Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports?

New Zealand 2026 election: trade access and agricultural exports

For a farm business in rural New Zealand, the key question is not just which party wants to grow exports. It is how each party proposes to secure overseas markets, protect the value of what you produce, and manage the costs and rules that affect your ability to supply those markets.

The 2026 general election is scheduled for 7 November. As of 22 October 2026, parties are campaigning on different approaches to agricultural production, environmental regulation and export-led growth. National is emphasising new trade agreements and increasing export value, while other parties place different weight on production costs, regional resilience, environmental standards and economic diversification. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary Sector

1. What the parties are offering

Beautiful landscape with grazing cows

National

Export growth, trade agreements and regulatory certainty

South Island, New Zealand Travel: Itinerary & Costs | Vietjet Air

ACT

Reducing farm costs and compliance burdens

  • Opposes agricultural emissions taxes and wants agriculture permanently outside the ETS.

  • Proposes national standards to simplify routine activities such as drain maintenance, fertiliser use, effluent management and water storage.

  • Has proposed a Rural Workforce Visa for year-round farm jobs.

  • Its central pitch is to improve profitability by reducing operating costs and regulatory uncertainty. ACT New ZealandACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

    What to examine: how the proposals would affect your actual compliance costs, workforce needs and environmental obligations.

Wyborcza.pl

Labour

Economic development, innovation and regional capacity

  • Its 2026 policy programme includes a Future Fund to invest in New Zealand businesses and a Small Business Action Plan.

  • Labour's primary-sector representatives have highlighted research and innovation, climate pressures, freight costs and unpredictable export markets as challenges for producers.

  • Its published election programme emphasises economic development and public services, but the material reviewed here does not establish a specific new agricultural market-access target comparable with National's export-doubling goal. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection 2026: How Parties Would Lift the Arable Sector

    What to examine: the detail of its agricultural emissions, freshwater and trade-negotiation policies, and their implications for your farm.

OUR LANDHOLDINGS — New Zealand Rural Land Co

New Zealand First

Primary-sector resilience and regional economic interests

Greens launch 'smart farming' policy | RNZ News

Green Party

Environmental protection and sustainable food and fibre production

  • Its 2026 manifesto backs sustainable farming, healthy waterways, regenerative approaches and good rural jobs.

  • Places greater emphasis on environmental protection and addressing agriculture's climate impact than the parties advocating removal of agricultural emissions pricing.

  • Presents environmental health as foundational to the long-term viability of food and fibre production. Manifesto 2026Compare NZ Political Parties Side by Side

    What to examine: the proposed emissions-pricing settings, freshwater requirements, transition support and implications for export competitiveness.

Opportunity Party

Opportunity

Innovation, investment and economy-wide reforms

Coverage note: This is a summary of documented positions found in party material and 2026 election reporting, not a claim that every policy has been fully costed or that every party has published a complete trade plan. I have focused on the six parties above where relevant material was available; other parties may also have policies worth examining.

2. What “protecting agricultural exports” means in practice

A trade agreement is only one part of the picture. For your farm, there are four distinct issues to compare across party policies.

Issue What to look for in party policies
Market access Lower tariffs, new free-trade agreements, reduced quotas and fewer barriers to selling overseas.
Export value Whether the policy could improve farm-gate prices, market competition, product premiums or value-added processing.
Cost of production Fuel, fertiliser, electricity, interest, labour, freight, water infrastructure and compliance costs.
Environmental and trade standards Rules on emissions, freshwater, traceability and animal welfare, including whether producers can meet overseas buyer requirements at a reasonable cost.

An important distinction: opening a market does not guarantee that exporters will earn more. Tariffs may fall, but prices still depend on demand, exchange rates, competition, freight costs and the terms offered by processors and buyers.

Likewise, environmental rules can impose costs on farms, but environmental performance can also matter to overseas customers and market access. The relevant question is what each party proposes, how it would be implemented and who pays.

3. Questions worth asking before you vote

Given that you farm well outside a main centre, I would compare the parties against these practical questions rather than relying on general campaign promises.

  • Trade: Which specific overseas markets and agricultural products are targeted, and what measurable improvements are promised?
  • Farm profitability: Which proposals are likely to change your annual operating costs, rather than simply increase total export revenue?
  • Environmental obligations: What are the proposed rules for emissions, freshwater, farm plans and consenting, and how much certainty would they provide?
  • Rural services and infrastructure: What commitments are there on rural roads, freight links, electricity reliability, telecommunications, healthcare access and emergency services?
  • Delivery: Which measures are funded, legislated or already operating, and which remain campaign commitments?

For the trade question in particular, National's export-doubling target is a clear stated objective. ACT's proposals focus more directly on lowering farm costs, while Labour, New Zealand First, the Greens and Opportunity emphasise different combinations of innovation, regional resilience, supplier competition and environmental sustainability. Those are differences in policy approach, not proof of which approach will deliver the highest returns for an individual farm. National sets out plan to double exports by 2034ACT New ZealandLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection 2026: What Parties Promise the Primary SectorManifesto 2026

4. Where to check the detail

These sources let you compare the parties' own commitments with independent election coverage:

One useful next step: Which type of farming do you run — dairy, sheep and beef, arable, horticulture, or mixed farming? Trade exposure and the costs of environmental compliance differ considerably by sector, so that would let me make the comparison more specific without assuming where in New Zealand you live.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports?

For a farming household operating outside a main centre, weighing operating costs, environmental rules, and local services alongside trade access is central to the 2026 general election.

Political parties differ substantially on how they view export growth, market access, and the regulatory framework underpinning the primary sector:

1. National & ACT (Centre-Right Coalition Approach)

  • Trade & Export Growth: National emphasizes expanding international market access and hitting export targets (pointing to recent trade agreements like those with the UAE and the India Free Trade Agreement). The overarching goal is to double export value over a 10-year window.
  • On-Farm Costs & Red Tape: Both parties focus heavily on lowering compliance costs to protect export margins. National highlights the removal of agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), the replacement of the Resource Management Act (RMA) with a focus on food and fibre production rights, and standardized rules for farm quarries and micro-hydro energy storage.
  • Regulatory Philosophy: ACT emphasizes removing regulatory barriers relating to land, water, and labor, arguing that lower government spending and no new taxes are the best ways to bring down inflation, interest rates, and seasonal overdraft pressures.

2. Labour & Centre-Left Parties (Labour, Green, Te Pāti Māori)

  • Cost-of-Farming Focus: Labour frames the primary sector's challenges around a "cost-of-farming crisis," pointing to rising operational inputs, fuel volatility, energy insecurity, and extreme weather.
  • Trade and Inputs: Labour supports streamlining the system for agricultural chemicals and veterinary medicines (noting lengthy approval delays for modern, safer options) and proposes structured support like an Arable Sector Forum to address sub-sector margins.
  • Environmental Bottom Lines: The centre-left approach maintains that strict environmental protections and export success must go hand-in-hand. The Green Party and Labour emphasize freshwater integrity, climate adaptation, and pricing or managing agricultural emissions to align with international expectations, warning that maintaining high-value premium export markets (such as the EU) requires verified environmental credentials.

3. New Zealand First

  • Primary Sector Priority: NZ First places strong emphasis on regional New Zealand and the primary sector as the backbone of the economy. Their platform focuses on ensuring that regulatory settings, reliable water infrastructure, and access to both seasonal and skilled labor support productive land use.
  • Export Protection: They strongly advocate for protecting traditional export pathways while ensuring domestic policies do not disadvantage New Zealand growers and farmers against international competitors.

4. The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • Stability & Innovation: TOP focuses on political stability, long-term economic planning, and investment in on-farm innovation and technology. They propose targeted mechanisms—such as tax credits on new technology investments—to help small businesses like farms step up productivity and environmental efficiency.

Are there specific compliance areas—such as freshwater management or regional infrastructure—that weigh most heavily on your farm's operational decisions this election?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties offering on trade access and protecting agricultural exports?

Navigating operating costs, local service access, and environmental rules while living remotely is a familiar balancing act for rural New Zealanders. As the 2026 General Election approaches, political parties are framing agricultural exports and trade access through slightly different lenses—focusing on market expansion, cutting compliance costs, or tying access to environmental standards.

An overview of what the major parties are generally offering or emphasizing regarding trade access, export protection, and the broader pressures on remote farming operations highlights these distinct approaches:

National

  • Trade & Export Focus: Strong emphasis on aggressively pursuing and upgrading Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and reducing bureaucratic roadblocks that delay market entry or compliance for primary products.
  • Operational Costs & Rules: Focuses heavily on rolling back what it views as excessive regulations on freshwater and farm management, proposing practical farming standards to lower compliance costs and ease stress on farm-gate margins.
  • Services & Infrastructure: Acknowledges the rural infrastructure deficit (roads, connectivity, transport capacity) which directly impacts getting goods to port and accessing local health/education services.

Labour

  • Trade & Export Focus: Supports maintaining and leveraging existing bilateral and multilateral trade frameworks, with an emphasis on building high-value, sustainable branding (e.g., Toitū or similar provenance frameworks) to protect premium pricing overseas.
  • Environmental Obligations: Advocates for structured support and partnership to meet freshwater and climate obligations rather than pure deregulation, arguing that maintaining strict environmental credentials protects market access in discerning high-paying international markets (like the EU and UK).
  • Services & Regional Support: Concentrates on regional resilience, maintaining rural connectivity, and workforce support for primary industries.

ACT

  • Trade & Regulatory Costs: Aligns heavily with cutting red tape to reduce input and operating costs. ACT targets the Health and Safety at Work Act and environmental compliance, arguing that the best way to support exporters is to "lower costs and fewer rules".
  • Fast-tracking Innovation: Emphasizes accelerating approvals for new agricultural chemistry, pest management tools, and seeds (such as HSNO Act amendments) so growers and farmers can protect yields and remain globally competitive without administrative delays. [Rural News Group]
  • Macroeconomic Approach: Focuses on government spending cuts and fiscal restraint to bring down domestic inflation and interest rates, which they present as vital relief for seasonal overdrafts and farm borrowing. [Rural News Group]

New Zealand First

  • Export Priority: Explicitly frames the primary sector as the backbone of the economy, noting that a vast majority of merchandise exports come from farming, growing, fishing, and forestry.
  • Protection of Industries: Emphasizes a strong protectionist stance for traditional export-earning and regional industries against what it describes as overly restrictive domestic mandates or overseas non-tariff trade barriers.
  • Regional Focus: Strongly champions rural infrastructure, local service retention, and regional manufacturing/processing capacity to ensure value is added locally before export.

Green Party & Te Pāti Māori

  • Export & Trade via Sustainability: Generally condition their support for the agricultural sector on accelerated transition toward low-emission, regenerative, and organic practices. They argue that global markets are rapidly moving away from intensive farming, and long-term export protection requires future-proofing against incoming international carbon and environmental border adjustments.
  • Focus: More heavily focused on domestic ecological health, local food networks, and lowering reliance on imported agricultural inputs (like synthetic fertilizers and imported feeds), rather than traditional volume-based export expansion. [Rural News Group]

To compare specific electorate candidates or drill down into individual party manifestos as election day approaches on November 7, 2026, you can explore tools likePolicy.nz or keep an eye on rural sector analyses via Farmers Weekly and Rural News Group.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account