Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

For your situation, I’d compare parties on one practical question: if you take on more paid hours, how much better off will you actually be after childcare fees, tax, and any reduction in government support?

For a sole parent renting in New Zealand with a preschool child, that means looking beyond general promises about helping families. The details of childcare subsidies, early childhood education (ECE), Working for Families, and Sole Parent Support can make a real difference to whether taking on extra work pays off.

The 2026 general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. You can use the parties’ published policies to compare what they propose, while checking which commitments are specific, funded and likely to affect your household. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Parties and policies to compare

I’d look closely at the following parties, comparing their actual proposals rather than treating this as a recommendation to vote for any one of them.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

1. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Free ECE proposal

The Greens have announced a specific plan to reduce parent fees and expand free early childhood education. Their proposal would cap fees at $10 a day above the existing 20-hour entitlement, then move towards free ECE for up to 35 hours a week from 2029. They also propose expanding community and not-for-profit provision. Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide

Why examine it: This directly addresses the cost of the childcare hours you may need to accept more work.

Check carefully: The proposed start date, the transition to the new system, whether your preferred centre would participate, and how places would be made available. The full benefit would not arrive immediately.

Source: Green Party website

South Island Election Conference 2026

2. New Zealand Labour Party

Labour's published 2026 ECE policy includes stronger teacher-to-child ratios, smaller groups, better oversight, community-based provision and work towards pay parity for ECE teachers. It also proposes restoring planning for where early learning services are needed. Early Childhood Education

Why examine it: The availability, location and reliability of childcare matter just as much as the advertised fee if you're trying to fit more paid hours around preschool pickup times.

Check carefully: What Labour proposes to change about the fees you personally pay, how quickly it would happen, and whether it would change childcare subsidy or benefit abatement rules. Its ECE quality commitments should not be mistaken for a confirmed reduction in your fees.

Source: Labour's ECE policy

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

3. New Zealand National Party

National's 2026 platform includes a focus on school readiness, developmental checks and reducing screen use in early childhood centres. Its wider economic approach emphasises low taxes, fiscal restraint and a welfare system focused on employment. 2026 Election PolicyScreen use to end in ECE and limits set in primary

Why examine it: If your priority is increasing earnings and keeping more of what you earn, look at National's tax and family-support settings alongside its employment and welfare policies.

Check carefully: Its published ECE commitments need to be distinguished from a promise to lower parent fees. Ask specifically how its proposals affect a sole parent who increases working hours, receives income-tested assistance or needs extra childcare.

Sources: National's 2026 policies · National's cost-of-living policies

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

4. The Opportunities Party (TOP)

TOP's published ECE direction includes more support for community-based services, changes to home-based care and proposed minimum staffing ratios. Its approach is worth examining if the type and availability of childcare are important to you. Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide

Why examine it: It raises questions about whether the system provides enough flexible, local and community-based early learning options for working families.

Check carefully: What direct financial help TOP would offer your household, and what it has committed to on the cost of your child's actual hours of care. Better provision does not automatically mean cheaper care.

Source: TOP website

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

5. New Zealand First

NZ First has announced a proposed $5,000-a-year Kiwi Kids Grant for each of the first three children, for the first three years of each child's life. The proposal is universal rather than income-tested, but it is aimed at giving families more choice about caring for young children. Election 2026: Early Childhood Education NZ Policy Guide

Why examine it: A direct payment could matter to your household budget if your child is within the eligible age range.

Check carefully: Your child's age, the final eligibility rules and whether the payment is designed to help parents buy childcare or instead make staying home more financially feasible. It is not the same as a subsidy tied to your childcare bill.

Source: NZ First website

These policies address different problems: reducing fees, improving access to services, supporting family income, or encouraging work. Their practical value to you depends on which of those changes would actually increase your take-home income.

The other issue to scrutinise: what happens when you earn more?

This may be just as important as childcare fees.

Policy area What to look for
Childcare subsidies Do income thresholds and subsidy rates let you afford the extra hours of care?
Working for Families How quickly do family tax credits reduce as your income rises?
Sole Parent Support How much of each extra dollar you earn can you keep after benefit deductions?
Rent assistance Would higher earnings change your Accommodation Supplement or other housing support?
Work requirements Are there practical obligations or exemptions that reflect childcare availability and your child's needs?

Current rules illustrate why these questions matter. Work and Income says eligible working parents may receive the Childcare Subsidy for up to 50 hours a week. From 1 April 2026, the maximum rate for one child is $6.72 per hour at the lowest income tier, with lower rates at higher income levels. The subsidy is subject to eligibility rules and may not cover your provider's full fees. Childcare SubsidyChildcare Subsidy (current)

Working for Families also has income-related reductions. Inland Revenue currently states that the Family Tax Credit starts reducing above annual family income of $44,900, at an abatement rate of 27.5%. Your actual entitlement depends on your circumstances and the other tax credits you qualify for. Family tax credit

These are current settings, not promises about what any party will retain after the election.

How to compare the parties fairly

I'd use three practical tests when reading their manifestos:

  • The extra-hours test: If you work an additional eight hours a week, how much extra income remains after tax, childcare and reduced support?
  • The childcare test: Does the policy reduce your actual out-of-pocket bill, and is the care available during your working hours?
  • The security test: Does the policy provide predictable support while you increase your hours, rather than creating a sudden loss of assistance?

For the specific policy detail, start with the Green Party manifesto, Labour's ECE policy, National's 2026 policies, and the independent Policy.nz 2026 party-policy comparison.

Remember that a party's manifesto is a proposal, not a guarantee of implementation. Coalition agreements, funding decisions and the timing of reforms can all affect what is delivered.

One useful next step

Before deciding which policies would help most, calculate your own current position. You can check what assistance you may qualify for using Work and Income's childcare subsidy information and Inland Revenue's Working for Families information.

Then compare how each party proposes to change the rules that affect your household. The key is not simply which party promises the most help, but which proposed changes would leave you with more disposable income while making it feasible to work the hours you want.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

Balancing part-time work, renting, and raising a preschooler as a sole parent is a classic juggling act, particularly when trying to avoid the "abatement trap"—where taking on extra hours causes you to lose childcare subsidies, Working for Families credits, or your Accommodation Supplement faster than your extra pay makes up for it.

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand General Election, the major political parties offer distinct philosophies on how to support working parents, reduce childcare costs, and ease cost-of-living pressures. Depending on your priorities, you should look most closely at National, Labour, and the Green Party.


1. The National Party (and Centre-Right Approach)

National’s approach focuses heavily on tax-backed incentives, rewarding work, and targeted relief rather than broad state-funded universal services.

  • Childcare Support: Their flagship policy for families is FamilyBoost, which provides a rebate of up to 25% on early childhood education (ECE) fees for families earning up to $180,000. They also maintain universal 20 hours of free ECE for children aged 3 to 5.
  • Work & Welfare: National emphasizes moving sole parents into employment through targeted work-support programs and case management, coupled with adjustments to tax settings rather than core benefit expansions.
  • Why look at them: If you are already working part-time and want direct financial assistance that scales with your earnings without locking you into strict public-provider models, National’s tax-credit approach (like FamilyBoost) is designed to put cash back into your pocket based on the childcare costs you actually pay.
  • The Catch: If your preschooler is under 3, universal free ECE hours do not apply, and FamilyBoost only rebates a percentage of your costs rather than making care free. You would still need to front the cash for fees and rely on Work and Income (WINZ) childcare subsidies.

2. The Labour Party

Labour traditionally focuses on public service provision, direct fee reductions, and protecting low-to-middle-income earners through tax credits and welfare adjustments.

  • Childcare Support: Labour has historically favored expanding direct access—such as extending 20 hours free ECE to younger children (like 2-year-olds)—to slash weekly childcare costs at the source rather than relying on tax rebates.
  • Work & Tax Credits: They focus on adjusting Working for Families abatement thresholds (raising the point at which your tax credits start reducing as you earn more) and boosting payments like the In-Work Tax Credit. This is designed specifically to make taking on extra hours financially worthwhile.
  • Why look at them: If your primary concern is lowering the actual cost of a preschooler's enrolment day-to-day (especially if your child is under 3) and ensuring that earning an extra few dollars an hour doesn't immediately trigger a heavy clawback of your tax credits, Labour’s structural reforms target these specific friction points.
  • The Catch: Labour relies heavily on government-funded and regulated delivery, which can sometimes face sector capacity constraints or depend on complex bureaucratic eligibility rules through WINZ and Inland Revenue.

3. The Green Party

The Greens focus heavily on structural poverty alleviation, universal public services, and removing financial barriers for caregivers.

  • Childcare Support: The Green Party campaigns on a platform of transitioning toward universal, free ECE for everyone, funded by higher taxes on corporate and wealthy entities, while heavily backing community-run centers, kindergartens, and kaupapa Māori options.
  • Sole Parent & Welfare Support: They propose higher baseline support payments for sole parents, significantly higher abatement thresholds, and lower abatement rates so that earning part-time wages does not heavily penalize your core income support.
  • Why look at them: If childcare costs are your single biggest barrier to working more, the Greens offer the most radical shift: making ECE completely free. Their welfare policies are also specifically tailored to protect sole parents transitioning from part-time to full-time work from losing their safety net too quickly.
  • The Catch: Their policy platform relies on major tax overhauls (such as a wealth tax), which face sharp political debate over economic stability.

What to Weigh When Casting Your Vote

  • If you want immediate out-of-pocket tax rebates while working: Look closely at National.
  • If you want to lower baseline childcare fees (especially for younger preschoolers) and protect Working for Families credits: Look closely at Labour.
  • If you want entirely free ECE and higher income thresholds before your benefits are cut: Look closely at the Greens.

As a renter, also keep an eye on how each party plans to adjust housing support (such as the Accommodation Supplement or social housing supply), as your rent combined with childcare will dictate how far your part-time income stretches.

To help narrow this down, is your preschooler currently under 3 years old, or are they already eligible for the universal 20 hours free ECE (aged 3 to 5)?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

As a sole parent working part-time with a preschooler, your ability to take on more work hours relies heavily on the direct out-of-pocket cost of Early Childhood Education (ECE) and how benefit or abatement rules treat your extra earnings.

Different parties approach this through distinct lenses—ranging from universal cash grants and fee-capping models to market-led flexibility and workforce support.


1. Green Party

  • Key Focus: Direct, deep reduction in childcare costs via public/community provision.
  • The Policy: The Greens propose capping ECE fees at $10 a day per child for hours beyond the baseline, moving toward making ECE entirely free for up to 35 hours a week by 2029. They also plan to phase out public funding to for-profit corporate childcare chains, redirecting that money into community- and public-based centers.
  • Why look here: If your primary barrier to working more hours is the high weekly invoice of commercial childcare, a hard fee cap or a path to free ECE provides the most direct financial relief, making extra working hours immediately viable without being eaten up by childcare bills.

2. New Zealand First

  • Key Focus: Universal cash support for families with young children.
  • The Policy: NZ First features the Kiwi Kids Grant , a universal, non-means-tested tax-free grant of $5,000 a year ($400 a month) for a child's first three years of life, which can also be taken as an upfront lump sum in the first year.
  • Why look here: Because your child is preschool-aged, a direct injection of cash ($5,000/year tax-free) is not earmarked strictly for a specific ECE provider. It gives you flexible cash flow that you can choose to apply toward private childcare costs, reducing hours at your part-time job, or covering household essentials while you transition into more work hours.

3. Labour Party

  • Key Focus: Strengthening the ECE workforce, quality, and baseline affordability.
  • The Policy: Labour historically anchors its ECE approach on teacher-to-child ratios, investing in the workforce (such as driving pay parity for ECE teachers), and protecting or expanding funded hours rather than radical market overhauls.
  • Why look here: Labour’s focus tends to center on the structural quality and stability of the sector and keeping the 20-hours-free framework robust. If you are worried about center closures, staff shortages reducing available enrollment slots, or the quality of care, Labour aligns with strengthening the public-backed workforce pipeline.

4. National / ACT

  • Key Focus: Economic incentives, workplace flexibility, and reducing regulatory compliance.
  • The Policy: National emphasizes workplace flexibility (such as structural changes to parental leave sharing) and broader economic management intended to curb inflation and reward work. ACT focuses heavily on reducing regulatory compliance costs on providers to encourage supply and lower operational overheads.
  • Why look here: Their philosophy centers on growing the overall economy and removing red tape so that businesses can offer more flexible part-time or scalable work arrangements. However, they generally lean away from large state-funded universal fee caps or direct stipends like the Greens or NZ First propose, favoring market-led accessibility instead.

What to weigh up:

  • Look closely at the Green Party if you want a direct policy guarantee that aggressively slashes out-of-pocket daily childcare fees.
  • Look closely at New Zealand First if you prefer flexible, unconditional cash support that you can direct toward whatever mix of care or living costs suits your family best.
  • Check each party's broader tax and working-for-families/benefit abatement policies to see how taking on extra hours at your job interacts with your net income and assistance thresholds.
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , your vote directly impacts the financial threshold where working extra hours becomes worth it. Under current Work and Income rules, sole parents face a 20-hour weekly work test once their youngest child turns three, and balancing abatement rates against high childcare and rent costs can create a "poverty trap."

The political parties approach early childhood education (ECE) and cost-of-living relief through very different mechanisms. The key parties to look closely at depend on whether you prefer direct cash support, fee caps, or systemic workforce funding.

The Greens: Fee Caps and Universal Free ECE

The Green Party offers a highly structured plan aimed at eliminating out-of-pocket costs entirely over time:

  • Immediate Cap: They propose capping ECE fees at $10 per day as a transitional measure.

  • Universal Free ECE: By 2029, the Greens intend to make ECE completely free for up to 35 hours per week.

  • Funding Shift: They plan to phase out all government funding for for-profit ECE centres by 2028, redirecting that money strictly to community-run centres, kindergartens, and kōhanga reo.

  • Why it matters to you: If you want to increase your hours substantially, a 35-hour free tier means you would not face skyrocketing childcare fees as your work hours scale up.

The National Party: Targeted Subsidies and Family Boosts

The National Party focuses on targeted financial relief and flexibility for working families:

  • Weekly Childcare Allowance: National relies on a weekly allowance program designed to subsidize childcare costs directly for working families.

  • Paid Parental Leave: They have pledged to gradually extend paid parental leave from 26 to 30 weeks by 2029 , with added flexibility allowing parents to take leave simultaneously.

  • KiwiSaver Baby Boost: For future planning, they propose a $1,500 cash injection into KiwiSaver for babies born from July 2027.

  • Why it matters to you: National's policies lean toward giving you tax-centric or direct cash subsidies to offset costs while keeping the current mixed provider model (public and private centres) intact.

The Labour Party: Pay Parity and Sector Stability

The Labour Party focuses primarily on funding the ECE workforce and building on the existing 20-hours free framework:

  • Teacher Pay Equity: Labour’s core ECE policy centers around a $600 million funding package aimed at achieving pay parity between kindergarten teachers and those in private/community care centres. They argue a stable, well-paid workforce reduces centre closures and keeps quality high.

  • Support Rollout: They support increasing operational funding for learning support and early intervention specialists.

  • Why it matters to you: Labour focuses on stabilizing the sector so centres don't pass wage pressures on to you. However, you will want to watch for their final 2026 manifesto to see if they match the Greens' extensions on free hours or National's direct cash rebates.

Minor Parties: Targeted Grants vs. Quality Systems

  • New Zealand First: Proposes a Kiwi Kids Grant providing a $5,000 annual tax-free grant for the first three years of a child’s life (for citizens), which could significantly offset toddler care costs before the standard 20-hour subsidy kicks in.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Advocates for replacing traditional licensing with strict, quality-focused government service contracts and increasing core funding for community providers.

To narrow this down, it would help to know:

  • What age is your child currently? (This changes when certain "free hours" or work-test rules apply.)

  • How many hours a week are you hoping to work ideally?

  • Do you currently utilize the Accommodation Supplement or other Working for Families credits?

This details can help clarify exactly how each party's tax and abatement changes will affect your take-home pay.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account