Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

New Zealand 2026 election: schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities

For someone living and working in a small New Zealand town, education policy is about more than what happens in the classroom. It is also about whether children can attend a local school, whether teachers and specialist support staff can be recruited and retained, and whether families have to travel long distances to get help for a child who needs extra support.

When comparing parties for the 2026 general election, I would separate their proposals into four practical questions:

  • Keeping local schools open: What do parties say about small-school viability, rural and regional schooling, school mergers and access to nearby education?
  • Retaining teachers: What are their plans for teacher pay, recruitment, housing, staffing levels and relief teachers?
  • Learning support: What would change for children needing teacher aides, speech-language therapy, specialist assessment or additional learning support?
  • Access and cost for families: Would children receive support locally, or would families still have to travel to larger towns or cities?

An important distinction is that a promise to increase education funding nationally does not, by itself, guarantee that a small community will retain its school, gain another teacher or receive a visiting specialist.

What the main parties are proposing

The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. The comparison below uses party policy pages and reporting available as of 22 October 2026. It distinguishes specific commitments from issues where a clear promise about small-town schools has not been published. Party policies, simplified: EducationEducation: party comparison 2026

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

Learning support, teacher supply and school facilities

National proposes Learning Support Coordinators for all schools with Years 1–8 students from 2028, alongside additional teacher-aide hours and training, building to two million extra hours annually from 2028. It also proposes expanding early intervention and investing in warmer, drier classrooms. Teaching the basics brilliantlySchool Onsite Training Programme to provide 704 places every year from 2028

For smaller communities: National has also announced an expansion of school-based teacher training, including pathways that let people in rural and isolated communities train online while remaining local. The programme is intended to help address staffing shortages. School Onsite Training Programme to provide 704 places every year from 2028

What to check: Whether the learning-support commitment guarantees sufficient staff and specialist visits for a small school, rather than simply extending eligibility or available hours nationally.

Policy: National's education policy

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Rural school transport and teacher-aide staffing

Labour says it will work to restore rural school bus routes cancelled under the current government, finding practical alternatives with communities where restoration is not possible. It also proposes cheaper uniforms, the return of school lunches from 2028, and lower transport costs. Cutting Back-to-School Costs

In an announcement reported on 22 October, Labour also pledged to hire 1,000 more teacher aides. Its disability-policy commitments include progressing the findings of the Highest Needs Review to address the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS), which funds support for students with the highest needs. Party policies, simplified: Education

For smaller communities: The bus proposal directly addresses the extra travel burden on rural families. The teacher-aide pledge is relevant to classroom support, but the available announcement does not establish how many aides would go to smaller schools or how they would be distributed.

Policies: Cutting back-to-school costs · Labour's 2026 policies

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Inclusive education and coordinated specialist services

The Greens propose expanding eligibility for learning support, creating a single agency to coordinate and resource specialist support for learners with health and disability needs, and implementing the Ministry of Education's Framework for Action: A Quality Education for All. Party policies, simplified: Education

For smaller communities: A coordinated specialist-support system could be relevant where families currently struggle to access services. The key unanswered question is whether it would fund more local specialists, outreach visits or travel support, rather than changing administration alone.

Party information: Green Party website

Te Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2023 - Policy.nz

Te Pāti Māori

Māori-led education and support for diverse learners

Te Pāti Māori proposes a Māori Education Authority and a Māori-led taskforce to improve how disabled, neurodivergent and other learners with different learning needs are taught and supported. It also proposes resourcing support teachers, accessible learning environments and professional development grounded in mātauranga Māori. Other published commitments include expanding school lunches and providing free public transport and in-school counselling for students. Party policies, simplified: EducationEducation: party comparison 2026

For smaller communities: Its proposals are relevant to culturally responsive learning support and reducing barriers to access. More detail would be needed to establish how funding and specialist services would reach small schools in practice.

Policy: Te Pāti Māori website

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

School choice and reducing family costs

ACT has promoted charter schools as an alternative that gives families more choice, and proposes limiting compulsory branded school-uniform items to three. Party policies, simplified: EducationEducation: party comparison 2026

For smaller communities: The important question is whether alternative schooling options would actually be available within a reasonable distance of your town. The policies cited here do not establish a specific commitment to keep existing small state schools open or provide more local learning-support specialists.

Party information: ACT website

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Specific commitments need further verification

In the recent disability-education comparison, NZ First expressed a general commitment to inclusive learning but did not supply a specific future policy in response to the questions asked. Party policies, simplified: Education

For smaller communities: I could not verify a specific current commitment from the sources reviewed to protect small-school viability, recruit teachers to isolated areas or guarantee local specialist learning support.

Party information: New Zealand First website

These are not assessments of which party would deliver the best results. They describe the published commitments found, and the gaps that matter when assessing their likely relevance to smaller communities.

What about keeping the local school itself open?

This is an important gap in the comparison. The policies above include teacher training, classroom support and school transport, but I could not verify a specific, comprehensive commitment across these parties to prevent small schools from closing or merging simply because they have low rolls.

For your circumstances, I would ask each local candidate three concrete questions:

  1. School viability: Would your party protect access to a local school, and what criteria would apply before a closure or merger was considered?
  2. Staffing: What funding or incentives would help small-town schools recruit and retain teachers, including relief teachers when someone is sick or leaves?
  3. Learning support: Would children be able to receive assessments, teacher-aide assistance and specialist services locally, and what waiting times or travel requirements would apply?

A useful benchmark is whether a party specifies funding, staffing numbers, delivery dates and how resources will be allocated to small schools. A national promise is less informative if it does not explain how a small community will benefit.

How to compare the proposals against your priorities

Use this checklist when reading manifestos or talking to candidates.

Select the issues that matter most to your household.

Keeping a local school accessible and setting fair closure or merger criteria

Recruiting and retaining teachers in small towns

Providing enough teacher-aide hours and learning support coordinators

Bringing specialist assessments and services closer to families

Maintaining school bus routes and reducing long-distance travel costs

Publishing funding, implementation dates and measurable commitments

0 of 6 priorities selected

Copy my prioritiesCompare parties against my priorities

For further independent checking, the PartyMap 2026 education comparison explains which parties have published, verifiable policy claims and which have gaps in the available evidence. Its education information was last updated on 20 October 2026. Education: party comparison 2026

One final point: because you work in a small town rather than on a farm, rural education policy should not be treated as relevant only to farming communities. School staffing, specialist services, transport and the ability of families to remain in a community with limited jobs and healthcare are interconnected. When candidates talk about regional development, it is worth asking whether their plans also support the schools and services that make living and working in smaller towns viable.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

Living in a smaller community where local jobs and healthcare are limited places a unique reliance on local schools not just for education, but as a vital social anchor for the town. For families driving long distances for services, keeping schools strong, fully staffed, and well-supported is a key community lifeline.

In the context of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties approach the challenges of retaining rural and provincial schools, teachers, and learning support through different philosophical lenses.


Teacher Recruitment and Staffing in Smaller Communities

Attracting and retaining qualified teachers in provincial and rural areas is a long-standing challenge. Parties propose various incentives:

  • National and the Coalition Government: Emphasize core foundational standards, structured literacy, and expanding educational choice (such as charter schools). While focusing heavily on academic achievement metrics and attendance, their approach to staffing largely relies on central funding frameworks, targeted allowances, and fast-tracked alternative training pathways to fill vacancies.
  • Labour and the Green Party: Tend to focus on broad workforce conditions. Labour’s education platform emphasizes strengthening the public education workforce and addressing teacher shortages through centralized support and retention measures. The Green Party emphasizes equitable resourcing across all regions so that smaller schools are not disadvantaged by a lack of scale.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on localized, community-led education solutions, advocating for Māori governance and resourcing that directly supports local, grassroots learning environments and culturally grounded staffing solutions.

Learning Support and Special Education

Access to speech language therapists, psychologists, and learning support coordinators is often sparse in smaller towns, meaning families often have to travel to larger centers.

  • NZEI (Teacher Union) & Sector Advocacy for 2026: Education sector advocates and unions have lobbied strongly for guaranteed provisions, such as a teacher aide in every classroom and ring-fenced funding for learning support coordinators in every school cluster.
  • Party Approaches: While specific parties structure their funding pools differently, center-left and progressive parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) generally campaign on expanding direct state-funded specialist services (like Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) support and learning support coordinators) to ensure small-town schools aren’t left relying on stretched regional health or education boards. Conversely, right-of-centre parties (National, ACT) lean toward localized administrative flexibility or targeted interventions, though rural equity remains a persistent cross-party talking point during election cycles.

School Retention and Network Security

In smaller towns, the threat of a school roll declining or facing a merger/closure can destabilize a community.

  • Network Stability: Parties face continuous pressure from provincial electorates to protect small rural schools from closure, as losing a school often signals the decline of the town itself. Mainstream parties generally commit to maintaining minimum staffing ratios for isolated or small schools to protect them from standard funding drops when rolls fluctuate.
  • Alternative Models: ACT champions choice-driven models like charter/partnership schools or education accounts, arguing that alternative funding models can inject vitality into areas underserved by traditional state systems. In contrast, Labour and the Greens strongly oppose charter models, arguing they siphon critical resources away from the public network, which rural communities rely on exclusively.

Considerations for Your Vote

When weighing your options for the 2026 election, you may want to look closely at:

  1. Direct Incentives: Do a party’s policies offer specific relocation or retention allowances for teachers moving to provincial areas?
  2. Specialist Access: How does a party propose delivering itinerant learning support (speech language, behavioral, and developmental specialists) to remote or small-town schools so families don't have to drive hours for care?
  3. Protection of Local Assets: What are the party's commitments to funding formulas for small schools where rolls drop below standard thresholds?
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

For households and workers in New Zealand's small towns—where long-distance travel is a reality and local services can be fragile—access to reliable local education, transport, and learning support is a key issue in the 2026 general election.

Political parties have outlined different proposals and focal points addressing small, regional, and rural schools, teacher resourcing, and learning support systems:

  • Labour Party:
  • Transport & Connectivity: Labour has made a specific campaign commitment focused on small and regional communities to restore rural school bus routes that were altered or cut, aiming to ease the petrol, time, and travel burdens on families in remote or small-town pockets.
  • Teacher Aides & Support: Labour announced an election policy to fund an additional 1,000 teacher aides nationwide to bolster learning support in schools, which directly impacts small schools that often struggle to piece together adequate individual specialist and classroom support.
  • National Party (Incumbent / Current Government Framing):
  • Learning Support & Intervention: National’s approach centers on scaling up its recent investments in the learning support system (highlighting expanded teacher aide hours, increases in Ongoing Resourcing Scheme [ORS] allocations, and targeted early intervention services). The strategy relies on contracting additional specialist capacity to reduce wait times for children needing behavioral and learning help rather than localized structural overhauls. [RNZ]
  • ACT New Zealand:
  • Transport Inefficiencies: ACT has focused on reforming rural school transport logistics, including proposing an “open seat rule.” Under this plan, children living along an existing school bus route could utilize spare seats regardless of which school they attend, aiming to maximize efficiency and help families in small communities bypass rigid "nearest school" eligibility constraints.
  • Other Parties (Green Party, NZ First, Te Pāti Māori):
  • Broader equity, early childhood, and community-hub funding models feature across other manifestos, but specific localized pledges for small-town schools center heavily on transport accessibility, localized funding equity, and expanding the availability of centralized regional specialists rather than letting smaller community schools close.

You can track detailed announcements and compare party manifestos directly using platforms like the The Spinoff or RNZ Politics as election day approaches on November 7, 2026.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

AI Overview

In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have introduced distinct strategies to address the challenges facing smaller communities and regional education. Their proposals focus on expanding schooling options, addressing teacher supply, and scaling up learning support.

A direct comparison of what the major parties propose for education in smaller and regional communities shows distinct policy approaches:

Party School Retention & Options Teacher Supply & Training Learning Support & Funding
National Delivers specialist school expansions ; retains core subjects like Agricultural Science. Expands the School Onsite Training Programme (704 places/year) with targeted online pathways for rural trainees. Emphasizes existing $750m investment , expanding private-sector specialist places and early intervention.
Labour Capping uniform costs ; restoring cancelled rural school bus routes. Focuses on workforce stability and building on previous Learning Support Reviews. Funding 1,000 additional teacher aides ($80m over 4 years) to assist busy classrooms.
ACT Expanding charter schools to 10,000 enrolments by 2029, aiming for one in every major town. Focuses on school operational freedom and performance-linked public funding. Providing choices outside mainstream systems; gives teachers powers to use "reasonable force" for disruption.
Greens Capping Early Childhood Education (ECE) costs; building resilient, interconnected communities. Focuses on expanding the local workforce via a $4.9b Youth Jobs Guarantee for education/training. Commits to universal student income and expanding inclusive/rainbow education frameworks.

National Party

The National Party emphasizes workforce training pipelines that allow people to remain in their home regions, alongside infrastructure upgrades for high-needs students.

  • Rural Teacher Recruitment: National's headline initiative is the expansion of the School Onsite Training Programme , which will scale up to 704 places annually by 2028. To support isolated towns, the policy specifically enables providers to offer online programmes, allowing trainees to complete their qualifications and work up to three days a week in local classrooms without having to relocate to major cities. Trainees receive a stipend of $20,660 in 2027.

  • Learning Support: Education Minister Erica Stanford has pointed to the government's delivery of 896,210 additional teacher aide hours and contracting 1,000 private-sector specialist places to cut early intervention wait times. National's infrastructure plan includes building 142 new specialist classrooms and 3 new specialist schools.

  • Curriculum: The party actively pushed back against curriculum thinning, explicitly reinstating Agricultural and Horticultural Science as standalone NCEA subjects to maintain learning pathways relevant to regional economies.

Labour Party

The Labour Party campaign focuses heavily on reducing household costs for families and boosting the number of support staff directly inside classrooms.

  • Learning Support & Teacher Aides: Labour has pledged $80 million over four years to fund 1,000 extra teacher aides nationwide. This policy aims to alleviate pressure on teachers in smaller or blended classrooms and ensure students with learning needs do not fall behind. They also plan to overhaul the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) based on the Highest Needs Review.

  • Regional School Access: To resolve the transport barriers created by recent Ministry of Education reviews, Labour has promised to restore the rural school bus routes that were cancelled, setting aside roughly $5 million per year to re-establish these connections or find practical local alternatives.

  • Cost Barriers: The party plans to introduce strict caps on branded school uniform costs and bring back a fresh, locally-made school lunch scheme by 2028.

ACT New Zealand

The ACT Party centers its platform on choice, decentralization, and structural classroom management.

  • Charter Schools Expansion: ACT proposes an aggressive expansion of charter (partnership) schools , aiming for 10,000 enrolments by 2029. Their goal is to have a charter school option "in every major town," allowing local communities or state schools to convert to this model using public funding with freedom from standard state restrictions.

  • Classroom Environment: ACT introduced an election policy providing teachers with explicit legal powers to use "reasonable force" to remove persistently disruptive students from the classroom, paired with potential fines of up to $3,000 for parents who do not engage with schools regarding their child's behaviour.

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

The Green Party builds its education platform around equity, community funding, and student welfare.

  • Youth Training and Local Jobs: The Greens have proposed a $4.9 billion "Youth Jobs Guarantee" targeting 16-to-24-year-olds. Run in partnership with local councils and non-profits, this programme provides direct funding to transition young people into paid work, education, or localized training pipelines.

  • Early Childhood & Tertiary Costs: They propose capping Early Childhood Education (ECE) fees at $10 a day before making it entirely free by 2029 by phasing out corporate, for-profit provider subsidies. They also advocate for returning to a fully fees-free tertiary system paired with a universal student income.


If you would like to explore this further, let me know if you want to look into how these parties plan to address regional healthcare shortages or what specific transport/infrastructure policies they propose to reduce the long travel times for services in smaller towns.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account