeing and access to essentials alongside its detailed election policies. I haven't verified enough specific current power-bill measures to give a precise comparison here.

What does that mean in everyday life?

  • More competition: the idea is that companies will offer better prices when customers have more genuine alternatives.
  • Government-owned energy or supermarkets: the government would own a business that competes with private companies, with the intention of keeping prices affordable.
  • Stricter pricing rules: regulators could investigate companies and penalise them if they break rules against excessive pricing.
  • Lower taxes and less regulation: the aim is to leave more money with households and businesses, while encouraging investment and economic growth.
  • Help with solar and energy upgrades: households may be able to lower their bills over time, although the benefits depend on eligibility, installation costs and how much power they use.

These approaches aren't mutually exclusive. The important difference is which tools a party prioritises and how it plans to pay for them.

3. What about wages, tax and money in your pocket?

A cheaper supermarket bill isn't the only way to improve your finances. You might also care about how much of your pay you keep, whether wages rise, and how much support you receive for essential expenses.

  • National emphasises keeping taxes low, controlling government debt and returning the government budget to surplus. Its stated position is that it will introduce no new taxes during the next term. 2026 Election Policy
  • Labour combines help with particular bills with measures intended to improve incomes and employment. Its plan includes public-transport fare caps, free GP visits and removing prescription charges, alongside its proposals on energy and groceries. Labour's Cost of Living Plan
  • The Greens put more emphasis on public provision, community support and changing how essential services and markets operate. Their food proposals include additional funding for food banks and community food initiatives. Food For All - The Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
  • ACT emphasises lower taxes, smaller government and fewer rules for businesses, arguing that investment and economic growth help lift incomes. ACT New Zealand
  • NZ First has announced proposals including annual minimum-wage increases and increased Working for Families support, alongside its plans to restructure supermarket and electricity markets. Our Policy

A useful question to ask about any proposal is: Will this reduce what I pay, increase what I receive, or do both? And when would that happen?

A tax cut, for example, can increase take-home pay for someone who pays that tax. But the amount of benefit will depend on the policy and the person's circumstances. A public service might reduce expenses without increasing wages at all.

4. How to work out which policies matter most to you

You don't need to agree with one party on everything. Start with what would make the biggest practical difference in your life.

Here are three questions worth asking as you compare policies:

5. Where to check the details before voting

These are useful independent or official starting points:

One practical reminder: New Zealand's general election is scheduled for Saturday, 7 November 2026, with advance voting starting on 26 October. You get two votes: a party vote, which helps determine each party's share of seats in Parliament, and an electorate vote, for your local representative. Check the official voting site for your enrolment and voting arrangements. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The most important thing is to compare the actual proposals, not just the slogans. Look at what each party would change, who would benefit, how the policy would be paid for, and how long it might take to affect your household.

You don't have to be an expert in politics to do that well.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

Welcome to voting! It is completely normal to find political terms confusing, and wanting clear, straightforward answers is a great place to start.

With the cost of living being the top concern for many households, the major political parties approach grocery bills, power bills, and overall household expenses in different ways. Broadly speaking, they split into two main approaches: cutting government spending and taxes versus investing more heavily in public services and targeted financial support.


1. National and ACT (The Centre-Right Approach)

  • The Core Idea: The best way to help with bills is to keep taxes low, rein in government spending, and boost economic productivity so businesses can grow and lower prices through competition.
  • On Food and Bills: They generally oppose adding new taxes (like taxes on property or wealth) and argue that government spending drives up inflation. Instead, they focus on tightening public sector spending, cutting red tape, and relying on market competition to bring down grocery and living costs.

2. Labour (The Centre-Left Approach)

  • The Core Idea: Direct government intervention and investment in everyday healthcare and essentials are needed to take the financial pressure off families.
  • On Food and Bills: Labour focuses on lowering everyday health and household costs. Their policies include targeting specific areas to save families money—such as expanding free or cheaper access to healthcare (like doctor visits and prescriptions) and supporting schemes to build up personal savings. To fund these and shift the tax load, they propose targeting areas like a capital gains tax on investment properties (excluding the family home).

3. Green Party and Te Pāti Māori (The Left / Progressive Approach)

  • The Core Idea: Major structural changes to the tax system are required to fund widespread relief, free public services, and poverty reduction.
  • On Food and Bills:
    • The Greens focus on extensive public investment (such as free public transport and expanded healthcare access) funded by introducing new taxes on wealth and large inheritances for the wealthiest New Zealanders.
    • Te Pāti Māori proposes removing GST (Goods and Services Tax) from all food to immediately lower supermarket bills, alongside introducing tax-free income thresholds for lower earners, funded by taxes on wealth.

4. New Zealand First (The Nationalist / Populist Approach)

  • The Core Idea: A mix of economic nationalism, targeted cost-of-living relief, and cutting back on government bureaucracy.
  • On Food and Bills: NZ First has historically supported measures like removing GST from basic food items to ease supermarket stress. They also emphasize cutting down on government consultants, supporting local industries, and using targeted tax adjustments rather than sweeping new taxes.

Summary Checklist: How to Think About Your Vote

  • If you believe the government should cut spending, avoid new taxes, and let the free market work, you will likely lean toward parties like National or ACT.
  • If you believe the government should invest more in public services, lower healthcare costs, and tax property investments, you will likely lean toward Labour.
  • If you believe the government should make radical changes like removing GST from food or taxing extreme wealth to fund free services, you will likely lean toward the Greens, Te Pāti Māori, or NZ First.

Is there a particular part of your household budget (like groceries, power, or rent) that is hitting your wallet the hardest right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

Welcome to voting! It is completely normal to find political talk confusing. Parties often use heavy jargon, but what they are really arguing about is how to manage the country's money and make everyday life more affordable.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , the major political parties have pitched different approaches to handling food costs, grocery bills, and the general cost of living. According to analysis from consumer advocacy and news reporting sources, here is a simple breakdown of how the main parties approach these issues.


1. Labour Party

  • The Big Idea: Government intervention to force lower prices and break up big corporate setups.

  • On Food & Groceries: Labour proposes forcing major supermarket groups (Woolworths and Foodstuffs) to legally separate their wholesale arms (how they buy food from farmers and makers) from their retail arms (the supermarket shops). They argue this stops big supermarkets from squeezing out smaller independent grocers. They also want to make "excessive pricing" illegal across essentials like food, power, and fuel, giving the watchdog (the Commerce Commission) power to take price-gouging companies to court.

  • On Bills & Cost of Living: Focuses heavily on public services to save household money—such as capping public transport costs, removing prescription charges, and introducing free or cheaper healthcare initiatives (like free GP visits for certain groups).

2. National Party

  • The Big Idea: Using targeted market reviews and relying on independent regulators rather than politicians direct-managing business.

  • On Food & Groceries: National has floated proposals regarding supermarket structure—such as looking into splitting the Foodstuffs cooperative into separate entities—though conditioned on a formal recommendation and review by the Commerce Commission. National’s framing emphasizes that politicians shouldn't act like "supermarket executives from the cabinet table," preferring that competition rules and market oversight are led strictly by regulatory authorities.

  • On Bills & Cost of Living: National generally emphasizes economic management through tax relief adjustments and managing government spending to curb overall inflation, which drives up household bills.

3. Green Party

  • The Big Idea: Public ownership and direct market disruption to guarantee fairness.

  • On Food & Groceries: The Greens support deeper structural changes to the supermarket duopoly. One of their prominent proposals involves establishing a state-backed or publicly owned supermarket chain (referred to as KiwiMart) to directly compete with private giants. They also want strict pricing-accuracy rules that force automatic compensation for shoppers if they get overcharged at the checkout.

  • On Bills & Cost of Living: Focuses on income support, building state-funded green energy initiatives to lower household power bills, and implementing wealth or asset taxes on high-earning brackets to fund cost-of-living relief for lower-income families.

4. ACT New Zealand

  • The Big Idea: Free-market solutions and reducing government red tape rather than adding new market rules.

  • On Food & Groceries: ACT generally opposes government intervention in business structures (criticising proposals to break up supermarkets or create state-owned stores as government overreach or heavy-handed control). They argue that the best way to lower food prices is to remove regulations that make it hard for new competitors or international supermarket brands to enter the New Zealand market easily.

  • On Bills & Cost of Living: Focuses on cutting government spending and reducing taxes so that working families keep more of their paycheques to handle their own bills.

5. New Zealand First

  • The Big Idea: Strict enforcement, tougher penalties, and nationalist economic protection.

  • On Food & Groceries: NZ First backs heavy enforcement against corporate rule-breaking, proposing steep financial penalties for major companies that breach fair-trading or grocery sector rules (aligning penalties closer to international standards).

  • On Bills & Cost of Living: Focuses heavily on local manufacturing, cutting taxes or duties on essential goods, and protecting domestic industries to shield Kiwis from global price shocks.


Summary Checklist: What's the core difference?

  • Labour & The Greens want the government to step in actively—either by breaking up supermarket companies, making high prices illegal, or setting up a public alternative.

  • National & NZ First lean towards tighter watchdogs and penalties, but are cautious about direct government management of business operations.

  • ACT wants less government involvement overall, arguing that freeing up the market and cutting regulations/taxes is the real fix.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account