Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

New Zealand 2026 election: learning support, assessments and healthcare for children

For your family, the key distinction is between policies that help a child get identified and assessed, receive support at school, and access health professionals — and policies that help parents manage the financial and work pressures that can come with caring for a child with additional needs.

New Zealand's general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026. The parties differ in how directly they address these issues: some propose expanding learning support and coordinating specialist services, while others emphasise early identification, additional school resources or broader healthcare affordability. Several parties still have gaps in their published detail. Party policies, simplified: EducationParty policies, simplified: HealthcareLabour's 2026 Election Policies

1. How the main parties differ on school learning support

Policy information available as of 22 October 2026. These are published commitments and reported party responses, not guarantees of future service availability.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Focus: early identification, more school support and specialist facilities.

  • Introduce a School Start Check before children begin school, establish clearer developmental milestones in early childhood education, and report progress to parents.
  • Expand the Early Intervention Service for children needing extra support.
  • Provide Learning Support Coordinators in all schools with Years 1–8 by 2028, plus additional teacher-aide hours and training, building to two million extra hours annually from 2028.
  • Continue plans for 142 new specialist classrooms, three new specialist schools and redevelopment of six existing specialist schools.
  • Its refreshed Disability Strategy includes making health services easier for disabled people to use, although National has not published a standalone disability manifesto for this election. Teaching the basics brilliantlyParty policies, simplified: EducationParty policies, simplified: HealthcareDisability Policies

What to examine: whether early checks lead to timely specialist assessments, and how much extra support individual children will actually receive.

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Focus: additional classroom staffing, inclusive education and more affordable primary healthcare.

  • On 22 October, Labour pledged to hire 1,000 more teacher aides.
  • Labour's education representative has said it would progress the findings of the Ministry of Education's Highest Needs Review to address problems with the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS), which funds support for students with the highest needs.
  • Labour opposes allowing teachers to use physical force against students under the proposed approach to managing disruptive behaviour.
  • Its health plan includes three free GP visits a year through a new Medicard and removing the $5 prescription fee from July 2027. Party policies, simplified: EducationLabour's 2026 Election Policies2026 Election Policy Summaries

What to examine: how Labour would change ORS eligibility and funding, and whether its GP policy would improve access to the specific specialists your child needs.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Focus: expanding eligibility for learning support and coordinating specialist services.

  • Expand the criteria for accessing learning support, potentially allowing more children to qualify.
  • Establish a single agency to coordinate and resource specialist support for learners with health and disability support needs.
  • Implement the Ministry of Education's Framework for Action: A Quality Education for All.
  • Support free, accessible healthcare, including primary and dental care, and fund mobile health clinics to reduce access barriers. The Greens also propose expanding the health workforce, including therapists. Party policies, simplified: EducationParty policies, simplified: Healthcare2026 Election Policy Summaries

What to examine: how the proposed eligibility expansion would work, whether it would shorten assessment queues, and how the single agency would be funded and implemented.

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Focus: Māori-led, culturally grounded support for children and whānau.

  • Establish a Māori-led taskforce to transform support for students with disabilities, neurodivergence and learning differences.
  • Resource support teachers, accessible learning environments and ongoing teacher development grounded in mātauranga Māori.
  • Propose Māori-led health and disability services, including a Mana Hauā Authority, free primary care and mobile or marae-based clinics. Party policies, simplified: EducationParty policies, simplified: Healthcare

What to examine: how these proposals would improve assessment access and school support in practice, including services available to families outside Māori-led providers.

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT

Focus: family choice, education reform and changes to how health and disability systems operate.

  • Emphasises family choice, including alternatives to mainstream schooling through charter schools, rather than proposing a major new disability-specific learning-support programme in its published education commitments.
  • Proposes increasing the medicines budget and allowing pharmacists to manage more everyday and ongoing health conditions.
  • Its wider disability approach favours individualised funding and reduced bureaucracy, but it has not published a detailed standalone disability manifesto for this election. Party policies, simplified: EducationDisability Policies2026 Election Policy Summaries

What to examine: whether proposed alternatives offer the particular specialist teaching and therapies your child needs, and whether mainstream-school support would be sufficient.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Focus: general healthcare access rather than a detailed child-disability programme.

What to examine: whether the party will make explicit commitments on assessment waiting times, specialist workforce capacity and predictable school funding.

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Focus: longer-term cross-party planning.

What to examine: what immediate commitments would help children while the proposed longer-term plan is being developed.

2. Access to assessments and health services: what matters most

A school learning assessment, a formal clinical diagnosis and eligibility for funded support are not necessarily the same thing. A child may need help at school before receiving a diagnosis, and a diagnosis does not automatically guarantee a particular level of school funding.

When comparing parties, it is useful to separate three questions.

A. Getting an assessment

Can children access educational specialists, developmental paediatricians, psychologists, speech-language therapists or other professionals when needed? Will the party increase workforce capacity, expand eligibility or set targets for waiting times?

Published difference: The Greens explicitly propose expanding school learning-support eligibility and coordinating specialist services. National's early checks aim to identify developmental needs sooner. Labour has made a commitment relating to ORS, but these measures do not themselves establish a guaranteed timeframe for a formal clinical diagnosis. Party policies, simplified: EducationTeaching the basics brilliantly

B. Getting healthcare and therapy

Will appointments be affordable and available? Consider GP visits, specialist referrals, mental health services, occupational therapy, speech-language therapy, medication and dental care.

Published difference: Labour proposes three free GP visits annually and free prescriptions from July 2027. The Greens propose broader free and accessible primary and dental care, more therapists and mobile clinics. Te Pāti Māori proposes free primary care and Māori-led services. National has emphasised making healthcare more accessible for disabled people, while ACT's published health proposals include greater pharmacist responsibilities and more medicine funding. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesParty policies, simplified: Healthcare2026 Election Policy Summaries

C. Getting support while waiting

Can the child receive teacher-aide hours, learning accommodations, assistive technology, specialist input or an appropriate learning programme without waiting for every assessment to be completed?

Published difference: National's additional teacher-aide hours and Learning Support Coordinators, Labour's teacher-aide pledge and proposed ORS changes, and the Greens' proposed expansion of learning-support eligibility are directly relevant here. Te Pāti Māori's proposals also focus on support teachers and accessible learning environments. Teaching the basics brilliantlyParty policies, simplified: Education

An important gap: In the party policies and recent comparisons I reviewed, I did not find a clear, shared set of commitments guaranteeing shorter waits for children's developmental or neurodevelopmental assessments. That is worth asking parties about directly, rather than assuming a general promise to improve healthcare will resolve it.

3. If you sometimes reduce paid work to care for your child

Your family's financial position is another important part of the comparison. A policy might improve healthcare access without compensating for lost work hours, or increase income support without resolving the shortage of help at school.

Here are the related differences worth considering:

These are broader disability and welfare policies, not necessarily specific entitlements for parents who reduce their hours to care for a school-age child. Check eligibility conditions and whether any proposed assistance would actually apply to your household.

4. Questions to put to parties before voting

The most useful questions are the ones that ask for a measurable commitment, rather than just a statement of support.

Your election checklist

0 of 6

Will you guarantee timely access to publicly funded developmental and neurodevelopmental assessments for children, and publish waiting-time targets?

Will children receive appropriate learning support while they wait for a diagnosis or specialist assessment?

Will you expand ORS eligibility or funding, and how will you address the needs of children who do not qualify?

How many additional teacher-aide hours and specialist staff will be funded, and when will they be available?

Will you expand access to publicly funded speech-language therapy, occupational therapy, psychology and developmental paediatrics?

What financial support will be available to parents who reduce paid work to care for a child with additional needs?

Copy questions for party candidates

5. Where to verify the latest policies

These independent comparisons are useful starting points, alongside each party's own published policies:

Bottom line

For your particular concerns, distinguish between identifying a child's needs early, providing support at school without unnecessary delays, and making health assessments and treatment accessible. These are separate policy challenges.

National has specified early checks, expanded school support and additional teacher-aide hours; Labour has made new teacher-aide and ORS-related commitments; the Greens have proposed widening learning-support eligibility and coordinating specialist services; and Te Pāti Māori has emphasised Māori-led, inclusive support. The other parties' general healthcare or education approaches need closer scrutiny for specific commitments on assessment access. Teaching the basics brilliantlyParty policies, simplified: EducationParty policies, simplified: Healthcare

The key question for every party is not just whether it supports children with additional needs, but what support your child could access, how quickly, and what happens while you are waiting.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

For families navigating the education and health systems with a child who has additional needs, finding consistent support—and managing the financial and career impacts of scaling back paid work—is a central issue.

While political parties approach disability support, learning assistance, and health access through different ideological lenses, their policies for the 2026 general election environment generally highlight distinct priorities:


Overview of Party Approaches

1. Labour Party

  • Education & Learning Support: Focuses on a rights-based, equity-focused approach aligned with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Historically champions expanding learning support services, including growth in the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) and early-intervention initiatives.
  • Access to Services: Tends to favor strengthening public service delivery and reducing administrative barriers within health and education, while opposing structural rollbacks in disability support legislation.

2. National Party

  • Education & Learning Support: Centers its approach on system stability, national consistency, and targeted funding rollouts (such as previous expansions of Learning Support Coordinators and ORS funding).
  • Health & Assessments: Focuses heavily on managing the financial sustainability of Disability Support Services (DSS) and implementing the refreshed New Zealand Disability Strategy (2026–2030), aiming for more predictable and nationally consistent service delivery rather than sweeping structural overhauls.

3. Green Party

  • Education & Learning Support: Strongly advocates for fully funded, inclusive education. Their policies emphasize removing structural and physical barriers within schools and significantly expanding specialist learning support, teacher aide resourcing, and ORS access.
  • Carers & Employment: Frames caregiver and disability support around systemic reform, advocating for income security and policies that reduce the pressure on families to absorb care burdens by removing workplace and structural barriers.

4. ACT Party

  • Education & Learning Support: Places a primary emphasis on broader educational standards, core academic outcomes, and general systemic reform rather than disability-specific programs. Learning assistance is generally viewed through the lens of overall school operational flexibility and raising achievement standards.

5. The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • Education & Support: Proposes increased funding for specialist learning support (including speech-language therapists, psychologists, and learning support coordinators).
  • Health & System Navigation: Advocates for a "Tell Us Once" cross-agency approach to prevent families from having to repeat assessments across education, health, and welfare systems, alongside better-integrated support for unpaid carers (including financial recognition via tax or income support mechanisms).

6. Te Pāti Māori

  • Education & Support: Focuses on culturally grounded, Māori-led solutions and structural welfare reform. Emphasizes removing barriers for whānau and ensuring that learning support and health services honor Te Tiriti o Waitangi, addressing disparities in how tāngata whaikaha Māori access timely assessments and care.

Key Considerations for Your Vote

When reviewing these platforms with your specific concerns in mind—getting timely assessments, securing adequate school-level support, and balancing the career/financial impacts of caring—you may want to look closely at:

  1. Assessment Backlogs: Do the parties offer concrete workforce plans to train and recruit more educational psychologists, speech-language therapists, and needs assessors to reduce wait times?
  2. In-School Resourcing: How do they plan to fund teacher aides, Learning Support Coordinators, and ORS criteria to ensure your child receives consistent support without forcing you to step in or reduce work hours further?
  3. Carer Support: Do their welfare or tax policies offer direct financial relief, flexible work rights, or respite options for parents who have to reduce paid employment?

Are there specific aspects of your child's schooling or health access—such as wait times for specialist assessments or school resourcing—that are weighing most heavily on your decision right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

Political parties in the 2026 New Zealand General Election approach learning support, early assessments, and disability allowances through distinct ideological frameworks regarding mainstream school resourcing, welfare thresholds, and targeted versus universal service delivery.

You can explore detailed party-by-party breakdowns and comparisons using tools like Policy.nz or the Disabled Persons Assembly Disability Scorecard. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026


Key Party Approaches to Learning Support & Assessments

Political Party School & Learning Support Approach Assessments & Specialist Health Access Support for Caregivers / Income Support
New Zealand Labour Party Favors increasing baseline and targeted funding for learning support specialists, teacher aides, and inclusive education frameworks in mainstream schools. Emphasizes public health and education-linked specialist services, aiming to reduce waitlists for educational psychologists and child health assessments. Supports expanding or indexing disability/child disability allowances and reviewing welfare abatement/partner income rules affecting caregivers reducing work.
New Zealand National Party Focuses on structured curriculum delivery, targeted resourcing based on assessed operational needs, and greater flexibility or choice within education. Tends to emphasize more efficient utilization or contracting of health and assessment services rather than large-scale structural expansions of public workforces. Generally targets assistance toward verified high-need thresholds while encouraging workforce participation and economic settings.
ACT New Zealand Advocates for prioritizing taxpayer-funded support strictly based on demonstrated functional/financial need rather than broad-brush or identity-based metrics. Favors operational efficiencies, potential choice models (such as direct-funding or private/non-governmental service access where cost-effective), and streamlined bureaucracy. Focuses on economic growth, tax relief, and welfare settings that encourage moving off benefit dependencies into paid work.
Green Party of Aotearoa NZ Calls for guaranteed, predictable, needs-based funding for every disabled ākonga (student) in mainstream schools and kura, covering full teacher aide and resource costs. Advocates for free, timely, universal access to neurodevelopmental, psychological, and health assessments within the public and school health network. Strongly supports increasing the Child Disability Allowance and Disability Allowance, and removing partner income testing/penalties on the Supported Living Payment for carers.
Te Pāti Māori Prioritizes a kaupapa Māori approach to disability and learning support, emphasizing whānau-centered resourcing and culturally grounded health/education services. Advocates for decolonised, localized health and learning assessment pathways managed through Iwi and community-led health providers. Supports broader social-security overhauls, lifting benefit and allowance rates, and recognizing the unpaid labor of whānau caregivers.

What to Consider for Your Situation

  • School-Level Resourcing: If your priority is guaranteed classroom help (such as teacher aides or assistive technology), parties like the Greens and Labour commit to expanding statutory or pooled educational support funds, whereas National and ACT lean toward measured, needs-tested fiscal discipline and operational targeting. [Disabled Persons Assembly NZ (DPA)+1]

  • Assessments & Waitlists: Access to educational psychologists and clinical assessments varies by party commitment to public health funding—left-leaning parties generally promise direct state investment to cut wait times, while center-right parties emphasize efficiency and targeted allocation.

  • Caregiver Support & Work Reductions: If reducing paid work impacts your household income, look closely at party policies regarding the Child Disability Allowance , the Disability Allowance , and partner income thresholds on benefits (where parties like the Greens and Labour propose increases/removals of penalties, and right-of-centre parties focus on broader tax/work incentives). [Disabled Persons Assembly NZ (DPA)]

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

AI Overview

Navigating the education system with a child who needs extra support can be deeply taxing, especially when it directly impacts your ability to work.

In the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties offer distinctly different structural and financial pathways for addressing additional learning support, assessments, and the care burden on families.

The policy differences across the major parties focus on how they manage school resourcing, assessment frameworks, and systemic disability support:

Policy Comparison for 2026

Party Classroom & Learning Support Stance Assessment & Health Services Approach Impact on Parent/Carer Work Demands
National Delivers substantial ongoing investments (building on Budget 2025/2026 initiatives). Mandates Universal Design for Learning in all schools and funds up to 25 extra classrooms in the specialist school network. Rolled out a nationally consistent assessment process via NASC and EGL sites to eliminate the "postcode lottery" for support allocations. Expanded early intervention assessments through the end of Year 1. Passed the Disability Support Services Act 2026 , which focuses on system sustainability but has drawn criticism for placing an emphasis on "family responsibility" and unpaid care.
Labour Has campaigned on expanding learning support by promising to fund an extra 1,000 teacher aides ($80 million over four years) to ease pressure on stretched classrooms. Pledged a rights-based approach, promising to repeal the Coalition's 2026 disability legislation and co-design an assessment/support framework directly with the disability community. Focuses on reducing "back-to-school" financial strain and aims to improve transitions so parents don't have to absorb as much unpaid monitoring and care.
Green Party Advocates for a fully funded, universally inclusive education model. Strongly opposes policies allowing physical intervention or isolation of students in schools. Promises to establish a single centralized agency to coordinate and resource specialist health and disability supports for learners. Will expand the criteria to make accessing learning support assessments easier. Promotes higher income support and enforceable accessibility standards so carers do not face structural financial penalties or poverty when cutting back paid hours.
ACT Focuses on individual choice and alternative environments. Champions Charter Schools tailored to high-needs learners and policies allowing teachers "reasonable force" to remove disruptive students. Favours smaller government with direct, individualized funding. Seeks to streamline the long-term benefit assessment process using a designated pool of MSD-approved independent doctors. Stresses personal and family responsibility while aiming to cut bureaucratic hurdles to allow parents more flexibility with direct funding.

Navigating Current Assistance

Regardless of the election outcome, you can currently access immediate support mechanisms through the Ministry of Education:

  • School-Level Interventions: You can formally request that your school's Learning Support Coordinator (LSC) or SENCO arrange an assessment to establish an Individual Education Plan (IEP) for your child.

  • Specialist Funding: For complex or high-level needs, schools can apply for the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) , which provides dedicated funding for specialist speech-language therapists, psychologists, and extra teacher aide hours.

To help narrow down which policies or systems best fit your family, would you like to explore how to apply for ORS funding , or look into the financial assistance available for parents who reduce work hours to care for a child?

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account