Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

Worked for 10s

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searching the web

Saving for your first home: what to look for in New Zealand’s 2026 election

For a renting couple with steady jobs, the key question is not simply which party promises cheaper homes. It’s which policies would leave you with more money after rent, tax, bills and everyday expenses — while making a first-home deposit more achievable.

There are two separate challenges:

  • Saving the deposit: You need enough money left over each payday to build your savings.
  • Catching the moving target: If house prices rise faster than your savings, your deposit goal can keep getting further away, even when you are doing everything right.

As you consider your vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election, it helps to compare policies across both challenges, including what they might cost, who would benefit and what trade-offs they bring.

1. The policies that could make the biggest difference to your savings

These are the main policy levers worth comparing. They work in different ways: some could help your budget immediately, some protect you against rent increases, and others reduce the amount you need to buy.

Happy real estate agent man gives keys to a new home owner woman

A. Rent increases and tenancy security

How it could help: Slower rent increases would make your household budget more predictable and help stop rent consuming each annual pay rise.

The Green Party has proposed capping rent increases at 2%, alongside stronger tenancy security and a rental warrant of fitness. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis

Trade-off: A strict cap may protect existing tenants but could discourage some rental investment or new supply, depending on how the policy is designed. Landlords might also raise initial rents or reduce maintenance if incentives and enforcement are poorly designed.

New Zealand Real Estate: 9 Essential Points Before You Buy - The Aotearoa Archive

B. Lower deposit requirements

How it could help: You may be able to buy sooner without saving a traditional 20% deposit.

National has proposed widening access to First Home Loans with 5% deposits by lifting the household income cap to $300,000. National is backing first home buyers

Trade-off: A smaller deposit does not make the house itself cheaper. You would borrow more, face larger repayments and potentially pay more interest over the life of the mortgage. Eligibility, lender approval and the homes available to you still matter.

Construction Company - Trusted Nationwide - Mike Greer Commercial

C. Build more homes and improve housing supply

How it could help: Making it easier to build homes, providing serviced land and funding infrastructure could increase the choice of homes available to buyers and renters. Over time, that could moderate rent and price pressures relative to a more constrained market.

National's housing-growth programme focuses on planning reform, infrastructure funding and incentives for councils to enable development. Budget 2026: Securing New Zealand's Future

Trade-off: New homes take time to plan and build. Infrastructure costs, construction capacity and the location of new developments all affect results. More building does not guarantee an immediate fall in your rent or house prices.

6 Smart Money Hacks Every Madiskarteng Homemaker Should Know

D. Reduce everyday household costs

How it could help: Cheaper commuting, power, groceries or healthcare could free up cash every week without requiring you to change your saving habits.

Labour has proposed a public-transport fare cap, a three-year fuel-tax freeze, measures on grocery and power pricing, and solar support that includes options for renters. Labour's Cost of Living Plan

Trade-off: Your savings depend on which expenses you actually have. A transport cap is worth little if you rarely use public transport, and some measures depend on implementation, take-up or future energy costs.

Housing sales trends suggest buyers' market will continue into spring | interest.co.nz

E. Change property taxes and incentives

How it could help: Tax changes can influence whether investors buy existing homes, build rentals or sell properties, which may affect competition for homes and government revenue for public services.

Labour proposes a 28% capital gains tax on gains from investment properties and other covered property sales arising after 1 July 2027, excluding the family home. The Greens propose reversing landlord tax changes. Labour’s capital gains tax explained – what is it and who will pay?Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis

Trade-off: The effects on house prices, rental supply and rents are uncertain. A tax that reduces some investors' willingness to pay for existing houses might help buyers competing for those homes, but effects on new investment, rental availability and government revenue also matter.

These are announced policy positions, not guaranteed outcomes. The details of legislation, funding and coalition agreements will matter as much as the headline promise.

2. Which policies affect your finances, and when?

Policy type Potential benefit to you When you might feel it
Rent-increase limits More predictable rent and potentially more savings When limits take effect and your tenancy is covered
Cost-of-living relief More cash left after regular bills Potentially soon after implementation
5% deposit lending Lower deposit target and earlier access to buying When eligible and approved for a mortgage
More housing construction Greater choice and less pressure on rents and prices Usually over several years
Property-tax changes Indirect effects on prices, supply and public spending Depends on behaviour and implementation

The important distinction is between cash in your account now and a lower house price or deposit target later. Both can help, but they are not interchangeable.

3. The trade-offs worth examining before you vote

For your situation, I would compare each party's policies against four practical questions rather than relying on campaign slogans.

  • Who gets immediate relief? A policy that reduces your transport or healthcare costs could help your savings balance now. Check whether you qualify and when it starts.
  • Does it help renters specifically? Rent caps, long-term tenancy protections and more public housing address problems that a first-home loan alone does not solve.
  • Does it make buying genuinely more affordable? Lowering the deposit threshold helps with the upfront hurdle, but mortgage affordability depends on interest rates, income, house prices and ongoing costs.
  • How is the policy funded? Tax cuts may leave some households with more take-home pay, while public investment or new benefits may require additional revenue. Consider the effect on public services, government borrowing and other taxes too.

For example, Labour estimates that its proposed public-transport fare caps could save a regular commuter around $1,300 annually, while its proposed fuel-tax freeze would save an average family $520 a year by 2030. Those are the party's estimates, not guaranteed savings for every household. Labour's Cost of Living Plan

Similarly, a 5% deposit scheme could bring your purchase date forward without increasing your savings rate, but you would still need to be able to service the mortgage. Rent protections could help your savings grow more steadily, but their long-term impact depends on how landlords, tenants and developers respond.

One further consideration: under New Zealand's MMP system, coalition negotiations can change which campaign proposals are implemented. KPMG's October 2026 review highlights that some tax proposals may not survive those negotiations. Summary of 2026 election tax policies

4. A useful way to assess your own position

You can calculate how much each type of policy would matter to you using a simple household budget:

  • Annual savings capacity = take-home income minus rent and other living costs.
  • Deposit progress = current savings plus your annual savings capacity.
  • Target gap = the deposit you need minus your current savings.

Then test how a change in rent, weekly expenses or the deposit percentage affects the target gap. This makes it easier to distinguish policies that improve your day-to-day finances from those that change the housing market over a longer period.

The underlying issue is that you need both a realistic deposit target and enough disposable income to reach it. Neither a tax cut nor a housing-supply reform guarantees both outcomes.

For a more tailored comparison, explore compare the 2026 parties’ policies for renters and first-home buyers or calculate how policy changes could affect our deposit timeline.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

Balancing the goal of saving a deposit while paying rent is one of the toughest financial tightropes for New Zealand households right now. Because you are renting while trying to buy, your financial reality is shaped by two competing pressure points: how much cash you can save out of your current income versus how fast the housing ladder is moving away from you.

Different political parties approach this dynamic through contrasting economic lenses. Below is a breakdown of the types of policies proposed for the 2026 general election that could directly affect a renting, saving couple, alongside the trade-offs each involves.


1. Direct Savings & Home-Entry Support (Easing the Deposit Hurdle)

Policies in this category aim to help you bridge the gap between your current savings and a bank's lending requirements.

  • Potential Policies:
    • Expanding access to low-deposit schemes (such as lifting income caps on First Home Loans to allow more buyers with a 5% deposit to enter the market).
    • Government-backed financing or subsidies for household energy upgrades (like solar, insulation, or heat pumps) which can lower day-to-day living and utility costs.
  • The Trade-Offs:
    • The "Moving Target" Effect: Lowering deposit barriers (like moving to a 5% threshold for more buyers) injects more purchasing power into the market. While it helps you get your foot in the door sooner, it can simultaneously stimulate buyer demand, driving up house prices further and keeping the target moving.
    • Debt Burden: Entering the market with a tiny deposit means a much larger mortgage, exposing you to higher interest rate risks and steep mortgage servicing costs right from day one.

2. Cost-of-Living & Rent-Focused Policies (Freeing Up Cash to Save)

These policies focus on your weekly overheads—keeping your rent stable so you can funnel more money into your house deposit savings account.

  • Potential Policies:
    • Rent Controls: Policies from parties like the Green Party or Te Pāti Māori proposing caps on rent increases (e.g., tied to inflation or average wage growth).
    • Stronger Tenant Rights & Long-Term Leases: Mandating longer-term or permanent tenancies and removing no-cause evictions to reduce the frequent moving costs associated with renting.
  • The Trade-Offs:
    • Rental Supply Constraints: Economic analyses often warn that strict rent controls can disincentivize private residential investment. If landlords choose to exit the market, overall rental supply can shrink. A tighter rental market can make finding a home harder, increase friction, or lead to landlords being more selective, which can inadvertently hurt renters.

3. Tax and Property Market Restructuring (Slowing House Price Growth)

These policies are designed to cool the property market overall, making houses fundamentally more affordable relative to your income.

  • Potential Policies:
    • Capital Gains Taxes (CGT) or Land Value Taxes: Parties like Labour (proposing a CGT on investment and commercial property excluding the family home) or The Opportunity Party (proposing a broad annual land tax) aim to curb speculative property investment.
    • Landlord Tax Settings: Adjusting interest deductibility rules (either maintaining/restoring them to encourage private rental supply, or removing them to level the playing field between investors and first-home buyers).
  • The Trade-Offs:
    • Cooling vs. Stalls: If speculative demand drops, house price inflation may flatten or drop, giving your savings a chance to catch up. However, harsher tax environments on investors can lead to immediate drops in private rental construction, tightening the rental market and potentially pushing rents up in the short term before supply stabilizes.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

When weighing your options at the ballot box, consider which side of the equation needs the most relief right now:

  1. Do you need immediate cash flow relief? Look toward policies targeting lower utility bills, cost-of-living adjustments, or measures that stabilize weekly rent.
  2. Are you worried about out-of-reach prices? Look toward structural housing supply reforms, planning law changes (to build more homes faster), or tax settings intended to dampen speculative competition against first-home buyers.

Given that you are trying to balance paying rent while building a deposit, which of these two pressures—the weekly cost of renting or the rising price of a first home—feels like the heavier obstacle for you right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

Saving for a first home while renting in New Zealand is a familiar and frustrating balancing act. As you look toward the 2026 general election, different political parties champion distinct economic levers to help renters and first-home buyers.

Evaluating these options means weighing policies that offer immediate relief or purchasing power against the broader economic and housing-market trade-offs they entail. You can explore a comprehensive breakdown of party stances on Policy.nz.


1. Policies Aimed at Lowering or Controlling Rent Costs

  • Rent Control and Caps
  • The Policy Idea: Parties like the Green Party propose capping annual rent increases (e.g., limiting increases to a low fixed percentage per year).
  • Potential Benefit for Saving: Direct short-term relief. Knowing your rent cannot jump unexpectedly allows you to budget your savings contributions more reliably.
  • The Trade-Offs: Critics and economic commentators argue that rigid rent controls can disincentivize private landlords from investing in or maintaining properties, potentially shrinking the overall rental supply over time. If rental supply drops, finding a place to rent at all can become harder and more competitive.
  • Strengthening Tenant Rights & Warrant of Fitness
  • The Policy Idea: Banning no-cause evictions and introducing mandatory rental Warrants of Fitness.
  • Potential Benefit for Saving: Stability and lower hidden living costs. Greater security reduces the frequency (and financial burden) of moving costs, while minimum quality standards can mean lower power bills due to better insulation and heating.
  • The Trade-Offs: Landlords may pass compliance costs on to tenants through higher initial rents when new tenancies begin, or exit the market entirely, affecting rental availability. [Realestate.co.nz]

2. Policies Aimed at Lowering Entry Barriers for First-Home Buyers

  • Expanding First Home Loan Thresholds & Low-Deposit Support
  • The Policy Idea: Proposals by parties like National include expanding access to government-backed low-deposit schemes (such as lifting joint income caps for First Home Loans significantly, allowing buyers with a 5% deposit to enter the market).
  • Potential Benefit for Saving: It shortens the timeline required to hit a massive 20% deposit target, meaning you could stop renting and start building equity sooner.
  • The Trade-Offs: Bringing more buyers into the market with smaller deposits increases overall purchasing demand. If housing supply doesn’t keep pace, injecting more low-deposit purchasing power risks bidding up house prices further—keeping the "target moving" or increasing your vulnerability to negative equity if property values fluctuate. [Realestate.co.nz]

3. Tax and Investment Policy Shifts

  • Changing Investor Tax Incentives (Interest Deductibility & Capital Gains)
  • The Policy Idea: Some parties propose rolling back interest deductibility for residential property investors or introducing broader comprehensive capital gains taxes (excluding the family home).
  • Potential Benefit for Saving: The goal of these policies is to level the playing field between property speculators and first-home buyers, cooling excessive investor demand and potentially dampening runaway house price inflation so that a fixed savings deposit catches up to the market value.
  • The Trade-Offs: If interest deductibility is removed, some landlords pass those costs straight to tenants via rent hikes in the short term. Conversely, if it cools investor demand too sharply, it can reduce the construction of new private dwellings, impacting long-term housing supply.

4. Supply-Side and Zoning Reform

  • Aggressive Urban Density and Zoning Overhauls
  • The Policy Idea: Continuing or accelerating bipartisan or market-driven planning reforms to free up land use and reduce barriers to building medium- and high-density housing.
  • Potential Benefit for Saving: Long-term stabilization or reduction of house and rental prices through a healthy, abundant supply of dwellings.
  • The Trade-Offs: Infrastructure strain (roads, water, public transport) in fast-growing urban areas, and lengthy lag times between policy implementation and actual houses being built. It provides little immediate cash in your hand next month to pad your savings account.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

When deciding which direction aligns with your goals, consider whether you want to prioritize:

  1. Immediate cash-flow protection (via rent controls or tenant stability), noting the risk to rental supply; [Realestate.co.nz]
  2. Easier, faster entry into ownership via lower deposit/income thresholds, noting the risk of stimulating more competition and higher prices; or [Realestate.co.nz]
  3. Systemic cooling of the property market via tax settings, aiming to stabilize house prices long-term, which can carry transitional friction for rents.
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

AI Overview

For a renting couple trying to save a first-home deposit in New Zealand, the 2026 general election features distinct party platforms targeting rent costs, savings capacity, and entry into the property market.


Policies that could leave you with more money to save

1. Rent Controls and Tenancy Security

  • The Policy (Green Party & Te Pāti Māori): Proposals include capping annual rent increases (such as limiting increases to 2% or tied to inflation/wage growth), introducing a rental warrant of fitness, and expanding long-term or permanent tenancy agreements.

  • How it helps you save: Direct caps limit how much your weekly outgoings for rent can climb each year, leaving more of your steady job income available to put into your deposit savings account.

  • The Trade-Offs: Economists and property groups warn that strict rent controls can reduce incentives for private landlords to stay in the market or invest in maintenance, potentially shrinking the overall supply of rental properties and driving fierce competition for remaining rentals.

2. Expanded Low-Deposit Entry Schemes

  • The Policy (National Party): Expanding access to the government-backed First Home Loan scheme by raising the combined income cap to a flat $300,000, allowing more buyers to purchase with a 5% deposit rather than 25% or 20%.

  • How it helps you save: It lowers the total cash threshold required at the bank door, meaning you may not need to wait until you hit a massive 20% deposit before buying.

  • The Trade-Offs: Lowering deposit requirements without dramatically increasing total housing supply can pump more purchasing power into the market, potentially bidding up house prices and keeping the "moving target" out of reach.

3. Land Value and Capital Gains Tax Shifts

  • The Policy (Labour, Greens, TOP, Te Pāti Māori): Labour proposes a 28% capital gains tax on residential investment and commercial properties (excluding the family home) starting July 2027. The Greens and Te Pāti Māori propose broader wealth/land taxes, while The Opportunities Party (TOP) proposes a 1.75% land value tax.

  • How it helps you save: These taxes aim to cool speculative investor demand for existing housing stock, which proponents argue slows runaway house price inflation so your deposit target stops sprinting away from you.

  • The Trade-Offs: Investors sometimes pass new holding or tax costs down to tenants through higher weekly rents, which can temporarily pinch your current savings rate.

4. Supply-Side and Infrastructure Reform

  • The Policy (National, ACT, TOP): Reforming the resource management system (replacing the RMA), freeing up zoning for medium-density housing, and providing financial incentives or GST refunds to councils for infrastructure.

  • How it helps you save: Accelerating the construction of new homes increases supply, which flattens or lowers property prices over the medium-to-long term.

  • The Trade-Offs: Consenting and infrastructure rollouts take years to materialize, meaning they offer little immediate relief for your weekly rent or short-term savings timeline.


If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

  • Roughly how long you plan to keep renting before buying?
  • Are you looking primarily in major metro centers (like Auckland or Wellington) or the regions?

I can share which specific party platforms align closest with those horizons.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account