Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

Hawke’s Bay flood protection: what is funded, what is being built, and what remains undecided?

Status checked against published information available in October 2026 · Heretaunga Plains, Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand

For your family, the key distinction is between money already committed to specific flood-protection works and future decisions about how the wider Heretaunga Plains will be protected, who will pay, and how much protection individual properties will receive.

As of October 2026, Hawke’s Bay has a substantial, funded programme of post-Cyclone Gabrielle flood-defence works. But the region's longer-term strategy for its major flood-protection schemes is still being developed. Those are two different things, and election promises about future protection should not be confused with construction contracts and funding that already exist.

The main organisations to understand are:

  • Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC): the principal organisation responsible for regional flood-control schemes, stopbanks, river management, drainage schemes and much of the current resilience programme.
  • Central government: a major funder of the post-Gabrielle recovery works and the government responsible for its own future funding decisions.
  • Hastings District Council and Napier City Council: responsible for relevant local infrastructure, such as urban stormwater networks. Hastings District Council is also delivering a specific flood-resilience project at Havelock North.

Sources: HBRC’s Restoring Flood Resilience programme and Reducing Flood Risk in Hawke’s Bay. Restoring Flood ResilienceReducing Flood Risk

1. The major works programme: funded and being delivered

The North Island Weather Events (NIWE) flood-resilience programme is the most concrete commitment to look at before assessing what candidates promise for 2026.

Regional flood-resilience programme

$256.5 million

$209m

Central government funding

$47.5m

HBRC contribution

The programme covers new community defences, upgrades to existing stopbanks, pump stations and flood-monitoring systems. These figures are the published programme allocation, not a promise that every possible future flood-protection project is funded.

Source: HBRC programme information, updated in 2026. Restoring Flood ResilienceHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | Restoring Flood Resilience

The wider programme covers seven major community projects, alongside other infrastructure upgrades. Here is how to interpret their status and accountability.

Project Status by October 2026 Who is responsible?
Ōhiti Road / Ōmāhu Main construction completed in August 2026; final checks and reinstatement remain. HBRC, with contracted construction teams.
Waiohiki Completed; one of the first two major community projects completed. HBRC.
Pākōwhai Construction underway. HBRC and its appointed contractors.
Pōrangahau Construction underway on a 1.7 km network of stopbanks and flood walls. HBRC; Galbraith Earthmovers is leading construction.
Whirinaki Stopbanks, road raising and associated works underway or nearing completion. HBRC and contractors, including Fulton Hogan for road works.
Havelock North Construction underway. Hastings District Council, within the wider resilience programme.
Wairoa Funded, with construction planned to begin in late summer 2026 according to the December 2025 update. Its subsequent construction status should be confirmed against the latest project update. HBRC, with Crown funding.

Sources: HBRC project overview, Ōmāhu completion announcement, Pōrangahau project and Whirinaki project. Restoring Flood ResilienceŌmāhu flood project reaches the finish line | News ArchivePōrangahauWhirinakiHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | Restoring Flood Resilience

A few important distinctions:

2. Other Heretaunga Plains works already funded

The seven community projects are only part of the picture. For homeowners on the plains, the existing flood-control scheme and the infrastructure that keeps it working are also important.

Brookfields Lower stopbank upgrade | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Brookfields Lower stopbank

Funded; works started

HBRC began enabling works in September 2026 on a 3.6 km upgrade along the Tūtaekurī River, on the Awatoto/Meeanee side. The stopbank is being widened and raised in places, with completion expected by April 2027. The government and HBRC jointly fund the programme; Goodman Contracting is the construction contractor.

Official project update Stopbank upgrade works bring better flood resilience to Awatoto | Ōmāhu stopbank upgradeBrookfields Lower stopbank upgrade

Ōmāhu stopbank upgrade | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Ōmāhu Upper and Lower stopbanks

Funded; enabling works underway

Around 2.8 km of stopbank is being upgraded to address weaknesses identified by post-Cyclone Gabrielle modelling. The works include additional freeboard and improvements to the river-facing slope. HBRC is responsible; Galbraith Earthmovers is the main construction partner. Main works were expected to finish around Christmas 2026.

Official project update Ōmāhu stopbank upgrade

Cyclone Gabrielle: Review finds major failings in Hawke's Bay Regional Council response | RNZ News

Pākōwhai flood defences

Funded; construction underway

New community flood infrastructure is being delivered as part of the NIWE programme. HBRC is responsible for delivery, with construction staged across the project area.

Official programme page Restoring Flood ResilienceHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | Restoring Flood Resilience

Regional Council launches pump station upgrade programme | News & Media | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Pump stations: Pākōwhai and Awatoto

Funded; upgrade programme underway

Pump stations remove water from low-lying drainage catchments when gravity drainage is insufficient. HBRC is upgrading the Pākōwhai and Awatoto (formerly Mission) stations. Brian Perry Civil was awarded the design-and-build contract, and site establishment for Awatoto works was reported in September 2026.

HBRC flood-resilience programme Stopbank upgrade works bring better flood resilience to Awatoto | Ōmāhu stopbank upgradeHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | Restoring Flood Resilience

Strengthening Hawke’s Bay’s Telemetry Network To Keep Data Flowing | Scoop News

River monitoring and flood telemetry

Funded; programme underway

Improvements to rainfall and river-level monitoring help councils forecast flooding and make evacuation decisions. HBRC is responsible for the region-wide telemetry upgrades, which were expected to be completed by late 2026.

HBRC programme details Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | Restoring Flood ResilienceReducing Flood Risk

These projects are not all intended to do the same job. A stopbank upgrade aims to reduce the chance of river water escaping its channel; a pump-station upgrade helps manage water collecting behind defences; and telemetry improves warning and response. None, by itself, guarantees protection from every combination of river, rainfall and coastal flooding. Reducing Flood RiskBrookfields Lower stopbank upgrade

3. What is still a future option rather than a funded construction commitment?

This is arguably the most important distinction for your election decision.

Reimagining Flood Resilience: the long-term Heretaunga Plains scheme

Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme       - Hawke's Bay | Resilient River Communities

Future decisions still required

HBRC has been reviewing the Heretaunga Plains and Upper Tukituki flood-control schemes to determine how flood risk can be reduced over the coming decades while keeping costs manageable.

The project was initiated following the Hawke’s Bay Independent Flood Review after Cyclone Gabrielle. Its community engagement outcomes were presented to councillors in July 2026 and are intended to inform HBRC’s 2027–2037 Long Term Plan. That means the long-term direction and investment decisions remain a separate process from the already-funded NIWE construction programme.

Sources: HBRC’s August 2026 report on community feedback and its flood-risk overview. Community feedback helps shape the future of region's flood resilience | HomeReducing Flood RiskMeeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council

What this means in practice:

  • Responsible organisation: HBRC is leading the review and will make regional investment and scheme-management decisions through its council processes.
  • What is not yet settled: the precise package of future works, their timing, their cost, and how any additional investment would be funded.
  • Why it matters to your household: the long-term review concerns the major schemes that benefit much of the plains, not just the specific post-Gabrielle communities receiving new stopbanks.
  • What to watch: decisions in HBRC’s 2027–2037 Long Term Plan, subsequent annual plans, and any funding agreements with central government.

The council has also been reviewing smaller flood, drainage and river schemes. River-channel maintenance, gravel management, stopbank upkeep, and protecting critical infrastructure are ongoing responsibilities, but they should not be treated as evidence that every proposed future enhancement has been funded. Reducing Flood RiskMeeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Other work and options that need to be kept separate

Work or proposal Position in October 2026 Responsible organisation
Existing Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme Operating and maintained; future improvements are subject to scheme reviews and funding decisions. HBRC
Review of smaller flood, drainage and river schemes Under review, with further decisions required about priorities and investment. HBRC, working with relevant local councils and communities
Additional future stopbanks or major changes to flood defences arising from the long-term review Options to be assessed; do not assume they have construction funding. Primarily HBRC, with central government potentially involved in funding
Further national funding for flood protection beyond existing commitments Depends on future government decisions, funding agreements and budgets. Central government, alongside regional and local authorities where applicable

Sources: HBRC flood-risk programme and Reimagining Flood Resilience. Reducing Flood RiskCommunity feedback helps shape the future of region's flood resilience | Home

4. How to distinguish a 2026 election promise from a real commitment

I could verify the existing council programme and its funding, but I could not establish a sufficiently reliable, up-to-date list of specific 2026 election pledges by individual parties or candidates for additional Heretaunga Plains flood works. It would be misleading to attribute a promise to a party without a published policy or a direct statement to support it.

When candidates discuss flood protection, these distinctions are useful:

  • Funded and contracted: a project has an identified budget and a delivery plan or construction contract.
  • Announced funding: money has been announced, but check whether it is appropriated, conditional, or dependent on a future agreement.
  • Policy proposal: a party proposes a new fund, higher protection standard, or new infrastructure, but the money and delivery arrangements may still need to be decided.
  • Long-term option: a council or technical review is considering possible solutions, but has not committed to building a particular one.

For an election pledge, ask for the named project, the amount of new funding, the source of the money, the responsible delivery agency, and the target completion date. Also ask whether the pledge is genuinely additional to existing commitments or simply restates money already allocated to NIWE projects.

5. What does this mean for your home, insurance and family?

The public infrastructure programme is important, but it cannot tell you on its own whether your particular property will become safer or cheaper to insure.

Three checks are especially relevant.

Check your property's actual flood exposure

Use HBRC's Hazard Portal and ask the council about river flooding, surface-water flooding, drainage constraints and any applicable land classification. A property can be exposed to more than one type of flooding.

Ask your insurer about your specific address

Check whether cover is available, the excess for flood damage, any special terms, and whether premiums or renewal terms could change following completed flood works. Do not assume a new stopbank will automatically improve your insurance terms.

Follow both capital costs and ongoing rates

Government contributions can reduce the immediate local share of a project, but ongoing maintenance and future upgrades still need funding. Ask how HBRC expects to recover those costs through rates and what the long-term funding plan is.

HBRC's flood-risk information explains that even stopbanks designed for a 1% annual-exceedance-probability flood cannot eliminate the possibility of flooding. A 1% annual probability is not a guarantee that such a flood happens only once in 100 years. Reducing Flood RiskBrookfields Lower stopbank upgrade

Bottom line for your voting research

As of October 2026, the concrete commitment is the $256.5 million regional NIWE programme, which includes community defences, stopbank upgrades, pump stations and telemetry. HBRC is the principal regional delivery body, with Hastings District Council responsible for the Havelock North project and central government contributing most of the programme funding.

The bigger question for your family's longer-term security is what happens after those works: which additional protections the Heretaunga Plains need, how quickly they will be delivered, and how the costs will be shared between central government, councils and ratepayers. Those questions are still being worked through the long-term scheme review and future planning decisions.

When comparing candidates, look for specific, costed commitments on those unresolved questions rather than counting all announcements about flood protection as new funding.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

ChatGPT · Hastings

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

Hawke’s Bay flood protection: what is funded, what is being built, and what remains undecided?

Position as at 23 October 2026 · Focus: Heretaunga Plains, Hastings, Havelock North, Napier and surrounding communities

For a homeowner on the Heretaunga Plains with school-age children, the key distinction is between flood protection that already has committed funding and a delivery programme, and the larger improvements that are still being planned or debated.

The good news is that substantial flood-protection work is funded and underway. The important qualification is that these projects do not eliminate flood risk across the Plains, and they are not the same thing as a comprehensive upgrade of the entire existing flood-control system.

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) is delivering most of the regional programme, with Hastings District Council responsible for the Havelock North project. Central government is contributing most of the capital funding through the North Island Weather Event (NIWE) resilience programme. Restoring Flood ResilienceHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | News Archive

1. The main funded programme

Total NIWE resilience programme

$256.5 million

Central government contribution

$209 million

HBRC contributes a further $47.5 million. The funding covers the wider regional programme, not just the Heretaunga Plains. Restoring Flood ResilienceŌmāhu stopbank upgrade

The following are the main works relevant to the Plains and nearby communities.

Project Position at October 2026 Who is responsible?
Pākōwhai flood defences Construction underway HBRC
Ōhiti Road–Ōmāhu community defences Main construction complete HBRC
Whirinaki flood defences Near completion HBRC
Havelock North flood protection Funded regional programme project Hastings District Council
Ōmāhu Upper and Lower stopbanks Enabling works underway HBRC
Brookfields Lower stopbank, near Awatoto Upgrade programme progressing HBRC
Pākōwhai and Awatoto pump stations Funded upgrade programme HBRC
Region-wide flood telemetry Funded upgrade programme HBRC

The programme is scheduled to have construction started across its projects by the end of 2026, with overall completion planned for mid-2027. Individual projects have different milestones, and that programme-wide target should not be interpreted as a guarantee that every asset will be fully commissioned by that date. Restoring Flood ResilienceHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | News Archive

2. What each project actually delivers

Regional Council welcomes new flood data | Home | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Pākōwhai

Building now

An 8.5 km network of new and upgraded stopbanks and flood walls along the Tūtaekurī-Waimate Stream, with bridge strengthening and stream realignment. Construction is scheduled to finish in the second quarter of 2027. It adds a second line of defence to the existing river stopbanks.

Delivery: HBRC. Funding: central government and regional rates through NIWE. PākōwhaiHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | News Archive

Flood risk category lifted for Ōhiti Road homes as project nears completion | News & Media | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Ōhiti Road–Ōmāhu

Main construction complete

Approximately 2.1 km of new and upgraded stopbanks and bunds, about 800 metres of raised roads, drainage improvements and erosion protection. Main construction was completed in August 2026, with final checks and reinstatement following.

Delivery: HBRC. Funding: $10 million project under NIWE. Ōhiti Road | ŌmāhuŌmāhu flood project reaches the finish line | News Archive

Whirinaki | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Whirinaki

Near completion

New residential and industrial stopbanks, improved drainage and road raising, including work on State Highway 2. The project is intended to improve protection for homes and the Pan Pac industrial site. HBRC reported the beach-side stopbanks were about 90% complete in August 2026.

Delivery: HBRC, working with contractors and transport agencies. Funding: NIWE. WhirinakiHawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | News Archive

Waiohiki stopbank complete in major flood resilience milestone | Waiohiki | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Waiohiki

A new stopbank of about 1 km was built to reduce flood risk for the community affected by Cyclone Gabrielle. HBRC reported this as one of the first two of the seven major post-cyclone community flood-resilience projects to be completed.

Delivery: HBRC. Funding: NIWE. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s flood resilience programme on track as construction momentum builds | News ArchiveŌmāhu flood project reaches the finish line | News Archive

Making Room for Rivers | Forest and Bird

Brookfields Lower — Awatoto and Meeanee

Enabling works started

A 3.6 km stopbank upgrade along the Tūtaekurī River, with the bank to be widened by up to 2 metres and raised by up to 0.6 metres in places. Vegetation clearance and site preparation began in September 2026; main construction was expected to follow in October, with completion planned by April 2027.

Delivery: HBRC, with Goodman Contracting. Funding: NIWE. Brookfields Lower stopbank upgradeStopbank upgrade works bring better flood resilience to Awatoto | Ōmāhu stopbank upgrade

Ōhiti Road | Ōmāhu | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Ōmāhu Upper and Lower stopbanks

Enabling works started

Around 3 km of existing stopbanks are being raised and widened to meet updated regional standards after the Cyclone Gabrielle breach. Site establishment and other enabling work began in September 2026, with the main construction phase expected to finish around Christmas 2026, followed by reinstatement.

Delivery: HBRC, with Galbraith Earthmovers. Funding: NIWE. Ōmāhu stopbank upgradeConstruction underway on Ōmāhu stopbank upgrade | Ōmāhu stopbank upgrade

Full swing for stormwater recovery works in Havelock North | Cyclone Recovery | Hastings District Council

Havelock North streams and flood protection

This is a combination of stream-corridor improvements, bank remediation, widening and bridge upgrades. The Mangarau Stream programme has already enabled 42 properties previously classified as Category 2C to be reclassified in July 2025. Other works continued through 2026.

Delivery: Hastings District Council, with contractors and landowners. The broader Havelock North project is part of the government-funded recovery programme. Building a resilient futureView this email in your browserRestoring Flood Resilience

Other funded infrastructure

Two less visible components matter to residents beyond the individual stopbank sites:

A further project to keep in view is the Pōrangahau flood-resilience network. Although outside the Heretaunga Plains, it is part of the same regional funding package and was under construction in 2026. It is an example of the programme addressing multiple communities rather than funding only Hastings and Napier. PōrangahauRestoring Flood Resilience

3. What is not yet funded for construction?

The biggest distinction for your vote is between the current recovery programme and the next generation of flood protection for the entire Heretaunga Plains.

A comprehensive upgrade of the Heretaunga Plains flood-control scheme

Future decisions pending

HBRC's Reimagining Flood Resilience project examined how to improve the Heretaunga Plains and Upper Tukituki schemes, which together benefit around 84% of Hawke's Bay residents.

Its findings were presented to councillors in July 2026. HBRC explicitly says no decisions have yet been made on the future flood-protection options. The options, costs and trade-offs are to be considered through the 2027–2037 Long Term Plan, with public consultation planned for 2027.

Responsible: HBRC, with input from communities, mana whenua, technical experts and partner agencies. Community feedback helps shape the future of region's flood resilience | HomeReducing Flood Risk

Upgrading more existing stopbanks to a higher standard

Some design work only

Earlier HBRC planning identified sites including Moteo, Omaranui, East Clive, Raupare Upper and Lower, Chesterhope Upper and Pākōwhai Park for various stages of design or consenting, with construction envisaged as separate future projects.

This should not be confused with the separately funded NIWE upgrades now underway. Each additional upgrade needs its own funding and delivery decision.

Responsible: HBRC. Resilient River CommunitiesMajor Schemes

Long-term river, drainage and catchment improvements

Ongoing work and future investment

Flood resilience also depends on river-channel capacity, erosion protection, gravel management, drainage, maintenance and planning controls. HBRC is reviewing smaller flood schemes as well as its two major schemes.

These are not one single funded construction project. Some maintenance and recovery work is already being carried out, while larger changes will depend on future scheme reviews, priorities and budgets.

Responsible: Primarily HBRC for regional flood-control schemes; district and city councils have separate responsibilities for local stormwater, land-use planning and related infrastructure. Reducing Flood RiskResilient River Communities

4. What does this mean for election promises?

The 2026 general election is an opportunity to distinguish a promise to improve flood protection from a commitment that already has an approved budget, a delivery agency and a construction timetable.

The existing NIWE programme is not merely a proposal for a future government: its funding and projects are already in place. By contrast, HBRC's broader post-2027 flood-protection choices remain unresolved. Restoring Flood ResilienceCommunity feedback helps shape the future of region's flood resilience | Home

I could verify the current programme and the Regional Council's future planning process, but I could not establish a sufficiently reliable, up-to-date set of official 2026 party commitments to give you a fair, party-by-party comparison. I would not treat a general statement about climate resilience, infrastructure or cyclone recovery as a specific promise to fund additional stopbanks.

When assessing a candidate or party, look for explicit answers to these questions:

Question to ask What a concrete commitment should specify
Will you fund further upgrades to the Heretaunga Plains scheme? A defined scope, such as named stopbanks or a stated upgrade standard
How much central-government funding will be available? A dollar amount, funding mechanism and whether it is new money or already committed
Who pays the remaining cost? The Crown, HBRC ratepayers, district ratepayers, or a specified combination
When will the work happen? Design, consenting, construction and completion milestones
What protection standard is promised? The modelled flood event and the areas or properties that benefit
How will you protect household affordability? How capital costs, ongoing maintenance and future rate increases will be managed
What happens if the work exceeds budget? Who bears the cost and whether the project scope or timetable changes

These questions matter because the current programme is time-sensitive and HBRC says it bears costs exceeding allocated project budgets. A promise to build more is not necessarily a promise that local rates will stay flat. Restoring Flood ResilienceŌmāhu stopbank upgrade

5. Who is accountable for what?

Central government

Commits national recovery funding and sets the relevant legislative and funding framework. The NIWE programme is managed through National Infrastructure Funding and Financing (NIFF).

Hawke's Bay Regional Council

The key agency for the regional stopbanks, flood-control schemes, river management, pump stations and monitoring systems. It also develops the future investment options and regional rates implications.

Hastings District Council and Napier City Council

Responsible for their own local infrastructure, stormwater and planning functions. Hastings District Council is the delivery lead for the Havelock North recovery project, while HBRC remains central to regional flood protection.

Contractors, landowners and communities

Contractors carry out the works under council contracts. Land access, maintenance arrangements and local engagement can affect delivery. Residents also need reliable warnings and evacuation plans because no stopbank guarantees protection against every possible flood.

The national government and regional council funding agreement is documented in the councils' Cyclone Recovery Funding Hawke's Bay overview. The regional council's flood-risk and resilience overview explains its wider responsibilities. Cyclone Recovery Funding Hawke's BayReducing Flood Risk

6. What I would check as a homeowner before voting

For your own property, the most useful question is not simply whether Hawke's Bay is receiving hundreds of millions of dollars. It is whether your particular part of the Plains benefits from the works already funded, and what happens to your risk and rates if the next round of upgrades is not approved.

  • Check your property's hazard information. Use the HBRC flood-risk information and your council's property records. Regional maps are useful, but they do not replace a property-specific assessment.
  • Ask whether your home is protected by a named NIWE project. Pākōwhai, Ōmāhu, Waiohiki, Havelock North and Awatoto have different works, designs and delivery stages. The benefit to one property should not be inferred from a project elsewhere on the Plains.
  • Check your insurance separately. A new stopbank or a change in a property's post-cyclone risk classification does not automatically guarantee insurance availability, affordable premiums or cover for every type of flooding. Ask your insurer how the specific work affects your policy and renewal.
  • Ask about the next long-term plan. The 2027–2037 HBRC Long Term Plan is where the next major choices on scheme-wide flood protection, investment and affordability are expected to be considered.

Bottom line

As of October 2026, Hawke's Bay has a substantial, funded programme of recovery-related flood defences, including works that are completed or under construction. But the future level of protection across the whole Heretaunga Plains, and the cost of going further, have not yet been settled.

For your 2026 vote, the clearest distinction to look for is whether a candidate is defending the existing funded programme, proposing additional protection with a credible funding and delivery plan, or supporting a longer-term option that has not yet been costed and approved. Those are materially different commitments, and the distinction is especially important when household insurance and rates are already major concerns.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

For residents and property owners on the Heretaunga Plains with school-age children, balancing flood risk, insurance viability, and protection costs is a central concern.

A major regional flood-resilience programme is actively underway to upgrade defences following Cyclone Gabrielle. The status of these works, who is delivering them, and how future options and election discussions are shaping up involve several key elements:


1. Funded and Underway Works (The $257M Regional Programme)

A suite of major flood-protection and resilience projects totaling approximately $257 million is currently rolling out across Hawke's Bay. This is heavily backed by Central Government funding (via the North Island Weather Event / NIWE recovery initiative) alongside regional contributions.

Key Heretaunga Plains and regional projects already funded and under construction include:

  • Ōmāhu Stopbank Upgrade: Physical construction is actively underway to raise and widen the Ōmāhu stopbank to improve local defences.
  • Brookfields Lower Stopbank Upgrade: Upgrade works have begun to bring greater flood protection to the Awatoto and Brookfields areas.
  • Waiohiki: Realigning local streams and constructing a new 1,035-metre stopbank.
  • Pākōwhai: Strengthening existing stopbanks and adding a new 8.5 km stopbank along the Tūtaekurī-Waimate Stream.
  • Ōhiti Road / Ōmāhu: Constructing a 960-metre stopbank along Taihape Road and protective barriers for nearby subdivisions.
  • Whirinaki & Pōrangahau: Dedicated stopbank and drainage infrastructure upgrades are also progressing under this umbrella.
  • Infrastructure Tech Upgrades: Modernisation of pump stations, enhanced telemetry, and improved flood forecasting dashboards are also being deployed.

Who is responsible?

  • Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC): Overall owner, designer, and manager of the major flood control schemes (including the Heretaunga Plains Flood Control and Drainage Scheme). They coordinate local rates, consents, and project delivery.
  • Central Government: Provided the bulk of the capital funding ($209 million of the total package via NIWE).
  • Local Contractors: HBRC contracts engineering and construction firms to execute the physical earthworks and stopbank builds.
  • District/City Councils: Councils like Hastings District Council and Napier City Council coordinate complementary local assets (e.g., urban stormwater, local stream clearing, and Havelock North stream restorations).

2. Future Options and Long-Term Strategy

Beyond the immediate post-cyclone rebuilds, long-term protection levels are under active review:

  • "Reimagining Flood Resilience" Project: HBRC has been running major community consultations to evaluate the future of the Heretaunga Plains and Upper Tukituki flood schemes. Historically designed for a 1-in-100 year event (1% AEP), the region is debating what level of protection is economically viable, as regional leaders note that "gold-plated" higher-standard defenses carry immense cost implications for ratepayers.
  • Future Scheme Reviews & Bylaws: Ongoing reviews of 23 smaller regional drainage and flood schemes, alongside a new Flood Protection Bylaw to legally safeguard stopbanks from unauthorized damage or encroachment, are moving through the consultation pipeline.

3. Election Context and Political Landscape (2026 General Election)

As voters weigh options for the 2026 general election, flood protection intersects heavily with national infrastructure funding, climate adaptation policy, insurance retreat, and local ratepayer affordability:

  • Central Government Funding vs. Local Rates: Because regional councils and local ratepayers cannot shoulder the entire multi-million-dollar burden of climate adaptation alone, the continuation of Crown-backed infrastructure funding, co-investment models, and post-disaster recovery packages are key points of debate among political parties.
  • Managed Retreat & Land Use Policy: National policies around land categorisation, building regulations in low-lying areas (such as parts of Napier and the Heretaunga Plains), and whether to structurally protect or gradually retreat from high-risk zones remain heavily scrutinized by local communities seeking insurance stability.

Are there specific aspects of the Heretaunga Plains flood schemes or local infrastructure costs affecting your household that you would like to explore further?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · Hastings

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

As homeowners on the Heretaunga Plains with school-age children, navigating flood risk, escalating insurance costs, and the financial burden of resilience work is understandably front of mind.

Below is an overview of the flood-protection works on the Heretaunga Plains, what is funded or underway, what sits in the future/policy phase, and who is legally and operationally responsible for delivering them.


1. What is Funded or Underway (Current Works)

  • Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme (HPFCS) Upgrades & Cyclone Repairs:
    • Details: Work to repair, reinstate, and upgrade damaged stopbanks, river channels, and drainage networks across the Heretaunga Plains is actively underway. This includes critical infrastructural repairs following Cyclone Gabrielle.
    • Pump Station Overhauls: A substantial upgrade programme is underway at major Heretaunga Plains pump stations—specifically Awatoto, Brookfield, and Pākōwhai—to increase their mechanical performance and flood resilience.
    • Streamlined Consenting: Utilizing post-cyclone legislative mechanisms (such as dedicated Orders in Council), regional authorities have fast-tracked resource consents to ensure stopbank construction, culvert improvements, and drainage works can proceed without standard multi-year delays.
  • The "Reimagining Flood Resilience" Project & Community Review:
    • Details: Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) initiated a comprehensive review of the Heretaunga Plains and Upper Tukituki flood schemes. Backed by community representative groups, this work evaluates how to upgrade protection levels while keeping ongoing ratepayer costs manageable.

2. Future Options, Local Decisions, and Election Context

  • Category 2 Property Infrastructure Solutions (Pākōwhai, Ōmahu, Waiohiki, Havelock North):
    • Details: Property-level and localized community interventions for areas heavily impacted during the cyclone remain a focal point. While broader regional recovery frameworks were established earlier, building localized defenses or deciding long-term viability for specific high-risk pockets involves complex cost-sharing between central government, local councils, and affected landowners.
  • National Election 2026 Context & Political Landscape:
    • Funding vs. Promises: Major physical infrastructure projects rely heavily on central government co-funding models (such as Crown-resilience packages). Ahead of the 2026 general election, political parties are framing their regional development, climate adaptation, and infrastructure manifestos.
    • What to look for in party platforms: When evaluating your vote, look closely at whether parties are committing to long-term national co-funding for local adaptation (helping cap soaring insurance and council rates), clarifying managed retreat/buyout frameworks, and providing legislative backing for local government climate-mitigation debt.

3. Who is Responsible for Delivering Each Part?

  • Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC):
    • Role: The primary regional authority responsible for the overall design, management, and maintenance of major flood control schemes (including the Heretaunga Plains Flood Control and Drainage Scheme). They oversee stopbanks, major river channels, regional pump stations, gravel extraction, and flood forecasting dashboards.
  • Hastings District Council (HDC) & Napier City Council (NCC):
    • Role: Territorial local authorities responsible for local roading drainage, storm-water networks that feed into regional schemes, land-use planning, and consenting decisions through district plans (determining where and how residential growth occurs safely).
  • Central Government:
    • Role: Responsible for national legislative frameworks (Resource Management Act reforms, emergency management laws), establishing risk categorisation guidelines, and—crucially—providing the large-scale capital grants and co-funding required so that regional ratepayers aren't left carrying the entire multi-million dollar bill alone.
  • Property Owners & Landowners:
    • Role: Responsible for private flood-proofing measures on individual sections, maintaining boundary-specific private drains, and funding a portion of scheme costs via targeted regional council rates.

To help tailor this to your specific decision-making process for 2026: Are you more focused on central government policy (such as national funding assistance to lower local insurance and rate pressures), or are you looking for specific council-level details regarding stopbank timelines near your neighborhood?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

For homeowners on the Heretaunga Plains, navigating flood protection, skyrocketing insurance pressures, and local rates involves a mix of major multi-million-dollar infrastructure packages already underway and ongoing longer-term regional planning.

1. Funded or Underway (Current Works)

Substantial packages are actively moving forward under co-funding arrangements between Central Government and local authorities following Cyclone Gabrielle.

  • North Island Weather Event (NIWE) Resilience Programme: A major

$256.5 million$ 256.5 million

$𝟐𝟓𝟔.𝟓 million

regional investment framework (

209

million

Crown funding and $47.5 million

from the Hawke's Bay Regional Council through regional rates). It focuses on hard engineering upgrades across heavily impacted areas.

  • Ōmāhu Stopbank Upgrade: Construction is actively underway on raising and widening the Ōmāhu stopbank near Ōhiti Road to significantly bolster local containment along the Ngaruroro corridor. [Hawke's Bay Regional Council]

  • Brookfields / Awatoto Lower Stopbank Works: Upgrade projects are underway to reconstruct and elevate defenses protecting the industrial and low-lying coastal/Awatoto sectors. [Hawke's Bay Regional Council]

  • Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme (Level of Service Upgrades): A

$30 million$ 30 million

$𝟑𝟎 million

targeted sub-programme (75.15% Crown-funded, 24.85% HBRC rates) aiming to lift historical performance and widen stopbanks across vulnerable reaches like Pākōwhai, Waiohiki, Whirinaki, Moteo, and East Clive.

  • Upper Tukituki & Gravel Extraction Strategies: Ongoing active gravel extraction frameworks (~

8

million

equivalent scope) to preserve river channel capacities.

2. Future Options, Long-Term Plans & Funding Pressures

  • Future Resilience vs. Affordability Trade-offs: The Regional Council's long-term and annual planning highlights that pushing every single recommended independent review fix concurrently risks severe rate spikes. Financial strategies balance loan-borrowing, targeted rates (such as localized stream management rates like the Mangarau Stream), and carbon credit offsets to keep regional rate increases manageable (averaging around 9.9% rather than peak initial forecasts).

  • Property Risk Categorizations and Land-Use Rules: Long-term adaptation options—including potential managed retreat frameworks, local district plan zoning restrictions, and higher building standard requirements—remain ongoing policy discussions between local district councils (Hastings District / Napier City) and property owners. [www.consultations.nz]

3. Who is Responsible for Delivering Each?

  • Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC): The primary statutory body legally and operationally responsible for the design, construction, maintenance, and overall management of major river flood control schemes, drainage networks, and regional stopbanks. HBRC also manages the local share of capital funding and bears budgetary overruns.

  • Central Government (Crown via Kānoa / Crown Infrastructure Partners): Responsible for providing the large-scale co-investment capital grants (e.g., NIWE and post-cyclone recovery pools), conditional on delivery timelines being met.

  • Territorial Authorities (Hastings District Council & Napier City Council): Responsible for local stormwater networks, land-use planning, district zoning permissions, and building consents that interact with regional flood paths.

If you'd like to narrow this down for your voting decision, would you like to:

  • Look at specific party policy differences regarding central co-funding for regional infrastructure?
  • Explore how these stopbank upgrades directly affect property risk ratings and insurance premium caps?
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · Hastings

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

Navigating property risk, escalating insurance premiums, and local protection costs on the Heretaunga Plains is a central issue for Hawke's Bay households.

The landscape of funded, underway, and future flood-protection works across the Heretaunga Plains and the broader region—along with who is responsible for them—breaks down as follows:

1. Funded and Underway Works (The NIWE & Resilient River Programmes)

A massive suite of flood resilience and risk-mitigation projects is currently funded and actively under construction. This is driven primarily by the North Island Weather Event (NIWE) funding package—a joint investment totaling over $250 million, featuring roughly $209 million from Central Government (managed via Kānoa/Crown infrastructure funding) and $47.5 million co-funded locally by the Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC). Hawke's Bay Regional Council's flood resilience programmeRestoring Flood Resilience | Hawke's Bay Regional Council

  • Waiohiki Stopbank : Construction on a major 1-kilometer-long stopbank to protect the Waiohiki area along the Tūtaekurī River. [Hawke's Bay Regional Council]

  • Whirinaki Flood Defences & Road Raising: Raising sections of State Highway 2 and building local residential/industrial protection infrastructure. [Hawke's Bay Regional Council]

  • Ōhiti Road & Ōmāhu Mitigation: Active construction to build new flood defenses aimed at moving high-risk properties into lower-risk categories.

  • Pākōwhai & Brookfields Lower Upgrades: Ongoing stopbank upgrades and engineering works. [Hawke's Bay Regional Council]

  • Havelock North Mitigation : Specific local infrastructure works. [Community Scoop]

  • Heretaunga Plains & Upper Tukituki Schemes Maintenance: Ongoing bed clearing, gravel extraction strategies, and pump station enhancements.

Who is responsible for delivery:

  • Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC) is the lead delivery agency for the vast majority of regional stopbanks, river channels, major drainage, and pump station upgrades.

  • Hastings District Council (HDC) is responsible for local stormwater connections and specific localized urban mitigations (such as portions of the Havelock North work).

  • Contractors (e.g., Fulton Hogan and local civil firms) are contracted directly by the councils for physical construction.


2. Future Options, Long-Term Planning & Policy

Beyond immediate post-Cyclone Gabrielle recovery projects, long-term resilience is being mapped out through strategic planning initiatives.

  • Reimagining Flood Resilience Project: A nearly year-long community and technical stakeholder collaboration finalized a comprehensive regional flood resilience strategy. This report outlines choices for future land use, regional adaptation, and higher-standard defenses (such as targeting 1-in-500-year event protections where feasible) across the Heretaunga Plains.

  • Property Categorization & Managed Retreat / Adaptation Frameworks: Long-term decisions around property buyouts, unviable high-risk rural/peri-urban land, and local rating policies to fund the regional 25% share of future infrastructural maintenance.

Who is responsible for delivery:

  • HBRC and local territorial authorities (Hastings District Council and Napier City Council) are responsible for turning these strategic frameworks into long-term spatial plans and District/Regional Plan rule changes.

3. Election Promises and Political Context (2026 General Election)

As the 2026 general election approaches, political parties are framing flood protection around national infrastructure funding, insurance retreat/backstop models, and local government co-funding relief:

  • Central Government Funding Commitments vs. Local Burden: A major point of debate for voters is the durability of central funding. HBRC is legally and financially responsible for cost overruns on current NIWE projects, meaning that if a project goes over budget, local ratepayers (you) absorb the difference. Parties are debating whether central government should shoulder a higher or 100% permanent maintenance/upgrade subsidy for regional river schemes (modeled similarly to the 100%-funded $70 million Wairoa allocation).

  • National Adaptation Bill / Climate Adaptation Framework: Parties are pitching competing legislative frameworks for managed retreat and how to handle escalating property insurance premiums/uninsurability in low-lying plains areas.

Who is responsible for delivery:

  • Central Government (the incoming Parliament after the 2026 election) holds the lever on national legislation, climate adaptation funding pools, and whether additional Crown-backed financial backstops or insurance-relief schemes are established.

To help tailor this to your voting decision, would you like to explore:

  • How the current co-funding structure impacts your rates bill?
  • Specific party policies regarding climate adaptation and insurance retreat?
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

AI Overview

Major flood-protection and resilience works across the Heretaunga Plains and Hawke's Bay are currently funded through a mix of Central Government recovery packages (such as the North Island Weather Events / NIWE programme and Crown co-funding) and local regional council rates, managed primarily by the Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC) in partnership with local territorial authorities like Hastings District Council and Napier City Council.

Funded and Underway Works

  • Waiohiki Stopbank & Key Resilience Projects: Construction is active on major post-Cyclone Gabrielle flood resilience projects—such as the Waiohiki stopbank—part-funded by the Central Government's $242–$257 million North Island Weather Events (NIWE) program.

  • Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme Upgrades: Targeted stopbank planning, raising, sheet piling, and erosion protection works are underway or completed across key areas like Taradale, Ngatarawa, the Maraenui stopbank, and Clive River , aiming to upgrade protection levels.

  • Havelock North Mangarau Stream Works: Local stream-specific flood resilience works are actively funded and delivered via Hastings District Council in coordination with HBRC.

  • Pump Station Replacements: Rebuilding and strengthening damaged critical infrastructure—including Pākōwhai, Mission, and Brookfield's pump stations—are funded and progressing.

Future Options and Long-Term Strategy (Post-Review / Policy Decisions)

  • Reimagining Flood Resilience Project: Following the Hawke's Bay Independent Flood Review after Cyclone Gabrielle, HBRC completed community and mana whenua feedback sessions (via the Reimagining Flood Resilience project) to evaluate long-term standards for the Heretaunga Plains and Upper Tukituki schemes. Future engineering vs. nature-based adaptation choices for higher protection thresholds (moving beyond legacy 1-in-100-year baselines) are currently before the council and communities.

  • Category 2 & 3 Infrastructure Reinforcement: Ongoing structural engineering and protective works supporting transition zones in sites like Pākōwhai , Ōmahu, Waiohiki, and Havelock North rely on ongoing central-local cost-sharing agreements.

Who is Responsible for Delivering Each?

  • Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC): Statutory owner and manager of the core regional flood control and drainage schemes (including the Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme), responsible for major river stopbanks, telemetry, and regional water/flood management.

  • Hastings District Council & Napier City Council: Responsible for local urban drainage, specific local stream projects (e.g., Havelock North), and shared governance/delivery of residential category recovery and local infrastructure.

  • Central Government (Crown / Kānoa – Regional Economic Development & NIWE): Provides major capital co-funding, regulatory mechanisms (such as fast-track/Order in Council consents under the severe weather legislation), and policy frameworks that dictate national-to-local disaster recovery funding.

If you'd like to narrow this down for your voting decision, tell me:

  • Which specific suburb or local zone (e.g., Pākōwhai, Waiohiki, Clive, Hastings urban) your home is in?
  • Whether you want to see the specific candidates' or parties' stated positions on regional flood-infrastructure funding for the 2026 election?
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · Hastings

We own a home on the Heretaunga Plains in Hawke's Bay and have school-age children. Flood risk, insurance and the cost of protecting our home are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which Hawke's Bay flood-protection works are already funded or underway, and which are still future options or election promises? Who is responsible for delivering each?

AI Overview

The Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC) and central government are delivering an extensive $257 million multi-year flood resilience program across Hawke's Bay following Cyclone Gabrielle, alongside major schemes on the Heretaunga Plains.

Funded and Underway Works

  • Waiohiki Project: A completed central-local partnership featuring a new 1-kilometre stopbank, stream realignment, and operational cycle trail.

  • Whirinaki Flood Defences: Residential and industrial stopbanks plus improved drainage are roughly 66% complete for Category 2C households.

  • Pōrangahau Flood Resilience Project: A $13 million two-stage build (funded via $9.77M central government NIWE money and $3.23M HBRC) involving a 1.7-kilometer network of stopbanks, sheet pile flood walls, and culverts.

  • Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme (HPFCS) Upgrades: Ongoing stopbank planning, maintenance, and structural upgrades (targeting Moteo, Omaranui , East Clive , Raupare, Chesterhope, Brookfields, Pākōwhai Park, and Maraenui) co-funded by HBRC and central government recovery pools.

  • Category 3 Voluntary Buy-out Programme: Jointly funded by the Crown, Hastings District Council, and Napier City Council for high-risk, un-inhabitable land designations.

Future Options and Policy Plans

  • Reimagining Flood Resilience Project: Completed community and mana whenua consultations (presented to HBRC) that map out long-term climate adaptation and flood conveyance strategies (such as "Making Room for the River") for the Heretaunga Plains and Upper Tukituki schemes.

  • Heretaunga Water Storage Project (Whanawhana): Transitioned to Heretaunga Water Storage Limited for a feasibility study (concluding late 2026) to assess regional water storage and resilience options.

  • National & Regional Land-Use/Inundation Rules: Ongoing reviews of district and regional planning controls, coastal hazard responses (e.g., Te Awanga/Haumoana and Westshore), and insurance risk alignment.

Who is Responsible for Delivering Each

  • Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC): Overall owner and manager of the 27 regional flood control and drainage schemes (including HPFCS and the Upper Tukituki scheme), responsible for stopbank design, maintenance, gravel extraction, and operational telemetry.

  • Central Government (Kānoa – Regional Economic Development & NIWE funds): Provides the bulk of capital co-funding ($209m out of the $257m post-cyclone portfolio).

  • Hastings District Council & Napier City Council: Partner in local urban planning, stormwater coordination, local-level project delivery (such as Havelock North works), and co-funding voluntary property buy-outs.

Would you like to check the specific flood zone or land category status for your exact address in Hastings, or explore how local council rates and insurance terms are shifting in your neighbourhood?

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account