Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

New Zealand 2026 election: healthcare, household costs and services for Pacific families

For a multigenerational Pacific household, comparing election policies means looking beyond headline tax cuts or health spending. The practical questions are whether your family can afford GP visits and prescriptions, find appropriate care for children and older relatives, access services without excessive travel or waiting, and live in a home with enough room for everyone.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I'd compare parties across five areas:

  • Affordable healthcare: GP fees, prescription costs, dental care and specialist treatment.
  • Pacific-accessible services: Pacific-led providers, culturally appropriate care, language support and community-based health services.
  • Children and young people: immunisation, school health services, mental health and affordable primary care.
  • Older relatives: prescriptions, chronic-condition management, disability support and aged care.
  • Household affordability and space: housing costs, overcrowding, rental conditions, income support and the effect of tax or benefit changes on your total household budget.

One important distinction: a party promising more funding for healthcare is not necessarily promising lower GP fees, and a policy that reduces one household bill may not improve access to appointments. I'll separate announced policies from existing government programmes and areas where a party's specific commitment needs verification.

1. How the major parties compare on healthcare

The following comparison reflects published 2026 election policies and a healthcare policy guide current to 9 October 2026. These are proposals, not guarantees that the policies will be implemented. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident DoctorsPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Party Published healthcare approach What it could mean for your household
Labour Three free GP visits per person each year; remove the $5 prescription fee from July 2027; free referred maternity scans from July 2028; free cervical screening for ages 25–69 from October 2027. Affordable HealthcareLabour's 2026 Election Policies Direct savings on eligible visits and prescriptions across a large household. Check how the three-visit limit works for ongoing care.
Green Party Proposes free, accessible diagnosis and treatment, including GP, dental, mental health, ambulance and aged-care services, alongside increased health workforce capacity. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident DoctorsManifesto 2026 Relevant if your family pays for dental treatment, counselling, GP visits or support for older relatives. The proposed system-wide changes would require substantial implementation.
National Emphasises funding more medicines and getting earlier care, while making existing health funding go further. 2026 Election PolicyPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 Look closely at which additional medicines would be funded and whether faster access translates into affordable local appointments.
ACT Proposes increasing the share of the health budget spent on medicines towards 12% by 2033, and allowing pharmacists to provide more services for everyday and ongoing conditions. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors Potentially useful for relatives needing regular medicines or straightforward treatment, depending on the services available locally and any charges.
New Zealand First Emphasises prevention, metabolic health, reducing GP administration, and bringing health coaches into primary care. The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy” Relevant to long-term conditions and preventive care. Its published plan needs to be examined for specific commitments on GP fees and prescription charges.
Te Pāti Māori The health comparison identifies a prevention-focused approach, stronger Māori-led solutions and culturally safe, accountable services. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors Consider its wider approach to equity and community-led care, while checking the details of policies specifically available to Pacific families.
Opportunity Party Proposes a 10-year cross-party health plan, lifting health funding to 9% of GDP and increasing primary-care funding. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors Relevant if your priority is sustained investment in primary care, rather than relying mainly on changes to individual fees.

For the full policy details, consult Policy.nz's 2026 health comparison and the New Zealand Resident Doctors' Association's health-policy guide.

What matters most for a large household?

Three practical distinctions are worth checking before comparing the parties further.

  • GP visits: Are visits free for every household member, or only certain visits or age groups? Is there a limit per person, and does it cover nurse appointments?
  • Prescriptions: Does a proposal remove the charge on each prescription, and when would that change take effect? A household with several people taking regular medicines could be affected differently from one that rarely needs prescriptions.
  • Dental, mental health and specialist care: Are these services included, or does the proposal mainly cover general practice and medicines? Don't assume that free GP visits mean free dental care or faster specialist appointments.

Labour's proposal is particularly specific about the number of free GP visits and the timing of prescription-fee changes. The Green Party's proposal covers a wider range of services. National and ACT place more emphasis on medicines, earlier care and how services are delivered. These are differences in policy design, not a verdict on which party will deliver the best results. Affordable HealthcareNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors2026 Election Policy

2. Which policies address Pacific families' needs directly?

Affordable care is only one part of access. A service may be technically available but still be difficult to use if there are language barriers, long waits, transport costs or a lack of culturally safe care.

A July 2026 Pacific voter survey reported that cost of living was the leading concern, with jobs and wages also prominent. A separate report noted that health and housing were major concerns too. These findings describe surveyed Pacific respondents, not every Pacific voter. Pacific voters send a clear election message: Tackle living costs and earn our trust‘No’: Ana Ika says election debate is missing the basics

Here is how to assess the parties' proposals against your family's circumstances.

Otara Samoan Methodist Church

Pacific-led and culturally appropriate healthcare

The Green Party's manifesto explicitly discusses Pacific Peoples, community partnership and addressing systemic barriers. For Labour, National, ACT and New Zealand First, check whether their specific commitments include Pacific health providers, language support, community outreach and measurable Pacific health outcomes. Manifesto 20262026 Election PolicyLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesThe Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”

Our Story | Pasifika Futures

Children and older relatives

Compare the availability of child health checks, mental health services, dental treatment, disability support, chronic-condition care and aged care. The Green Party explicitly includes dental, mental health and aged-care services in its proposed expansion of free public healthcare; Labour's published plan specifies GP visits, prescriptions and screening. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident DoctorsAffordable Healthcare

14 Meadowcourt Drive | Manukau | Manukau City | Houses for Sale - OneRoof

Space, housing and household bills

Look for policies addressing affordable larger homes, overcrowding, rental quality, electricity, food prices, transport and wages. Labour has proposed a $20 weekly public transport fare cap and grocery-price measures; National has proposed greater grocery competition and measures on power costs. The Greens emphasise affordable, warm homes. Labour's 2026 Election Policies2026 Election PolicyManifesto 2026

3. Questions to ask before deciding

These questions help distinguish a headline announcement from a policy likely to change your family's day-to-day experience.

Your priority What to verify in each party's plan
More money left after bills What happens to your household's disposable income after taxes, benefits, housing costs and transport expenses?
Enough space at home Are there specific commitments to more affordable family-sized homes, public housing or reducing overcrowding?
Affordable care for everyone What would your family pay for GP visits, repeat prescriptions, dental work and specialist care?
Care for older relatives Are home support, respite care, aged care and long-term-condition services adequately funded?
Pacific-accessible services Are Pacific providers and community-led services funded, with language access and measurable outcomes?
Shorter waits Are additional staff, appointments and service capacity funded, rather than only announced?

One caution: the number of policies explicitly directed at Pacific Peoples is not the same as the number of policies that could benefit Pacific households. Broad policies on housing, income, primary care and public transport can also make a material difference. NZ Election 2026: What are political parties promising Pacific families? — rthecoconet.tv - The world’s largest hub of Pacific Island content.uuLabour and Greens clash over what's ‘transformative’ for NZ's Pacific voters

4. Where to compare the complete election policies

The general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting beginning on 26 October. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

5. A useful next step for your household

To make this comparison more concrete, which expense is putting the most pressure on your family right now?

Your answers can help narrow the comparison to the policies most likely to affect your household budget and access to care, without assuming which party you should vote for.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

For a multigenerational Pacific household juggling the costs of living, caring for children, and supporting older relatives, health and household service access are critical issues in the 2026 New Zealand general election.

Political parties offer distinct approaches to lowering costs, reducing wait times, and addressing the specific health needs of Pacific communities.


1. Cost of Living and Direct Healthcare Access (Primary Care)

For families where multiple generations need regular GP visits, prescriptions, and check-ups, cost is often the primary barrier to early healthcare.

  • Labour Party: Places healthcare affordability at the centre of its platform. Its flagship policy is the Medicard, which provides three free general practitioner (GP) or nurse consultations each year for every New Zealander entitled to public healthcare. Labour also pledges to restore universally free prescriptions and introduce free maternity scans and free cervical screening. These policies are designed to directly lower out-of-pocket primary care costs for families, funded via a proposed capital gains tax.
  • Green Party: Proposes an even broader expansion, advocating for unlimited free GP visits, alongside free dental care, mental health services, and universal public healthcare coverage funded through a wealth tax. Their focus is on removing financial barriers entirely, prioritizing high-need community clinics.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on whānau-centered and Māori/Pacific health equity, supporting free primary care and dental services for households under income thresholds (such as families earning under $60,000), alongside self-determined, culturally safe health services.
  • National and ACT (The Coalition Government/Right-of-Centre): Generally oppose broad universal subsidies like free GP visits for all, characterizing them as untargeted fiscal relief. Instead, they focus health funding on building primary care capacity, targeted budget investments, and expanding public-private partnerships (such as contracting private hospitals to clear elective surgery backlogs) to reduce wait times.
  • New Zealand First: Focuses on resource allocation based strictly on clinical need rather than ethnicity, a GP-controlled Waitlist Reduction Fund to clear backlogs, and overhauling Pharmac to speed up access to life-changing medicines.

2. Services for Older Relatives and Children

Multigenerational households require robust support systems spanning both ends of the age spectrum—from pediatric and family wellness to aged care.

  • Aged Care and Support for Seniors: Parties like NZ First place a strong emphasis on older New Zealanders, campaigning to protect the superannuation age at 65 and introducing cost-relief measures like a 50% SuperGold rates rebate for fixed-income homeowners. The wider debate on aged care involves balancing public capacity with private and community-provider funding models.
  • Maternal, Child, and Preventive Health: Parties on the left (Labour, Greens) emphasize prevention, screening, and family-oriented care (such as free scans, expanded immunisation, and youth mental health access). Conversely, National and ACT emphasize clinical efficiency, targeting funding towards reducing emergency department (ED) wait times and addressing immediate operational bottlenecks in hospitals.

3. Structural Approaches to Pacific and Equity Health

A major point of difference between the parties is how healthcare is structured and delivered to minority communities experiencing health disparities (such as higher rates of chronic conditions like diabetes and gout):

  • Targeted vs. Clinical-Need Models: Left-of-centre parties and Te Pāti Māori emphasize structural equity, culturally safe community care, and tailored approaches designed to close health gaps for Māori and Pacific peoples.
  • Universal/Clinical-Need Frameworks: Parties like ACT and NZ First strongly advocate for a "single system" based strictly on individual clinical need, opposing ethnicity-based funding or separate governance structures, arguing instead that universal funding upgrades will benefit all low-income families equally.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

Navigating the 2026 general election in a multigenerational Pacific household means looking at how different party platforms intersect with the practical realities of everyday costs, housing pressures, and getting timely medical care for both tamariki/children and older relatives.

To compare where the major parties stand on these overlapping needs, you can explore the independent voter tool Policy.nz or specific Pasifika-focused breakdowns like The Coconet's Palota Tool. NZ Election 2026: What are political parties promising Pacific

Here is how the main political groupings generally compare on the core issues affecting your household:

1. Affordable Healthcare & Access

  • Labour: Proposes targeted cost-relief in primary care, including three free GP visits (via a proposed capital gains tax framework), free prescriptions, free maternity scans, and guaranteed job placements for graduate nurses. Their approach centers on state-backed universal access and workforce retention to cut wait times.
  • National (Incumbent): Focuses on system delivery through increased funding for Pharmac and elective surgeries (utilizing mixed public-private capacity), alongside boosting the medicines budget while reprioritizing funds. Their strategy leans heavily on expanding capacity and reducing surgical backlogs through partnered service delivery.
  • New Zealand First: Proposes structural changes including a "Waitlist Reduction Fund" that lets GPs directly purchase private or specialized consultations/operations for patients stuck on public waiting lists, alongside a proposed overhaul of Pharmac.
  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Advocate for deeply expanded public health models, including moving toward completely free universal healthcare that incorporates comprehensive mental health, aged care, and dental coverage, alongside dedicated self-determined commissioning for indigenous and Pacific health providers. [apex.org.nz]

2. Household Costs & Cost of Living

  • Labour: Promotes cost-of-living relief through measures like a $20 weekly cap on public transport fares, fairer grocery pricing regulations, and direct support for care and health workers. [NZ Labour Party]
  • National: Focuses on economic management through tax relief adjustments, inflation control, and business-led growth to ease general household burdens, alongside targeted support rather than broad market caps.
  • Greens / Te Pāti Māori: Emphasize income-boosting policies, such as baseline income supports, removing GST off basic food items or altering tax brackets (e.g., tax-free thresholds for lower earners), and aggressive action on rental price controls to protect larger families. [The coconet.tv]

3. Space & Housing (Multigenerational Needs)

  • Housing space is critical for large or extended families. Left-of-centre parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) generally emphasize building more state and public housing, strengthening renters' rights, and supporting papakāinga or community-housing models. Right-of-centre parties (National, ACT) focus more on unlocking land supply, incentivizing private residential development, and reforming the Resource Management Act (RMA) to make building homes faster and cheaper.

Next Steps to Compare:

  • To look up specific candidates or cross-reference party manifestos on Pacific-specific health providers and community funding, visit Policy.nz.
  • For a tailored summary regarding Pacific families, check out the The Coconet TV Talanoa.
  • Check your enrolment status or details via Vote.nz ahead of polling day on 7 November 2026.
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

AI Overview

For Pacific families living in multigenerational households, balancing household costs, housing space, and healthcare for both children and older relatives is a major priority. In the lead-up to the 7 November 2026 general election , parties are offering very different approaches to healthcare affordability, primary care access, and community support.

Here is how the major political parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families.

Quick Comparison: Key Healthcare & Cost Commitments

Political Party GP & Prescription Costs Workforce & Local Access Focus Key Support for Kids & Seniors
Labour 3 free GP visits per year via "Medicard"; removes $5 prescription fee. Guaranteed jobs for graduate nurses; Family Doctor Loan Scheme to open clinic spots. Free referred maternity scans; $4/hour pay rise for care/support workers.
National Retains existing fee structures; invested $447M into primary care capacity in Budget 2025. Focuses on increasing private surgeries to clear backlogs; funding a new Waikato medical school. Proposes an extra $604M for Pharmac medicine funding over four years.
Green Party Unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone. Prioritizes community care clinics in high-need areas; universal stipends for trainee nurses. Expands free school lunches; extends paid parental leave to 15 months.
ACT Proposes a $6,000 incentive to opt out of public health for private cover. Boosts GP funding by $400M; lets pharmacists treat more conditions to ease wait times. Plans to build a dedicated national cancer centre ("Starship for Cancer").
NZ First Focuses on a $925M waitlist reduction fund rather than free visits. Aims to reduce GP administrative burdens and add health coaches to primary clinics. Focuses heavily on preventative health, metabolic health, and nutrition guidelines.
Te Pāti Māori Free GP and dental care for whānau/families earning under $60,000. Proposes a "Māori Health Card" to link funding directly to the patient. Focuses on reducing inequities; proposes a tax-free income threshold up to $30,000.

Key Policy Breakdown for Multigenerational Households

1. Reducing Household Medical Costs

For households with multiple generations under one roof, everyday healthcare costs add up quickly.

  • Left-leaning parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) focus heavily on cutting direct costs. The Labour Party is campaigning on its "Medicard" system to give every New Zealander three free GP visits a year and eliminate the $5 prescription copayment. The Green Party goes furthest by promising completely free, publicly funded GP and dental care for everyone.

  • Right-leaning and coalition parties (National, ACT, NZ First) prefer targeted funding or alternative structures. The National Party argues that broad free care plans are fiscally unsustainable, opting instead to boost funding for Pharmac to subsidize more specialist medicines. The ACT Party introduces a consumer-choice model, offering a $6,000 incentive for individuals who choose to opt out of the public health system entirely in favor of private health insurance.

2. Accessing Local Services & Easing Clinic Wait Times

Getting a timely appointment at a local clinic is a common struggle for families.

  • Improving local clinic capacity: To ensure families can see a doctor closer to home, Labour proposes a low-interest "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to help practitioners open or buy into local practices, freeing up an estimated 4.5 million appointments. ACT has pledged a $400 million funding injection aimed at recruiting overseas GPs and retaining local ones.

  • Alternative care pathways: To bypass long clinic waitlists altogether, ACT proposes cutting red tape to allow pharmacists to treat minor ailments and manage stable, long-term conditions. New Zealand First advocates for placing dedicated "health coaches" inside primary care clinics to help patients manage chronic illnesses before they require a doctor or hospital visit.

3. Support for Children and Older Relatives

Multigenerational Pacific homes often balance care for the very young and the elderly.

  • Elderly and Care Worker Support: Labour is promising a mandatory $4-an-hour pay rise for care and support workers, which aims to improve the quality and retention of home-care staff looking after older relatives.

  • Child Health and Nutrition: The Greens want to protect and expand the school lunches initiative to ease household grocery costs. NZ First plans a "Make NZ Healthy" curriculum overhaul, embedding metabolic health and strict nutritional guidelines into primary schools to combat chronic health issues from a young age.

Voting Information

If you are planning your vote, ensure your household details are up to date on the Electoral Commission Roll. The deadline to enrol to vote in the 2026 General Election is midnight on Sunday, 25 October 2026 , with election day falling on Saturday, 7 November 2026. Voting information is available in multiple Pacific languages, including Samoan and Tongan, via the official Vote NZ platform.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account